If Google doesn’t know we’re hosted in the UK, does that affect our SERPs?
-
Hi,
In November 2011 our eCommerce website dropped from between 3rd and 4th position in the UK SERPs down to 7th and 8th. A year after this happened, we still haven’t moved back up to the original ranking despite all our best efforts and we’re looking for a bit of insight into what could have happened. One of our theories is this, do you think it might be the problem?
In October 2011 we moved from a single-site custom built CMS hosted in the UK to a multi-site custom built CMS hosted on a much better server based in the UK. As part of this move we started using CloudFlare to help with security and performance (CloudFlare is a security CDN). Because CloudFlare’s servers are in the US, to the outside world it almost looks like we went from a slow hosting company in the UK to a much quicker hosting company in the US.
Could this have affected our rankings? We know that Google takes the server IP address into account as a ranking factor, but as far as we understand it’s because they (rightly) believe that a server closer to the user will perform better. So a UK server will serve up pages quicker to a visitor in the UK than a US server because the data has a shorter distance to travel.
However, we’re definitely not experiencing an issue with being recognised as a UK website. We have a .co.uk domain (which is obviously a big indicator) and if you click on “Pages from the UK” in the SERPs we jump up to 3rd place. So Google seems to know we’re a UK site.
Is the fact we’re using CloudFlare and hence hiding our real server IP address – is this penalising us in the SERPs?
Currently out of the 6 websites above us, 4 are in the US and 2 are in the UK. All of these are massive sites with lots of links, so smaller ranking factors might be more important for us. Obviously the big downside of not using CloudFlare is that our site becomes much less secure and it becomes much slower. Images and some static content is distributed via a local CloudFlare server, which means it should tick Google’s box in terms of providing a quick site for users.
CloudFlare say in a blog post that they used to have Google crawl rates and geo-tagging issues in the past when they were just starting out, but in 2010 they started working with “the big search engines” to make sure they treated CloudFlare like a CDN (so special rules that apply to Akamai also apply to CloudFlare). Since they’ve been working with Google, CloudFlare say that their customers will only see a positive SEO impact.
So at the moment we’re at a loss about what happened to our ranking. Google say they take IP’s into account for ranking, but by using CloudFlare it looks like we’re in the US. We definitely know we’re not having geo-tagging issues and CloudFlare say they’re working with Google to ensure its customers aren't seeing a negative impact by using CloudFlare, but a niggling part of us still wonders whether it could impact our SEO.
Many thanks, James
-
Hi Des, Thanks, I didn’t know that’s why we were assigned a “special crawl rate” in WMT. Could the special crawl affect our ranking? For example Google puts a lot of weight on freshness, so if Google is crawling us less (we can’t tell if it’s more or less than before), could this make our site look less fresh? We have really tried our best to rule out all other possibilities. Our content is much better and more frequent than it was before and our link building is natural and gradual. We’ve also looked at over optimisation and our competitors. Our competitors are Wikipedia, a couple of national UK newspapers, Harvard, a medical encyclopaedia and a single American competitor. We’re the first UK company to appear the in the SERPs. Whilst these are obviously very big companies, none of them (with the exception of the American company) targets the keyword as much as our website does. Incidentally we did come back up to 4th yesterday but we’ve already a dropped a place today so it doesn’t look like it’ll last. The other thing we found really strange is that the singular version of our keyword didn’t drop at all and has stayed very stable; it’s just in the plural keyword that we dropped. The vast majority of our anchor text is using the plural version (it’s in our brand name) and the domain also contains the plural version. Was there an algorithm change around that time, or maybe are we over optimising the plural keyword? (Is that even possible?) Thanks James
-
Hi SEO5, Thanks for your response. I had come across that forum post before, which incidentally led me to CloudFlare's article about how they work with Google. Maybe I wasn't being explicit enough in my question. We definitely know that Google prefers a faster website and that they have special rules for CDN's. So just to clarify, we were just wondering if there is any way that could using CloudFlare (and therefore not making it clear we’re hosted in the UK) negatively affect our rankings? We’re specifically looking at the UK SERPs ,rather than the US SERPs. Also could you clarify with what you mean with server change? The new server is faster and more reliable, but are there other factors than server speed and server location that Google take into account? We’ve also looked at over optimisation and our competitors. Our competitors are Wikipedia, a couple of national UK newspapers, Harvard and a medical encyclopaedia and a single American competitor. We’re the first UK company to appear the in the SERPs. Whilst these are obviously very big companies, none of them (with the exception of the American company) targetx the keyword as much as our website does. Thanks, James
-
1. Cloud flare is a distributed service with edge servers in many countries around the world. These servers will send your website content from the edge. Users in the uk will most likely be served from a uk server. 2. Google is well clued up on cloud flare and will as you said know that it is dealing with a cdn. Hence in webmaster tools you will not be able to adjust the google crawl rate. 3. In google webmaster tools you can set your desire location, tld that you are targeting. In your case .co.uk. This will tell google I am interested in .co.uk based queries. 4. You should not rule out other possibilities. As sherlock says "when you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth? "
-
Hi James,
The loss of ranking could be attributed to various factors:
- Over optimization penalty
- The changing of the servers
- Competitors outranking you with more quality and aggressive SEO
If you do have a co.uk domain then the changing of hosting from the US to UK could have impacted the rankings.
Here's a link to a discussion on Cloud fare's impact on SEO.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Fred Google Update & Ecommerce Sites
Hi I've seen a couple areas of our site drop in average rankings for some areas since the 'Fred' update. We don't have ads on our site, but I'm wondering if it's 'thin' content - http://www.key.co.uk/en/key/ We are an ecommerce site and we have some content on our category pages - which is a bit more generic about the section/products within that section - but how can it not be if it's a category page with products on? I am working on adding topic based content/user guides etc to be more helpful for customers, but I'd love some advice on generating traffic to category pages. Is it better to rank these other topic/user guide pages instead of the category page & then hope the customer clicks through to products? Advice welcome 🙂
Algorithm Updates | | BeckyKey0 -
Google October 2015 Algorithm Update?
According to Accuranker (https://www.accuranker.com/blog/google-october-2015-algorithm-update/), "Google has made some big changes to their algorithm". Other than that one article, I haven't noticed or even heard of any considerable fluctuations. Even Mozcast is looking pretty normal today. Has anyone noticed anything or have any other sources on this? If so, any ideas on what this update seems to be targeting?
Algorithm Updates | | Silkstream0 -
How Additional Characters and Numbers in URL affect SEO
Hi fellow SEOmozers, I noticed that a lot of websites have additional characters and words at the end of the URL in addition keyword optimized URL. Mostly for E-Commerce sites For example: www.yoursite.com/category/keyword?id=12345&Keyword--Category--cm_jdkfls_dklj or wwww.yoursite.com/category/keyword#83939=-37292 My question is how does the additional characters or parameters(not necessarily tracking parameters) affect SEO? Does it matter if i have additional keywords in the additional stuff in the URL (1st url example)? If you can provide more information, that would be helpful. Thank you!
Algorithm Updates | | TommyTan0 -
My Website No Longer Appears in Mobile Google Search but Does in Desktop...Why Is This?
For a long time my website has appeared in both desktop and mobile search in Google. Yet recently it has stopped appearing in mobile yet still on desktop. Any ideas why this is happening and how to rectify it please? Many Thanks.
Algorithm Updates | | WSIDW0 -
Test site is live on Google but it duplicates existing site...
Hello - my developer has just put a test site up on Google which duplicates my existing site (main url is www.mydomain.com and he's put it up on www.mydomain.com/test/ "...I’ve added /test/ to the disallowed urls in robots.txt" is how he put it. So all the site URLs are content replicated and live on Google with /test/ added so he can block them in robots. In all other ways the test site duplicates all content, etc (until I get around to making some tweaks next week, that is). Is this a bad idea or should I be OK. Last thing I want is a duplicate content or some other Google penalty just because I'm tweaking an existing website! Thanks in advance, Luke
Algorithm Updates | | McTaggart0 -
Google "In-Depth Article" Question
Google started featuring "In-Depth Articles" a few days ago. You can read about them here and here. I have two questions about them... If you already hold a great position in the SERPs. Let's say your existing article ranks at #2 or #3. If that article becomes one of the "In-Depth Articles", will it disappear from the #2 or #3 position? I have lots of content that I could mark as an In-Depth Article, but I don't want to do that if it will pull me out of a hard-earned SERP position. Has anyone seen "In-Depth Articles" that do not have the Schema markup? Thanks!
Algorithm Updates | | EGOL1 -
Google and Wikipedia
Ok, I love Wikipedia as much as the next guy but the amount of weight that google puts on this site is getting crazy. My search terms that I am going after are "speakers" and "loudspeakers" Can somebody tell me why wikipedia needs the top 8 -10 spots for those terms? is that really a good search result for users of google? More of a rant then a question I know. I just needed to get that off my chest!.
Algorithm Updates | | kevin48030 -
Do you believe CTR affects rankings
As you know, Google tracks CTR on keywords for your website visible through google Webmaster Tools. How much if at all do you believe this affects your rankings on the tracked keywords?
Algorithm Updates | | TheGrid0