Title tag best practices when domain and brand are the same
-
I know the old standard for title tag optimization is to use your brand name in the title for a multitude of reasons, all of which are indisputable The most important reason being any strength and awareness can aid in click-thru. But does this hold true for exact match domains? Considering the way a search result is displayed, any awareness and strength derived from using the brand in the title is automatically included in the search result of an exact match domain without having to sacrifice valuable characters in the title. The organic value (or value beyond simply seeing the brand displayed and nothing else) can't have that much of an impact, can it?
For Example, given the result attached, is it worth it to repeat dog.com in the title if it is already showing in the result?
-
Hey guys,
My suggestion was based on an assumption that this is a title tag for a home page.
Dog Supplies | Food, Bed, Toys and Treats for Dogs | Buy Online
Main keyword for this page is "dog supplies" however the homepage also mentions what type of supplies are sold on the site so it makes sense to include them in the title tag instead of leaving it out because those are your secondary keywords. Then, as you stated the category pages should target the type of supply in this case dog food:
<title>Dog Food | Biscuits, Bones, Treats and MORE for Dogs</title>
Listed above is the secondary keyword, and tertiary keywords. Also the plural because "food for dogs" is different than "dog food"
Again simply putting <title>Dog Food | Dogs.com</title> i think is selling yourself a little short, because the title tag is extremely important to SEO as long as you have room after putting the main keyword first you should utilize that space for SEO (better chance to rank for "dog biscuits" "dog bones" and "dog treats" due to better optimization, and also for better CTR. A person looking for dog food may be like "oh this place seems to sell more than just basic dog food, or oh cool i need biscuits too i can get them all here"
That's a whole other topic though, writing and experimenting with different messaging in title tags to increase CTR through persuasive copy to make yourself stand out among the competition.
-
Both Malachi and Irving share valid points. I will agree with both of them in concept but suggest a different implementation.
The reasoning definitely holds for exact match domains. When users want SEO information most will search Google for "SEO" without thinking of "SEO.com". It is very important to brand your site at every opportunity, and the title tag is one of the most influential opportunities available to a site owner.
In the example shared, irving is right the title seems spammy. It also is targeting too many keywords. Five keywords is simply too many. One is ideal, but you can stretch to two depending on the competitiveness of the keyword. My page title recommendation is: Dog Supplies | Dogs.com
Dog Food, Dog Toys, Dog Bedding, Dog Treats would each be separate categories and/or pages within the site, and each would have the appropriate title such as Dog Food | Dogs.com.
These titles show a clear focus for your page and brands your site, all in a pleasing, non-spammy manner.
-
I can completely understand your opinion on the spam issue. I think in the particular case it wouldnt be regarded as spam (i may be wrong) Your solution is great as well. and the additional plural is great.
-
I disagree. 4 instances of DOG in the title tag and 4 instances of DOG in the meta description is way too spammy.
I would have two instances in the title tag and two in the meta tag at most.
Dog Supplies | Food, Bed, Toys and Treats for Dogs | Buy Online
Featuring a large selection of dog supplies, we carry every major brand of food, bed, toys and treats for dogs of all sizes and breeds.
don't forget using the plural
-
I think you provided a great example on describing your question. For this particular case, i think they did it absolutely correct. if the domain and branding are the same, use the domain.com and then use descriptors of the top content you want to focus on within the website. From there link or use high value assets to promote the content within the brand.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
SEO results/title tags/desktop vs. mobile
I am trying to figure out why my title tags comes up different between desktop and mobile search results. Desktop returns my title tag as written, but on mobile I get something completely different. It's related to the site, but not anything I can read, as coded in the site (i.e. not the title tags, meta, or anywhere else). Has anyone else experienced this? My title tag is 64 characters - I know it's a little bit over, but would that cause such a weird issue as a completely different title in the search results?
On-Page Optimization | | tallyhodesign0 -
Mobile - incorrect brand capitalisation
Hi there, Has anyone experienced incorrect capitalisation of their brand on mobile - we've tried lots of different things to correct it, but so far none have worked. Any ideas (issue is only on mobile)? Thanks Vic
On-Page Optimization | | Vict810 -
What is the best way to change keywords?
I have a client who is moving and I'll need to redirect their site to a new city. Taking local out of the picture, what is the best way to convert the site? Here are somethings I've already done. Changed the title keywords Ensured the page grade is an A for the new keywords. Changed the alt tags on images on the front page. Since I made these changes, the website has actually fallen in ranks from what it was initially ranking for the new city (the website was already ranking organically on page 2 and has dropped to mid page 3.) Thanks in advance
On-Page Optimization | | jonnyholt0 -
Titles
Our site http://villasdini.com is offering beach villas on sunny Diani beach in Kenya. I have a category with beach villas in Diani beach which I want to be shown in serp if somebody search for Diani beach villas, or Diani beach hotels, Diani beach accommodation etc. I have also category with small boutique hotels, which I want to be shown in serp if somebody search for Diani beach villas, or Diani beach hotels, Diani beach accommodation etc. Should I also include Diani beach in titles? Will that not be too much of Diani bech in titles? I am afraid I have anyway already too much of "Diani beach" keyword and perhaps I am even punished for it as I can't rank for this keyword at all almost a year:-( I also want to rank on Diani beach itself and I have created Diani beach page which I want to be shown in serp when somebody search for Diani beach. I am kind of getting crazy of this:-( Any advice what I am doing wrong and what strategy I should rather do? Thank you very much, Iris
On-Page Optimization | | Rebeca10 -
Title tag length
Hi, I am fairly new to SEO and have just noticed the end of my title text has been cut off by Google in the serps results. Everything i have read tells me titles should be maximum of 70 characters, however, Google is only displaying 54. See below Security systems | wireless | battery powered | Police... Nobody else on the page is showing more than 54 characters. Am i missing something obvious? Any and all help gratefully appreciated. Thanks Si
On-Page Optimization | | DaddySmurf0 -
Changing Title Tags once Indexed and positioned?
Hello, Would it be wise to change title tags on a page that is optimized and ranked already in google? These are sports pages, and the teams we are targeting are now in the playoffs so we wanted to insert that into our Title? Thanks!!
On-Page Optimization | | TP_Marketing0 -
Setting up a domain for a future site
Hi there, That may be a bit of a silly question to ask, but we've setup a new domain for an existing site. While the site is in the making, the site owners wants to already start promoting the new URL on stationeries etc. Hence, we need to setup the new URL so that it forwards to the site, but so that Google doesn't give it the history of a secondary (less important) domain. What is the best way to do this? Currently we've put in a 301 redirect, but will that bear no future consequences on the SEO of the site, when the site is moved to this new domain, and the old domain is 301 redirected. Thanks, SEOeclipse
On-Page Optimization | | Bozboz0 -
Avoiding "Duplicate Page Title" and "Duplicate Page Content" - Best Practices?
We have a website with a searchable database of recipes. You can search the database using an online form with dropdown options for: Course (starter, main, salad, etc)
On-Page Optimization | | smaavie
Cooking Method (fry, bake, boil, steam, etc)
Preparation Time (Under 30 min, 30min to 1 hour, Over 1 hour) Here are some examples of how URLs may look when searching for a recipe: find-a-recipe.php?course=starter
find-a-recipe.php?course=main&preperation-time=30min+to+1+hour
find-a-recipe.php?cooking-method=fry&preperation-time=over+1+hour There is also pagination of search results, so the URL could also have the variable "start", e.g. find-a-recipe.php?course=salad&start=30 There can be any combination of these variables, meaning there are hundreds of possible search results URL variations. This all works well on the site, however it gives multiple "Duplicate Page Title" and "Duplicate Page Content" errors when crawled by SEOmoz. I've seached online and found several possible solutions for this, such as: Setting canonical tag Adding these URL variables to Google Webmasters to tell Google to ignore them Change the Title tag in the head dynamically based on what URL variables are present However I am not sure which of these would be best. As far as I can tell the canonical tag should be used when you have the same page available at two seperate URLs, but this isn't the case here as the search results are always different. Adding these URL variables to Google webmasters won't fix the problem in other search engines, and will presumably continue to get these errors in our SEOmoz crawl reports. Changing the title tag each time can lead to very long title tags, and it doesn't address the problem of duplicate page content. I had hoped there would be a standard solution for problems like this, as I imagine others will have come across this before, but I cannot find the ideal solution. Any help would be much appreciated. Kind Regards5