Why is OSE showing no data for this URL?
-
Hi all,
Does anyone have any ideas as to why OSE might not have any data for this URL:
http://www.ccisolutions.com/StoreFront/product/shure-slx24-sm58-wireless-microphone-system-j3
It is not a new page at all. It's been on the site for years.
Is OSE being quirky? Or is there an underlying problem with this page?
Thanks in advance for any light you can shed on this,
Dana
-
Hi Paul,
We discovered that the problem was being caused by a trailing "comma" at the end of the keyword string that we once used to populate the Meta keywords tag. Unfortunately, the keyword information in those fields is still being parsed. The parser did not know what to do when it encountered a comma followed by nothing.
We did run a query and found that this problem was affecting 128 of our product pages and had been for a long time. We haven't been populating the keywords for almost a year now, so the problem is at least that old.
The commas are now gone.
Thanks again to you and Andrew!
-
Glad I could help, Dana.
And yes, "borked" is a technical term. It's defined as existing in a badly broken state as a result of an inexperienced/inattentive user making unauthorised/incorrect changes to a website's code or content
Can also be used as a verb: "he borked the database so badly the whole site went 503".
Not that it's ever been applied to me or anything.
And yea - sometimes our tools can mislead us, even though the info they provided was "technically" correct.
Suggestion for a fast way to test the rest of the site for this kind of error: Use the paid version of Screaming Frog to program a search for a snippet of code that should be in the content area of every product page. Limit the crawl to the product pages category. (Or whatever sections of the site you're worried about.)
You could search for something as simple as class="productExtendedDescription" which would at least ensure the content container was there. Still wouldn't prove there was any content it it, but if you wanted to get fancy with regex, you could even do that too. You could also search for the tag, which would indicate that the rest of the pages' code likely exists.
Just an idea to speed up the testing process.
Paul
-
Thanks so much Paul,
Yes, when I ran a "Fetch as Googlebot" it returned a "Success" message, but when I looked at what Google is seeing there is no content on the page.
"borked" - great term...I am definitely going to have to file that one away for future use!
If the problem is isolated to this page, that's one thing. I am more concerned that this problem is effecting a larger number of pages.
Once I figure it out, I'll come back here and post what we found/fixed.
I really appreciate the comments from you and Andrew very much!
-
Dana, there's no content on that page.
The massive head section with all it's JavaScript is there, making it look like there's lots of code, but the actual body content has somehow been deleted.
This is all I see in the actual body of the page:
|
<form name="headerForm" action="IAFDispatcher" onsubmit="return submitQuery()" method="post">
That's it. There's no actual content, no footer, no closing or tag, which makes me think someone's actually deleted the content part of the code by accident.
Good luck figuring out who borked it
Paul
</form>
|
-
I just ran the source code for this page through the validator at: http://validator.w3.org/
There are a multitude of problems that need to be addressed. Thanks very much Andrew. I do have enough HTML knowledge to provide guidance to our IT manager on how to fix the problems. I don't have access to much of the source code, so it will certainly be a "project" to fix the issues.
I am sure these problems are everywhere all over the site, as many people with very little experience in coding and design have had their hands in the pot (so to speak) over the years.
At least this will allow me to prove to our CEO that our underlying code is indeed presenting a problem for indexing and crawling.
-
I did some comparisons with other pages and it doesn't seem that the drop-down frequency selector is the culprit. This page also has one: www.ccisolutions.com/StoreFront/product/shure-slx24-sm58-wireless-microphone-system-h5
but the cache in Google seems to be fine for this page and OSE displays data for it just fine.
-
Could the coding issue be related to the drop down box that's located just above the pricing on the right hand side? That is one thing that makes this product page different from others on our site.
Thoughts?
-
I also see what you mean that there is a problem with Google's cache. The cache date is really old (April 11) and there is no preview of the page.
Anyone who can point me in the right direction?
-
Thanks so much for responding Andrew. I have suspected problems with our code for a long time, but I am not a coder, sp it's been a challenge to attempt to identify the specific problem.
I believe this is not just a problem with this page, but could be a problem across many pages on our site.
Can you are any of my fellow Mozzers point to what you are seeing in the source code that leads you to believe it is corrupted?
Many thanks for any help. I truly appreciate it!
Dana
-
Hi Dana,
I think your page is corrupted, I have copied a link to the sourcecode I am seeing http://pastebin.com/BRfFT4RR
It looks like Google Cache is also having problems with this page. Perhaps OSE had trouble too and so skipped the page?
- Andrew
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Unsolved Old Account Data
I've just got our account live again after the old payment card had expired. Now I'm back in the account I don't see my old set up and all the site / keywords I've previously had set up. Can you help?
Moz Pro | | Paul_Coupe0 -
Good job! This URL received an grade A ?
What does this mean ? This page still ranks very bad at Google. So what does it mean that it recives a grade A ?Also, if this URL recives Grade A. It should clearly be optmizied very good on the Keyword. Stil its on page 9 in google. That is very very low on this keyword. Alot of bad blogs, foreign pages, pages without the keyword in heading, pages without any good content etc. rank better.Does this score have anything to do with ranking on google ?Something is clearly wrong with this page. The on-grade tool wont tell me what that it is. And probably dont understand either, since it gives A. Is there anywhere I can check this page on what is wrong with it ?http://www.butikksiden.no/archives/5-toffe-canada-goose-jakker and Canada Goose jakker Re-Grade Pa Good Job! This URL received an A grade
Moz Pro | | butikksiden0 -
Historical data in rank report not matching summary?
I got a new rank report today. For a lot of keywords in Yahoo and Bing it is saying things like >49 etc. When I hover over it, it tells me that these are new keywords for me that I didn't rank for before. When I look at the historical graph for those specific engines though it just shows me going back at the same position historically. For example like position 17 going back many months without change. Can anyone tell me what is up with that?
Moz Pro | | edu-SEO0 -
Where does the crawler find the urls?
The SEO Moz crawler has found a number of 500 error pages, and 404s etc which is very useful 🙂 however some of the urls are weird/broken formats we don't recognise and nobody remembers ever using - not weird enough to imply hacking, but something broken in the CMS Is there anyway to find out where the crawler found these urls? I can patch up and redirect the end result as best I can but I would prefer to fix plug the leak thanks 🙂
Moz Pro | | Fammy1 -
What period of time do OSE social media metrics represent?
When one hovers over the social media metrics in Open Site Explorer the popups say that the numbers represent the total number of times the URL has been posted, liked, tweeted or +1'd. Those numbers are [appear to be] more dynamic than the data in OSE's other reports and seem to get a fresh analysis each time the URL is entered. So I'm wondering what period of time is it counting in it's "total number of times" determination? If I'd like to track the data to get an idea of, say, total number of Facebook Shares for a one month period, how often should I check the numbers?
Moz Pro | | BlastAM1 -
No data showing in SiteExplorer
For this site: www.cooperator.biz/ I see no backlinks in SEO Moz Open SiteExplorer but Majestic SEO is showing 13 unique domains linking to it. I regularly encounter zero data for sites that I know have backlinks, why is this? If it's a problem with crawling them, why would I continue to use SEO Moz when other SEO services are showing me links? Kind regards, Rich
Moz Pro | | Boogaloodoood0 -
Changing the Timeframe of Historical Crawl Data
Hello, Just read a great post about the implications of duplicate content for sites after the most recent Panda update: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/duplicate-content-in-a-post-panda-world?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+seomoz+(SEOmoz+Daily+Blog) In the post is an image or crawl data history that shows months, not days or weeks, worth of trending data as it relates to duplicate content. So my question is this: How do I change my view/date range on my own campaigns so that I can view the trailing months of data rather than only what seems to be the past 4 weeks or so? This would really help me identify the impact of some on page changes we've recently made for a client. Many Thanks, Jared
Moz Pro | | surjm0 -
HUGE LINK!PR9 Not showing up
Hi ,My site is ranking very well.Although lacking large numbers of links ,Im only able to grasp the bottom page of First Page, Im in the position #6 through Position #10 with approximately 44 keywords. Its been about a year now so i think im doing well .. ** Here is my problem,** I recently was able to pick up a few very good High ranking backlinks ,They are in the Range of pr8 & 9 they have huge amounts of links pointing to them,One of them is a Dot Edu back link..Niether one of these are showing up..In fact , In the open site explorer i had a couple very high domain rank backlinks showing as my top link. This been there for 7 months They are gone...Now i have these 2 new backlinks both pr8 and pr9 not showing up in the top of the list..They are both cached .I can see them in the cached links .. ** But where the heck is my new links ??? been about 1-2 months ..shoudnt these show up in the top of open site exploreer?? Very aggrevating...Could this be open site explorer reading the site differently month after month??**
Moz Pro | | herrie0