One post on a keyword updated frequently vs. multiple posts
-
I'm wondering - which is better for SEO: having one post which is updated frequently or multiple posts on a given topic?
Take this example: I write the ultimate guide to grilling steak. This guide should be updated at least yearly, if not more frequently. Should all the updates be applied to the existing post, or should there be a new, yearly post for each yearly guide to grilling steak?
Another related question: is it bad for SEO to have a single-page site? Let's go back to the example: what if we create a single page which is the ultimate guide to grilling steak. We don't create additional content or anything else: it's only the guide which continues to get added to over time with new photos, new comments, new ideas, more information, etc. Is that going to rank better than a blog with separate posts that address all the different things that go into grilling steak (choice of meat, cooking methods, useful tools, etc.)?
Thanks,
--eric
-
Very helpful - thanks!
-
Thanks for the very thorough response! So if I'm understanding your response correctly:
Question #1: Updating a single post vs. Having multiple posts
Obviously this depends on the content, but it sounds like the solution you're advocating is to update the content at the original URL to have the most up-to-date content. With each update, you then move the "old" content to a new URL so in essence it stays archived and available for people.Question #2: Single page site vs. Broad site
This depends even more on the content and the goals. If you have one search term you're really trying to knock it out of the park on, then OK. But be aware of the risks of putting all your eggs in one basket (when it comes to both SEO and satisfying the needs of your audience).Am I getting it?
-
I believe the first idea that was about creating a guide and update it from time to time is a better ideas as this will help you get more and more links over the period of time and people will always find it relevant so they will stick to it!
2<sup>nd</sup> Question:
There is no harm in having a 1 page website if it is about a guide but then do not expect it to rank for multiple different keywords and if you want that then you ideally should use blog for that!
Hope this helps!
-
For the example you use I go for building one totally authoritative page and keeping it up to date. Surely they can only be one "ultimate" guide to grilling steak! You want this to be the definitive resource for anyone interested in the topic. As soon as you start having yearly pages you're going to risk competing with yourself.
And besides, what's better for the visitor? Aren't they going to be confused by multiple pages?
Having a constantly updated resource like this can really grow your authority over time. Find ways to encourage comments / shares and even user generated content. (Can you get review/testimonials) to support the methods described on the page etc.
On a resource page that I maintain, I also make sure I keep the published date updated. That way both visitors and google can see that not only the most comprehensive guide, but also fresh and updated. (I'm getting quite a few searches for "{topic} 2013".
If the page is changing frequently it can help regular visitors if you keep a change log (with dates!) at the bottom of the page so they can quickly find out what's new.
Do you experience seasonality in your niche or does your get stale quickly with time? If say you had a page covering the annual popularity of steak recipes (for example) then I'd probably take this approach:
I'd have a a "Top 10 Steak Recipies" page which I'd update every year with the latest version. The previous years post would be renamed/reposted as "Top 10 Steak Recipes in 2012". I'd then link to the latest version from each old post.
The key here is to make sure you maintain the URL for your main Top 10 page.
This way it will continue to earn links, shares etc over time. The latest version becomes the most authoritative version, but the previous versions are still there for anyone that's interested. (This assumes that the topics past history is something people care about!)
If you're not maintaining a consistent URL for your main post you'll be starting again from scratch every year.
With regards to your second question - yes a single definitive resource page can work, but it's going to depend on a bunch of other factors. For instance, do you have a big, well known brand with a massively authoritative site sitting at the top of your SERPS!
By having just the one hyper-specific one/two page site you're narrowing the topics/keywords your going to be competing for and potentially limiting the reach of your site. If there's traffic there and you can compete then maybe this is exactly what you want to do - but it's a bit like having all your eggs in one basket.
A safer bet is probably a broader site, but keeping the pages specific to particular subjects but again this depends on the resources/time/money you have to develop and maintain content for a bigger site.
What are your goals for the site? What is the website going to have to do to satisfy both your goals and those of your visitors? It can be tough to do that with a one-pager. Who are your audience and what do you need to do to reach them.
-
It's an interesting idea. I think i'm going to side with having multiple pages.
1. As long as your site architecture is done right, even a new page should be supported with good authority from the domain
2. The old post can still have good content on it and receive long-tail visits that the new page will not receive
3. Wouldn't the user experience be much better for a site that you can move around in, not a 30,000 word page? Your bounce rate might seem abnormally high too, which will affect rankings.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Should the same posts appear in both parent and child categories?
Hi all, For context, I'm trying to Silo my content more efficiently. I've just moved all content into their own SILO'd categories and removed them from duplicate categories. As such, posts now sit only in 1 category. My question here is: Should my posts be showing in both the parent category and it's sub category or just the sub-category? I've currently got this only showing in the sub-categories it's relevant to. For example:
On-Page Optimization | | xtrapsp
Post name: Shimano Fishing Rod Review
Parent Category: Fishing Rods
Sub Category: Shimano And the post only shows inside Shimano0 -
Link flow for multiple links to same URL
Hi there,
On-Page Optimization | | doctecs
my question is as follows: How does Google handle link flow if two links in a given page point to the same URL? (do they flow link individually or not?) This seems to be a newbie question, but actually it seems that there is little evidence and even also little consensus in the SEO community about this detail. Answers should include source Information about the current state of art at Google is preferable The question is not about anchor text, general best practises for linking, "PageRank is dead" etc. We do know that the "historical" PageRank was implemented (a long time ago) without special handling for multiple links, as e.g. last stated by Matt Cutts in this video: http://searchengineland.com/googles-matt-cutts-one-page-two-links-page-counted-first-link-192718 On the other hand, many people from the SEO community say that only the first link counts. But so far I could not find any data to back this up, which is quite surprising.0 -
Keywords ranking on Homepage but are not mentioned.
I was wondering why some of my keywords are ranking in my homepage but are not mentioned even once. Is it maybe because they are semantically related with the keywords targeted on the homepage? What are the reason(s) for this? Thanks for enlightening me with this one.
On-Page Optimization | | TWSOM0 -
Keyword Stuffing Issues
Hi Folks, At this URL https://purplegriffon.com/courses/project-management/prince2 as an example, you can see that I am outputting all course dates in a table. Each table row contains information regarding the specific course such as start date, duration, location but also course title. In the course title it will obviously contain the keyword, in this example that is 'prince2'. So my question is this. As the MOZ on-page grader indicates that I am keyword stuffing (even though I receive an A grade) will Google be clever enough to know that I am displaying a table of events for PRINCE2? Or will it class the page as containing too many keywords? Each event links to a specific event page for that event, so is unique. I am interested in hearing the thoughts of the community on this. Thanks. Regards Gareth
On-Page Optimization | | PurpleGriffon0 -
In need of guidance on keyword targeting
Hello I'm in need of some guidance as my head has gotten into a spin. Here's the website - www.onsite-sm.co.uk
On-Page Optimization | | Hughescov
Here's the keywords - concrete repair, concrete repairs, concrete repair contractors
Here's the question - The homepage doesn't really rank for anything specific and the concrete repair page isn't really strong enough to rank for the above keywords. What should I do? Thanks for any help.0 -
Avoid Keyword Dilution
Hi
On-Page Optimization | | ulefos
I am struggling with keyword dilution, and I don't understand what I need to do to change.I have read it but don't get it. This is the explanation - You want to target each keyword with a single page on your site, so modify the anchor text of this link so it is not an exact match. The only thing that I see is the title and the anchor text the same and the image alt also the same is that what the problem is here is the page I am trying to sort out for the keyword kiln dried logs.
Thank you0 -
Updating Old Posts
I have ~ 45 posts that I wrote 2-3 years ago that need to be updated with current information and I'm wondering if I should: Just update them Update them and change the date published to present day Publish the updated info. as a completely new post other? ... and why. I've read so many conflicting thoughts on this, really curious to hear what other Pro members think (or would do if it were them). To give a little more background, the topics of the posts are various retirement communities. Things that may have changed could be they added new amenities, new home types, prices, number of homes still available, etc. I have one page of my site that acts as sort of a directory linking to an article(post) for each community, but worried if I add all the updates as new posts I'll have to link to separate articles about each community which doesn't really make things too friendly for the reader. They want to know about what's going on with each community now...not back 3 years ago. Thoughts? Suggestions? Many thanks! Ryan
On-Page Optimization | | ryanerisman0 -
Why is on-page optimisation not showing all my keywords
Why is on-page optimisation not showing all my keywords, it is reporting on only about 10 of the 40
On-Page Optimization | | yours2share0