Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
How to properly link to products from category pages?
- 
					
					
					
					
 Hi All, We have an e-commerce website and the category pages are built so that there is a product image and below it there is the title. Both the image and the title are in a href (each on its own). I encountered the following unfinished discussion here at MOZ: 
 http://www.seomoz.org/q/how-to-optimize-achor-text-links-on-ecommerce-category-page#post-93758The discussion states that its improper. The question is - if it is wrong then why? (maybe because Google will give its weight to the image anchor instead of the text anchor since it is higher in the page). The other question is how to resolve the matter? 
 Should I add nofollow to the image href?Thanks 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Dear Everett, Can you supply the link to the article? Thanks 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Also see this page for more information on using named anchor links (i.e. page.html#image) to avoid the "first link counts" issue. This is what Alan Mosley is recommending. I think it is much safer than using CSS to try and "trick" search engines. You can put the image on product pages in a named anchor like #image. Resources: http://www.seomoz.org/blog/results-of-google-experimentation-only-the-first-anchor-text-counts http://www.seomoz.org/ugc/3-ways-to-avoid-the-first-link-counts-rule http://www.seomoz.org/blog/the-first-link-counts-rule-and-the-hash-sign 
- 
					
					
					
					
 No problem, glad I could help! 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Works amazing!!!!! Thanks a lot for all of your help. 
- 
					
					
					
					
 I would do something like this: http://jsfiddle.net/D7vMG/3/ (do you see the z-indexes? it makes sure the anchor is higher positioned then the paragraph.) You can of course use only the <a>-tag and not a heading. In that case you can put the position: absolute on the a-tag.</a> <a>Hope it helps! Good luck!</a> 
- 
					
					
					
					
 THANKS!!! I've been working on it since your first reply  Last question (I'm a bit rude now) - I also have price beneath "The New Ipad" anchor. Currently it is not in the href and I'm thinking of keeping it this way (which would mean it will be in the H3 but not in the href). Also, the href's are simple href's not surrounded by h3's, What do you think? Changing them? (keeping the price outside the href but inside the H3) It seems correct but changing would mean of a lot of anchors will be changed on the entire website... scarry 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Yeah of course, you can style the link any way you want. Even hide it  although I wouldn't recommend that hehe. although I wouldn't recommend that hehe.I made this jsfiddle for you: http://jsfiddle.net/D7vMG/1/ good luck trying it yourself! 
- 
					
					
					
					
 It is pretty much as if the anchor flows over the entire image. I did this a while back on a dutch telecom website called typhone dot nl. Check it out, it's on the frontpage (the offer blocks all have it) The H3 is just there as an example. If I just got an H1 above all products, i use h2's, if there is a h2, i use h3's. and so on. 
- 
					
					
					
					
 That's what the css code above does, it puts the link beneath the image visually when users look at the site, while keeping the link above the image in the actual code. 
- 
					
					
					
					
 I should not of said 2 pages, but it has been shown that both links will give link text relevancy. The javascript link will be followed, it will not help 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Is there a way to do so and having the link appearing beneath the image? I don't want to change the design 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Dear Alan, If Google will see it as two pages I'm guessing I will need to add a canonical to the # version. Is that the case? What about having the image with a javascript link? (location.href) or is that suspicious? 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Dont use no-follow, you will just leak link juice. One way around this, is to use a anchor # in your url for the image. like page.html#someterm This will in fact give you link text relevancy for both, google will see this as 2 different pages. Make sure you have alt text for the image. This tataic and well as what x-com may in the future be seen as over optimization, so it may be tter to do somthing like this Your link textYou can just link the whole lot in the one link. Or move your text to above the image. 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Thank you for the answer. I'm not too strong with css besides for the basics, what you mean is that the anchor will be displayed beneath the image for the user even though the code is placed before the image and also that clicking on the image will actually be like clicking on the anchor since its size includes the image??? Brilliant, it will also give more "engagement credit" to the anchor instead of splitting it (actually ppl usually clicking on the image). By the way, do you put all of your products on the page as H3? Thanks 
- 
					
					
					
					
 Hi Noamflint, we develop a lot of e-commerce websites and I want to fill you in how we tackled this problem several months ago and how. We deleted the anchor of the image! In our code it looks something like: The New iPadAs you see at the moment there is no anchor on the image, but our clients do want this. because of usabilty. and people just love clicking images. We solved this with CSS: div { position: relative; padding-top: 30px; display: block; } div h3 { position: absolute; top: 0px; left: 0px; display: block; } div h3 a { width: 200px; height: 230px; display: block; } div img { width: 200px; height: 200px; display: block; } This code above is pseudo of course, but i hope you see what we are trying to accomplish. The anchor tag is positioned absolute in the parent div. With the dimensions on it, the link is above the image, so when people hover the image. they automatically hover the link. Clicking in it, takes them to the detail page. You should try it! Maybe it will help you out. 
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
- 
		
		Moz ToolsChat with the community about the Moz tools. 
- 
		
		SEO TacticsDiscuss the SEO process with fellow marketers 
- 
		
		CommunityDiscuss industry events, jobs, and news! 
- 
		
		Digital MarketingChat about tactics outside of SEO 
- 
		
		Research & TrendsDive into research and trends in the search industry. 
- 
		
		SupportConnect on product support and feature requests. 
Related Questions
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Would You Redirect a Page if the Parent Page was Redirected?
 Hi everyone! Let's use this as an example URL: https://www.example.com/marvel/avengers/hulk/ We have done a 301 redirect for the "Avengers" page to another page on the site. Sibling pages of the "Hulk" page live off "marvel" now (ex: /marvel/thor/ and /marvel/iron-man/). Is there any benefit in doing a 301 for the "Hulk" page to live at /marvel/hulk/ like it's sibling pages? Is there any harm long-term in leaving the "Hulk" page under a permanently redirected page? Thank you! Matt Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | amag0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Best Practices for Title Tags for Product Listing Page
 My industry is commercial real estate in New York City. Our site has 300 real estate listings. The format we have been using for Title Tags are below. This probably disastrous from an SEO perspective. Using number is a total waste space. A few questions: Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Kingalan1
 -Should we set listing not no index if they are not content rich?
 -If we do choose to index them, should we avoid titles listing Square Footage and dollar amounts?
 -Since local SEO is critical, should the titles always list New York, NY or Manhattan, NY?
 -I have red that titles should contain some form of branding. But our company name is Metro Manhattan Office Space. That would take up way too much space. Even "Metro Manhattan" is long. DO we need to use the title tag for branding or can we just focus on a brief description of page content incorporating one important phrase? Our site is: w w w . m e t r o - m a n h a t t a n . c o m <colgroup><col width="405"></colgroup>
 | Turnkey Flatiron Tech Space | 2,850 SF $10,687/month | <colgroup><col width="405"></colgroup>
 | Gallery, Office Rental | Midtown, W. 57 St | 4441SF $24055/month | <colgroup><col width="405"></colgroup>
 | Open Plan Loft |Flatiron, Chelsea | 2414SF $12,874/month | <colgroup><col width="405"></colgroup>
 | Tribeca Corner Loft | Varick Street | 2267SF $11,712/month | <colgroup><col width="405"></colgroup>
 | 275 Madison, LAW, P7, 3,252SF, $65 - Manhattan, New York |0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Can Google Bot View Links on a Wix Page?
 Hi, The way Wix is configured you can't see any of the on-page links within the source code. Does anyone know if Google Bots still count the links on this page? Here is the page in question: https://www.ncresourcecenter.org/business-directory If you do think Google counts these links, can you please send me URL fetcher to prove that the links are crawlable? Thank you SO much for your help. Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Fiyyazp0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Date of page first indexed or age of a page?
 Hi does anyone know any ways, tools to find when a page was first indexed/cached by Google? I remember a while back, around 2009 i had a firefox plugin which could check this, and gave you a exact date. Maybe this has changed since. I don't remember the plugin. Or any recommendations on finding the age of a page (not domain) for a website? This is for competitor research not my own website. Cheers, Paul Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | MBASydney0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Best practice for retiring old product pages
 We’re a software company. Would someone be able to help me with a basic process for retiring old product pages and re-directing the SEO value to new pages. We are retiring some old products to focus on new products. The new software has much similar functionality to the old software, but has more features. How can we ensure that the new pages get the best start in life? Also, what is the best way of doing this for users? Our plan currently is to: Leave the old pages up initially with a message to the user that the old software has been retired. There will also be a message explaining that the user might be interested in one of our new products and a link to the new pages. When traffic to these pages reduces, then we will delete these pages and re-direct them to the homepage. Has anyone got any recommendations for how we could approach this differently? One idea that I’m considering is to immediately re-direct the old product pages to the new pages. I was wondering if we could then provide a message to the user explaining that the old product has been retired but that the new improved product is available. I’d also be interested in pointing the re-directs to the new product pages that are most relevant rather than the homepage, so that they get the value of the old links. I’ve found in the past that old retirement pages for products can outrank the new pages as until you 301 them then all the links and authority flow to these pages. Any help would be very much appreciated 🙂 Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | RG_SEO0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		When removing a product page from an ecommerce site?
 What is the best practice for removing a product page from an Ecommerce site? If a 301 is not available and the page is already crawled by the search engine A. block it out in the robot.txt B. let it 404 Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Bryan_Loconto0
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Is it better "nofollow" or "follow" links to external social pages?
 Hello, I have four outbound links from my site home page taking users to join us on our social Network pages (Twitter, FB, YT and Google+). if you look at my site home page, you can find those 4 links as 4 large buttons on the right column of the page: http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/ Here is my question: do you think it is better for me to add the rel="nofollow" directive to those 4 links or allow Google to follow? From a PR prospective, I am sure that would be better to apply the nofollow tag, but I would like Google to understand that we have a presence on those 4 social channels and to make clearly a correlation between our official website and our official social channels (and then to let Google understand that our social channels are legitimate and related to us), but I am afraid the nofollow directive could prevent that. What's the best move in this case? What do you suggest to do? Maybe the nofollow is irrelevant to allow Google to correlate our website to our legitimate social channels, but I am not sure about that. Any suggestions are very welcome. Thank you in advance! Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | fablau9
- 
		
		
		
		
		
		Do 404 pages pass link juice? And best practices...
 Last year Google said bad links to 404 pages wouldn't hurt your site. Could that still be the case in light of recent Google updates to try and combat spammy links and negative SEO? Can links to 404 pages benefit a website and pass link juice? I'd assume at the very least that any link juice will pass through links FROM the 404 page? Many websites have great 404 pages that get linked to: http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/links?site=http%3A%2F%2Fretardzone.com%2F404 - that was the first of four I checked from the "60 Really Cool...404 Pages" that actually returned the 404 HTTP Status! So apologies if you find the word 'retard' offensive. According to Open Site Explorer it has a decent Page Authority and number of backlinks - but it doesn't show in Google's SERPs. I'd never do it, but if you have a particularly well-linked to 404 page, is there an argument for giving it 200 OK Status? Finally, what are the best practices regarding 404s and address bar links? For example, if Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Alex-Harford
 www.examplesite.com/3rwdfs returns a 404 error, should I make that redirect to
 www.examplesite.com/404 or leave it as is? Redirecting to www.examplesite.com/404 might not be user-friendly as people won't be able to correct the URL in the address bar. But if I have a great 404 page that people link to, I don't want links going to loads of random pages do I? Is either way considered best practice? If I did a 301 redirect I guess it would send the wrong signal to the crawlers? Should I use a 302 redirect, or even a 304 Not Modified redirect?1
 
			
		 
			
		 
			
		 
			
		 
			
		 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				 
					
				