Multiple local addresses for one domain
-
Hi Mozzers!
If I have a website that has a separate office in each state that they wish to rank locally for eg: "service CityA" "service CityB" etc
Would it be best to have a separate subdomain for each major city (unique content on each) with the office address specific to that city? Then there would be a separate Google places listing the subdomain as the website.
Or should we just use subfolders? Would Google Places accept the subfolder as the web address?
thanks!
-
Hi Joshua,
I was speaking from a Local SEO perspective, but I didn't make that clear. Sorry about that. You write:
"I just have a feeling that Google may see the subfolder landing pages as an attempt to game the Local listings"
Now, typically, when dealing with local clients with multiple locations, I simply create a unique page for each of the locations - just a file, and no need to build out with subdomains or subfolders. It sounds like perhaps you are dealing with a client with more complex needs than this?
I have searched to no avail for any reliable documentation which states that Google would view either subdomains or subfolders with suspicion or favor. I have never seen any discussion of a preference on their part. I'm not sure anyone but a Google Places rep would be able to offer you a reliable answer on this
A final note - be aware that when you designate any URL other than the homepage URL of a website as being appropriate on a Place Page, Google's display is likely to show only the homepage URL, but when you click on the link, it takes you to the page specified.
I'm sorry not to have a better answer to your question. I guess my answer is that there is an absence of data that Google would view either subfolders or subdomains as spammy in relation to Places.
-
the subdomain vs subfolder issue was more a question of 'which will Google Places/Local" prefer rather than a question of SEO value.
I just have a feeling that Google may see the subfolder landing pages as an attempt to game the Local listings
Any thoughts?
-
Hi Josh!
Thanks for coming to Q&A with your question. I'm the Local SEO Associate here in the forum. You have gotten some excellent feedback on this thread so far. To recap your original question, you are asking whether it's better to use sub-domains or sub-folders for city landing pages.According to Google Places Help Forum Top Contributor, Archie Watt, there is simply no difference from and SEO perspective. I have never seen any data to the contrary. It's somewhat akin to the concept that Google doesn't care what language your website is coded in so long as they can crawl it thoroughly. Here is a thread on this topic at the Google Places Help Forum:
http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Webmasters/thread?tid=3f77dd134ba635b2&hl=en
My advice - do what makes most sense for the user to use and webmaster to manage.
Best of luck!
Miriam -
It's really important to take that to heart. I get clients all the time that have had their listings/accounts rejected because they had been advised to game the local system.
But it's also important to understand your client. Back to Marriott, each of those locations is technically a different business (the hotel itself being owned by someone else, operating under the Marriott name). As an aside, it's also a ton of fun trying to establish and manage hotel Places listings while the brand is attempting the same thing for the same locations. Especially one so authoritative as Marriott.
And to throw another wrench in it, you also have to consider that Google attempts to solve as many problems as they can algorithmically (did I just make that up?). By this I mean that they don't know the inner working of your business/niche, they can only make assertions based on the info they find. I had no idea that all these Marriotts you see on the highway weren't actually "owned" by Marriott themselves until I worked with a hotel management group. The folks on the Local team didn't didn't either for a very long time.
If you're in doubt, or there is even a remote idea that your intentions are to cover more SERP space outside of legitimate reason, it's better to play it safe.
-
Here is what googles states
Businesses that operate in a service area, as opposed to a single location,
should not create a listing for every city they service. Businesses that operate
in a service area should create one listing for the central office or location
and designate service areashttp://support.google.com/places/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=107528
-
Hi Joshua,
You can use 1 sub folder per City and submit all of your offices to Google Adress. But in my opinion if you want to do things in a better way, I would create one subdomain for each city since they would be more targeted to the city then having multiple subdirectories.
Subdomain + page name + content would be targeted to the queries that people search for this would be more targeted and you can link them indivually in their local communities individually.
Both ways are good for what you want to do, but I do prefer the subdomain approach since for me it seem more targeted.
-
Hi Joshua,
You can use 1 sub folder per City and submitted all of you're offices to Google Adress. But in my opinion if you want to do things in a better way, I would create one subdomain since they would be more targeted to the city then having multiple subdirectories.
Subdomain + page name + content would be targeted to the queries that people search for this would be more targeted and you can link them indivually in their local communities individually.
Both ways are good for what you want to do, but I do prefer the subdomain approach since for me it seem more targeted.
-
Hey Josh,
This really depends in the situation specifically, but I can give you a few cases I've had in the last year or so.
Generally, it's OK, to have each location on a sub-folder/page specific to that address; along with a Google Places page for that page. But it depends on the type of business, locations, etc. You can kinda ask yourself the intent on adding multiple Places listings as the resulting indicators are what Google will use.
What I mean is, if you have a client that wants to get a bunch of "addresses" so they can dominate a larger area in Google Places, then you are going to run into issues. Google doesn't like PO Boxes and the like (UPS mailboxes, etc.). I've seen/got them listed a ton of times, but they are more likely to run into problems later.
If you have real locations that a person can visit, then you'll usually be ok. I handled the Places pages for a Marriott client, and each location under the Marriott brand has its own Google Places page, with links to the specific page on the primary site.
On the other hand, I just took on a lawyer that was previously advised to get a bunch of FedEx boxes around town and use those for multiple listings. He came to me for a reason.
I'm really thinking that Google takes the business type into consideration, so be mindful of that.
-
One places listing per web site and location.
but this brings up aproblem of trying to get all this site to rank. Its hard enouth to get one to rank.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Is it better to shorten my existing url to use only keyword after domain with a 301 redirect from existing url
I have a long existing URL that has included my key word but the url has about 5 additional words in the text ( eg url would have " /super widgets in stock at the widget store " as url text after domain. keywords is super widget The URL was at the top of search results for my keyword for many years until recently. Is it better to shorten my url text to now use only my keyword " /super-widgets " after the domain with a 301 direct from my existing url to optimize it Thanks
On-Page Optimization | | mrkingsley2 -
Link flow for multiple links to same URL
Hi there,
On-Page Optimization | | doctecs
my question is as follows: How does Google handle link flow if two links in a given page point to the same URL? (do they flow link individually or not?) This seems to be a newbie question, but actually it seems that there is little evidence and even also little consensus in the SEO community about this detail. Answers should include source Information about the current state of art at Google is preferable The question is not about anchor text, general best practises for linking, "PageRank is dead" etc. We do know that the "historical" PageRank was implemented (a long time ago) without special handling for multiple links, as e.g. last stated by Matt Cutts in this video: http://searchengineland.com/googles-matt-cutts-one-page-two-links-page-counted-first-link-192718 On the other hand, many people from the SEO community say that only the first link counts. But so far I could not find any data to back this up, which is quite surprising.0 -
Address on Every page of the website for Local SEO? Good or Bad?
Is this good idea to add business address on every page of the website?, How Google see this? and This is Good or bad for ranking?
On-Page Optimization | | Dan_Brown10 -
Should a keyword be optimized on One page only?
I have a niche website that focusses on selling pizza delivery bags, the search keywords that are used by users are about 7 and their are another 15 long tail keywords. The question is do i optimize every keyword per one page only? i have a blog on the website www.prodelpizzabags.com/blog/ if i write a blog post that would "compete" internally with another keyword, what should i do, what are the best practices I would be thankful for any insights regarding keyword/page optimization
On-Page Optimization | | akramsabra0 -
Two keyowrds for one page
Hi there! I just optimize two pages for the same keyword as I didn't find a especific keyword for each one independently. On the other hand, these keyword was "suitalbe" for the same two pages. Obviously Google will have to "make a decision" regarding what page should it be indexed in the first postion? In what aspects or elements of the page should I incide in order to give priority to one page more than the other one? Thnaks
On-Page Optimization | | juanmiguelcr0 -
Schema business address - can this affect me in the national rankings
Looking at using Schema microdata on our new website, we currently rank quite decently in Google UK. If I was to add schema mark up for our business address could this effect us in Google UK rankings wise i.e. our rankings for national search (for want of a better word!) suffer but our local rankings increase?
On-Page Optimization | | Jon-C0 -
Very confused on this one?
I have a product that is available for Canadians only but not for Americans. I was just wondering how I can allow Google to find the Canadian page but not the American Page. I want to optimize this product to show in Google CAN results but not in the results for USA. Is this even possible?
On-Page Optimization | | odegi0 -
How do I address "Critical Factors: Accessible to Engines"?
Hello,I am going thru the on-page report card produced by SEOMOZ and am stumped as to how to address the first critical factor. It looks like the correct meta tag to get search engines to index the site is at the bottom of the header. And as far as I know, which isn't much, the site returns the HTTP code 200 when I refresh.I am new at this, so please let me know if you have some specific solutions. I am using IWeb and the IWeb SEO Tool to make meta code improvements. I have pasted the head code for my website (www.grass2greens.com) below. Thanks in advance!<html lang="en" xml:lang="en" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type"><meta content="iWeb 3.0.4" name="Generator"><meta content="local-build-20120619" name="iWeb-Build"><meta content="IE=EmulateIE7" http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible"><meta content="width=880" name="viewport"><title>Grass to Greens: Asheville Edible Landscapingtitle><link href="Grass_to_Greens__Asheville_Edible_Landscaping_files/Grass_to_Greens__Asheville_Edible_Landscaping.css" media="screen,print" type="text/css" rel="stylesheet"><style type="text/css"><script type="text/javascript" async="" src="http://www.google-analytics.com/ga.js"><script type="text/javascript" async="" src="http://www.google-analytics.com/ga.js"><script src="Scripts/iWebSite.js" type="text/javascript"><script src="Scripts/iWebImage.js" type="text/javascript"><script src="Scripts/iWebMediaGrid.js" type="text/javascript"><script src="Scripts/Widgets/SharedResources/WidgetCommon.js" type="text/javascript"><script src="Scripts/Widgets/HTMLRegion/Paste.js" type="text/javascript"><script src="Grass_to_Greens__Asheville_Edible_Landscaping_files/Grass_to_Greens__Asheville_Edible_Landscaping.js" type="text/javascript"><script type="text/javascript"><meta content="Grass to Greens offers a range of edible landscape design, consultation, installation, and maintenance services. Free Consultations! We specialize in beautiful and useful vegetable gardens, season extension, tree work, orchards and food forests, stone work, fencing, and rain water catchment. Grass to Greens is an edible landscaping company committed to creating food security and fostering social justice through urban agriculture in the Asheville area. " name="description"><meta content="Landscaping Asheville Edible Gardens" name="keywords"><meta content="follow,index" name="robots"><link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="Grass_to_Greens__Asheville_Edible_Landscaping_files/Grass_to_Greens__Asheville_Edible_LandscapingMoz.css">head> Grass to Greens: Asheville Edible Landscaping
On-Page Optimization | | dcaudio0