Our site is slow..
-
We have noticed that our site is much slower than many of our competitors and expect that this is affecting our organic ranking.
We are on dedicated UK Fast server with
[20/08/2013 16:44:35] Tony Jackson: Operating System: CentOS 6 64-bit
CPU: 1x Intel Xeon E5-2620 @ 2.0GHz
Memory: 8x 8GB DDR3 RDIMM
Hard Drive: 4x 128GB SSD RAID10
[20/08/2013 16:46:28] Tony Jackson: Nginx, percona, tomcat/solr, Magento CE, cat: 25200 productsI could really do with your thoughts on this page for example
http://www.pretavoir.co.uk/sunglasses/ray-ban-sunglasses.html
-
I am not a huge fan of APC at present (PHP PECL library, not the power battery company). Maybe nginx won't segfault like Apache has been for us.
As for the hosting, what I mean is to use a load balancer with multiple servers. Will you take some performance hit in getting DB data? Probably, but very little. But you're getting far worse now with Magento so it doesn't matter how fast your machine is (like I said, it's a beast so if it's not sitting at 0.01 almost all the time you've got major issues). Remember that this impressive machine is also a single point of failure. I had an impressive box running our DB once (multiple webservers) and the RAID controller crapped out in the middle of the day. We got back up under the two hour SLA but it cost us a lot of sales.
Now we run two webservers, a multi-AZ DB (automatic failover to secondary if master dies) and all behind a load balancer in AWS. I won't pretend this isn't without any issues (we wound up in an odd instance where the DB failover didn't work as expected) but it's a lot more redundant and scalable. I bet our setup is cheaper than your behemoth, too. Remember, you still have to chew through all the code each and every time the page is loaded (your problem is processing the individual thread, not horsepower). Splitting your site amongst multiple webservers means you have scalability as well.
-
Highland, Thank you for the response.
We are using memcached locally as it seems to give best results, having tried a combination of APC and memcached.
Would moving our database to a different server speed up the time to first byte(ttfp) as currently we sit with very little load on cpu? What would be the benefit?
Where you mention 'a cloud based solution' are you referring to using Cloudflare to sit in front of our server to act as a cdn and cache, or to move to a complete cloud based solution? I assume it is their Business package you refer to which gives the ddos and other protection.
Looking at Googles pagespeed tools, out ttfp seems to be the hold-up. which then just leaves the off site code (Snapenage, Comodo, etc) bringing up the last elements.
-
Thanks for this response.
We had been looking at Cloudflare and also at rearranging our server somewhat. Will let you know.
-
Magento is built on top of Zend Framework 1, a notoriously slow PHP framework. It also does some things that slow it down. Some thoughts...
- Be sure your use the Magento caching system.
- Move your database off to another machine. 25k products is a LOT
- Your hosting setup is monolithic. While your box is a beast of a machine (12 threads, 64GB RAM, 4x 128GB SSD) it's still susceptible to slow-down. I bet 50 concurrent users could bring it to its knees. While CDNs can help offload some of this, I recommend the beast with a cloud based solution. I bet you could get 2 or 3 servers plus a DB server for less than what you're paying for this one beast. Then put your machines behind a load balancer. So you would have multiple web servers serving your site up, a load balancer routing traffic to the fastest one and a common DB powering it.
- Switch to Cloudflare for your DNS. They will cache pages for you and they do it for free. They also add a layer of security.
- Use WMT to benchmark your site speed. It tells you the load time in a handy graph. Play around with it and see what happens.
-
We are using Magento on Nginxwth caching enabled with memcache
-
Generating the page seems to take very long. What shopping cart software are you using? Can it cache pages?
-
Thanks for your reply.
This page is a better example of our problem
http://www.pretavoir.co.uk/sunglasses/ray-ban-sunglasses.html
-
Your website isn't that slow from London but there lots of things you can do to improve speed:
1. Use a CDN like NetDNA to host CSS, Javascript and images. By using a CDN, you will also increase the number of simultaneous (parallel) downloads since these files will be hosted on another (sub)domain.
2. You have lots of Javascript files. Try combining them into one file.
3. Add a cache header, this will instruct web browsers to cache your images, css and Javascript files. Simply add this to your .htaccess file:
AddType image/x-icon .ico
<ifmodule mod_headers.c=""># YEAR
<filesmatch ".(ico|gif|jpg|jpeg|png|flv|pdf)$"="">Header set Cache-Control "max-age=29030400"</filesmatch>WEEK
<filesmatch ".(js|css|swf)$"="">Header set Cache-Control "max-age=604800"</filesmatch>
24 HOURS
<filesmatch ".(html|htm|txt|php)$"="">Header set Cache-Control "max-age=86400"</filesmatch></ifmodule>
======================================================
... and sorry for my english.
Hope that helps!
-
Yes had looked at GT Metrix though not paid much attention to YSlow. Will take a look now.
However it may be of more interest to look at the speed of this page rather than homepage;
http://www.pretavoir.co.uk/sunglasses/ray-ban-sunglasses.html
-
Hi Sean,
Your system looks pretty decent... I guess it depends on your traffic load though.
Have you checked out your results on GTMetrix.com?
You scored well in the PageSpeed testing, but not in YSlow. I'd take a look and see if you could leverage some of the suggestions there.
Hope this helps.
Mike
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Why is this site at no.1?
In the last 2 months, a previously unranked/unheard of website jumped straight to no.1 position for a particular keyword when searched from USA and is even ranking over many other big brands or stronger DA/PA sites. I did notice some very strange JavaScript popup links that are heavily keyword linked from the first mention of the keyword on the page content. What are they trying to do here? Otherwise they don't seem to have much PA/DA or seo going on. Why are they doing so well?!
Competitive Research | | emerald0 -
SEO's done, 301s in place, old site STILL outranks new site. What to do?
Since Sep 2010 I have had a site up with minimal SEO optimization (www.chrisbrushmusic.com). Oct 29, 2012, I launched a new site on a new domain (www.chrisbrushdrums.com) with more content and tons of SEO work behind it. The content of the new site is significantly different from the old site, and I wish to keep the old site around. I have 301's in place for specific URLs on the old site that point to the new site. I have submitted xml sitemaps for the new site. As of now, the old site still outranks the new site (i.e. Google search for "nashville session drummer" and my old site is #9 - my new site is nowhere). What should I do? Thanks.
Competitive Research | | cbrush0 -
Working through the slides on my first seo project, I'm trying to determine the most popular content on competition sites.
From the video, I understand I should be looking for unique opportunities. But is there a baseline for product qualification, ie., a min. PA,LRD, Inbound LInks, social shares, etc. I guess I'm asking what I should be looking for in the data provided on each competing site? What determines THE most popular and unique product?
Competitive Research | | AhmadS0 -
How can a site rank higher when you beat them by A LOT on virtually every SEOMOZ factor?
Any insight into what's driving these results would be appreciated. Another site ranks #6 and we rank #22 on a keyword that scores 67% for "Keyword Difficulty", but we score significantly higher than them on almost every ranking factor including having nearly 10 times more backlinks along with higher PA and DA scores,etc. Here is a comparison from the Keyword Difficulty Tool report. Question: What could be going on? Factor and ranking comparison (us v. them) with our higher rankings are listed first. PA: 61 v. 39, mozRank 5,85 v. 4,54, mozTrust 6.00 v. 5.49, mT/mR = 1.0 v. 1.2, total links = 4,198 v. 90, internal links = 4198 v 90, external links = 275 v. 57, followed links = 4171 v 85, no follow links = 27 v 5, linking root domains = 46 v 30 on-page grade = A v B broad keyword usage in title: yes v yes broad keyword usage in document: yes v yes keyword used in url = no v no keyword used in domain = partial v no KW exact match - no v no exact anchor text links = 2373 v 13 %links w/ exact anchor text = 56% v 14% linking root domains w/ exact anchor text = 7 v 8 % linking root domains w/ exact anchor text = 15% v 26% partial anchor text links = 0 v 0 Domain Authority = 54 v 27 Domain mozRank = 5.4 v 3.2 Domain mozTrust = 5.8 v 3.7 DmT/DmR = 1.1 v 1.2 External links to domain 9261 v 63 Linking root domains to this domain = 355 v 33 linking c- blocks domains to domain = 267 v 30 tweets = 4 v 3 FB shares = 13 v 11 Google Plus one shares = 1 v 0
Competitive Research | | rickt0070 -
Sites With Duplicate Content Ranking Way Higher
The site I am writing about is easendtorontohomes.com I don't get it. I see that some of my competitors have more inbound links and have been around longer. Their SEOmoz trust etc is also higher. But I don't get how many could possibly be ranking higher since they're sites are all template based site via Web Tech Design and the content is duplicated from one to the other. The other weird thing is that they do everything wrong - they stuff their keywords tag, some of them use the same keywords/meta data on every single page, some of them don't even have meta tags, some of them don't even have a blog with ANY original content. Apart from listings EastEndTorontoHomes.com has TONS of original, well-researched, and keyword rich content. I just don't get it. Is it possible that google has some sort of relationship with that company? Or am I totally missing something? Some of these sites include: tinasmith.ca, mikeclarke.com, teamkassen.com
Competitive Research | | annasus0 -
Are there any tools to extract keywords and long tail keywords from a site and report keyword density by URL?
I need a tool that does the following: Find exact matches for keywords in content of sites and report keyword density by URL. Then identify the value generated by a particular keyword.
Competitive Research | | MotionPoint0 -
Our site being outranked by competitors with lower "moz" scores - due to on-page SEO?
Howdy, Our SEO efforts are doing well, but for a few keywords it seems we cannot budge one of the competitors sitting in spot #1. Through some competitive analysis I've noticed that our website has a much higher mozRank with regards to both page and domain compared to the current #1 spot. My question is what kind of factors could be the issue as to why we are still being outranked. Is it simply a case of poor on-page SEO at this point or should I be taking the mozRanks with a grain of salt.
Competitive Research | | marketingdepartment.ch0 -
How does a site get to no 3 in Google with no KW in their links?!!
Hello everyone, my first post - ahhh I'm investigating a niche and there is a site that should have no right being there in my view. It's no. 3 Google UK for 'company formation' with a small site with 65 weak links from only 7 domains and hosted in the US. But more importantly, the Open Site Explorer says there is not 1 link with that term in its anchor text. This I find crazy and makes me suspicious. But before I go back to my client saying "oh they must be black hat" I would like your expert views. I'm not sure whether to tut or congratulate them and for the first time I'm not sure what reasons to give for their amazing performance! What's your views?
Competitive Research | | GOYMedia480