Tuesday July 12th = We suddenly lost all our top Google rankings. Traffic cut in half. Ideas?
-
The attached screenshot shows all.
Panda update hit us hard = we lost half our traffic.
Three months later, Panda tweak gave us traffic back.
Now, this past Tuesday we lost half our traffic again and ALL our top ranking Keywords/phrases on Google (all other search engines keywords holding rank fine).
Did they tweak their algorithm again? What are we doing wrong??
-
couldn't they edit out the links back to your site?
-
something to throw into the mix from a guy I know who was also hit hard by the panda update was the incoming links cname. Do the incoming links you have all come from one particular source or host ?
-
It's a possibility. There have been ongoing discussions on internal linking on most of the major SEO forums for quite some time.
My personal feeling is that most websites can effectively reduce the number of internal links by auditing their link flow, determining their "ideal" real estate and ensuring that they are not necessarily duplicating unnecessary links, which would steal some of the juice that might otherwise go to some of the bigger pages.
Only <5% of people ever see the footer in the average website, so my opinion has always been that the footer should contain supporting links to areas to help the user in "context". Contact, About, Sitemap and Investors, for examples, are classic links one might find there.
Big real estate - or important pages in the website - should be linked to from your main nav or areas above the fold with lots of user exposure.
Keep in mind when changing and removing links - it is a process. Do not go in and remove all or a significant part of your links in one week.
Make one or two good changes, then wait for a period of a week or so, then make others small changes over time
Hope this helps.
Todd
www.seovisions.com -
OK. Well, my suggested strategy would be:
- Go through the list Todd gave to make sure that there is nothing wrong on your site. If not, you can probably assume it was a Google algorithm tweak, so proceed to...
- Work on improving your site, starting with any areas you know of that might be an issue. I would say any content that is not unique would be a good place to start.
-
If you think people are scraping your content, you might want to look into making sure you link back to your pages within your content so that you always get links back in those cases.
I noticed that when scraper site pick up SEOmoz content, tehy dont pick up the footer with the author links back. So make sure to keep links in the actual body text
I also saw a number of site that pull seomoz content into an iframe on their site. Places like twitter and Flickr detect when their pages are opened in an iframe and give a error message -> tabs.to/POL-Lp
-
Thanks - reading up on rel=author now. Looks kinda complicated from the Google instructions..
-
Great advice - I especially like the suspicious inbound links idea.. never thought of that.
We have had experts say that we have too many links per page on average on our site, and that we should consolidate the links in the sitewide footer as they add so many links per page.
Is this a good idea? Are we being hurt by having so many outbound links and such a link heavy footer?
Thanks
-
Place links within your content too if people are talking your content, also add the rel=author attribute.
I would also look at the link profile for your site, have you added any dodgy links recently.
Regards.
-
Drops such as the one you have experienced can be difficult to assess. I would advise the following procedures to rule out other issues first. As Egol correctly stated it is important to not jump to fixes right away, for two reasons. First of all, the situation could be temporary and could revert. Second of all, changes you make will obscure the potential issues, making it more difficult to find problem spots.
1. Check robots.txt to ensure there are no issues with file additions that could be blocking major pages
2. Check link canonical tag, if you use it, to ensure there are no issues there with incorrect urls
3. Check inbound links both using inbound link tools and Webmaster tools for any suspicious bursts of links or links that look dodgy you might not account for
4. Run a sitewide meta check on all titles and meta descriptions and ensure everything is correct. There are software companies that offer fairly inexpensive options that will spider the entire website relatively quickly. Do this late at night post-swell
4. Use Xenu to check all broken links and fix. Even if there are only a few.
5. Run the google bot indexing tool in GWT and check for any instances of funny code or potential problems
6. Analyze your analytics to determine which keyword clusters lots the most positioning. This can often give you clues as to what might have happened.Hope this helps.
Todd
www.seovisions.com -
Study this... implement carefully....
http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?answer=1229920
-
So at the footer of any article we publish by another author have a link to that author's original article with rel="author" in it?
-
Hold your fire. Your traffic might come back tomorrow.
However, it looks like you are on the edge of whatever Google does not like because you are flashing in and out.
Hang in there, keep working to improve and iron out any problems that you think might be causing this.
-
One thing that I would do is implement the rel="author" attribute in a link to your author pages if you have not already done that.
-
That page has been around for 10 years on our site, and as you can see, many many people are ripping it off, along with all other pages on our site.
Would you recommend an aggressive campaign of "cease and desist" emails to these plagiarizers, coupled with more addition of unique content??
-
All of our top ranked articles are unique, although many people rip them off and it's hard as heck for us to track them all down and get them to remove our content.
I recently did this for our "Raised Garden Bed" Page, which contributes a huge amount of our traffic. It was very labour intensive.
Our blog has a lot of articles that other authors have written and are republished elsewhere.
-
Adam is asking the right question. On http://eartheasy.com/live_water_saving.htm, I grabbed some text "Many beautiful shrubs and plants thrive with far less watering than other species. Replace herbaceous perennial borders with native plants. Native plants will use less water and be more resistant to local plant diseases." That text appears on a bunch of sites. I tried this with several other phrases from different pages on your site, and almost every time several other sites shared identical text to yours.
Google is penalizing you because your content is identical to a bunch of other sites. The more unique, original content you have, the more you should see your rankings rise.
-
Are your articles unique or are they syndicated?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
We recently transitioned a site to our server, but Google is still showing the old server's urls. Is there a way to stop Google from showing urls?
We recently transitioned a site to our server, but Google is still showing the old server's urls. Is there a way to stop Google from showing urls?
Algorithm Updates | | Stamats0 -
Fetch as Google in GWT - Functionality
Hi, For example, some of the HTML improvements notices from GWT, says dupe meta descriptions or titles, for pages that have since been 301 redirected or had a canonical tag added. So, my idea is to force google to read it using "Fetch as Google" - hoping that it will now see 301 redirection or the fix we have implemented. Does this work? How long does it take? Lastly, should I just click the "fetch as google" or should I also click on the "Submit to index" button? Thanks!
Algorithm Updates | | bjs20100 -
Google Maps marker inconsistency
We just discovered that depending on the address format you enter into Google, you may come across incorrectly placed marker locations on Google Maps. Is this because our Google Places address format is not consistent with Google Maps' format? If so, when I go into Google Places to update the address format, am I going to have to go through the citation process all over again?
Algorithm Updates | | SSFCU0 -
Effectiveness of a Guest Blog if it is not getting you any traffic
Hi, I have been paying adequate attention to Guest Blogging for the past 4-5 months. I have posted good quality articles on some decently ranked websites. Of late I managed to get a guest post on a website with a page rank of 4. But I didn't get any referral traffic from it. My concern was will the Guest Blog also contribute to my Organic Search ? Will google give me any points if my links on the Guest Blog are not generating any traffic ? I was under the impression that Guest Blogs will work in your favour and will help in improving your search traffic only if you have visitors from that particular page. Any comments on this ? Eric
Algorithm Updates | | EricMoore0 -
Measuring Author Rank
It's pretty clear that "AuthorRank" is going to be a big thing for SEO. Although the main principles seem to be pretty straightforward (http://www.seomoz.org/blog/authorship-google-plus-link-building) what I'm less clear about is how we can start to think about author influence as a measurable metric. Webmaster tools gives us Author Stats as an impact on the site's impressions/CTR, but how do we measure the influence of an individual author? Are those factors even defined? Will we get to a stage where authors can be given a Klout-like score for Google Authorship? If not that, how will it look? This will be a HUGE question to solve for future content development strategies, and is something I'm thinking a lot about right now. Best, Matt.
Algorithm Updates | | MattBarker3 -
Is Google Rotating Good Matches?
I have a theory that Google may be trying to be fair to white-hat-seo sites that are doing the right things with blogging, linking, social media, etc. [ie that deserve equal good positioning] are being cycled to and from the first page, perhaps in a weekly or monthly basis. My theory would be that they are purposefully doing it to give those sites more equal exposure. My case: I've had top rankings for http://thedogbitelawyer.com for almost all of the important terms for dog bite lawyers for a couple of years now. When Penguin came out we lost some ground across the board, and identified that perhaps there was too much duplicate content left over from when I inherited the site. I reworked the site wording and link structure a bit and gained back positioning. Since that time we are up and down like a yo-yo on the top terms! Anybody else have this suspicion? If it's true, I don't need to stress, if we are bouncing around for other reason's I'd better keep stressing!
Algorithm Updates | | JCDenver0 -
What do you think Google analyzes for SERP ranking?
I've been doing some research trying to figure out how the Google algorithm works. The one thing that is constant is that nothing is constant. This makes me believe that Google takes a variable that all sites have and divides it by that number. One example would be taking the load time in MS and dividing it by the total number or points the website scored. This would give all of the websites a random appearance since there that variable would throw off all the other constants. I'm going to continue doing research but I was wondering what you guys think matters in the Google Algorithm. -Shane
Algorithm Updates | | Seoperior0 -
Traffic drop :(
Hello MOzzers, hope you are all well. Here is my question. Site : http://www.gunshotdigital.com Issue: Traffic In the past 3 days we have close to 300 Unique visitors, but today we just have 5. Totally confused as to why this might be. I know Matt Cutts hinted at algo change in 2 months. Our rankings are still steady. So could anyone help? 🙂 Thank you Mozzers, we love you and are flattered to be part of this formidable community. Vijay
Algorithm Updates | | vijayvasu0