Social Media and its importance for organic ranking
-
Hi Community,
maybe this question hasn't to be answered directly, but can be answered with a link. I am sure the answer must be out there on the web...
I have a company, a companies website and a companies facebookpage. Now the question: What kind of user activity on my facebookpage is good for the organic ranking in google? Is it only good, when people click the "like"-Button on my homepage (which gives me a nofollow-backlink from facebook - unfortunatelly in most cases hidden for googles eyes)? Is it useful when I get a "like" directly on my facebookpage? Or is it the best to have a status on facebook that is shared very often?
Will Google see the connection between a shared facebook status and my website (of course the website is on the info page of my facebooks site...)?
I ask that because I wonder how (for example) a viral picture on facebook shared very often can helb my business.
Uuuuh, so, where's my answer on the web?
Thank you!
André -
I found this a few weeks ago, you may see this as proof you may not but thought I would share anyway.
http://searchengineland.com/what-social-signals-do-google-bing-really-count-55389
-
I have not seen any detailed information from Google on how they assess social media activity. (IF anybody knows of some please let us know.)
** (which gives me a nofollow-backlink from facebook - unfortunatelly in most cases hidden for googles eyes)..**
Google can see these. They are not supposed to give you pagerank benefit. Initially google was not counting these links in the denominator of the pagerank equation but then they decided to add them into the denominator and didn't say anything to anybody until after the fact. So, when Google says how they do something I use that information with great confidence for a very short time and aways suspect that they could have changed their mind.
If you think that getting likes on facebook is beneficial to your rankings (I think that).... then the most powerful thing that you can do is give visitors content that they will like.
-
I think this year it's v.v.v.v important to be active in G+ too once you have the icons set up as Robert suggested.
On G+ there's data that shows how the amount of circles you are in has much more of an effect on G's algo than the engagement from people with you in their circles (+1s on posts) etc (Sort of the opposite to FB/TW)
-
Andre,
Don't know what type of business you have or website, but for me I think the most important indicator is the social icons on a site. We put Twitter, FB like, FB Share, and G+1 on almost all pages of all sites. Our experience is that as we watch people tweet, +1, and like or share a page it does improve the ranking over time.
We have clients who come in adamant about a branded FB page, etc. and unless they are really into branding, we do not push on that piece. Yes, have a reasonable page, but get the icons on first.
As to the viral picture shared often I think it does help, but have no empirical data on that. My suggestion is to have a link to the site where they can do something with the picture. Remember to have the icons there as well.
Hope it helps,
PS Please support open source developers - contribute to those whose tools you use.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google Indexed Images: Website Vs Social Media
I use Pinterest, Twitter and Instagram to post images that are already featured on my website. I have been following a routine of uploading the images to these social media platforms only after I can see Google has indexed the image from my original site. My website is ecommerce and the product images drive sales more than any other factor. The thinking behind my method was that when these images are posted on Pinterest, Twitter and the various Instagram crawler sites (I realise Instagram images aren’t indexed directly), Google would recognise that the image was already attributed to my website. The ‘duplicate’ image would not therefore be indexed and the originally uploaded website image would remain in ‘Google Images’. After completing various searches and reviewing other Q&A’s on Moz, it seems as though this is in no way guaranteed and images reposted on social media platforms may still replace the already indexed image from the website. I am assuming this is because Google views these platforms as more authoritative than mine. I usually change the image by adding logos, text, backgrounds, borders etc before posting on Pinterest and this seems to have worked most of the time (both the original and ‘amended for Pinterest’ versions are often indexed) but images posted on other platforms are usually identical. Does it make sense to continue with my method or am I shooting myself in the foot by reposting these images on social media at all? I obviously want customers searching for products, who then click on an image, to be directed to my site rather than one of my social media pages or worse, an image reposting site. Additionally, If I post images on social media before they are uploaded to my website (for example to tease a product launch), would Google likely class these images as the ‘original’ and therefore be less likely to index the website version of the image once it is uploaded? Any thoughts are appreciated.
Social Media | | g3mmab2 -
Manual submission vs automated submission to social bookmarking sites for blog posts
Howdy Mozzers! Say we're creating great content on our blog and would like this content to be seen and shared by as many people possible. Should we submit our blog posts manually to social book marking sites or use an automated service like Only Wire? The advantage of using automation is obvious, saves time on submission. Are there disadvantages? Is google bot going to raise an eyebrow and give us a dirty look? Cheers! MozAddict
Social Media | | MozAddict0 -
Can I change URL structure and maintain social signals?
I have recently updated an area of our website that had lots of content and some great social signals such as tweets, pins and facebook likes. The URL structure has changed and URLs have been redirected, but I'm wondering if we have now lost all the social signals? No pins, likes etc show on lots of popular content since the URLs have changed. Is there any way to preserve these or are they lost forever? Thanks in advance
Social Media | | BeadsDirect0 -
Do bitly and owly shares on social media help out my site for SEO?
Hi Mozzers, Do shortened URLs, such as bitly and owly help out my website in terms of SEO? I know they will help in terms of referral traffic from people clicking on the URLs, but how about increasing DA, PA, etc.? Thanks!
Social Media | | Travis-W0 -
Importance of Links and Social
I am putting together a presentation for my managers about why link building and social media is important for SEO so that we can get more resources allocated to these areas. Does anyone have advice/links of convincing arguments for me to include? Thanks!
Social Media | | theLotter0 -
Social media and google
Do you need exact url brand match to get the benefits of social media noise in the google organic rankings? EG: twitter.com/brandname facebook.com/brandname my url extensions have my brnad but other words in, if i get noise does my website stil benefit in the rankings because it has the url in the profile? or do i need exact match in the url?
Social Media | | pauledwards0 -
Is using a platform to automatically cross post on the social bookmarking websites good or bad for SEO?
Is using a platform to automatically cross post on the social bookmarking websites good or bad for SEO?
Social Media | | Melia0 -
Custom Social Media icons: Good or bad?
Hi guys, In our never-ending search for better SEO strategies and results, our journey has led us to question the idea of creating custom social media icons for our site. We are wondering if anyone has had experience, either negative or positive, by using these icons, or if there is no difference at all? I would like to make it clear that we are only thinking about customizing the icons that lead to our Facebook page, Twitter profile, YouTube channel, etc. NOT the like/share/tweet/etc buttons. We understand the negative effects in changing those icons, but are interested in knowing if creating general icons that match our design will be a good or bad thing. Any replies are appreciated, thanks!
Social Media | | jid0