Broken back links
-
I have noticed that some of the back links built for us by our SEO agency we have no longer work. Is there is a common view on the percentage of back links generally do not work say after a year or so. If there is an acceptable number, want to give to my SEO agency as a KPI?
-
Josh - thanks for those inputs. I am going to get deeper into this with the SEO agency - my hunch is that it is poor link building as we normally update our site with fresh and relevant content almost every day. But when quizzed, the agency said that it is natural for back links to die and didn't seem to make any sense
-
Hey Kesh,
An acceptable number is going to be difficult to come up with. It all depends on your content, the types of links you're getting, etc.
When you say that they don't work, do you mean they are broken links? If so, is it because your site no longer has the page that it linked to (resulting in a 404)? If so, I would work with your SEO to have that content re-created or redirected as appropriate.
http://seo-factor.com/404-reports-for-link-building/
I would also attempt to contact those sites and have them update the links to your site.
If they are broken because the linking site mis-coded something, again I would have your SEO contact them and see if you can't get them updated.
Are they just being dropped by the linking sites all together? Then I would definitely talk to your SEO and discuss what types of sites are dropping your links, why they may be doing so, and what other types of links you are getting.
I'm having a hard time thinking of a situation where the links built to your site would regularly drop, other than being paid for or in some sort of directory service. This isn't to say that there isn't a more "legitimate" reason, but I would talk with your SEO to get answers to those.
I also don't know about placing a KPI on that until you hammer out some of the finer points. Generally speaking we as SEOs don't always have power over third parties. At least, until I finally invent my 'SEO Brain Control' device. Odds are, your SEO has noticed already and should have some sort of plan. But we are a funny in that we sometimes assume that everyone knows all about this stuff and it's not a talking point.
Given my vague answers I'll give you a couple of scenarios and my opinions on them.
If you're getting bunches of links from low quality sites, and regularly seeing those links drop and new links added, then it's likely because those links are paid-for in some capacity. If that's the case, call your SEO and make sure they explain their plan, and the risks associated with buying links. Basically, poke and prod until you get answers (and ask many questions here for second opinions).
But if your SEO is helping you promote the awesome content created through your site, and building many quality links to your site. Then maybe those dropped links are because scraper blogs pick it up sometimes. This is in a way a sort of flattery. In that case your SEO might be totally kicking...you know. Just make sure they have in place methods to prevent/combat/make use of those scraper sites.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Internal Links - First Link Rule Confusion
Hello All - I would like to create a guide for my team of rules for internal links and I could use some help. My understanding is that Google only counts the first link to a page, so any crafted keyword text links within the content do not count if the page in question is linked to from the main navigation. Is this correct? For example, if the menu or drop down menu in main site nav (which exists on all pages of the site) includes a link to a particular section that will be the only one that ever counts since the menu is on every page? Example: let's say a website selling cat toys includes a drop down menu on the homepage with links to "holiday cat toys". Does this mean that no other text links in content on the site will support that page from an SEO perspective since the link is in the main nav and will always be the first one counted? In the past we have added text links in the content on the homepage to important pages on the site. It seems to work, though now I'm questing these tactics based on the first link rule. I would appreciate some advice, clarification, thoughts, etc. Thanks!
Link Building | | JBMediaGroup0 -
If i get link pointing to a specific page , will that link add up to the count of linking root domains too ?
If I create a fresh link pointing to specific page on my site, apart from adding a number to "page linking root domains" does it also add up to root domain linking ?
Link Building | | Techbate1 -
Link Exchange
Hi everyone, I just started working for a client in a new niche. After reviewing the backlink profiles of his competitors I can see that the top sites are using a ton of link exchanges. They are from really spammy sites too. The kind that will link to anyone that provides a link back. Anyone else seeing much of this?
Link Building | | SixTwoInteractive0 -
Domain name holding pages link back, good or bad?
We are a web design and hosting company http://www.spiralsites.com But when we register domains for clients, or they take email only or a name is parked we have it using a holding page which can be seen as follows: http://www.jcevents.co.uk/ is this a good thing? Bad thing? Could it would it should it benefit our rankings? Should we do more to make it look less like our main site and actually try to use it better to help rank our other services pages?
Link Building | | spiralsites0 -
Is link exchange a reliable source to get back links?
I read a latest post on seomoz that _“Do not buy or exchange link with anyone who contacts you. This is completely against Google's policies and if they were to find out, you could be penalized." So I went through Google's ''Link Schemes'' and found that ''Excessive link exchanging ("Link to me and I'll link to you")'' can negatively impact a site's ranking . _ So is it the ''excessive'' link exchanging that can cause a negative impact? Exchanging links with good quality, cached sites (without excessive doing) can do good or bad? Can anyone please explain to me in detail?
Link Building | | semvibe0 -
Editorial links
http://www.wired.com/culture/lifestyle/news/1999/01/17484 how do you get a link from an article like this where the author writes for a high domain authority site and just ends up listing a lot of links to different companies?
Link Building | | JohnWalker0 -
For a new site, does it matter which sites I get back links from first? I.e., are the first back links more important than later ones?
I've heard that when a site is new, the sources from which it gets its first back links are very important -- that the early links are more important for ranking than later links. Is this true. If so, what would be some good places to get these very first links? Thanks.
Link Building | | sigma3x0 -
Panda Update: Isn't a link still a link?
I was doing some link building and some SEO's said that the Panda update affected many websites. I am going to use eZineArticles.com as my example. EzineArticles was affected by the Panda update and does not show up in the SERPs as much as before. But they still have doFollow Links coming from the articles I am submitting. QUESTION: Regardless if EzineArticles was affected by the Panda Update, isn't a "Follow Link" still a "Follow Link" OR am I completely wasting my time on this devalued website? Edit: Yes I know a PR 0 page is not as valuable as a PR 9 page. I am asking from the standpoint of the affected Panda Update domains overall.
Link Building | | Francisco_Meza0