Google.co.uk & Google.com difference of ranking
-
How can our website rank on page 3 in google.co.uk and yet it ranks on page 20 for the same keyword on google.com?
This doesn't seem to affect our competitors though and its only our site that is being affected/penalized.
-
For technical signals they'd have to remove any UK signals by replacing with US or neutral. Like hosting location (US) or Webmaster Tools' geographic target setting (Unlisted).
For content signals, agree: keep what already exists with possibly some revisions and/or build additional content that refers to the global nature of the business and the markets being served. Maybe home page copy that talks about "serving clients world-wide". Pages like "Top 5 Reasons Californians Visit Blackpool", and all that kind of thing indicating the page is relevant to Californians.
-
Instead of removing UK ranking signals, would it not be better to add some US ranking signals in addition - in an effort to rank for both .co.uk and .com?
-
I see this happening in Canada. Even though in reality your business, like many in Canada, is serving a global market, Google suddenly decides your website is primarily relevant for one of the non-US English speaking markets, and so knocks it back on .com while leaving it alone on .ca (or .uk or ..au.).
My strategy would be to remove as many signals as possible that would make them think you're only serving the UK.
There can be a problem with this approach: hopefully not in your case but there may be a period where the non-.com ranking suffers as a result. I had a situation where I had a clear choice between ranking page 1 on .ca .uk .au while page 10 on .com - or on page 2 for all. Webmaster tools market setting could be flipped back and forth at will to cause either state. The only way out was to set it at page 2 for everywhere and do everything else to get back on 1 - took time and we had to accept the page 2 .ca etc ranking meanwhile.
-
We used to get good traffic from both google.co.uk and google.com as some mobile devices are set to use google.com by default and its still showing the correct listings for all other sites which rank in the uk search in google.com so its more curiosity as to why we were being penalized.
The other point is our not wanting to miss out on foreign visitors who are looking for hotels in Blackpool as it is a tourist hotspot so to speak.
We're clearing cache and checking in incognito browsers to check rankings and to add to the mystery some visitors (depending on isp's) see the sites on page 1.
Thanks for the offer of checking rankings, we have this covered.
-
Out of interest why do you want to rank on google.com if you are targeting "blackpool hotels" are you getting a lot of US clients?
I would of thought it would be mainly UK searchers you're looking to target?
Also have you tried using SEO Moz's ranking checker to confirm a US search position? (It could be google personalising your search).
If you PM me your domain and keyword ill check for you.
-
Pre-penguin we had 2 sites which dominated the Google search for "blackpool hotels" and hundreds of variations. The sites are beginning to perform again for the longer keywords and most are returning to page 1. The money term, so to speak, is "blackpool hotels" as it gets over 27,000 searches in google per month.
One of our main competitors had/has a much worse linking profile than us and they jumped back into page 1. They hold less content for their clients than we do too. With the content of our competitors and ourselves being related to the UK no overseas office are in play.
Geographically our servers are located in the US, simply down to budget at this time. The links we have were never paid for and we've never really launched any campaigns down to our content being so good.
Neither site has any duplication of its content on other domain names (this was removed in May) and all duplicate content was redirected to the main or given canonical meta info.
Rankings were always top 5 in both google.com and google.co.uk pre-penguin.
All the rankings in Bing and Yahoo have been unaffected with the post-penguin changes we've made which does point out the links we had were poor to begin with.
Does this all sound like its to do with old links from duplicate sites still playing a part?
-
There's lots of factors at play here - for example, what are you competitors backlink profiles like? Are they getting links from the US / World wide? How does this compare to your backlink profile.
What about citations, (reputable) directory listings? How about on-page references to over-seas offices etc. Do you have projects/services targeted at these markets? Where are their sites hosted?
How are they ranking for other keywords, particularly geographically relevant terms? Can you identify what your competitors are doing that you aren't?
You mention that you had to remove content to get back the .co.uk rankings. I take it your trying to recover from penguin?
Have the ranking on google.com always been this way though (even before you were penalised?)
It's hard to be more specific without details of the site/keyword(s) in question.
-
Its a good point you make, but all the sites ranking in the top 4 pages remain the same in google.com search for the same keyphrase that rank in google.co.uk - all apart from our site(s) which seem to be penalized.
Would this be down to a difference in algorithms on differing google servers? Could some be seeing content we've removed to get back the .co.uk rankings?
-
Generally speaking it's a lot harder to rank on google.com than it is for a geo location like google.co.uk - perhaps you are sending stronger signals to google that you are a uk based company?
FYI if you are only trying to rank in the UK then anyone going to google.com gets redirected to .co.uk any way.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Time For New Website To Rank?
We've been working on a site for the past couple months and going to be launching in a couple weeks. How long does it take for Google to establish a "stabilized" ranking for the site and various pages? The main homepage will have its targeted keywords and each product page will have its own targeted keywords. We have about 100 total pages for the site. I know rankings may fluctuate initially but trying to get an idea of when the rankings are stabilized before we start working on the ongoing SEO like earning backlinks, changing on-page optimization, etc to be able to track changes in rankings over time.
Reporting & Analytics | | vikasnwu0 -
Referral issue in Google analytics
We have an eCommerce website that counts paypal as a referral source in Analytics. The site takes people to Paypal to make a payment and then back to the website to a Thank You page once that payment has been made. Due to this, Analytics sees this as a conversion that has come from Paypal, and also records it as a referral source, when we know this is not really the case. This also distorts the data in analytics and prohibits us from clearly seeing which channels sales have come from. Is there anyway in Analytics to include Paypal as a part of the website so that it does not record Paypal as a separate referral website?
Reporting & Analytics | | Gavo0 -
Google News Bug
During today and yesterday we are getting a lot of visits (Over 400) from http://news.google.com the visits are all at the same time and to different pages, the visits are very brief so much so that it pushes our bounce rate up to 69% in GA. Is there anything we can do to stop this? Thank you in advance?
Reporting & Analytics | | Palmbourne0 -
Google Direct Traffic Reporting for Mobile on Analytics
We noticed a significant drop in our direct traffic in Google Analytics for mobile on July 30th but all our other traffic remains the same. What is the possible cause of this?
Reporting & Analytics | | COEDMediaGroup0 -
Google Analytics Not Tracking 100% of Visits?
Hi all, We're having an issue with Analytics where we are getting different figures from what Silver Pop are saying. For example email campaign A sent via Silver Pop, with Google Analytics tracking code show's 50 unique clicks in Silver Pop. Looking at Google Analytics there are only 10 visits from that campaign. So I thought it could be something with the tracking, but there wasn't a significant rise in web visits = either Google Analytics is not recording visits properly or Silver Pop figures are wrong. I'm more inclined to think that it's something to do with Google Analytics. Has anyone come across something similar? Where one system is showing you X amount of visits but the figures on Google Analytics don't add up? A few quick things already covered: Double checked the links have been tracked properly, but this doesn't explain the low increase in web visits generally We've double checked that Google Analytics tracking code is properly installed (and it is / was at the time of send). Any help would be much appreciated! Thanks guys.
Reporting & Analytics | | RKHStaff1 -
Google Analytics Not Working
I added the code before tag but still google not showing it is installed. Status: Tracking Not Installed Last checked: Mar 15, 2013 10:38:10 PM PDT Can someone check my domain - www.plugnbuy.com
Reporting & Analytics | | chandubaba0 -
My Google Webmaster Search Queries are 0??!!
For the past 2 days Google Webmaster has recorded 0 search queries to my site, but traffic seems stable. Any ideas about why this is happening and what I should do about it? Or is it a Google glitch I should not be concerned about (hoping for this option)
Reporting & Analytics | | theLotter0 -
Do Google penalise you for having too many 404's?
Hi There I have been doing some work reducing the number of 404's displayed in the Crawl Errors found in Googles Webmaster Tools. We had a lot of products that were no longer available so have now been removed to reduce the number of 404s that had been found. However, there are a number of URLs that have been crawled that do not exist on our website and have been flagged in the list of Crawl Errors. I want to know if Google will penalise us for this, perhaps affecting our quality score or if they can see that this is something out of our control. This site for example: http://sibd.com/com_offers_unique_gifts.html has generated a lot of truncated URLs on its site that link to pages that don't exist on our site: http://www.arenaflowers.com/flowers/pri… That is the exact link that it is trying to locate. Here is the report for that particular link. As you can see the content has been scraped by other sites which has spread the problem further. Pages that link to http://www.arenaflowers.com/flowers/pri.. URL Discovery Date
Reporting & Analytics | | ArenaFlowers.com
http://www.justsearchit.com.au/for_flowers_offers,3.html
Sep 12, 2011
http://sibd.com/offers_unique_gifts_for.html
Sep 11, 2011
http://sibd.com/offers_unique_gifts.html
Sep 11, 2011
http://sibd.com/com_offers_unique_gifts_for.html
Sep 11, 2011
http://www.flexfinder.com/flowers_offers_unique_gifts.html
Sep 10, 2011
http://sibd.com/offers_unique_gifts_with.html
Sep 10, 2011
http://sibd.com/com_offers_unique_gifts.html
Sep 10, 2011
http://sibd.com/of_flowers_offers_from.html
Sep 9, 2011
http://arama.frmpc.com/for_flowers_for_less_ltd_includes.html
Sep 9, 2011
http://arama.frmpc.com/flowers_for_less_than_do.html
Sep 9, 2011 I have spotted a lot of these and currently have around 3.3K 404s in total, a majority are from sites we don't control. Is there an acceptable number of 404s a site should aim for and is the above something we should address or are Google smart enough to work out that we can't fix this ourselves? Thanks! Sam.0