Moz Crawl Test: WordPress sites with and without /feed and /trackback entires?
-
I have multiple WP websites and on some of the websites, on my Moz Crawl test, I see an entry for every blog post but also entries for /feed and /trackback for that single blog post. For example,
www...com/someArticle
www....com/someArticle/feed
www...com/someArticle/trackback
1. Can anyone explain why the Crawl test is picking up the /feed and /trackback items? Is it simply because they are 301 redirects to the original post (www...com/someArticle)?
2. What setting(s) in WordPress are making this information appear? Or is it just that the site(s) that have the /feed and /trackback are displaying "normal" behavior for a WP site with a lot of trackbacks and feed entires?
3. Should /fee and /trackback, as well as /author be blocked in robots.txt?
Thanks in advance for your advice and input!
-
I have the same issue but instead of it redirecting to the parent post its just going to a 404 page.
-
So I solved the problem (or at least figured where it was coming from). On this particular site, under the comments area, there is a link for "trackback url" and a link for "comments rss feed". Naturally these are ../trackback and ../blog so that's why the crawl is picking them up. They are 301 redirected to the "parent" page so that's why they are not a duplicate content issue. Thank to everyone for their help!
-
1. If you check the source code of your blog posts, there must be some sort of link to the feeds - possibly even in the header. I'm not 100% on how the Moz crawler operates (if it only spiders <a>anchor links or if it spiders referenced links in the header - pretty sure the latter) - but either way that's how they're finding it, through some sort of link on the page.</a>
<a>You could try running a crawl with Screaming Frog SEO Spider and see if it also picks up the feed URLs and Screaming Frog will show you where it found the links as well.
2. Good question. Your theme may be displaying links to these things somewhere - the best way to find out is to crawl with Screaming Frog and it will show you which pages link to your feed and trackback URLs. Then if you don't need them, you can go into the editor and remove them from the code.
3. I agree with Thomas here, I would not block them with robots.txt - rather I would see if you can fix them at the source and remove the links if they are not needed.
-Dan</a>
-
Thanks, I'll check it out!
-
Hi, you should never block feeds they're really pretty beneficial to your site. Take a look at this from Joost it will explain it much better than I can
http://yoast.com/example-robots-txt-wordpress/
All the best sincerely, Thomas
-
Thank you.
When you say "TrackBacks are from people posting either identical or similar content to WordPress.com", what do you mean? I thought trackbacks were notifications of links back when someone links to your content?
And why does the codex recommend blocking feeds and trackbacks in robots.txt?
Thanks again!
-
the TrackBacks are from people posting either identical or similar content to WordPress.com I would follow up with that. unless that person is you.
No do not block a feed with robots.txt and do not block the TrackBacks use automatics Digital millennium act takedown if somebody is stealing your content.
Sincerely,
Thomas
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Spam score by moz
como puedo estar seguro de que los enlaces toxicos que informa la herramienta moz spam score, son realmente malos para mi seo? Algunos de ellos parecen totalmente buenos! gracias!! as I can be sure that the toxic links moz tool reports the spam score, they are actually bad for my SEO? Some of them seem totally good!
Moz Pro | | Sbm20080 -
Pages Crawled: 1 Why?
I have some campaigns which have only 1 page crawled, while some other campaigns, having completely similar URL (subdomain) and number of keywords and pages, have all pages crawled... Why is that so? It has been also a while I waited and so far no change...
Moz Pro | | BritishCouncil0 -
Find out what keywords a site is ranking for
I want to find out what keywords a site is ranking for. In other words, I want to find out how Google is currently seeing a site. I've used Google KW tool - not very accurate when you simply type in the URL. Is there anything in SEOMoz I can use? New to this. thanks
Moz Pro | | goodge0 -
SEOMOZ Crawl Test
Guys I really have an issue that i know have but cannot see if that makes sense. Basically 3 months ago i did a site wide 301 from economyleasinguk.co.uk to www.economy-car-leasing.co.uk Every thing looks good get all the correct header responses , all canonicals work perfectly , Google webmaster tools is updated fetch as google bot shows the old site is 301 I tried the seomoz crawl test today on the old domain and got this message Oh no! Looks like the page you were trying to access is temporarily down which at first thought ok because the site was not there it wont do it on an old 301 domain, however i tried it on a domain i know has just been 301'd and i got this message The URL http://www.site1.com/ redirects to http://site2.com/. Do you want to crawl http://site2.com/ instead?
Moz Pro | | kellymandingo
Would you like to:
Continue with www.site1.com
Continue with site2.com I really do not know what to do, its either the redirect script is missing something however its doing what it should or the server is a problem but again its doing what it should so why would SEOMOZ not be able to crawl the old URL like it example site above. Now the strange thing is Open Site Explorer does see the 301 and asks if i want to check the new URL instead Ps the redirect is done using PHP redirect which i am asking him to change to a htaccess as its now on a apache server and was wondering if this could be an issue, all pages go to correct pages as requested Thanks in Advance1 -
Crawl Test taking 10+ days and still "In Progress" - normal or glitch?
I started a crawl test for my large site - WallStreetOasis.com - on June 20 and still have not received my results. It still says "Crawl in Progress" 10 days later. Does this seem odd or problematic, or is this normal?
Moz Pro | | WallStreetOasis.com0 -
Pages Crawled: 0 ?
I've been with SEO Moz for over a month and a half. Why would this weeks crawl have Pages Crawled: 0? I've made no changes since the crawl last week that had 10k pages crawled...
Moz Pro | | mr_w1 -
Crawl Errors Confusing Me
The SEOMoz crawl tool is telling me that I have a slew of crawl errors on the blog of one domain. All are related to the MSNbot. And related to trackbacks (which we do want to block, right?) and attachments (makes sense to block those, too) ... any idea why these are crawl issues with MSNbot and not Google? My robots.txt is here: http://www.wevegotthekeys.com/robots.txt. Thanks, MJ
Moz Pro | | mjtaylor0 -
Open Site Explorer vs. Linkscape... without mozRank passed how do you measure link value?
Hi all, Since Linkscape was retired we've been struggling without the mozRank passed data for our competitor research. However, I've read that it wasn't a particularly reliable metric to go on so my question is: what makes a link more valuable, in your opinion? I'm trying to work out the relation between Page Authority / Domain Authority / Number of Links etc., ideally to come up with some form of ranking system where we can say: Overall link value = ( (A x Page Authority) x (B x Domain Authority) x (C x Number of Links) ) / Number of Linking Domains or something like that. Is this a good way to go about it? What do you guys look at when using the OSE data? Thanks in advance for your help!
Moz Pro | | OmarKattan0