New Site Launch- Bad Rankings
-
So I am slightly stumped. I work on a few eCom sites and over the past few months we have been launching new products as well as some site updates/upgrades. The issue that I am having is this. Product that is actually new this season, as in we did not carry it before, is ranking fine...generally speaking we are top 3 in Google with Brand/Product name.
However product that is not new, meaning it has a new color or graphic but has been in the catalog for years is not ranking. In Prior years the URL's ended with the product name, now however they have additional information added to the end for this season. Would not directing the old URL to the new URL effect the rankings of these pages?
I am open to suggestions beyond redirecting as well. Thank you!
-
Yes we are actually thinking of doing an "archive" type page so people can look and see what season their product is from..this helps with warranty processing for customers.
Thank you Brian for your help!
-
"is it still ok to go do a redirect, is there any harm in this" Not at all. Older content pages that are being deprecated are redirected to other pages all the time, most usually to the home page.
"And I guess moving forward we would have to do a redirect every season as the product names stay the same."
That's a different story... I'd actually consider new taxonomy/IA altogether. Do older products still receive support/service? Customers might want to find the product they'd had if they have service questions.
Anyway, good luck, let me know how it all works out!
-
Yes there was link juice that we would like to harvest...I am thinking that the redirect is the way to go.
So next question. Since the "new" product has been live since June is it still ok to go do a redirect, is there any harm in this?
And I guess moving forward we would have to do a redirect every season as the product names stay the same.
-
They no longer appear in searches as we put a "no follow" on them..that is fine we don't want to rank for the older product but the URL has history if you will.
I assume the old pages had some external links from product reviews? Since you want to harvest that link juice for the new pages, if you don't want to do a redirect you can set rel="canonical" on the old page to the new pages; though that means the older products will still be visible in SERPs, the SE juice would pass to the new. Better though to redirect to equivalent product pages.
Noticed there's no sitemap, or at least it's hard to find... http://goo.gl/ULW69
Also, I googled "Machete 1213" and got this as #1, as we would expect: http://ridesnowboards.com/snowboards/machete-1213
-
Hi Brian, yes let me clarify.
1. They no longer appear in searches as we put a "no follow" on them..that is fine we don't want to rank for the older product but the URL has history if you will.
2. Here is an example of a URL. My thought process is that we needed to redirect the old to the new...as it stands now we cannot get the new URL's to Rank in the top 50.
old: ridesnowboards.com/snowboards/machete
new: ridesnowboards.com/snowboards/machete-1213
3. Yes I believe so...however I am going to double check with the dev team.
Hope this helps
-
Hi Melissa,
A few clarifying questions:
- When you say the older products are not ranking, do you mean they aren't appearing even for brand and product-specific searches?
- Do I understand you right, that you've got new URLs for old pages (product pages) but the older URLs aren't 301 (or 302) redirected to the new URLs? If that's the case, then yes, not redirecting from the old URL to the new one would affect the rankings of those pages.
- I assume all internal links and sitemap were updated to point to the new URLs, and that there are no internal links pointing at the outdated URLs?
- What is the textual difference between the canonical URL of the older products vs. the newer ones?
I'd need to see the actual site to be able to understand more clearly. Would you be willing to put up screenshots or link to an example of an older product that is not ranking anymore? (Perhaps with an example of the older URL too?)
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Could another site copying my content hurt my ranking?
Earlier this week I asked why a page of mine might not be ranking locally. (https://moz.com/community/q/what-could-be-stopping-us-from-ranking-locally). Maybe this might be part of the answer – another firm has copied huge chunks of my website copy: **My company: **https://idearocketanimation.com/video-production-company/ The other company: http://studio3dm.com/studio3dm-com/video/ Could this be causing my page to not rank? And is there anything I can do about it, other than huff and puff to the other firm? (Which I am already doing.)
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Wagster0 -
What's the average rank update time after site and/or backlink changes?
What's currently the typical time, ON AVERAGE, it takes to see ranking changes when significant improvements are made to significant ranking signals on a long-established (as opposed to brand new) website? Does the rank update associated with on-page optimization happen sooner than addition of quality backlinks?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | JCCMoz0 -
Best way to "Prune" bad content from large sites?
I am in process of pruning my sites for low quality/thin content. The issue is that I have multiple sites with 40k + pages and need a more efficient way of finding the low quality content than looking at each page individually. Is there an ideal way to find the pages that are worth no indexing that will speed up the process but not potentially harm any valuable pages? Current plan of action is to pull data from analytics and if the url hasn't brought any traffic in the last 12 months then it is safe to assume it is a page that is not beneficial to the site. My concern is that some of these pages might have links pointing to them and I want to make sure we don't lose that link juice. But, assuming we just no index the pages we should still have the authority pass along...and in theory, the pages that haven't brought any traffic to the site in a year probably don't have much authority to begin with. Recommendations on best way to prune content on sites with hundreds of thousands of pages efficiently? Also, is there a benefit to no indexing the pages vs deleting them? What is the preferred method, and why?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | atomiconline0 -
Will Regularly Adding New Blog Posts Improve Ranking?
We have added very little new website content in the last year. Our domain is www.metro-manhattan.com. Would adding a brand-new blog post once a week help improve our ranking in Google? A few years ago adding new content would've had quickly had a positive effect. Is that still the case? Or should we focus content creation resources in other areas such as social media? Thanks, Alan
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Kingalan10 -
Would changing the file name of an image (not the alt attribute) have an effect of on seo / ranking of that image and thus the site?
Would changing the file name of image, not the alt attribute nor the image itself (so it would be exactly the same but just a name change) have any effect on : a) A sites seo ranking b) the individual images seo ranking (although i guess if b) would be true it would have an effect on a) although potentially small.) This is the sort of change i would be thinking of making : ![Red ford truck](2554.jpg) changed to ![Red ford truck](6842.jpg)
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Sam-P0 -
REPOST: How much does "overall site semantic theme" influence rankings?
Hello everyone on the new cool Moz! I've optimized sites before that are dedicated to 1, 2 or 3 products and or services. These sites inherently talk about one main thing - so the semantics of the content across the whole site reflect this. I get these ranked well on a local level. Now, take an e-commerce site - which I am working on - 2000 products, all of which are quite varied - cookware, diningware, art, decor, outdoor, appliances... there is a lot of different semantics throughout the site's different pages. Does this influence the ranking possibilities? Your opinion and time is appreciated. Thanks in advance.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | bjs20101 -
Mobile Site Outranking Main Site
Hi, We have recently been hit with a problem regarding our mobile site, where it is outranking our main site. This is causing a drop in orders and ranknings for our main site. It would appear that google has indexed our mobile site and so the two are now competing against each other. Our main site is on a .co.uk and our mobile site on a .mobi, but we have now taken down the mobile site until we get this sorted. Does anyone else have any experience of this happening and how to stop it happening again? Thanks Steve
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Steve251 -
SEO for New Web Site Launch
I am going to launch a new website with digital marketing included SEO, SMO, PPC, SEM, ORM services. Please anyone suggest me what would be marketing & brand promotion strategy for this.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | afycon0