Can fun, slightly unprofessional text be good for conversion rates?
-
I operate on a freemium model. The three plans are currently called "Free", "Gold" and "Platinum". Besides being incredibly square and boring, these titles are also meaningless.
I'm doing a slight redesign of my site, and the new (unreleased) site has a very fun, playful feel. I'm also trying to make everything more streamlined and obvious. I'm considering renaming the three plans "Boring Amateur", "Kick-Ass Amateur" and "Bona Fide Professional" on the registration page and simply "Boring", "Kick-Ass" and "Professional" elsewhere. There are lots of places on the site where I have to refer to "amateurs" vs "professionals" - these tags would make that easier to explain. Easier = more sales.
What do you think about using unprofessional text like this? Is it too risky, possibly offending too many people and losing sales? Or is it a good eye-catcher?
I know the best answer is "test it." But this is one of those changes that I don't want to have to put my users through too many times.
Thanks for any thoughts!
-
Here's my two cents. I run two web sites offering the same service, one in the UK and one in Italy. One of the qualities most people remember me by from what I heard (and what I've been told) is my sense of humour.
Last year I decided to incorporate this in my two sites and the results could NOT have been more contradictory. The UK market seemed to respond better to my naming the services and membership statuses in a humorous manner than their italian counterparts. I actually lost two Italian clients because they took offence to having their membership status as 'Principianti' which in essence means newbies.
I want to add that there was no rudeness in the humour employed by either site, I simply did away with any formality.
Result: Perhaps some A/B testing would have been clever in hindsight but ultimately what I lost with this experiment I more than made up for in clients with a sense of humour!
-
Good point on keeping it industry-related.
"High School", "College", and "Pro" would be the obvious, safe choice.
I'm going for something closer to "Little Leaguer", "College Superstar", "Professional". I just have to figure out how to say it in a compact, memorable way.
-
If it is a sports related site then there are tons of different terms you can bring to bear on the matter! Sounds fun.
-
Maybe name it "Toe in Water", "River " and "Niagra Falls"
or
Mild Sauce, Medium Sauce and Hot Sauce (with flames)
Boring seems a little too risky..for the little guys getting their foot in the water. I am not sure but SEOmoz has me hooked to sign up however they did it. lol I start my paid subscription tomorrow and even though I now I am not a "PRO" it makes me feel good that I am moving in the right direction. So you have to look at the pre-sale and the post-sale. After a person buys something you don't want them having buyers remorse and feel "Boring". Again just thoughts but maybe your campaign would attract a different audience with more cash.
-
I would make it fun but keep them related to your sports industry.
-
Yes, I usually take on every project with a different criteria. Depending how important this project is for you, it's probably better you play it safe. Let's take SEOMOZ for instance, which has different names for user levels and they sound professional and fun at the same time. I would tighten it up in this way by balancing between professional and fun.
-
Haha. While that might work, I'm also thinking of making the change for ease-of-use purposes. The new names, with "amateur" and "professional" already built into the names, saves me from having to include a lot of unnecessary text elsewhere on the site.
-
Free-user conversion is really important for us because the data provided by the free users is what powers the paid memberships. Without free users we have nothing to sell.
It's hard to explain in text how I want the word "boring" to be construed. And that's my fear.
-
Looking at your site, I think you could get away with a lot.
I would be tempted to do something like:
"Girly Man Plan", then "Real Man Plan", then "Manly Man Plan" or whatever.
You would of course alienate the women, but I am guessing there are not too many there in your line of business.
Good Luck.
-
I totally agree and that' why I clearly stated that it may decrease the conversions :). I was just suggesting what I would do. I guess I'm a little bit more of a risk taker
-
Smashing Magazine has a good article on price plans (granted its not about price plan names) but I thought it might be of benefit to you.
http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2008/10/13/pricing-tables-showcase-examples-and-best-practices/
-
Good points. The audience is mainly 18-35 year old males. That being said, there are also a fair number of 45-55 year olds.
I suppose there is a lot of wiggle room between "Gold" and "Kick-Ass". Maybe I'll try to tone it down slightly while still being playful.
-
With things like this, you can't let you personal persona dictate what you do. What you want and what your target audience want could be two separate things entirely. This is why I said you need to take your target audience into account.
-
You need to know what to say and how to say it when using coloquioal (unprofessional) text on a website.
I agree with stubby MailChimp does it very well but I think their branding has helped them get away with it. They use a chimp, and as we all know chimps can be mischievous animals so maybe this visual cue gives them a bit more flexibility with the wording on their website.
They are still a professional company and they do supplement the humour and 'banter' (for use of a better word) with page upon page of useful and professional information. If used sparingly and used well you can get away with it and I think it can benefit conversion rates.
In terms of the plan names you might want to think of your target audience before using words like, "kick ass" but food for thought. If you website is targeting young adults then I'd say Kick Ass is acceptable, if you're targeting the middle-aged / elderly then I'd suggest avoiding it.
-
The whole point of a freemium model is to get lots of free users to eventually convert into buying members. Although, I totally like the new names for your plans, it may decrease the conversions due to the fact some people are big babies and may get offended if you call them boring. Personally, I would go for it because I like to be bold and take the risk.
-
I tend to like it. MailChimp does it very well (mostly after you sign up). SeoMoz does it a some, but not as well as Mailchimp.
I might cringe at "boring", but in general I would say it engages people just a hair so they know you are real.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
When to determine that a change DIDN'T affect conversion rates
Hi everyone, Description of test: We're a lead gen site trying to add more value by providing users with real, live quotes after they submit a lead. However, we don't want showing the quotes to tank our lead conversion rates. So we're running a test where 50% of leads see quote results and 50% don't, and we compare the lead conversion rates for each. The best possible outcome is to show that showing the quotes DIDN'T negatively affect conversion rates. My issue: When do we conclude the test? In the end, we're hoping to see that the change didn't cause a statistically significant difference between the control and version B, which is the opposite of every other test I've ever run. So, at what point do we conclude that the changes in version B didn't have a significant effect on lead conversions? Currently the control is doing 5% better than the variation with a p-value of .379
Conversion Rate Optimization | | ted-zarceczny0 -
Vat conversion rates (UK)
Does anyone have any evidence about the impact of displaying or not displaying prices including VAT on your website on conversions? A client wants to show prices excluding VAT so the prices look competitive with their competition who also display excluding VAT (20% UK sales tax). I have explained that the sudden 20% increase to the basket cost will put off a lot of customers (even if all prices are marked as excluding tax) but they will not listen. We have previously displayed both prices but this looked messy and customers got confused. What I really need is some research that shows what the impact of doing this is (ignoring the fact that it is not even allowed by HMRC). Any thoughts welcome!
Conversion Rate Optimization | | MrFrisbee0 -
Is putting an email address in the page title a good idea?
As our Contact Us page title was a little short I added in sales@example.com So "Contact us : Sales@example.com" We don't get a lot of spam and it hasn't noticeable increased since we did this. Tynt suggests that a reasonable number of people have copied and pasted the email - presumably to contact us Is it worth experimenting with further or a waste of time?
Conversion Rate Optimization | | Zippy-Bungle1 -
Please Settle a Bounce Rate Debate
Here's the Question: If a person clicks a PPC ad and hits the landing page, and the landing page has a form to fill out embedded in it without having to click, does that count as a bounce if the person leaves the page immediately after filling out and submitting the form or does the submission negate the bounce tally? Hope this makes sense and thanks in advance.
Conversion Rate Optimization | | jesse-landry0 -
Can someone recommend a guide to getting started with Rich Snippets?
It's a bit tough to find info about getting started with Rich Snippets and how to start associating that information with the website. I'd appreciate some links to guides on how to get started, followed by how to get good at it. Thank You All in advance
Conversion Rate Optimization | | HMCOE0 -
How to track PPC conversions?
I use both adwords and Microsoft Adcenter. I am looking to be able to track my conversions from each PPC site. I do not have a "Thank You" or "Check Out" page that I can tag because any sales that I make are through clicks on a link that goes offsite to an affiliate company that I receive commission from. However, the link on my site is a "Buy Now" button, so to get some idea of which source is giving me better conversions I'd like to know whether adcenter or adwords is sending more people that end up clicking this link. Canb anyone suggest a way or a program to set up in this manner? Thanks in advance for your help!
Conversion Rate Optimization | | VictorVC0 -
How can I Monetize My Site with The Type of Traffic it Receives?
I was just in here yesterday asking a question, so I appreciate everyone's patience with this newbie! This is a totally different site that I have a question about so here goes: I have a site that has started to receive large amounts of traffic from an image search. My intention was to use Amazon for products based on my website theme. I haven't been getting traffic from my intended keywords. Now I rank #2 for an image search, loads of traffic! GREAT! But what next? These ppl. aren't looking to buy stuff, they just want the image. Fine, it is a public domain image. I thought of adding some more informational articles and using adsense to bring in some cash. Any opinions on the best way to go with this site? I only have 3 articles up so it could go in any direction from here. Thanks!!!
Conversion Rate Optimization | | iheartkelby0 -
What is a good closing ratio? I am at 32%
I have a client I landed about 1 1/2 months ago. The only traffic coming to the site is from Google Adwords. The goal page is the "Get A Quote" page and the closing ratio is 32.4%. So about 1 in 3 visits fill out the quote form. I usually do eCommerce and I am used to seeing 2-3% goal conversions. But 32.4%???? Is that normal for a regular static site (non-ecommerce). It's been like that for a whole week! Should I toot my own horn here?
Conversion Rate Optimization | | Francisco_Meza0