Are tags important for SEO?
-
I just installed a plugin called SEO content control and it is telling me I need to write descriptions for my tags. I haven't been using tags although I did create a list of them. I don't have an endless amount of time on my hands so is this a worthwhile task?
-
Hey there - I'm going to weigh in and just concur basically with Paul. Also just like to add a link to the wordpress resource post I did on Moz which breaks down a lot of the distinctions between tags and categories. Hope that helps too.
-
Ok I did click noindex tag pages in my metarobots tags. I have to figure out how to use my robots.txt file. Thanks again!
-
Short answer - absolutely yes. If you can't make them provide a clear benefit to your visitors, don't use 'em.
Longer answer - still yes, but if you have enabled them but haven't used them at all up until now, you can also block crawling them in your robots.txt file (You'd also want to have the tag pages include a no-index metarobots tag in their headers, just in case)
Doing this would tell the search engines not to even waste their time trying to find the tag pages in the first place.
Paul
-
Wow - thanks for all that info. I appreciate it. One quick question - can I forget tags altogether - and noindex them? I don't feel any need to use them on my site.
-
I'm going to have to offer a different opinion than Chad, njam. There's nothing about tags that is intrinsically beneficial for SEO, and in fact misusing them can cause considerable SEO problems.
Bottom line, the primary purpose of tags is as an additional navigation tool for your visitors, and must be carefully implemented so not to damage your site's SEO. There's nothing magic about a tag - it's a link to your content organized in different ways
Tags are part of what's called your site's taxonomy - i.e. how it organizes its information. Tags allow the visitor to get listings of your existing content grouped by different topics - much like categories do, but on a more granular scale. And there's the kicker - tag listings are just your regular content, but grouped differently.
Because they're the same content as exists elsewhere on the site, they can easily be seen as duplicate content by the search engines, leading to a dilution of the ranking power of the actual posts. (This issue can also occur with category listings if they're not handled correctly, which is why you're already no-indexing them).
Most WordPress SEO specialists actually recommend that tag pages be no-indexed - a command that tells the search engines to not even include them in search results as they can so easily confuse the search engines about which version of your site's content is most important.
So... use tags on a website if you think they will significantly add to the visitors' ability to understand and navigate your site. Then, make sure you've taken steps to ensure they don't confuse the search engines.
Do NOT use tags just because they're available. If you don't have a clear strategy for using them, don't clutter your site with them.
If you want an idea of how tags fit into a taxonomy, here's a real-work analogy:
Think of your blog as a book on raising kids, for example. The book would have a bunch of separate chapters on things like childbirth, schooling and education, care and feeding, discipline, family finances - you get the drift.
These are the equivalent to your blog's categories - broad topics that would allow someone to pick up your book and leaf through it, immediately understanding what the book's about, and enabling them to read just the sections that apply to them.
In the back of the book is the index. It's full of words and phrases that you have used a couple times in the book, but aren't topics that deserve a whole chapter (category). These are the equivalent of your tags. For example, perhaps you mention peanut butter in the care & feeding chapter. Later, you also mention in the schooling chapter that parents shouldn't send peanut butter sandwiches in kids' lunches because of the allergy risk to others. In addition, you mention PB in passing in the finance chapter as a cheap source of protein for kids meals.
Obviously there'd be no point in having a whole chapter (category) on peanut butter, but a reader might find it useful to have the index (tags) at the back of the book show them all the places in your book you've mentioned peanut butter.
That's a bit of a facetious example, but hopefully it gives you an idea of the different uses? If not, lemme know and I'll try to clarify further. Just remember, there's nothing magic about tags for SEO and they in fact carry some risk. They are for human visitors. If the visitors don't find them useful, they shouldn't be there.
Paul
-
Ah. I had no idea tags helped with search engines. Thanks!
-
Categories help your posts get found within a website while the tags help your post get found on the search engines. My assumption is that you are using WordPress. ( For example: I run a blog on real estate investing. There are several categories to choose from inside of the WordPress website.I want people who are highly interested in reading about the niche subject of real estate investing to read my post so, I type in the categories, " investing" " real estate." This helps the visitors who are apart of the WordPress community and are interested in real estate investing find my blog. What the tags do is help people who go to Google and type in " real estate investing blogs" find my blog. This is the difference as I understand it. The good thing is that you will only have to type your tags once. Once they are in the system, it just a matter typing a few letters before it pops up.
-
Interesting. So how are tags different than categories? I already categorize all my posts and they're usually in several categories. I have category pages noindexed which was advised here on this forum.
-
No, the descriptive tags helped my blog posts get noticed and it better optimized my post for the search engines. I know that it is a pain starting out but I can say that I could tell a difference in the posts that had tags and the posts that did not.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Product Descriptions (SEO)
So I would like a few opinions. How long should a product description be? Enough to get the point across? 100 words? 800 words? Over detailed? Any advice would be appreciated.
On-Page Optimization | | mattl990 -
Is Wix still terrible for SEO?
In Australia, I hear it over and over again that Wix is literally the worst site builder you can use due to it's poor site build for SEO. Has anyone here got some tangible reasons for why this is? As I am constantly getting asked this by clients who are using Wix and want me to help with their SEO.
On-Page Optimization | | UndergrndMarketing0 -
Adding Location to Title Tags has dropped SEO Rankings
After adding the suburb of my business to each title tag on my website, I've noticed their rankings have dropped from page one to page four in a lot of cases. Should I wait it out and expect to see them improve in the future? Should I revert them back to their old title tags? I'm a little concerned!
On-Page Optimization | | thomaslutrov0 -
301 Redirect and SEO Rankings
I recently restructured my webpage URL's (about 300 ~ 75% of my total website) to make the URL paths more SEO friendly. Within a few hours of restructuring the pages, I did a 301 redirect to my old URL's and pointed them to the new pages. I have seen ~ 50% drop in organic traffic. I started the restructuring exercise 14 days ago and finished it a few hours back. I have 3 questions: How long will it take for me to recover my old traffic. Will I recover most of it or some of it? Due to a glitch in the specified path, some old URL's were wrongly redirected (this happened with 9 pages to be exact). I will explain exactly what happened: www.redirct.com/superseonow1 ---- redirected to ---- www.redirectnow.com/seonow1 **/superseonow was 301 redirected to /seonow. After 3 days I realize that /superseonow1 was actually /supernow1. The same thing happened to 9 pages - /superseonow2, /superseonow3 ..... ** I have removed all the wrong redirects. When I tried to enter the correct (old) paths now and 301 redirect them to the new paths, the page was not found using the old paths. Should I redirect the old paths to the New ones even now? 3. Finally, in how much time after you change the page structure should you use the 301 redirect. Since I had two different teams working on this job, there could have been up to a 24 hour gap between the redirection.
On-Page Optimization | | rajatsharma0 -
Does Channeladvisor really assist in SEO?
I'm getting emails from Channeladvisor recommending I join, thereby taking advantage of a change to Google Shopping. It is starting in Australia from today (13Feb13). Is it an upgraded version of Google Adwords, or another form of a Commerce Merchant (obviously with multiple channels,e.g. Ebay, Amazon etc)? With Adwords, I found it too expensive for the type of product we sell (printer cartridges). But the real question is, DO MY RANKINGS DROP FROM NOT USING CHANNEL ADVISOR?
On-Page Optimization | | ABCPS0 -
Are lots of wordpress tags hurting my SEO?
When I started my blog 4 years ago and didn't know what I was doing, I set it up to be organized using tags (no categories). I have around 20 tags and around 250 articles. Each blog article typically has 2-4 tags associated with it. There is a lot of topic overlap and putting each post in only one category wouldn't work. I have been no indexing, do follow my tag pages because they are just a list of post titles, but I'm wondering if the whole situation is hurting my SEO. On my homepage I have a sidebar menu/list of all the tags so I have link juice going to no indexed (but dofollow) pages. Reducing the number of tags would be bad for user experience because people who were looking for info on a specific topic wouldn't be as easily able to find what they want. Ideas?
On-Page Optimization | | KateV0 -
What are the best FREE Magento Extension for SEO?
I am launching an eCommerce website in magento, and there are some affiliate products are included. I am looking best and Free magento extension that allow me to add no-follow attribute to outgoing link with one click. Please do suggest Thanks
On-Page Optimization | | Ganesh340 -
Best SEO structure for blog
What is the best SEO page/link structure for a blog with, say 100 posts that grows at a rate of 4 per month? Each post is 500+ words with charts/graphics; they're not simple one paragraph postings. Rather than use a CMS I have a hand crafted HTML/CSS blog (for tighter integration with the parent site, some dynamic data effects, and in general to have total control). I have a sidebar with headlines from all prior posts, and my blog home page is a 1 line summary of each article. I feel that after 100 articles the sidebar and home page have too many links on them. What is the optimal way to split them up? They are all covering the same niche topic that my site is about. I thought of making the side bar and home page only have the most recent 25 postings, and then create an archive directory for older posts. But categorizing by time doesn't really help someone looking for a specific topic. I could tag each entry with 2-3 keywords and then make the sidebar a sorted list of tags. Clicking on a tag would then show an intermediate index of all articles that have that tag, and then you could click on an article title to read the whole article. Or is there some other strategy that is optimal for SEO and the indexing robots? Is it bad to have a blog that is too heirarchical (where articles are 3 levels down from the root domain) or too flat (if there are 100s of entries)? Thanks for any thoughts or pointers.
On-Page Optimization | | scanlin0