Virtual Hub Page Impact
-
I currently have a website structure that has multiple subfolders.
One of the primary sub-folders has hundreds of pages within (e.g. www.mydomain.com/subfolder1/page)
The pages are all accessible through other subfolders, as contextually appropriate, but there is no existing hub page for the specific pages. In other words, while www.mydomain.com/subfolder1/page1....n are all valid URLs, www.mydomain.com/subfolder1/ is a 404.
My question is given that the pages within the subfolder are accessible through multiple other subfolders, how much of an issue is it that the specific subfolder these pages are within 404s.
Does this negatively impact in any way?
-
TL;DR - Yes and no.
There are two cases and i will be descriptive as possible.
1st case is if subfolder are linked from other pages. Like /subfolder2/page2 -> /subfolder1/ or /subfolder1/page1 -> /subfolder2/. In this case you link direct to 404 page and this can frustrate users and bots too. There is also some confirmation that nonuseful 404 page is low quality signal too: http://themoralconcept.net/pandalist.html (#10 in low quality signals). That's why you need to use crawlers and fix 404s - good for users and good for bots too.
2nd case is when users are curios. I'm one of them. Sometime. So let's say we have curious URLs:
http://www.moz-team.com/randfishkin/article1http://www.moz-team.com/randfishkin/article2
http://www.moz-team.com/randfishkin/article3
http://www.moz-team.com/cyrussheppard/article1
http://www.moz-team.com/cyrussheppard/article2
http://www.moz-team.com/cyrussheppard/article3
as you can see urls are very clean and very descriptive. And now add curious user (pick me!) that can want to see more about Rand or Cyrus. This can be page with CVs, short bio or list of all their articles. So just editing URLs to: http://www.moz-team.com/randfishkin/ or http://www.moz-team.com/cyrussheppard/ using backspace. In perfect world this will give information... but in your case 404. And this is not good for users.That's why it's much better if you can create "category" page for each subfolder even if this isn't linked from other pages. This was explained many times as "silo structure":
https://moz.com/blog/site-architecture-for-seo
http://www.bruceclay.com/eu/seo/silo.htm
http://www.stateofdigital.com/optimising-urls-seo-ux/I hope that this answer will help. You MUST optimize site for users and bots too.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
FAQ page structure
I have read in other discussions that having all questions on an FAQ page is the way to go and then if the question has an answer worthy of its own page, you should abbreviate the answer and link to the page with more content. My question is when using some templates in WP, they have a little + button you can click and it reveal the answer to the question. Does this hurt SEO versus having all text visible and then using headers/subheaders? An example of the + button https://fyrfyret.dk/faq/
On-Page Optimization | | OrlandSEO1 -
How many keywords should I optimize a page for?
Hi, There is a lot of debate going on on whether to use a single keyword per page or multiple keywords per page. What I know for sure is that it is not advisable to repeat the same exact keyword in different pages. I need to optimize product pages, categories and pages for an online store and still do not know if it is better to: 1-work with one main keyword per page plus latent semantic keywords, 2-to optimize a page for multiple different keywords (2 to 4 keywords) which are strongly related to the main topic or to the product sold in a particular product page 3- use single keyword for each page (and no more than one keyword per page). Some seo gurus argue this is the best way to get higher ranking for that particular page in the serps. My personal opinion would be 1 or 2, but I would like to hear what you suggest and think about it. Any suggestion or opinion is welcome and appreciated. Thanks in advance
On-Page Optimization | | cinzia090 -
Google Search Console issue: "This is how Googlebot saw the page" showing part of page being covered up
Hi everyone! Kind of a weird question here but I'll ask and see if anyone else has seen this: In Google Search Console when I do a fetch and render request for a specific site, the fetch and blocked resources all look A-OK. However, in the render, there's a large grey box (background of navigation) that covers up a significant amount of what is on the page. Attaching a screenshot. You can see the text start peeking out below (had to trim for confidentiality reasons). But behind that block of grey IS text. And text that apparently in the fetch part Googlebot does see and can crawl. My question: is this an issue? Should I be concerned about this visual look? Or no? Never have experienced an issue like that. I will say - trying to make a play at a featured snippet and can't seem to have Google display this page's information, despite it being the first result and the query showing a featured snippet of a result #4. I know that it isn't guaranteed for the #1 result but wonder if this has anything to do with why it isn't showing one. VmIqgFB.png
On-Page Optimization | | ChristianMKG0 -
New Page Not ranking?
One of this client's top keyword is "oak beams". They already rank well in the UK for other related terms like "reclaimed oak beams" at /reclaimed-oak-beams/ and "air dried oak beams" at /air-dried-oak-beams/ We have created a page at /oak-beams/ but this page ranks nowhere? Instead the reclaimed oak beams or air dried oak beams page ranks for the term "oak beams". Any ideas why Google is swapping between those pages and not choosing the /oak-beams/ page? A few notes are that the /oak-beams/ page is newest page on the site and yes I know there are no links pointing to it but there are no links pointing to the other pages either?
On-Page Optimization | | Marketing_Today0 -
Help with the indexation of my page
Hi all, I have a problem with my website. When writing site:www.pinesapiensa.com there're no pages indexed although the webmaster tools tells me that the sitemap file has been processed in 13 May and the number of indexed paged are 21. ¿What could be happening? I have to mention that there are two domains "www.piensapiensa.es" and "www.piensapiensa.com" addressing the same website and there's a redirection from piensapiensa.com to piensapiensa.com but it doesn't work properly. Thanks
On-Page Optimization | | juanmiguelcr0 -
How much SEO value does a fashion site get from bolting text onto the bottom of home page? Does the value compensate for cluttering up a page focused on an iconic image?
Getting ready to launch a completely redesigned site for a fashion designer. Since it is a fashion site, visitors do not need text to describe what the site is about., We are weighing three options: 1) clean design with no text (just images and navigational links), 2) bolting on a couple of sentences of text at the bottom of the page to signal keyword terms to the search engines, 3) following the lead of the top ranking site in the category and adding lots of text to the bottom of the page. Do the SEO benefits justify cluttering up the design by bolting text onto the bottom of the home page, and if so, how many characters of text seem to be the minimum to be effective?
On-Page Optimization | | RandyP0 -
Rate of similarity between two pages
hello, what is the maximum rate of similarity between two pages to avoid duplicate content? We often talk (in France) at a rate of 70% Thanks for your answers Denis
On-Page Optimization | | android_lyon0 -
Pages not cached
Sorry for all the questions. I have dozens of article pages that are not cached by google. How can I get them cached?
On-Page Optimization | | azguy0