What now? Do we believe Moz or Matt Cutts?
-
Following Today's post on Moz Blog: Amazing Correlation Between Google +1s and Higher Search Rankings, Search Engine Land released a Matt Cutts statement that clearly says that Google +1s does not affect rankings at all: http://searchengineland.com/googles-matt-cutts-once-again-1s-have-no-direct-impact-on-rankings-170200
Now, who should we believe? Do we need to focus on G+ or it would be better to spent our time using other link building/earning techniques?
-
So you basically have 2 different arguments here, both of which are probably true.
1. Raw +1s don't directly effect search rankings (What Matt Cutts said)
2. Sharing on Google+ likely has secondary benefits that help search engine visibility. (What I said in my Moz article, although not as clearly as I would have liked)
Matt Cutts wasn't refuting the article directly (as far as I could tell) but debunking the conclusion that many people were drawing from it.
Regardless, we know links are important, and good content is important, and the type of content that earns good links is also often the type of content that earns +1s. Hopefully, you can find a way to pursue it all at once.
-
This comment on the SEL article sums it up best - http://searchengineland.com/googles-matt-cutts-once-again-1s-have-no-direct-impact-on-rankings-170200#comment-1010348314
-
I personally trust Moz
while Google will tell you there's no direct relation between plus ones and higher rankings I think they are just trying to tell you not to expect a simple +1 to make you go up in the serps however if you have enough of them there's no way in my opinion Google could not care or not take that into account.
There may be an an indirect method in which plus ones are getting sites that receive many of them higher rankings.
I hope that sheds someone on my opinion.
All the best,
Thomas
-
At the end of the day, one thing we know for sure is that Google+ will play an increasingly important role in search rankings. Google's foray into Authorship and how it optimises G+ for SEO are clear signs that Google wants to increase the correlation between G+ and its search engine.
Focusing on getting +1s is like trying to get a lot of Facebook likes, which we know is a factor that can be easily "gamed" by buying likes. Google will surely know better than that to give a disproportionately high weightage on the number of +1s.
The same old adage should still apply: Focus on generating interesting quality content. But don't forget about sharing it and trying to generate a discussion on G+, which will help in your SEO.
-
Re-read the Moz blog. It talks about why it is not a direct impact on rankings but an indirect one. Matt Cutts is an engineer and thinks in black and white, there is nothing "direct" but that does not mean there is not an indirect effect. The indirect effect is what the blog post is talking about. Read the "update" part at the bottom.
-
We should not "believe" anything, we should always test :).
-
This reminds me so much to "The Matrix"...
-
I would agree with Mike.
Search Engine Land and Moz are looking at it from an outside view and crunch a ton of numbers to figure out what sways SEO. Matt Cutts wants to get rid of spammers, if he clearly comes out and states it does make a difference and effects your ranking. I can see a ton of spammers flooding a Google+, which would be great for the company from a birds eye view.
I wouldn't be overly concerned about the specifics in SEO ranking. Focus more on developing a great website with Google Webmaster guidelines in mind (clean code is super important!), make sure your website looks great to consumers (lowers bounce rate and increases brand awareness) and have your website load within 2 seconds. Don't forget to add great and valuable content to your site. It will naturally start to get ranked (reach out to journalists to get mentions + link backs!).
-
Maybe everyone is right... Correlation does not equal causation.
Moz sees that there is a correlation between higher ranked sites and +1s but that does not mean +1s cause higher rankings. It could be that higher ranked sites are more likely to get +1'd.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Best reports for competitive social engagement insights? (Moz or not)
My client, in a large industrial sector, is trying to find or purchase good data for their industry as far as benchmarks for social engagement. While the DIY tools have social trackers, many require you to connect to the account you want to measure - so competitive research is a non-starter. What would you use to build a spreadsheet of social engagement metrics from a set of, say, 10 competitors in a niche vertical (e.g. industrial robotics?)
Social Media | | scottclark1 -
Is Moz really able to track G+ properly
Hi, I have invested a good deal of time building a G+ community, from nothing to 137 (as of today) We post regular good quality mini blogs and images. We interact with communities and link back to our our own blog. We don't sell on it, it 100% user friendly content. I am getting 10 or so shares per post and 20 or so likes 2-3 times week. My questions are this: Why can't Moz track page views or post activities for posts on different communities? With all this work we still not able to fully intergrate G+ into our Moz view of the world Thanks James
Social Media | | Divelife0 -
We doing more now then ever .. but its not paying off? Please help any ideas or thoughts are welcome?
Since August 11th We have been dropping 5 to 10% in Organic Search Traffic ?
Social Media | | 365ToursSafaris
We are now producing as more quality content/ blogs/YouTube videos Facebook and Google plus posts, then ever before. We taking a look at our pages, author tags, paying more attention to titles and meta descriptions.
we are not acting Spammy in any way, or at least not that we can see. But for some reason, Google analytics Stats are just going down week after week, our website is www.safari365.com Can anyone help us see what we are doing wrong ?0 -
Are there plans for Moz to track social activity for LinkedIN Company Pages any time soon?
Currently only Facebook and Twitter can be tracked. My business focuses on B2B and I focus heavily on LinkedIN and would like to track activity from LinkedIN. Any plans?
Social Media | | Marketing-Maven1 -
Why aren't social interactions showing any data? It was last week, but now displays nothing? Anyone know why this is?
Hi, As I look through the various accounts I work on I can no longer see any data from the social interaction on Facebook or Twitter. This now means that no data is displayed about growth rate etc. Does anyone know why this is? Thanks, Adam
Social Media | | adamgthorndike0 -
SEO Moz Page authority and Domain authority do not correllate wih SERPS
I have checked the competitive landscape and the rankings with the keyword difficulty tool. E.g. for "Schuhe" - google.de - the rankings do not correlate with MOZ Page authority and Domain authority. What are the reasons for that and what are the important factors currently not reflected in SEO Moz Page and Domain authority?
Social Media | | delphinus0 -
Social media monitoring on SEO Moz
Is there anywhere I can learn about social media monitoring on SEO Moz? For some reason I just get a blank page when trying to access the section on here Thanks!
Social Media | | HugoK0 -
Google analytics now showing social signals
Looking through Google analytics today and noticed that there is a section under top content that shows number of Facebook likes & shares, tweets, diggs, delicious book marks, etc. Anyone else seeing this? [staff note: see answers, this came from a Chrome extension]
Social Media | | prima-2535090