Disavow first (and link removal outreach second) as tactic?
-
I need to remove/disavow hundreds of domains due to an algorithmic penalty. Has anyone disavowed first and done the outreach thing second as a tactic?
The reason why I was considering this was as follows:
- Most of the websites are from spammy websites and unlikely to have monitored accounts/available contact details.
- My business is incredibly seasonal, only being easily profitable for half of the year. The season starts from next month so the window of opportunity to get it done is small. If there's a Penguin update before I get it done, then it could be very bad news.
Any thoughts would be much appreciated.
(Incidentally, if you are interested in, I also posted here about it: http://moz.com/community/q/honest-thoughts-needed-about-link-building-removal)
-
Thanks Marie.
Sorry, yes, by "take effect", I meant see better results in the SERPS.
I understand that I have been affected by Penguin (I had an audit carried out by Paul Macnamara, who you referred me onto. He was great, BTW).
So I guess it's just a waiting game. I'm crossing my fingers very tightly!
From Paul's audit, I do have a good base of links, and I am continuing to build them. Also, for many keywords, the site actually ranked higher before any link building was ever done by the bad SEO company. With these things in mind, I'm really, really, really hoping that my fortunes will change on the next Penguin refresh - whenever that might be!! Will be very disappointed if not. SUCH a frustrating thing as it feels very much out of my control.
Thanks for taking the time to reply!
-
It really depends on what you mean by "take effect". As soon as you submit the disavow, Google starts applying an invisible nofollow tag to each link that you have in that file as they crawl the web. However, in some cases, it can take 6 months or more for all of the links to get crawled.
Will you see a change in rankings after you file a disavow? I have seen some sites where within 24-48 hours there is an improvement which is always nice. However, if you were affected by the Penguin algorithm then you won't see any improvement until Google refreshes Penguin which could be any day now or even months from now. AND, in order to see improvement you have to have good links present. If your previous rankings were there because of links that are now deemed unnatural, then there may be no improvement at all either now or when Penguin refreshes.
-
Marie, in your experience, does it take weeks or months or most disavows to take effect? I submitted my disavow file 3 weeks ago and nothing so far...
-
Absolutely do the disavow first. There's no reason not to, especially if you are dealing with an algorithmic issue. (For some sites with manual penalties, I'll submit a disavow as soon as I can and then do the outreach.)
On a side note, if you have an algorithmic issue (i.e. Penguin), no one knows for sure whether you even need to remove links. Of course, there are benefits to removing links. Google will tell you to do so because you don't want people to look at your site's links and see bad ones online. But, I recently asked John Mueller in a hangout whether link removal (as opposed to disavow) was necessary for Penguin and here's what he said:
From a theoretical point of view, using the disavow tool is enough...from a practical point of view it almost always makes sense to still delete those links as much as possible.
You can see the response here at about 41:20: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KWYooFjmx5c&list=UUthrUiuJUtFSXBUp48D8bAA&index=2
The main reason why removing may be better than disavowing is because it can take weeks or months for a site on your disavow list to get recrawled and as such be disavowed. However, I have found that in most cases, if you have spammy links, if you don't control the login info you used for link submission (or if there is no way for you to remove the link yourself) the response rate is always very poor (like 10-15% if you're lucky).
If you've been hit by Penguin, there are two things that need to be in place in order to recover:
1. An EXTREMELY thorough link audit and disavow. IMO it's not enough to get 80-90% of the bad links. The only sites I have seen recover had close to 100% disavowed. This means doing a manual review of every single domain linking to you from every source you can find.
2. A site that has a base of good natural links with the ability to attract new links. If you don't have that and you are planning on manufacturing your own links again then you probably will not recover.
-
In light of the all round astonishment I went and checked the actual numbers, rather than off the top of my head - it was 44% removed.
So still way better than I'd expected.
-
Hi Emma
First of all, great news that your penalty was lifted. Are things back to what they were prior to the penalty being imposed?
In terms of my website... As it's an algorithmic penalty, not a manual one, there's no reinclusion request to submit in my case. So, the only way I can show penance is to show that some links have been manually removed - most likely I would only get a very small percentage of these removed, if any, due to the spammy nature of these sites.
I can still go through this outreach process. But, I mainly wondered if there was any disadvantage in doing the disavow first. I am very concerned that there could be a Penguin update before I get chance to outreach then disavow. Due to the seasonality of my market, a few weeks can make a dramatic difference to the chance of survival of the business. The window of opportunity for sales happens in the spring and summer.
I can always do a second round of disavowing afterwards.
Thanks
Coral
-
50% is a shockingly high success rate, way above the norm. I had a 16% success rate on one of our sites and around 35% on one of our much larger sites. I had one of the top names ever in SEO tell us that 5% would be a good success rate, though I think that's lowballing a bit.
-
Interesting video... loving Matt Cutts' T-shirt
There's no reinclusion request to be made as it's just an algorithmic penalty. Not a manual penalty.
-
Your stats are interesting, and show much better success than anyone else's I've heard. 50% is amazing, but doesn't seem that representative of the general experience (from what I've read). Well done to you though.
Just to clarify, I'm not thinking that there will be a Penguin update in the next three weeks. Rather, if there is an update and I haven't actioned it, that's things looking pretty bleak for me for the entire season. Because, by the time the next one arrives, it could be too late (as things are quiet again).
-
The disavow tool is technically a recommendation to Google to ignore the toxic links, it does not have to disavow any, let alone all of the sites that you suggest. The point of sorting out a penalty is is performing penance and proving you won't do it again. Taking the easiest step first without recording efforts that show that you have tried to resolve it manually won't make you pass the manual review.
I know this for a fact as the agency that got us in a penalty in the first place performed two disavows before I took over and lifted our penalty. I manually checked over 10,000 and recorded my efforts for all, only then was it lifted. I understand that you want to fix it quickly as it is your business, but there is no quick fix other than playing by goggles rules on this one and showing that you understand that spammy links are not good. I recommend email out reach and recording everything on a goggle doc to send through with your re inclusion request. Best of luck
-
Coraltoes,
There isn't any question about whether or not you can go straight to the disavow tool as a first step in cleaning up bad links, as Matt Cutts confirms here. Exactly what the difference is between doing that and first communicating to all spammy link webmasters so that you have that file to include with your reinclusion request isn't so clear cut.
-
Hi,
I think Its a Good idea to disavow first and then Go after the Link removal thing.
I have a domain which got penguin penalty , We have Spent alot of time in removing links and Still have domains where links can not be deleted duw to certain issues So Atlast We have to disavow them.
So I would advise you to Disavow all of the bad backlinks first and then spend time in removing them.
Also, As Matt said above, It is impossible to recover domain from penguin in around 3 weeks Time.
You my better to start a New domain.
Thanks
-
Have to say I haven't done it your way round - we've completed three rounds of email outreach then submitted a disavow file, so I don't want to guess to far on advisability of doing it the other way around. For starters I've no idea how well / quickly Google handles domains removed from a disavow list.
Your first assumption needs comment though - every domain we're removing links from was from a spammy website (zero quality SEO directory), as a result of a submission package they bought years back before I joined.
We managed to get about 50% of the list removed from that email outreach process. Granted one was a directory network with over 100 domains, but even counting their domains as one that we got about 40% success.
Around 10% responded with a demand for a fee - ranging from 99c to $50. Clearly all those were instant place in disavow list
So to summarise I was really surprised how successful the email outreach part was - we'd been expecting next to nothing by way of response rate rather than around 50% success.
Even if you do it disavow first, hoping for a Penguin update in the next three weeks so the file is actioned prior to your season starting is a little optimistic!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Improve First Contentful Paint (FCP) and First Input Delay (FID)
Please suggest me how to improve First Contentful Paint (FCP) and First Input Delay (FID) for my website (http://www.mastersindia.co/) on mobile. All the java scripts moved into footer, added async and defer on JS. Also, apply all the possible ways suggested buy the Google pagespeed insights tool but we did not see more improvement. We tried to defer and async all the CSS but while doing this our website gets break. Please help me to solve it. thread-18712370-27405935606745616.png
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | AnilTanwarMI0 -
Top hierarchy pages vs footer links vs header links
Hi All, We want to change some of the linking structure on our website. I think we are repeating some non-important pages at footer menu. So I want to move them as second hierarchy level pages and bring some important pages at footer menu. But I have confusion which pages will get more influence: Top menu or bottom menu or normal pages? What is the best place to link non-important pages; so the link juice will not get diluted by passing through these. And what is the right place for "keyword-pages" which must influence our rankings for such keywords? Again one thing to notice here is we cannot highlight pages which are created in keyword perspective in top menu. Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | vtmoz0 -
Using rel="nofollow" when link has an exact match anchor but the link does add value for the user
Hi all, I am wondering what peoples thoughts are on using rel="nofollow" for a link on a page like this http://askgramps.org/9203/a-bushel-of-wheat-great-value-than-bushel-of-goldThe anchor text is "Brigham Young" and the page it's pointing to's title is Brigham Young and it goes into more detail on who he is. So it is exact match. And as we know if this page has too much exact match anchor text it is likely to be considered "over-optimized". I guess one of my questions is how much is too much exact match or partial match anchor text? I have heard ratios tossed around like for every 10 links; 7 of them should not be targeted at all while 3 out of the 10 would be okay. I know it's all about being natural and creating value but using exact match or partial match anchors can definitely create value as they are almost always highly relevant. One reason that prompted my question is I have heard that this is something Penguin 3.0 is really going look at.On the example URL I gave I want to keep that particular link as is because I think it does add value to the user experience but then I used rel="nofollow" so it doesn't pass PageRank. Anyone see a problem with doing this and/or have a different idea? An important detail is that both sites are owned by the same organization. Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ThridHour0 -
'Nofollow' footer links from another site, are they 'bad' links?
Hi everyone,
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | romanbond
one of my sites has about 1000 'nofollow' links from the footer of another of my sites. Are these in any way hurtful? Any help appreciated..0 -
Site wide footer links vs. single link for websites we design
I’ve been running a web design business for the past 5 years, 90% or more of the websites we build have a “web design by” link in the footer which links back to us using just our brand name or the full “web design by brand name” anchor text. I’m fully aware that site-wide footer links arent doing me much good in terms of SEO, but what Im curious to know is could they be hurting me? More specifically I’m wondering if I should do anything about the existing links or change my ways for all new projects, currently we’re still rolling them out with the site-wide footer links. I know that all other things being equal (1 link from 10 domains > 10 links from 1 domain) but is (1 link from 10 domains > 100 links from 10 domains)? I’ve got a lot of branded anchor text, which balances out my exact match and partial match keyword anchors from other link building nicely. Another thing to consider is that we host many of our clients which means there are quite a few on the same server with a shared IP. Should I? 1.) Go back into as many of the sites as I can and remove the link from all pages except the home page or a decent PA sub page- keeping a single link from the domain. 2.) Leave all the old stuff alone but start using the single link method on new sites. 3.) Scratch the site credit and just insert an exact-match anchor link in the body of the home page and hide with with CSS like my top competitor seems to be doing quite successfully. (kidding of course.... but my competitor really is doing this.)
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | nbeske0 -
How to get around Google Removal tool not removing redirected and 404 pages? Or if you don't know the anchor text?
Hello! I can’t get squat for an answer in GWT forums. Should have brought this problem here first… The Google Removal Tool doesn't work when the original page you're trying to get recached redirects to another site. Google still reads the site as being okay, so there is no way for me to get the cache reset since I don't what text was previously on the page. For example: This: | http://0creditbalancetransfer.com/article375451_influencial_search_results_for_.htm | Redirects to this: http://abacusmortgageloans.com/GuaranteedPersonaLoanCKBK.htm?hop=duc01996 I don't even know what was on the first page. And when it redirects, I have no way of telling Google to recache the page. It's almost as if the site got deindexed, and they put in a redirect. Then there is crap like this: http://aniga.x90x.net/index.php?q=Recuperacion+Discos+Fujitsu+www.articulo.org/articulo/182/recuperacion_de_disco_duro_recuperar_datos_discos_duros_ii.html No links to my site are on there, yet Google's indexed links say that the page is linking to me. It isn't, but because I don't know HOW the page changed text-wise, I can't get the page recached. The tool also doesn't work when a page 404s. Google still reads the page as being active, but it isn't. What are my options? I literally have hundreds of such URLs. Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | SeanGodier0 -
Should I remove all rel=nofollow links?
I have a 60 page site that had some nofollow links sprinkled throughout, 50% of which are probably on its mailto: email links. Should I remove all nofollows all in one go, or just the mailto links first, and later the others? Or has anyone had any negative effects in 2012 from this?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | emerald0 -
Links from tumblr
I have two links from hosted tumblr blogs which are not on tumblr.com. So, website1 has a tumblr blog: tumblr.website1.com And another site website2.com also uses the a record/custom domains option from tumblr but not on a subdomain, which is decribed below: http://www.tumblr.com/docs/en/custom_domains Does this mean that all links from such sites count as coming from the same IP in google's eyes? Or is there value in getting links from multiple sites because the a-record doesn't affect SEO in a negative way? Many thanks, Mike.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | team740