Multiple Google Places listings under review
-
I have a client with a waste removal business who had multiple listings on his Google Places account for different service locations.
Over the last four months I have been creating separate listings for each separate service location, each under a different Google account and with a unique business name, address, phone number and website URL. They have all been verified by postcard and listed separately in local directories so that they have citations. As I have been creating the new listings I have also been deleted the old ones to make sure they are not flagged as duplicates.
2 months ago all the listings in the client's Google Places account were placed under review. I made some changes and submitted it for re-review but no go with Google.
Now all the new listings I set up have also suddenly been placed under review.
About a week ago I noticed that information in two separate Google Places listings was being mixed up - for example, the website URL for one listing was being shown in another listing. There is no connection between these two listings other than that they were both set up from the same IP address so this seems very strange. I reported this to Google and asked them to sort it out, then all of a sudden I found that ALL of the new listings had been placed under review. So now my client has no active listings at all.
He can't afford to wait another 2 months for Google to review all the listings again so I am wondering whether the best course of action would just be to delete everything and start over.
Any advice would be most welcome!
-
Just to pick up your point about keywords in the title. Yes, all the new business listings have keyword rich titles - e.g. Dagenham Waste Removal, so you could be right about that being the source of the problem.
-
Thanks for the reply.
I hear what you're saying about not creating even more confusion but this situation requires some form of human intervention to unravel and getting someone at Google to respond is nigh on impossible.
Just to be clear, all the new listings I have set up are on separate accounts. They have all been verified by postcard and up until recently were appearing normally in Google Places.
The other suggestion that has been made is that I should set up service locations on the main listing rather than separate listings for each location but as the main listing is suspended I can't do that. It does appear to be a catch 22 situation.
-
Thanks for your reply Robert.
Google doesn't appear to offer the option of phone verification in the UK so I have been forced down the postcard verification route.
Each of the listings has a different business name based on the locality (e.g. Dagenham Waste Removal, Romford Waste Removal) physical address, phone number and website URL.
The reason why I set up separate listings for each service location was that the consensus on the Google forum was not to put all your eggs in one basket.
-
Jan, we have several clients with multiple locations and have not run into this problem. Your issue begs a few more questions, so sorry for the long answer.
Your client is in waste removal and I am assuming your multiple locations are in the same city. I wonder why you are using post cards as opposed to phone numbers for your verification given that using phone numbers is near instantaneous for verification? In highly competitive industries/keywords like brick and mortar dating, etc. my experience has been that Google is a bit more sensitive. Waste removal - is a highly competitive term so, likely more 'watched.'
You stated the URL was different for each listing, do they have common phone numbers? The problem with this is Google really doesn't like call centers for Places. They seem to prefer differing phone numbers.
Currently within Google's known issues on Places is Inability to request reconsideration of a Places listing: Google Places › Help articles › Google Places Known Issues. While this is not your exact issue, you may be better off following the advice there and just start over. Given that this has now been two months....I would start over.
First, I would go into each account and delete it from appearing. I would then create a new Google mail account for each location (again assuming they are real locations and not PO boxes or UPS boxes with 'addresses'). I would insure that if I am using the same domain name in the URL that each location had its own page with address and a distinct phone number and I would verify using that number.
I would also not take months but do each and every one asap. On categories, where possible if a differing service is offered I would certainly show it. Lastly, if the problem is there is one location and multiple service areas, you need to use one account and then show your service areas as opposed to trying to list each. -
I don't think you're going to like the course of action here, because it is be patient. Google's database that runs Google Places has had issues with duplication and mixing up listings going back a long time. They have gotten better over time but are not perfect. I would not continue deleting and recreating things in their database because I think it will only cause more confusion. You could go to the Google Places forum and try to get some assistance there if you have not already done that. They are mostly moderated by the community, but some times you'll see Google employees responding to posts and expediting.
Was there anything in the listing that flagged it for review? Often times people try to use keywords in the title of the listing because it has improved performance in the past, but they do not like that. Moving forward if you want to make changes to a current listing I would just make sure that listing is verified and then process changes as opposed to deleting old listings and creating new listings on top of them, which is what it sounds like is happening, but correct me if I'm misunderstanding.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Blocking Google from telemetry requests
At Magnet.me we track the items people are viewing in order to optimize our recommendations. As such we fire POST requests back to our backends every few seconds when enough user initiated actions have happened (think about scrolling for example). In order to eliminate bots from distorting statistics we ignore their values serverside. Based on some internal logging, we see that Googlebot is also performing these POST requests in its javascript crawling. In a 7 day period, that amounts to around 800k POST requests. As we are ignoring that data anyhow, and it is quite a number, we considered reducing this for bots. Though, we had several questions about this:
Technical SEO | | rogier_slag
1. Do these requests count towards crawl budgets?
2. If they do, and we'd want to prevent this from happening: what would be the preferred option? Either preventing the request in the frontend code, or blocking the request using a robots.txt line? The latter question is given by the fact that a in-app block for the request could lead to different behaviour for users and bots, and may be Google could penalize that as cloaking. The latter is slightly less convenient from a development perspective, as all logic is spread throughout the application. I'm aware one should not cloak, or makes pages appear differently to search engine crawlers. However these requests do not change anything in the pages behaviour, and purely send some anonymous data so we can improve future recommendations.0 -
Google rejected my reconsideration request of unnatural link manual action, and list one blog article twice as example?
Hi Moz Community, On April 22 my site received a manual action in Google Webmaster telling me it's caused by unnatural links. After some a deep cleaning of all the sitewide links, which I think is the major problem of my external links, I requested a reconsideration request on May 4. And Google rejected my reconsideration request of unnatural link manual action on May 29, and list one blog article twice as example, which is quite weird to me. Is it normal for Google to list one URL twice as example in the feedback? I don't quite see the reason for that. Does anybody have any idea about that? This is really quite frustrating to me. And to be honest, I don't see much problems about the article Google listed as well. Yeah it's all about our product and it has 3 do-follow links to our site. But it contains no words such as sponsor, advertisement, or rewards... And the blog itself is quite healthy as well. The post also get rather high engagement, with organic comments and shares. How did Google flag that out? I don't think it's possible that Google will go into all our site links one by one... Hope you guys can help me with that. Thanks in advance! Ben
Technical SEO | | Ben_fotor0 -
Google ignoring the Title Tag?
Anybody seen this too? We have a webpage with tiny different title tag and H1. If you search for let's say "Renovatie", you get to see the title tag "De kostprijs van je renovatie". However, when you search with the search term "Wat kost een renovatie", we see the H1 title in the SERP, which is "Wat kost een renovatie". So that's normal when you search a term that's exact the same as the H1 tag, Google ignores the title tag? N.
Technical SEO | | nans0 -
Duplicate content on Places to Stay listings pages
Hello, I've just crawled our website https://www.i-escape.com/ to find we have a duplicate content issue. Every places to stay listing page has identical content (over 1,500 places) due to the fact it's based on user searches or selections. If we hide this pages using canonical tags, will we lose our visibility for each country and/or region we promote hotels? Any help on this would be hugely appreciated! Thanks so much Clair
Technical SEO | | iescape0 -
When will all of Google Maps be the same again?
As many of you are aware that the pigeon update was only applied to the new Google maps resulting in very different search results for Google local business. When you search for a business on old Google maps then you get totally different results vs the new Google maps. Some businesses totally disappeared completely from the search results. I have done my research and found out that it's because the new Algo was only applied to the new maps. Also new algo does not apply to other countries. Well the reason I posted this topic is because I have noticed that all the new Google Business listings I am verifying for my clients are all being put under the old Google maps and not the new ones. They come up fine when searching from old maps but not the new ones. I understand Google has not rolled out the pigeon on all data centers but why? Will Google eventually roll out the update to old maps? Since Google is adding businesses to old google maps then what's the point of even adding new listings?
Technical SEO | | bajaseo0 -
Google Local Gone Loco
I am a bankruptcy attorney in Southern California. I have been doing my own SEO since I had a couple of bad experiences paying someone to "do" it in the past. If you want it done right, do it yourself I suppose. Anyway, I have been ranking well in Google local results. At first I peeked in at 3/3 showing on the first page of the searches. Then I climbed to Number 2 in local searches, probably as a result of finding sites and making sure my addresses, phone numbers and business names were all correct. However, this week (as I climbed to #3 spot in the local search for my city+ bankruptcy attorney, my Google local result dropped to page 2. One of my employees rated me on google local and gave me a google + which is gone and the pictures that I uploaded to Local Google are gone. I don't know if this is some kind of penalty because an employee gave me a rating (they were completely up front about working for me) or if something else is going on. I was also trying to claim my business on Yahoo (which resulted in some kind of "Account Suspension"). I have no idea what is going on. You can take a look at my site if it helps: http://ashcraftfirm.com We are trying to rank for "murrieta bankruptcy attorney" Thanks for any help you can provide.
Technical SEO | | gcashcraft0 -
Is the number at the top of google wrong
If I search a term, any term, Google states at the top 922,000 results (as an example). However, if you click the "O" in google at the bottom you can get the 2nd and 3rd and 4th page of results. Those numbers don't match. The result of my searches would show anywhere from 120-140 results, but the number at the top is in the tens of thousands if not millions. Am I missing something here? Shouldn't these numbers be the same?
Technical SEO | | StreetwiseReports0 -
How can I get a listing of just the URLs that are indexed in Google
I know I can use the site: query to see all the pages I have indexed in Google, but I need a listing of just the URLs. We are doing a site re-platform and I want to make sure every URL in Google has a 301. Is there an easy way to just see the URLs that Google has indexed for a domain?
Technical SEO | | EvergladesDirect0