How to Choose destination page for a 301 redirect?
-
I am doing some SEO for a wedding chapel in Vegas. There are some old packages that no longer exist and the bounce rate for the page is high so I am planning to 301 the page. How to best determine the best 301 destination?
I have a few options. As an example the page was optimized for garden weddings. The page itself does not place well in the SERPS for garden weddings in Las Vegas, but our outdoor wedding packages in Las Vegas page places in the top 10. So that page is in an option.
However, there is a different location that has a garden setting. Is that a better choice?
Some content might match better than others, but any page I choose would be relevant content.
Thank you so much
-
When determining the best 301 destination for your old packages page, it's important to consider relevance, search engine rankings, and user experience. Here's a step-by-step approach to help you make an informed decision:
Evaluate relevance: Consider which destination aligns best with the intent and content of the old packages page. If the page was optimized for garden weddings in Vegas, it may be logical to redirect it to a page specifically dedicated to outdoor wedding packages in Las Vegas, as it maintains the thematic relevance.
Analyze search engine rankings: Check the search engine rankings for both the outdoor wedding packages in Las Vegas page and the different location's garden setting page. If the outdoor wedding packages page consistently ranks higher for relevant keywords and has a stronger presence in the SERPs, it might be a better choice for the redirect. However, if the garden setting page for the different location performs better, it could be worth considering.
Review user experience: Put yourself in the shoes of the users who would land on the old packages page and consider their expectations. If they are specifically looking for garden weddings in Las Vegas, redirecting them to a page that offers outdoor wedding packages in Las Vegas would likely provide a better user experience. If the different location's garden setting page can still meet their needs effectively, it may also be a viable option.
Monitor traffic and bounce rate: After implementing the 301 redirect, closely monitor the traffic and bounce rate of the destination page. If the bounce rate improves and users engage with the content, it's a positive sign that the redirect is effective. Keep an eye on the analytics to ensure the chosen destination is performing well.
-
Hi @leslieevarts!
I suppose outdoor wedding packages page is a good replacement for Garden weddings: the meaning of it is pretty close to outdoor weddings. You can also link from the Outdoor weddings to the page with locations for Garden weddings, this will be very user-friendly. -
@leslieevarts I am trying to give my best below.
When it comes to selecting the best 301 destination for your wedding chapel page, there are a few factors you should consider. The first thing to do is to assess the content on the page that you're planning to redirect. Make sure that you're not redirecting a page with outdated or irrelevant information.
Next, consider the relevance of the new page you're considering redirecting to. If the outdoor wedding packages in Las Vegas page is a good match for the garden weddings content you're redirecting, then it's a viable option. However, if there's another location that has a garden setting that would be a better match for the content, you may want to consider redirecting to that page instead.
When making a decision, take into account the ranking potential of the pages you're considering redirecting to. If the outdoor wedding packages in Las Vegas page is already ranking in the top 10 for garden weddings, that may be a better option than redirecting to a page with lower rankings, even if it's a better match for the content.
Ultimately, the goal is to select a page that is relevant to the content being redirected, has good ranking potential, and is likely to provide value to users. By carefully considering these factors, you can make an informed decision on the best 301 destination for your wedding chapel page.
-
@leslieevarts
Permanently redirect old pages or entire folders of pages to new locations in your Webflow site using the 301 Redirects settings:
1-Open Project settings > Hosting > 301 redirects
2-Add the old URL in the “Old Path” field (eg. /old-url)
3-Add the new URL in the “Redirect to Page” field (/entirely/new-url/structure) -
When deciding on the best destination for a 301 redirect, there are a few factors to consider:
Relevance: Choose a destination that is closely related to the content of the old page. In this case, since the old page was optimized for garden weddings, the new destination should also be relevant to garden weddings.
Traffic and ranking potential: Choose a destination that has the potential to receive similar or more traffic and ranking potential than the old page. In this case, since the old page is not ranking well, it may be better to redirect to a page that is already ranking well for similar keywords, such as your outdoor wedding packages page.
User experience: Consider the user experience when choosing the destination page. Will users find the new page relevant and useful? Will they be able to find the information they need easily?
Business goals: Consider your business goals and which page will better serve those goals. In this case, if you have a different location with a garden setting that is available for weddings, redirecting to that page may help promote that location and increase bookings there.
Based on these factors, both options you mentioned could be viable. If the outdoor wedding packages page is already ranking well and receiving traffic, redirecting the old page to that page could be a good choice. However, if you have a different location with a garden setting that is available for weddings and you want to promote that location, redirecting to that page may be a better choice.
Ultimately, you should choose the destination that aligns best with your business goals and provides the best user experience while also being relevant and having potential for traffic and ranking.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Forced Redirects/HTTP<>HTTPS 301 Question
Hi All, Sorry for what's about to be a long-ish question, but tl;dr: Has anyone else had experience with a 301 redirect at the server level between HTTP and HTTPS versions of a site in order to maintain accurate social media share counts? This is new to me and I'm wondering how common it is. I'm having issues with this forced redirect between HTTP/HTTPS as outlined below and am struggling to find any information that will help me to troubleshoot this or better understand the situation. If anyone has any recommendations for things to try or sources to read up on, I'd appreciate it. I'm especially concerned about any issues that this may be causing at the SEO level and the known-unknowns. A magazine I work for recently relaunched after switching platforms from Atavist to Newspack (which is run via WordPress). Since then, we've been having some issues with 301s, but they relate to new stories that are native to our new platform/CMS and have had zero URL changes. We've always used HTTPS. Basically, the preview for any post we make linking to the new site, including these new (non-migrated pages) on Facebook previews as a 301 in the title and with no image. This also overrides the social media metadata we set through Yoast Premium. I ran some of the links through the Facebook debugger and it appears that Facebook is reading these links to our site (using https) as redirects to http that then redirect to https. I was told by our tech support person on Newspack's team that this is intentional, so that Facebook will maintain accurate share counts versus separate share counts for http/https, however this forced redirect seems to be failing if we can't post our links with any metadata. (The only way to reliably fix is by adding a query parameter to each URL which, obviously, still gives us inaccurate share counts.) This is the first time I've encountered this intentional redirect thing and I've asked a few times for more information about how it's set up just for my own edification, but all I can get is that it’s something managed at the server level and is designed to prevent separate share counts for HTTP and HTTPS. Has anyone encountered this method before, and can anyone either explain it to me or point me in the direction of a resource where I can learn more about how it's configured as well as the pros and cons? I'm especially concerned about our SEO with this and how this may impact the way search engines read our site. So far, nothing's come up on scans, but I'd like to stay one step ahead of this. Thanks in advance!
Technical SEO | | ogiovetti0 -
301 Redirects
Hi, We have migrated to a new domain name and I wrote my redirects as follows: Redirect 301 / http://www.healthpointe.net Redirect 301 /urgent_care_locations.shtml http://www.healthpointe.net/healthpointe-locations/ Redirect 301 /locations.shtml http://www.healthpointe.net/healthpointe-locations/ Redirect 301 /career_client_relations_rep.shtml http://www.healthpointe.net/careers/ My issue is that when I include the first redirect, which is to the main page of the website that the other redirects stop working. Any idea what the problem could be?
Technical SEO | | healthpointeseo0 -
Canonicals & 301 Redirects to new Domain
We will be changing our domain name soon and I want to make sure I'm not painting myself into a corner. Of course, I want to transfer as much link equity as possible. Question #1: Do I need to define a canonical from the old domain to the new domain? Question #2: Do I also need to put 301s in place on the pages with link equity, or is there a way to apply 301s across the entire site on all pages? Any input would be appreciated greatly! Thanks!
Technical SEO | | BVREID0 -
301 redirects without .htaccess
I have a client that recently moved from an old ZenCart e-commerce site to Volusion. The domain name did not change. We need to redirect a bunch of the old URLs; however, Volusion's redirect tool does not work for URLS with "?" . The old ZenCart structure is: http://www.mydomain.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&products_id=563 Volusion is a hosted platform and we do not have access to the .htaccess file. Any suggestions on a workaround? Thanks!Nancy <colgroup><col width="960"></colgroup>
Technical SEO | | NancyVPS
| |0 -
301 Redirect for 3 Domains into 1 New Domain
So I wanted a quick sanity check on the htaccess syntax for migrating 3 domains into 1 new domain. For example, we're migrating 3 sites abc.com, def.com and ghi.com, all into 1 new site on ghi.com. Here's the htaccess we're placing on the root of ghi.com: redirect 301 http://www.abc.com/wines.html http://www.ghi.com/wines redirect 301 http://www.def.com/trade.html http://www.ghi.com/trade
Technical SEO | | cmaseattle
redirect 301 http://www.ghi.com/winery-tours.html http://www.ghi.com/visit/taste On the DNS side of things, we're parking abc.com and def.com on the ghi.com server. I'm not seeing examples of htaccess files for this scenario, and none that use any domain info on the "from" side of the redirect 301 syntax. Any suggestions before we pull the trigger? Thanks!0 -
Linux Server recognizing ASP Pages (301)
Greeting, I am in the process of 301 a group of pages on our site. We are thinking about switching from ASP to a Linux Server. Question 1. - Would anyone have any information of creating a Sever Spoof so that the Linux Server will recognize asp pages for a 301? Question 2 - How will this style of 301 Effect SEO rankings? Thanks, Tony
Technical SEO | | Tonyd230 -
How to safely reduce the number of 301 redirects / should we be adding so many?
Hi All, We lost a lot of good rankings over the weekend with no obvious cause. Our top keyword went from p3 to p12, for example. Site speed is pretty bad (slower than 92% of sites!) but it has always been pretty bad. I'm on to the dev team to try and crunch this (beyond image optimisation) but I know that something I can effect is the number of 301 redirects we have in place. We have hundreds of 301s because we've been, perhaps incorrectly, adding one every time we find a new crawl error in GWT and it isn't because of a broken link on our site or on an external site where we can't track down the webmaster to fix the link. Is this bad practice, and should we just ignore 404s caused by external broken URLs? If we wanted to reduce these numbers, should we think about removing ones that are only in place due to external broken URLs? Any other tips for safely reducing the number of 301s? Thanks, all! Chris
Technical SEO | | BaseKit0 -
Permanent 301 redirects vs canonical urls?
Im moving a website that was .php to wordpress with a few static HTML pages. Which is better use permanent 301 redirects and delte the old pages, leave the old pages and use canonical urls and 301 redirects or something else?
Technical SEO | | senith0