Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
How can I reduce the number of links on a page and keep the site easy to navigate?
-
The SEOmoz Site Crawl indicates that we have too many on page links on over 9,970 pages. This is an ecommerce site with a large number of categories. I have a couple of questions regarding this issue:
-
How important is the "too many on page links" factor to SEO?
-
What are some methods of reducing the number of links when there are a large number of categories? We have main categories with dropdown menus currently and have found that they are used to browse and shop the store.
-
-
Thanks. Forgot about the 2nd Twitter link. The 2nd FB link actually allows a visitor to signup for the email list and actually does get used, but differently than the FB icon.
We removed the subcategory links from the Decor section as well. This cuts down quite a bit on the number of links. Thanks for your suggestions.
-
I believe there are just 2 links each to FB and Twitter - one at the top and one at the bottom.
I noticed in the top there are the "f" and "t" icons which each link to facebook and twitter respectively. In addition, there is the "@NantucketBrand which is a twitter link, and "Facebook instantly" which is a facebook link. It's ok to have these variations if they are helpful and visitors use them. I point them out mainly because they may not be used or there may be confusion as to how they are used compared to the normal "f" and "t' icons.
-
Ryan - Thanks for taking a look.
I believe there are just 2 links each to FB and Twitter - one at the top and one at the bottom. I'll make sure that gets down to 1 link each.
The addresses are linked to help fix some local listings. We've had some trouble with incorrect info in Google Places.
That's a good idea about the links in the decor section. Seems like a good compromise to allow most items to be found easily but still eliminate some links.
Thanks again for taking for you help!
-
I would again suggest reviewing your Analytics to see which links on your page actually receive clicks. Consider removing unused links. A few specifics:
-
You have 3 links to your facebook and twitter each. Two links in the upper-right header area, and one in the footer. Perhaps one link to each in the header is enough?
-
You offer multiple links to an external site (list-manage1.com) for your mailing list signup. Consider consolidating to a single link and offer this function internally.
-
Your footer offers a separate link to Google maps for each location. I see the value of this setup IF the links are actually used. These links appear on every page of your site so if they are not being used, you may wish to remove them.
-
The only other area I question is the Nautical Decor & Gifts sub-categories. There are 25 of them. If your analytics shows those categories are all being used, I would keep them. Otherwise, you may wish to consider consolidating some of them, or removing the sub-categories all together and having users click through to the main category page which then offers those sub-categories.
I can't tell for certain but it seems your main focus is clothing, and those gifts are more of an additional offerings type of thing. If that is the case, those 25 links are taking a lot of PR away from the more important areas of your site, as those links are offered on every page.
-
-
Sure - http://bit.ly/mP3PGv
Not sure about the usual way of sharing links here.
-
If you are willing to share a link to your site, we can offer a more specific evaluation. Otherwise we are offering vague generalities which may or may not apply to your situation.
-
Thanks for the replies. No social media widget - just 1 link to our page on a couple of sites.
Most of the links are for the category and sub-category navigation. There are some footer links that could be combined and some tag cloud links that should just be removed.
I am thinking about whether all the sub-category navigation should be removed. The menus could just contain the main categories. Once those are clicked on, the sub-categories on listed anyway.
-
Adding to Ryans post:
The amount of links is one thing to consider, but also consider the depth of your site, that is: how many clicks does it take to reach any given page. Use a crawler like Xenus link sleuth and crawl your site. You should look into anything over 4 or 5, depending on the amount of pages.For an ecommerce site i wouldn't worry about the 100 links per page warning, but 200 visible links are too much. Best thing to do is too look at every object of a page (links, images, buttons, badeges etc.) and ask yourself whether it is really necessary or dead weight. Reduce as much as possible.
Nearly forgot to ask you: are you using some sort of social media widget? These little buggers sometimes contain links to tons of sites, thus increasing link count. There used to be an addon for firefox called link grab! which printed out a list of all links on a page.
-
How important is the "too many on page links" factor to SEO?
The "too many links" warning is set to alert you on any page with over 100 links. The importance of this warning depends on your site and SEO goals.
There are two general guidelines I would suggest for evaluating your site:
1. Review your site's analytics reports to determine which links are not used. If users are not using the links, you should highly consider removing the link, or at least making some change to the link which would help users find it. Maybe you increase the font size, change the color or move the location.
2. Understand links control the flow of PR throughout your site. You want to use links to help direct visitors to pages which are more useful for users, or perhaps more profitable for you. You do not want necessarily want to provide a link to every area of your site on each page. The links should be helpful and relevant.
Let's say you have a used car site. You do not want to provide a link to every conceivable category possibility from your home page. If you did you would have hundreds of categories representing every manufacturer, every make, every model, every year, every vehicle type (SUV, pickup truck, economy car, sports car, etc.). It's far too much.
Determine a logical breakdown and keep your links to a minimum. You want to make things easy for users. Putting 200+ links on a page makes it very difficult for users to find what they really want.
One method of reducing links is to not offer all the sub-categories, especially when they drop down to 3rd and 4th tier choices. Another method of reducing links is to combine pages. Perhaps you offer links to "About Us", "Contact Us", "Privacy Policy", etc. You could consider combining several pages into one and thereby reducing your links.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Is one page with long content better than multiple pages with shorter content?
(Note, the site links are from a sandbox site and has very low DA or PA) If you look at this page, you will see at the bottom a lengthy article detailing all of the properties of the product categories in the links above. http://www.aspensecurityfasteners.com/Screws-s/432.htm My question is, is there more SEO value in having the one long article in the general product category page, or in breaking up the content and moving the sub-topics as content to the more specific sub-category pages? e.g. http://www.aspensecurityfasteners.com/Screws-Button-Head-Socket-s/1579.htm
Moz Pro | | AspenFasteners
http://www.aspensecurityfasteners.com/Screws-Cap-Screws-s/331.htm
http://www.aspensecurityfasteners.com/Screws-Captive-Panel-Scre-s/1559.htm0 -
Links to Your Site: No Data Available in Google Search Console
The site I am working on did not have their site submitted to Google Search Console (formerly Google Webmaster Tools). I submitted the site and a sitemap that auto updates. Google is crawling the site daily (about 30 pages a day). Under Search Traffic > Links to Your Site it shows no data is availible. I thought it was because it was a newly submitted site, but it has been two months now. Moz seems to have the same issue. Moz does show inbound links, but their are some that we think should really help us that are not shown. For instance, the Dallas Morning News wrote this article. They have a high DA and PA. Also, iliveindallas.com has an article about us that is still on the front page. That was a few weeks ago but also does not show up on Moz or Google SC. We are trying to be selective about the links we are getting. That they are follow links from reputable sites. Worried that both Google and Moz are not showing them.
Moz Pro | | TapGoods1 -
What to do with a site of >50,000 pages vs. crawl limit?
What happens if you have a site in your Moz Pro campaign that has more than 50,000 pages? Would it be better to choose a sub-folder of the site to get a thorough look at that sub-folder? I have a few different large government websites that I'm tracking to see how they are fairing in rankings and SEO. They are not my own websites. I want to see how these agencies are doing compared to what the public searches for on technical topics and social issues that the agencies manage. I'm an academic looking at science communication. I am in the process of re-setting up my campaigns to get better data than I have been getting -- I am a newbie to SEO and the campaigns I slapped together a few months ago need to be set up better, such as all on the same day, making sure I've set it to include www or not for what ranks, refining my keywords, etc. I am stumped on what to do about the agency websites being really huge, and what all the options are to get good data in light of the 50,000 page crawl limit. Here is an example of what I mean: To see how EPA is doing in searches related to air quality, ideally I'd track all of EPA's web presence. www.epa.gov has 560,000 pages -- if I put in www.epa.gov for a campaign, what happens with the site having so many more pages than the 50,000 crawl limit? What do I miss out on? Can I "trust" what I get? www.epa.gov/air has only 1450 pages, so if I choose this for what I track in a campaign, the crawl will cover that subfolder completely, and I am getting a complete picture of this air-focused sub-folder ... but (1) I'll miss out on air-related pages in other sub-folders of www.epa.gov, and (2) it seems like I have so much of the 50,000-page crawl limit that I'm not using and could be using. (However, maybe that's not quite true - I'd also be tracking other sites as competitors - e.g. non-profits that advocate in air quality, industry air quality sites - and maybe those competitors count towards the 50,000-page crawl limit and would get me up to the limit? How do the competitors you choose figure into the crawl limit?) Any opinions on which I should do in general on this kind of situation? The small sub-folder vs. the full humongous site vs. is there some other way to go here that I'm not thinking of?
Moz Pro | | scienceisrad0 -
Compare sites?
I'm frustrated, so want to ask a stupid question....My site.. www.seadwellers.com outranks my biggest competitor in most Moz catagories... www.rainbowreef.us ...EXCEPT Facebook likes...(he has a ton) **And yet, rainbowreef.us outranks me in most keywords on
Moz Pro | | sdwellers
Google?! I know it's not simple...but Can anyone take a quick peek and give me any insight as to why??? ** Example "Dive Key Largo" keyword...he is #1 and I am #5...typical in the most important keywords!0 -
Canonical URLs all show trailing slash on main site pages - using Yoast SEO for Wordpress - how to correct
We are using Yoast for a number of our sites. We use naked domain as the canonical. I have noticed in the header tags that all our sites show the canonical URLs as having a trailing slash: Example: http;//foxspizzajc.com, when I look at the source code, it shows the canonical as http;//foxspizzajc.com/ Of course, it is much more likely that all sites that link to us will not use the trailing slash - so preferably we do not want that to be the canonical - among other reasons. Does this need to be fixed so the trailing slash is removed? I cannot see how to do this in Yoast SEO or in Permalinks structure for Wordpress. Sorry for my ignorance. Thanks for any help.
Moz Pro | | Adam_RushHour_Marketing1 -
How to track data from old site and new site with the same URL?
We are launching a new site within the next 48 hours. We have already purchased the 30 day trial and we will continue to use this tool once the new site is launched. Just looking for some tips and/or best practices so we can compare the old data vs. the new data moving forward....thank you in advance for your response(s). PB3
Moz Pro | | Issuer_Direct0 -
How do you check the outbound links of a site?
There are great tools like http://www.opensiteexplorer.org that will tell you all about the inbound links. What about the more basic and easier question: What outgoing links does this site have?
Moz Pro | | SkinLaboratory2 -
What analysis exists for Out Bound Links (OBL) from your site
Hi Maybe I am missing this but I can''t seem to see it. I am doing some analysis on a client's site and want to get a csv list of links from the client's site to external sites. So what I am looking for is a list of Out Bound Links (OBL) from the client's site. I want to run these past a black list / bad link neighborhood checking script I have. This would actually be a nice feature in SEO Moz Pro, unless it actually already does and I am just missing it or not setting filters correctly. Thanks Trevor
Moz Pro | | tstolber10