Marketing URL
-
Hi,
I need a bit of advice on marketing URL's.
The destinations URL is http://www.website.com/by-development.php?area=Isle Of Wight&development=developmentname.
If we wanted to use www.website.com/developmentname on literature to send people to the ugly URL above, what would we do?
Would we need to rewrite the ugly URL to the neat and then 301 the ugly to the neat?
Currently, the team are using a new domain of neatandrelevant.info and 301 redirecting it to ugly URL but there are lots of different developments they want to send people to so a new domain is bought for each development which seems a bit unnecessary. They point to different pages on the ugly URL website.
Assuming canonical tag would not be needed then because the ugly URL page would be redirected.
Also, as the website has ugly URL's anyway, would it not be best practice to use rewrites anyway so that the URL's read www.mywebsite.com/region/development?
Would it confuse things to then have extra short marketing URL's missing out /region?
Hope that makes sense....
-
I don't understand the point of the external domain, either - I tend to agree with you that sub-folders would be perfectly fine here. Unfortunately, there are two issues at play:
(1) You've got to direct the short, marketing URLs to the main site URLs. That's a relatively easy - you could either use rewrites or redirects (rewrites are probably better for humans, in this case). Google can't generally index URLs that are on printed materials, TV ads, billboards, etc. (unless people start linking to them or promoting them on social), so your SEO risks are pretty minimal. The safest bet would be a straight 301-redirect.
(2) The other issue is the long/ugly URLs on the site in general. If you want to move the entire site to the short URLs and then use those short URLs for marketing, that's great, but then you'll need to 301-redirect the entire current site. There are definitely risks to that approach, and I'm not sure it's necessary here. The benefits really depend on the scope of the current site and whether the URL structure is creating problems, like spinning out duplicate pages. You could also potentially use rel=canonical to solve some problems, but again, changing your site-wide URLs involves risk.
I wrote more on (2) here:
-
Just wanted to clarify - [www.getmove-in.com/sub] is a folder or sub-folder. A sub-domain would be [sub.getmove-in.com]. We rarely recommend sub-domains for SEO these days.
-
Had a nudge from Moz to look at the question again to try and get the answer I need - thanks to those that have helped so far though.
The site our (other and independent) marketing team are trying to send people to is http://www.getmove-in.com/ - specifically the pages about individual developments such as http://www.getmove-in.com/by-development.php?area=Isle%20Of%20Wight&development=Pan%20Meadows. The problem is it's an ugly URL and not good to put on the bottom of printed leaflets.
What they are after is a snappier URL. They have currently 'solved' it by buying a new domain www.panmeadows.info to publish on leaflets. This domain redirects to the internal page http://www.getmove-in.com/by-development.php?area=Isle%20Of%20Wight&development=Pan%20Meadows. It seems an odd way of doing thing and means that they have to buy a new domain each time they want to publicise a new development.
What would be ideal is if they could use www.getmove-in.com/panmeadows as a URL. I suspect that even if they could get a neater URL structure to the site, the URL would be in a longer format such as www.getmove-in.com/development/isleofwight/panmeadows or www.getmove-in.com/isleofwight/panmeadows which is longer-than-ideal for a leaflet.
First question: Should all the pages on the site be re-written to neater URL's? (and I'm guessing in the absence of being able to do a redesign and 301 the pages as Wesley suggested this would be the case).
Second question: If we can do this, would we need to 301 the old ugly URL pages to the new? (guessing you do)
Third question: If we can do that and we get neater URL's, how do we get even shorter ones for the purposes of writing on leaflets (marketing URL's) e.g. www.getmove-in.com/panmeadows. What would be the technical bit behind someone seeing www.getmove-in.com/panmeadows on a leaflet and ending up on the content on the page http://www.getmove-in.com/by-development.php?area=Isle%20Of%20Wight&development=Pan%20Meadows.
Sorry if it's written confusingly
-
Thanks again Nathan.
Still struggling to understand why they are doing what they are doing. It may well be custom CMS - it was created by an external design agency who may well have suggested the additional domain 'strategy'.
Am hoping to have a chat with the team that set all this up to see what we can do because the URL's are ugly and the domain buying seems a bit strange to me.
-
No problem,
Thanks for sharing the URL, that really help clear things up.
After doing some digging around this is what I've come up with. Keep in mind that this is my opinion and not a guaranteed answer.
- Your URL is www.getmovin-in.com, this is the root domain.
- Ever page created on your site should be a sub-domain. e.g. www.getmove-in.com/sub-domain page.
- There should be no need to purchase these pages, they are just created and labeled neatly
- I have no idea what CMS they are using, it is not wordpress (which is what I work with). According to the developers site it is a hand built CMS. Not sure why they would do this when there are others already built and really easy to use.
- You basically have a non-profit/real-estate site. Here is a good example of that kind of site here in the states, http://www.hudhomestore.com
Unfortunately I have little experience in dealing with this type of site, but I can tell you, if you site returns a search result like region, city, price, etc, then you will have those ugly URLs. I want to say there is a way to deal with it but I'm not sure. You might try browsing through the blogs at distilled.net, or even contacting them since they are based in the UK I believe. (I am not good with European geography, forgive my ignorance! )
Again I hope this helps, even if only a little.
-
Thanks Nathan,
I don't understand the logic either. The site was designed before I arrived and the relevant department has only just told me how they are marketing individual developments.
The site is http://www.getmove-in.com/. It is a CMS but I don't know what as I don't deal with this website. Also don't know hosting details.
The sort of site they have bought to 301 is panmeadows.info.
-
if you are using a CMS like wordpress, then you should be able to just simply rewrite the url after the ".com/" to what ever you want. I don't understand why you would need to buy a new url and 301 anything, even if your not using a CMS.
I am guessing based off what you wrote, that you have a "Main site page" with navigation somewhere on the top or side. If this is correct then i would say you need to stop buying new domains and simply create a "developments" tab in the navigation with a drop down listing the different pages and create simple clean urls for each page. e.g my: www.mywedsite.com/createuniqueurl
This is the best advice i can give with the information provided. It's also kinda difficult to explain!
Hope this helps
-
Unfortunately that's not an option at the mo. A contract has been signed with the web design company.
-
I think the best option would be to move all the content to a better URL structure and make sure to set up 301 redirects from the old URL's to the new URL's.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google Indexing Pages with Made Up URL
Hi all, Google is indexing a URL on my site that doesn't exist, and never existed in the past. The URL is completely made up. Anyone know why this is happening and more importantly how to get rid of it. Thanks 🙂
Technical SEO | | brian-madden0 -
New URL Structure
Hi Guy's, For our webshop we're considering a new URL structure because longtail keywords to rank so well. Now we have /category (main focus keywords)
Technical SEO | | Happy-SEO
/product/the-product345897345123/ (nice to rank on, not that much volume) We have over 500 categories and every one of them is placed after our domain. Because i think it's better to work with a good structure and managed a way to make categories and sub-categories. The 500 categories may be the case why not every one of them is ranking so well, so that was also the choice of thinking about a new structure. So the new URL structure will be: /category (main focus keywords)
/category/subcat/ (also main focus keywords) Everything will be redirect (301, good way), so i think there won't be to much problems. I'm thinking about what to do with the /product/ URL. Because now it will be on the same level as the subcategories, and i'm affraid that when it's on that level, Google will give the same value to both of them. My options that i'm considering are: **Old way **
/product/the-product-345897345123/ .html (seen this on big webshops)
/product/the-product-345897345123.html/ Level deeper SKU /product/the-product/345897345123/ What would you suggest? The new structure would be 20 categories 500+ sub's devided under main categories 5000+ products Thanks!0 -
Need URL structure suggestions
On my website I am in the process of creating expat city guides for different cities in Cambodia. I've already gotten three up, but I am worried that my URL structure is not the best, so I am wondering if I should fix it before I put the rest up. Right now the city guides are housed here: movetocambodia.com/expat-city-and-island-guides/ There's a section for each city, this one is for Battambang: movetocambodia.com/expat-city-and-island-guides/battambang And then there are sections for hotels, restaurants, etc. movetocambodia.com/expat-city-and-island-guides/battambang/battambang-hotels-and-accommodation So once you finally get to a review for an individual hotel or activity, the URL is really long, like this: movetocambodia.com/expat-city-and-island-guides/battambang/battambang-hotels-and-accommodation/classy-hotel Should I just par the section names down so the URL would be something like this: movetocambodia.com/expat-city-guides/battambang/accommodation/classy-hotel/ ? I was hoping by having the long URLs slugs for my section pages, such as "battambang-hotels-and-accommodation" they would be more likely to show on search terms like "Battambang hotels" than if the section was just "accommodation." However, this whole section is getting much less search traffic than anything else on my site, so I am wondering if it is because of these ridiculously long URLs. Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Technical SEO | | Lina5000 -
Should we use & or and in our url's?
Example: /Zambia/kasanka-&-bangweulu or /Zambia/kasanka-and-bangweulu which is the better url from the search engines point of view?
Technical SEO | | tribes0 -
Can I redirect a URL that has a # in it? How?
Hi there - My web developer is saying that I can't do a URL redirect with a "#" in it. Currently, the URL is actually an anchored link within a page (which the URL indicates with a #). I want to change the content to a new URL, but our website links internally to the old URL, so we would need to do a URL redirect (assume 301). Can you tell me if this is possible and how? Thanks!
Technical SEO | | sfecommerce0 -
How does a sitemap affect the definition of canonical URLs?
We are having some difficulty generating a sitemap that includes our SEO-friendly URLs (the ones we want to set as canonical), and I was wondering if we might be able to simply use the non-SEO-friendly, non-canonical URLs that the sitemap generator has been producing and then use 301 redirects to send them to the canonical. Is there a reason why we should not be doing this? We don't want search engines to think that the sitemap URLs are more important than the pages to which they redirect. How important is it that the sitemap URLs match the canonical URLs? We would like to find a solution outside of the generation of the sitemap itself as we are locked into using a vendor’s product in order to generate the sitemap. Thanks!
Technical SEO | | emilyburns0 -
Why google index my IP URL
hi guys, a question please. if site:112.65.247.14 , you can see google index our website IP address, this could duplicate with our darwinmarketing.com content pages. i am not quite sure why google index my IP pages while index domain pages, i understand this could because of backlink, internal link and etc, but i don't see obvious issues there, also i have submit request to google team to remove ip address index, but seems no luck. Please do you have any other suggestion on this? i was trying to do change of address setting in Google Webmaster Tools, but didn't allow as it said "Restricted to root level domains only", any ideas? Thank you! boson
Technical SEO | | DarwinChinaSEO0 -
Blog URLs
I read somewhere - pretty sure is was in Art of SEO - that having dates in the blog permalink URLs was a bad idea. e.g. /blog/2011/3/my-blog-post/ However, looking at Wordpress best practice, it's also not a good idea to have a URL without a number - it's more resource hungry if you don't , apparently. e.g. /blog/my-blog-post/ Does anyone have any views on this? Thanks Ben
Technical SEO | | atticus70