Canonical URLs all show trailing slash on main site pages - using Yoast SEO for Wordpress - how to correct
-
We are using Yoast for a number of our sites. We use naked domain as the canonical. I have noticed in the header tags that all our sites show the canonical URLs as having a trailing slash:
Example: http;//foxspizzajc.com, when I look at the source code, it shows the canonical as http;//foxspizzajc.com/
Of course, it is much more likely that all sites that link to us will not use the trailing slash - so preferably we do not want that to be the canonical - among other reasons.
Does this need to be fixed so the trailing slash is removed? I cannot see how to do this in Yoast SEO or in Permalinks structure for Wordpress.
Sorry for my ignorance.
Thanks for any help.
-
As far as I understand this, to your browser and to Google, they're the same page (this really seems to only apply to the homepage, other pages "/" really matters a lot).
I would not worry about changing the canonical, in fact it's technically the 'right" location of the page. When it comes to the HTTP docs, a request to the root needs "/". All modern web browsers add it back in for you even if it's not there. This is I believe why the canonical is set as it is there in yoast.
I covered this in a blog as someone asked this at Pubcon this year in a keynote.
http://www.winstondigitalmarketing.com/yoast-homepage-canonical-correct-include-trailing-slash/
-
I searched high and low for how to pull this off for the Yoast plugin specifically for my homepage. And wa-la, here was the answer in the community forum. Thanks guys! The advanced area in the yoast plugin for the homepage did the track. Just the homepage is set now to mywebsite.com instead of mewebsite.com/ Too me this is cleaner for SEO and local search SEO since all citations and inbound links are pointing to mywebsite.com NOT mywebsite.com/ Maybe Google will shine a bit more SERP love on me.
We shall see - better make an annotation not in Google analytics so I can reference if positive impact occurred.
-
I wrote to Yoast about this issue but they wouldn't respond because I am using the free plugin. I may respond and let them know about this discussion. Seems like a valid legitimate question, no? I would love an official response...
-
Hi Gianluca,
He was talking about a WordPress website which, by default, already has a 301 redirect in place on the homepage URL with the slash to the URL without the slash.
What's strange is that the Yoast SEO plugin points the homepage canonical tag to the URL with the slash - which is 301 redirected to the URL without!
I know search engines handle this very well and probably just ignore the canonical tag, but if you want it to be 100% correct (and why wouldn't you?) adding a the canonical tag in the Advanced tab is a very easy fix.
-
Gianluca - so you believe their is no reason to actually go in and fix this?
-
Hey Dave - great suggestion. I did that and it worked.
Doesn't it seem strange to you that Yoast, the master of SEO - automatically does this?
Kind of makes me think that Google doesn't see the trailing slash as a different URL for the homepage. Wouldn't their team catch this or address it? -
Why nobody is answering that the most normal thing to do should be redirecting via .htaccess the URL with the ending trailing hash to the one without (or viceversa)?
I mean, that's what I would do if it was just the case of the home page.
Said that, I would not worry that much, because that is one of those exact duplication cases that Google understands and solves with no problem.
-
What you could do is set up a filter in your functions.php file to change the URL based on the homepage but that's a bit too much maybe ;-). Next to that I think it's due to the fact that some web servers set up the trailing slash by default.
-
I find it strange that this happens with Yoast as it points the canonical tag for the homepage to a 301 redirect URL. I don't think it's a big problem as search engines seem to handle it well, but it's a problem that I wouldn't expect to see in such a popular and reputable SEO plugin.
If you use the plugin editor to remove the trailing slash you will remove the trailing slash from all pages of your site (something you may not want to do).
If you only want to remove the trailing slash from the homepage the easiest option would be to manually add the canonical URL without the trailing slash in the Advanced tab for Yoast when editing the homepage (as Linda said above). Doing this for one page will take you 2 seconds and fix the problem!
-
Hey Linda - I appreciate that - however when I read that article - its still seemed to open to debate if this is necessary to fix or not. Are you aware of a way to have it autofixed in wordpress? The only solution I read there was either hacking Yoast SEO to remove the trailing slash - or to manually edit every single page.
Am I over thinking this? I agreed with one poster who mentioned that Moz appears to have wanted this issue correct because their homepage shows that moz.com does not have the trailing slash in the canonical tag - nor does yoast.com.
Odd to me then that the Yoast plugin would then add this.
Are you aware of a way to remove it that is more effective?
-
A similar question has been asked here before: http://moz.com/community/q/how-do-i-get-rel-canonical-to-eliminate-the-trailing-slash-on-my-home-page .
"Login to your WordPress backend as an administrator and look for "Plugins" on the left menu and go to "Editor" within the plugins menu."
You can also edit the canonicals of individual pages and posts under the "Advanced" tab on the individual page or post editing page.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
2 canonical links on 1 page, 1 for print version
Our developer has added a 2nd canonoical link for the "print" version of our page. I read on another post that this appears to be not be the correct way to do this. Is there a better way ? Here is an example of the code:
Moz Pro | | foodsleuth0 -
Seo moz has only crawled 2 pages of my site. Ive been notified of a 403 error and need an answer as to why my pages are not being crawled?
SEO Moz has only crawled 2 pages of my clients site. I have noticed the following. A 403 error message screaming frog also cannot crawl the site but IIS can. Due to the lack of crawling ability, im getting no feed back on my on page optimization rankings or crawl diagnostics summary, so my competitive analysis and optimization is suffering Anybody have any idea as to what needs to be done to rectify this issue as access to the coding or cms platform is out of my hands. Thank you
Moz Pro | | nitro-digital0 -
Why does it keep displaying br tags and claiming 404 errors on like 4 of my URL's for all my Wordpress sites?
Is anyone else having the same issue? These errors don't actually exist and i think it has something to do with wordpress - how can i fix this?
Moz Pro | | MillerPR0 -
I am trying to find inbound links for one of my site urls. My question is does SEOMoz able to track all internal links as the Open Site Explorer shows 0 internal links?
It shows 0 internal links when I am pretty sure we have multiple internal links.Should we use absolute urls or relative urls for internal links?
Moz Pro | | SulekhaUSLLC0 -
How can I prevent errors of duplicate page content generated by my tags from my wordpress on-site blog platform?
When I add meta data and a canonical reference to my blog tags for my on-site blog which works using a wordpress.org template, Roger generates errors of duplicate content. How can I avoid this problem? I want to use up to 5 tags per post, with the same canonical reference and each campaign scan generates errors/warnings for me!
Moz Pro | | ZoeAlexander0 -
On-Page SEO Fixes - Are They Relative?
So, I'm implementing on-page fixes for a site that my company runs SEO services for (www.ShadeTreePowersports.com). However, I was wondering if there was a way to rank a pages' SEO quality, in general? As of now, it seems like the only way your recommendations can be consumed and altered is on a keyword basis. However, this seems be the reason I have a good amount of my F-Grades. Since my website sells powersports apparel and accessories, we cover a variety of applicable (but different) keywords like 'Motorcycle parts' or 'snow tubes,' because we sell so many different types of products. But, when I look at my F-Grades - SEOMoz is telling me my homepage is ranking poorly for a multitude of those pertinent keywords - but only because my page isn't catered specifically to each of them (IE: 'Snowmobile Parts' - 'Water Sport Apparel') But, with so many different types of products, catering to a specific one is impossible and would be detrimental. Is there a way to see how a page ranks, without factoring in those keywords? Or a better way that I can use these recommendations more efficiently? Thanks guys!
Moz Pro | | BrandLabs0 -
Why would opensite explorer show a link from baidu result page with baidu as a linking root domain?
I found an old domain that has very high domain authority and one of its top linking root domains is baidu I clicked the link in ose and it took me to a baidu serp????? please explain...im happy to clarify if need be or give you the site in question just let me know what you think. I checked ose for the page authority of the serp page it was 50. would that page be helping the site in question to rank? or am I just dumb for asking this question One more thing I couldnt actually find a link to the page I was looking at in ose on the baidu result page.. thanks
Moz Pro | | duncan2740 -
OSE shows 118 FB shares but we show more, whats wrong here?
I ran www.lauriloewenberg.com/ in OSE and it shows 118 Facebook shares while we see more than that. Maybe we are doing something wrong or a setting isn't correct, I'm not sure. The site was created in WordPress. Here are 3 posts that add up to 224 shares: Post 1 114 shares Post 2 64 shares Post 3 46 shares I'm sure there are some people that are sharing multiple posts, Will that make a difference? Even if that was true the number still seems very low. Thanks 🙂
Moz Pro | | Mike-Dream0