Testing your code and site
-
I’ve got various WordPress websites with the Share This social plugin for WordPress. I have been using Firebug and http://analyze.websiteoptimization.com/wso to do general checks on the site and the code. And used W3C validator too.
Due to the way WordPress appears to work we never seem to be able to get all the firebug/ website optimization tests to pass and the W3C validator passes everything on HTML 5 apart from 7 errors with the Share This social plugin.
How do you test your code/websites? Should I stop be a perfectionist and just be happy?
-
W3C feedback -
Validation Output: 7 Errors
-
Line 12, Column 125: Attribute xmlns:fb not allowed here.```
<code class="input">….facebook.com/2008/fbml" xmlns:addthis="http://www.addthis.com/help/api-spec" ></code>[✉](http://validator.w3.org/feedback.html?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.homecinemauk.com%2F;errmsg_id=html5#errormsg "Suggest improvements on this error message through our feedback channels")
-
Line 12, Column 125: Attribute with the local name xmlns:fb is not serializable as XML 1.0.```
<code class="input">….facebook.com/2008/fbml" xmlns:addthis="http://www.addthis.com/help/api-spec" ></code>[✉](http://validator.w3.org/feedback.html?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.homecinemauk.com%2F;errmsg_id=html5#errormsg "Suggest improvements on this error message through our feedback channels")
-
Line 12, Column 125: Attribute xmlns:addthis not allowed here.```
<code class="input">….facebook.com/2008/fbml" xmlns:addthis="http://www.addthis.com/help/api-spec" ></code>[✉](http://validator.w3.org/feedback.html?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.homecinemauk.com%2F;errmsg_id=html5#errormsg "Suggest improvements on this error message through our feedback channels")
-
Line 12, Column 125: Attribute with the local name xmlns:addthis is not serializable as XML 1.0.```
<code class="input">….facebook.com/2008/fbml" xmlns:addthis="http://www.addthis.com/help/api-spec" ></code>[✉](http://validator.w3.org/feedback.html?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.homecinemauk.com%2F;errmsg_id=html5#errormsg "Suggest improvements on this error message through our feedback channels")
-
Line 109, Column 382: Attribute addthis:url is not serializable as XML 1.0.```
<code class="input">…homecinemauk.com/' addthis:title=' ' ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" …<="" code=""></a></code><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" …<="" code=""></a>[✉](http://validator.w3.org/feedback.html?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.homecinemauk.com%2F;errmsg_id=html5#errormsg "Suggest improvements on this error message through our feedback channels")`
`* Line 109, Column 382: Attribute addthis:title is not serializable as XML 1.0.```
<code class="input">…homecinemauk.com/' addthis:title=' ' ><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" …<="" code=""></a></code>
````<a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" …<="" code=""></a><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" …<="" code=""></a>[✉](http://validator.w3.org/feedback.html?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.homecinemauk.com%2F;errmsg_id=html5#errormsg "Suggest improvements on this error message through our feedback channels")` `* ![Error](http://validator.w3.org/images/info_icons/error.png "Error") _Line 109, Column 382_: Attribute addthis:url not allowed on element div at this point.``` <code class="input">…homecinemauk.com/' addthis:title=' ' **>**<a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" …<="" code=""></a></code> ````<a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" …<="" code=""></a><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" …<="" code=""></a> <dl><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" …<="" code=""></a> <dt><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" …<="" code="">Attributes for element </a>[`div`](http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec-author-view/#the-div-element):</dt> <dd>[Global attributes](http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec-author-view/#global-attributes)</dd> </dl>` `* ![Error](http://validator.w3.org/images/info_icons/error.png "Error") _Line 109, Column 382_: Attribute addthis:title not allowed on element div at this point.``` <code class="input">…homecinemauk.com/' addthis:title=' ' **>**<a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" …<="" code=""></a></code> ````<a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" …<="" code=""></a><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" …<="" code=""></a> <dl><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" …<="" code=""></a> <dt><a class="addthis_button_facebook_like" …<="" code="">Attributes for element </a>[`div`](http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec-author-view/#the-div-element):</dt> <dd>[Global attributes](http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec-author-view/#global-attributes)</dd> </dl>` `* ![Warning](http://validator.w3.org/images/info_icons/warning.png "Warning") _Line 109, Column 452_: Attribute fb:like:layout is not serializable as XML 1.0.``` <code class="input">…ok_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"**>**<a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a></code> ````<a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a> <a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a>[✉](http://validator.w3.org/feedback.html?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.homecinemauk.com%2F;errmsg_id=html5#errormsg "Suggest improvements on this error message through our feedback channels")` `* ![Error](http://validator.w3.org/images/info_icons/error.png "Error") _Line 109, Column 452_: Attribute fb:like:layout not allowed on element a at this point.``` <code class="input">…ok_like" fb:like:layout="button_count"**>**<a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a></code> ````<a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a> <dl><a class="addthis_button_tweet"></a> <dt><a class="addthis_button_tweet">Attributes for element </a>[`a`](http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec-author-view/#the-a-element):</dt> <dd>[Global attributes](http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec-author-view/#global-attributes)</dd> <dd>`[href](http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec-author-view/#attr-hyperlink-href)`</dd> <dd>`[target](http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec-author-view/#attr-hyperlink-target)`</dd> <dd>`[rel](http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec-author-view/#attr-hyperlink-rel)`</dd> <dd>`[media](http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec-author-view/#attr-hyperlink-media)`</dd> <dd>`[hreflang](http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec-author-view/#attr-hyperlink-hreflang)`</dd> <dd>`[type](http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec-author-view/#attr-hyperlink-type)`</dd> </dl>` `* ![Warning](http://validator.w3.org/images/info_icons/warning.png "Warning") _Line 109, Column 557_: Attribute g:plusone:size is not serializable as XML 1.0.``` <code class="input">…oogle_plusone" g:plusone:size="medium"**>**<a class="addthis_counter addthis_p…</code></pre> <p class=" helpwanted"=""></a>[✉](http://validator.w3.org/feedback.html?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.homecinemauk.com%2F;errmsg_id=html5#errormsg "Suggest improvements on this error message through our feedback channels")</code> ````* ![Error](http://validator.w3.org/images/info_icons/error.png "Error") _Line 109, Column 557_: Attribute g:plusone:size not allowed on element a at this point.``` <code class="input">…oogle_plusone" g:plusone:size="medium"**>**<a class="addthis_counter addthis_p…</code></pre> <div class=" ve="" html5"=""></a> <dl><a class="addthis_counter addthis_p…</code></pre> <div class=" ve="" html5"=""></a> <dt><a class="addthis_counter addthis_p…</code>Attributes for element </pre> <div class=" ve="" html5"=""></a>[`a`](http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec-author-view/#the-a-element):</dt> <dd>[Global attributes](http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec-author-view/#global-attributes)</dd> <dd>`[href](http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec-author-view/#attr-hyperlink-href)`</dd> <dd>`[target](http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec-author-view/#attr-hyperlink-target)`</dd> <dd>`[rel](http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec-author-view/#attr-hyperlink-rel)`</dd> <dd>`[media](http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec-author-view/#attr-hyperlink-media)`</dd> <dd>`[hreflang](http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec-author-view/#attr-hyperlink-hreflang)`</dd> <dd>`[type](http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec-author-view/#attr-hyperlink-type)`</dd> </dl></code> ``````````
## Analysis and Recommendations * TOTAL_HTML - Congratulations, the total number of HTML files on this page (including the main HTML file) is 1 which most browsers can multithread. Minimizing HTTP requests is key for web site optimization. Y * TOTAL_OBJECTS - Caution. You have 20 total objects on this page. From 12 to 20 objects per page, the latency due to object overhead makes up from 75% to 80% of the delay of the average web page. See Figure II-3: [Relative distribution of latency components showing that object overhead dominates web page latency](http://www.websiteoptimization.com/secrets/performance/II-3-object-overhead.html) in [Website Optimization Secrets](http://www.websiteoptimization.com/secrets/) for more details. Consider reducing, eliminating, and combining external objects (graphics, CSS, JavaScript, iFrames and XHTML) to reduce the total number of objects, and thus separate HTTP requests. Consider using [CSS sprites](http://www.websiteoptimization.com/speed/tweak/css-sprites/) to help consolidate decorative images. * TOTAL_IMAGES - Caution. You have a moderate amount of images on this page (14 ). Consider using fewer images on the site or try reusing the same image in multiple pages to take advantage of caching. Using CSS techniques such as colored backgrounds, borders, or spacing instead of graphic techniques can help reduce HTTP requests. * TOTAL_SIZE - Warning! The total size of this page is 315393 bytes, which will load in 66.86 seconds on a 56Kbps modem. Consider reducing total page size to less than 100K to achieve sub 20 second response times on 56K connections. Pages over 100K exceed most attention thresholds at 56Kbps, even with feedback. Consider optimizing your site with [Website Optimization Secrets](http://www.websiteoptimization.com/secrets/), [_Speed Up Your Site_](http://www.websiteoptimization.com/speed/) or [contacting us](http://www.websiteoptimization.com/contact/) about our optimization services. * TOTAL_SCRIPT - Caution. The total number of external script files on this page is 5 , consider reducing this to one or two. Combine, refactor, and minify to [optimize your JavaScript](http://www.websiteoptimization.com/speed/tweak/javascript-optimization/) files. Ideally you should have one (or even embed scripts for high-traffic pages) on your pages. Consider [suturing JavaScript files together](http://www.websiteoptimization.com/speed/tweak/suture/) at the server to minimize HTTP requests. Placing external JavaScript files at the bottom of your BODY, and CSS files in the HEAD enables progressive display in XHTML web pages. * HTML_SIZE - Congratulations, the total size of this HTML file is 12545 bytes, which less than 50K. Assuming that you specify the HEIGHT and WIDTH of your images, this size allows your HTML to display content in under 10 seconds, the average time users are willing to wait for a page to display without feedback. * IMAGES_SIZE - Warning! The total size of your images is 207700 bytes, which is over 100K. Consider [switch graphic formats](http://www.websiteoptimization.com/speed/tweak/graphic-optimization/%3Eoptimizing%20images%3C/a%3E%20for%20size,%20combining%20them,%20and%20replacing%20graphic%20rollovers%20with%20CSS.%20You%20can%20often%20%3Ca%20href=) to achive smaller file sizes (from JPEG to PNG for example). Finally, substitute CSS techniques for graphics techniques to create colored borders, backgrounds, and spacing. * SCRIPT_SIZE - Warning! The total size of external your scripts is 95148 bytes, which is over 20K. Consider [optimizing your JavaScript](http://www.websiteoptimization.com/speed/tweak/javascript-optimization/) for size, combining them, and using [HTTP compression](http://www.websiteoptimization.com/speed/tweak/compress/) where appropriate for any scripts placed in the HEAD of your documents. You can substitute [CSS menus](http://www.websiteoptimization.com/speed/tweak/cssmenus/) for JavaScript-based menus to minimize or even eliminate the use of JavaScript. * MULTIM_SIZE - Congratulations, the total size of all your external multimedia files is 0 bytes, which is less than 10K. Firebug on Firefox Yahoo: See attached image Google: See attached Image [OdPjx.png](http://i.imgur.com/OdPjx.png) [VRW71.png](http://i.imgur.com/VRW71.png)```
-
-
Hi John,
7 errors all related to 1 plugin shouldnt be a big deal - especially when it comes to social plugins. A lot of the social share buttons themselves dont validate.
Im also not sure what you mean "the way WordPress appears to work"?
Could you post some of the errors here so we can see and try to help? The W3C error itself should let you know what you can do to fix the problem
-
Do you use Firebug? Any other tool suggestions?
-
W3C is an indicator of how well you have built your website but not for SEO as it use to be. I would suggest you focus on the sites speed, as it would typically deal with the issues you are facing with plugins and code. Hope this helps, Vahe
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Best way to Load Responsive Images for Responsive Site?
Hello All, Can anyone suggest be best technique to load responsive images? We are developing responsive site so looking for good ideas from your side so that it load very fast. Thanks!
Web Design | | micey1230 -
URL Designing and Site Architecture
Hi, 1. At the end of the URL, should we have "/" or not (for e.g. my website www.example.com/abc/) 2. What is the optimum level of site depth 3. Google crawler will go through the breadcrumb or url (If a page is at 6th level through breadcrumb and at 4th level through URL, at which level will google crawler recognize this.
Web Design | | adiez12340 -
On site SEO opinions
Hi all, I have been testing different configurations for my on-site SEO for a while now and I think I am pretty much there. However it is always nice to know what other SEO's think about my keyword density and usage. My site is http://www.tomlondonmagic.com I am curious as to what you think regarding landing page content, whether you need lots or text or little text? I have just removed links in the text as I feel I want to keep as much juice on my landing page as possible. Thanks all!
Web Design | | TomLondon0 -
Should the parent directory of the main site-navigation be clickable or not?!?
Highly discussed in our team is the question: Should all parent navigation items be clickable, or only the ones that have no child menu appearing on mouse over? At Starwood Germany, we would like to adjust the main navigation for all our websites in order to improve consistency and user friendliness. At the moment, most of our websites feature both clickable non-clickable parent items, depending on whether the items have a corresponding child menu (appearing on mouse over) or not. See example here: http://www.imperialvienna.com/en Some of our team members believe it might be irritating and/or confusing for the user if some items are clickable while others are not. What do you think? Any thoughts and insights would be truly appreciated!
Web Design | | DFM_GSA0 -
How will a sites ranking be affected??
Hey guys, My MD has just put this to me, we have a site the is currently ranked in top 3 for all there chosen search terms. The company is undergoing an overhaul of their design and want a new site to match this. They have asked how changing the site design will affect their rankings. More content is going to be added with this there will be new pages links etc Any information would be greatly appreciated.. Thanks Anthony
Web Design | | Anthonykal-group0 -
Considering site navigation options
I am working on a site redesign and re evaluating concepts I haven't thought about for a few years. I generally see site navigation that is either "top-down" or "left bar". Top down navigation normally uses the left nav. for search refinements. The benefit of top nav. is that it clears up the center of the page for non navigation content. The drawback is that you can't fit as many categories in a top nav. Left side nav. can hold a long list of categories, but subcategories are often in the center of the page. In the past, I have preferred to use left nav. with a multi level scroll over search refinement. I believe this allowed users to get to their destination page with fewer clicks. (I have always believed that every required additional click causes lost customers). I also believe that this has caused me to get more juice flowing to deeper pages on sites and better long-tail conversion. This means I have had pages with a LOT of links. With this method, I have tightly controlled my categories. What on other sites are often dynamic search refinements, are on my sites additional categories. I am considering making a site with a top down navigation system. I like the additional screen space in the center I get to work with. Is my assumption about pages created by search refinement wrong? Is it ok for SEO to have a left nav that has a bunch of search refinements that are dynamically created?
Web Design | | EugeneF0 -
For a varied product type or keywords group is it best to have several sites?
Hello everyone... Question: I have 7-8 generic keywords that I would like to rank for, is it possible for one site to rank highly for all these different keywords, or would this be best achieved by making 2 or 3 websites in total targeting different keywords (product sectors)? More info: We are in a niche industry & would like to know if it would be beneficial to have several websites made for specific product types rather than one main site? Although these sub classifications of products are nice, they are competitive as they have a high search volume Would it be better to build specific websites that only do that one type of product and have related keyword in domain, content & blogs on the site to that effect to increase relevance and positions as a result? Thanks
Web Design | | Ray_UK0 -
Dynamic pages and code within content
Hi all, I'm considering creating a dynamic table on my site that highlights rows / columns and cells depending on buttons that users can click. Each cell in the table links to a separate page that is created dynamically pulling information from a database. Now I'm aware of the google guidelines: "If you decide to use dynamic pages (i.e., the URL contains a "?" character), be aware that not every search engine spider crawls dynamic pages as well as static pages. It helps to keep the parameters short and the number of them few." So we wondered whether we could put the dynamic pages in our sitemap so that google could index them - the pages can be seen with javascript off which is how the pages are manipulated to make them dynamic. Could anyone give us a overview of the dangers here? I also wondered if you still need to separate content from code on a page? My developer still seems very keen to use inline CSS and javascript! Thanks a bundle.
Web Design | | tgraham0