New to MOZ and so far love tools but need some quick tips on title, keywords and descriptions
-
First of all:
I am excited about using all the MOZ tools! I just got back my webcrawl and have found
a lot of issues that I am working on.I am a Vacation Rental Property Manager with 150 properties, all different.
- 90% of my pages have the same keywords and descriptions and a lot of same page titles
too. I can change all of these by adding a few fields in my database and then
populating the meta information dynamically.
For Example:
<title>Big Bear Cabins | Big Bear Cabin Rentals - Chateau Alta Vista Cabin</title>
Chateau Alta Vista, Big Bear Cabins, Big Bear Cabin Rentals
Chateau ALta vista is a Big Bear Cabin with four bedrooms, three
bathrooms, it is Big Bear Luxury Property.If you notice the Title, keyword are dynamically populated from the database using the
property name of Chateau Alta Vista. The description is an extra field in the database that I just implemented that I can customize per property.I have a few questions, but here is more information: I also have 5 or 6 related pages
to each property. Pages Like general information, photos, calendars, book
Question 1): Is the best way of doing my titles, keywords and descriptions. Any concerns or recommendations. I have read, do not even use keywords anymore.Question 2) I have other pages that show maybe 8 or 10 photos. So is it ok to do the following;
Title <photos of="" big="" bear="" cabin="" chateu="" alta="" vista<="" title="">Meta Keywords <photos of="" big="" bear="" cabins="" chateu="" alta="" vista="">Meta Description <check out="" photos="" of="" big="" bear="" cabin="" rentals,="" chateua="" <br="">Alta Vista, etc
- Currently, I have some archaic page naming with database driven url parameters such as</check></photos></photos>
http://destinationbigbear.com/property_Detail_v.aspx?propid=669
and at worse
http://destinationbigbear.com/Property_detail_v.aspx?propid=669&rate=
$1,127.10&checkoutdate=07/13/2014&beds=4&firstnight=07/11/2014&nights=2
I do not have he ability to to full url encoding such as http://destinationbigbear.com/cabins/chateau-alta-vista
but I can do http:/www.destinationbigbear.com/big-bear-cabin-info.aspx?cabin=chateau%alta%vista
Question is what do I do... If I do change the page names I will lose the history of property_detail_V.aspx which only has a Page Authority of 21, but if I change the page name and dynamic navigation of my website will I not lose all my authorities, if so, is it worth doing it?
My highest keyword ranking is 30 which is terrible.
Nick
- 90% of my pages have the same keywords and descriptions and a lot of same page titles
-
Jane,
You have been awesome! I almost done going through all of the bad items that Moz generated and am getting ready to run the crawl again! Then once I am done with that I will submit to Google again. First time in years I have some confidence I can make a difference.
Nick
-
The different pages such as photos, calendars, etc per cabin are not being flagged as duplicate but rather the same page but different cabins..
Such as
http://www.destinationbigbear.com/property_Detail_v.aspx?propid=203
http://www.destinationbigbear.com/property_Detail_v.aspx?propid=203
Same Layout, Same Page Title, Same Meta information but 100% different content because of different cabin descriptions.... so that is why I am planning on dynamically changing page titles and meta descr by inserting the cabin names.
<title>Fox Lodge Big Bear Cabin <title></p> <p><title> Summit Enchantment Big Bear Cabin <title></p> <p>I am thinking this should cure my problem.</p> <p>Nick</p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p> </p></title>
-
Hi there,
I am not sure why these exact examples are being picked up for duplicate content (their title tags are exactly the same, however) because the text on page is different.
Even though many of these pages are different, the tool will be picking them up as duplicates because there is too much duplication between each page's content, e.g.:
http://i.imgur.com/D44s1wV.png
and
http://i.imgur.com/hEARGo9.png
One option is to have this heavily-duplicated information hosted on a separate URL, with the page calling the content of that URL into the text box using an iframe. This will "remove" the content from the page as far as Google is concerned, but it will mean that the same content is not being found over and over again on different URLs.
This will mean that the URLs have very little content on the however, and you should really write new content to provide sufficient unique content to tell Google what the page is about.
Consider the "tabs" option I mention above - you would start with a URL like http://www.destinationbigbear.com/property_Detail_v.aspx?propid=501 and use CSS tabs to switch to the rates page, video page, photos page, etc. This would house all of a cabin's information on one URL and mean that there are no more URLs like http://www.destinationbigbear.com/Property_detail_rates.aspx?propid=501 where the text content of the page is largely a duplicate of every other cabin page.
-
Thank you very much.
I was worried about page load time especially with regards to the images that are 150k each and can have 10 to 20 images.... hence separation of content...
Thanks again, I have another question regarding dynamic pages...
I think the webcrawls give me errors or the moz tools for duplicate page titles and content when I have urls like this.http://www.destinationbigbear.com/property_Detail_v.aspx?propid=500
http://www.destinationbigbear.com/property_Detail_v.aspx?propid=501
and so on...
Is there something called canonical link - I looked at this but I do not think this is would help... I am just looking to have each page craweled as one page or I guess if I dynamically change the title and meta description then they would be unique?
Nick
-
Hi there,
Question 1): Is the best way of doing my titles, keywords and descriptions. Any concerns or recommendations. I have read, do not even use keywords anymore.
Agreed on the meta keywords tag - it is no longer needed.
There is some redundancy in the two tags at the moment. The primary rule is that you should be first and foremost writing for people, not search engines. You'll naturally include the keywords search engines need to see if you write for people (check afterwards to ensure you have, but good usability very often translated to good SEO):
**Suggestion **for a page about the Chateau Alta Vista:
<title>Chateau Alta Vista Cabin, Big Bear Lake, California | Big Bear Cabin Rentals</title>
There is no need to repeat the location / site name.
Chateau Alta Vista is located on Big Bear Lake, CA and is available for weekend breaks or longer stays. Space for up to 14 guests, 4 bed, 3 bath. Internet and hot tub provided.
There is no need to use keywords in a meta description from a ranking point of view (they do not influence rankings), but users should get a good idea of what they're going to find when they click through from the meta description. Think of it as free advertising space.
The photo pages should be fine, but consider including these in a larger page about the cabin itself, i.e. adding value to the cabin pages rather than creating new pages, similarly to how property websites show 8 - 10 photos of a property they are selling or renting, e.g. http://www.zoopla.co.uk/for-sale/details/33290790. The slide show takes precedence here whereas yours would probably not (lower on the page or in another tab), but see how they have used tabs to go between content, rather than create new URLs / pages - all the content is stored on the one URL about that one property.
If I do change the page names I will lose the history of property_detail_V.aspx which only has a Page Authority of 21, but if I change the page name and dynamic navigation of my website will I not lose all my authorities, if so, is it worth doing it?
If you 301 redirect between the old URL and the new one, the majority of the authority of the old page will transfer to the new one. Having said that, you only want to go through a lot of 301 redirects (NOT 302s! They pass no authority) if you really have to. Modern search engines are far better at dealing with dynamic URLs than they were years ago, so it is really hard to say if doing this would be beneficial enough to outweigh the fact that you need to go through redirects from the existing URLs.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Need to change permalink structure - need advice on these two options
I have a client with a robust Wordpress blog that ranks well for a number of high-volume terms. We are doing a site rebuild, and they are adamant they don't want to lose any SERP ranking. However, their permalink structure contains the date the post was published, i.e. https://www.company.com/blog/2018/10/28/blog-post-title The date inclusion is not ideal for obvious reasons, but also because it's creating 404 links when pre-scheduling with Hubspot. Option 1: Change the permalink structure for all posts, past and future, and implement 301 redirects The only reason I'm not outright doing this is because there will be some slippage in the rankings, given that redirects only pass on a percentage of juice. The client doesn't want any slippage. Option 2: Create a new instance of Wordpress in a new subdirectory and continue the blog from there This will mandate a new structure for the blog posts; now posts will be children of /industry-blog/ instead of /blog/, but the old posts will remain as they are under /blog/ (and with dates intact). But I don't know if this will cause some hierarchical confusion that will negatively impact both the old blog and the new blog. Any advice given is appreciated. Please feel free to correct me if I've gotten anything wrong, I've only been practicing SEO for a few years now.
On-Page Optimization | | Marce5210 -
Duplicated page titles
Dear friends, We have a problem which occurs on our page with duplicated page titles. Landlords are posting rooms on our page and most of them are giving the same name to the rooms and after that, we are getting more and more duplicated page titles. We are applying random whit this title tag: Accommodation for students in {city.name}: {name}. English title
On-Page Optimization | | Eurasmus.com
Certified student rooms in {city.name}: {name} English title
Erasmus room for students in {city.name} | {name} English title
Student room in {city.name}: {name} English title Also our title tag is sometimes to long but there is no possibility to make them shorter. I think. If anyone would have some idea be free to comment and help us. Kind regards Miško Macolić Tomičić0 -
Webmaster tools content keywords conundrum
I'm working on optimising a phrase that is made up of two words. I've noticed in webmaster tools that the two words are listed separately under the content keywords section. This is fine apart from the two words are listed at very different significance levels, 2 and 18. Drilling deeper it shows that both these words have two variants. The word in position 2 occurs 483 times and the word in 18 occurs 60 times. Sadly the phrase is commercially sensitive as I'd like to just be able to share it here but can't. Should I be looking to include the weaker word more frequently on the site? In anchor text? Or is this normal distribution? Would optimising the weaker word risk the wrath of Panda? moz-question.jpg
On-Page Optimization | | Hannahm240 -
Google cache tool help
This link is for the Ebay Google cache - http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:www.ebay.com&strip=1 I wanted to do the same for my homepage so I switched out the urls and it worked. When I try to get a different link in there such as mysite.com/category it wont work. I know my pages are indexed. Any ideas why it wont work for other pages?
On-Page Optimization | | EcommerceSite0 -
Meta Keywords
Hello! Just wondering what opinions others have on Meta Keywords? Ive read in the past here on Seomoz that they are irrelevant now to search engines. I do see some of our Large competitors still using them. When I use the SEO page tool to check out pages for optimization it recommends that we remove them? This is something that I have been doing for a few months now but am second guessing myself now. Should I continue to leave them out of current page structure? Thank You!!!!
On-Page Optimization | | TP_Marketing0 -
Can Your Site Get Penalized For Keyword Stuffing On An 'Untarged' Keyword?
My site has dropped since the EMD/Panda 20 roll out and I am looking for reasons why. I am looking at Keyword Stuffing as one potential problem. My web site is on the topic of WordPress Security with that being the main keyword I want to target. Now I can limit the number of occurrences of 'wordpress security' to below the recommended 15, but it is impossible to do this for 'wordpress' without severely compromising the user experience. I've got other content on topics such as WordPress Backup and WordPress Security Plugins etc, so obviously the word 'wordpress' is bound to appear frequently. Is there a risk that Google will penalize me for Keyword Stuffing on 'wordpress' and thus pull down the site or page for other keywords? Or would it simply mean I won't be able to rank for 'wordpress' (which I am quite happy about)? Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | andersvin0 -
I need quality backlinks. Do they need to be similar to company website?
Our website seems to be well optimized. However I need to find more quality backlinks. I am having a hard time with this. Do backlinks have to related to the company? The reason I ask is because I can receive some links, but they do not relate to our company. BUT sometimes we have customers come to our facility and we book them a local hotel room and send them to near by restaurants. Is it ok to have local restaurants and local hotels links on our website and have them link to ours, on a page for customer visits. OR any other tips on receiving quality backlinks?
On-Page Optimization | | hfranz0