Question about understanding Google Ranking System
-
Hi,
I have too many question that I need answer to understand Google ranking system. I have been analyzing different website in different niche, but puzzling to understand how Google rank actually. Some websites have good number of backlinks with good SEO metrics, but some low SEO profiled websiites outrank good sites.
I am here with my first question.
I am working for one client website who sell sex toys online. So we are optimizing keywords like sex toys, buy sex toys, sex shop, sex toy store and too many keywords to rank on google.ca. My client website is cupidboutique.com. We have some competitors that I want to mention below:
1. PinkCherry: This is one of our big competitor. They have 2 domain one is for US and one is for Canada. Both websites ranking well for different keywords. Basically .ca domain is more successful than .com domain. But I am surprise why Google consider the websites for rank. If you see, both websites are identical, that means both website have same product, same category structure, and the most important all products description are duplicate on each domain. On google webmaster guideline, google mention that if 2 domain have identical content, then Google ignore the duplicate one in ranking. But still both websites ranking for different search term.
I compare the SEO metrics of our domain and their .ca domain, there is not big difference. Our websites also have good number of links, good PA/DA, even more good number of social sharing than them. But our rankings are not even comparable with them. They are ranking within 20-30th on Google for different product category keywords, but not our.
2. Hushcanada: This is another website ranking well, but I a surprise how? This website is ranking on very high competitive keyword with very fewer number of backlinks. Their PA/DA, number of backlinks, social sharing all metrics are very few. Their business also established recently that is 2013, which I found through archive.org, whereas our client business has been running since 2003-2004. As a Ecommerce business website their homepage is not showing any product , their catalog can be found under "shop online" page only.
There are even some more websites ranking well with very low SEO metrics in this niche.
If Google is not looking for these SEO staff, then what other staff Google looks to rank website?
Hope I will get some favorable answer of my question.
-
I'm having trouble getting hotme.ca to rank for anything competitive - I can get it in #1 for "Toronto sex toys", but here you've got a strong local SEO impact, which could easily over-ride a lot of standard organic signals.
In most cases, it's not that they're hiding anything in their link profile, but one of a few explanations:
(1) Other sites have inflated PA/DA due to spammy links. We've just introduced spam scoring recently, but keep in mind that PA/DA are generally measures of overall ranking strength, and they don't account for quality/spam. In an industry where spammy is common, and especially when you've got tons of sites in the 20s and 30s, these numbers can leave out a lot.
(2) We're not crawling a lot of the weaker or lower-quality links. We tend to take a quality-over-quantity approach in MozScape, but if an entire industry relies on low-quality links, Google could be seeing more than we're seeing.
(3) Other factors are over-riding these link signals, as Massimiliano says. On-page is definitely one, technical issues is another, and local factors (as I mentioned above).
When someone is masking a link profile, what we usually see is that they're 301-redirecting other domains to that domain (and we aren't seeing those links directly). Typically, though we'd see those 301-redirects, and I'm not seeing that for hotme.ca.
Truth is, if they are doing something unethical, there's almost nothing you can do about it, unless it's flat-out illegal. In SEO, chasing your competitors bad behavior is almost always a completely waste of time - believe me, I've done it for clients (and it was a colossal waste of time and money). You have to focus on your site and what you can do.
-
First, I really think you are underestimating the importance of on-page optimization. If you read that backlinks are all that it matters, it's true, but given that the html code is not a mess. And even so, when comparing two websites with a similar backlink profile, the more on-page optimized wins.
Second, let's take hotme.ca, for which keywords are you analyzing its ranking?
-
Guys,
Please lets talk about a specific topic. What you said about our website I will fix the things.
So I have some specific question on the websites that ranking high in this niche. As I said previously most of websites ranking in this niche, showing very few backlinks as well as low DA/PA and all scores showing as on majestic, Hrefs and open site explorer. What I guess they are either hiding the backlink data or there are something that I am not able to find out.
No# 1 website in this niche is spencersonline.com and this is vital that this website ranking on #1. All of their SEO score is very high as compare to other competitor's website.
Open Site Explorer Data for this website:
PA/DA: 61/68, Number of linking root domain: 3370, Facebook/Twitter/Google Plus sharing: 2830/1575/1141
Now I am showing you some websites that ranking on good position in this niche, with low score:
hotme.ca:
DA/PA: 24/28, Linking Root Domain: 14 Only, Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus sharing: 750/93/296industrialuv.com
DA/PA: 25/37, Linking Root Domain: 40 Only, Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus sharing: 0/15/78loveshop.ca
DA/PA: 20/30, Linking Root Domain: 24 Only, Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus sharing: 7/3/3hushcanada.com
DA/PA: 22/30, Linking Root Domain: 23 Only, Facebook, Twitter, Google Plus sharing: 11/16/20Can you think that a website with only 14 linking root domain can rank in such a high competitive niche. I am asking do these websites hiding their backlinks or are they doing unethical way to rank high?
-
So, I've got you around #43 for "adult sex toys" (just to pick one), and PinkCherry.ca around #11.
It's tough, because there are a ton of sites in the first few pages with DA/PAs in the 20s-40s. This is a tricky range that covers a lot of sites - it's not particularly strong, and it can be easily skewed by bad links or hurt by technical issues.
I don't see any evidence of an outright penalty situation. I see a lot of small technical issues and sub-optimal on-page (such as the internal linking mentioned on Massimiliano's comments) that could make a difference, but it's hard to say how much of a difference.
At first glance, I do tend to agree that the link profile is dubious. I see a ton of free directory links, for example. They range from ok to things that look outright spammy, like:
http://seolinkcloud.org/Society_/Sexuality/?p=15
Now, any one of these directories by itself is no big deal, but if you have a link profile built on this stuff and a lack of a strong core to offset it, you can end up seeing your site devalued. Unfortunately, when you're in that 30s range for DA, this is a common problem - the strong links aren't strong enough to offset the moderately spammy links.
The good news is that I think some small-scale link clean-up, a focus on stronger/better links, and some technical changes could actually go a long way for you. I'm not seeing a smoking gun here (and admittedly Q&A can't replace a full audit), but mostly a lot of small things that may be adding up to harm the site.
-
I'd tend to agree that the top menu is spreading link equity far and wide - I'm seeing something like 800 internal links from the home-page. It doesn't give Google any sense of hierarchy and could really be harming the top category pages from performing well.
This home-page size is also huge - I know that's not uncommon for an e-commerce site, but you've got something like 1MB just of Javascript and multiple 200K images. This isn't penalty-level stuff, but it can really weaken your ability to rank, and generally isn't great for conversion either. The giant scrolling banner images would be an easy thing to lose - I don't know of one UX/conversion person who thinks those are good for sales, and they just take a huge amount of code and load-time.
-
That megamenu is giving that page too many external links.
Choose a main keyword for each page and optimize for it, choose some (few sematically related) secondary keywords and try to optimize the page for them without jeopardaizing the first.
Please go again through MOZ guides and blog post and very nice whiteboard friday videos to better understand what "optimize" mean.
Once done if you will look back at the source code of those pages you will notice yourself they don't smell nicely.
Depending on the keyword competition level you may need to get some backlinks for those keywords, which means generate good quality links from relevant websites, within relevant content, without a spammy anchor, etc...
Work page by page, keyword by keyword. It's a long and draining process.
-
Hi,
Thank you for your reply. I don't understand what you say by "that megamenu is overkilling with external links". Can you please explain what you mean by that?
You are saying about pagegrader and onpage SEO of Hushcanada.
This website is ranking for different keywords like "sex toys", "sex toys online", "sex shop", "sex store".
But no any keyword phrase they even mentioned on any part of their website. Only "sex toy" keyword has been mentioned on title tag. For each keyword Moz page grader gave "F" grade. For a low competitive keyword it can be acceptable, but they are ranking with such a high competitive keyword.
There are some more niche, that I am seeing this type of ranking puzzle. Do you think that Google take some other major metrics to rank a website?
-
If I look at your backlink profile with ahrefs, there's few I don't like, I am referring to anchortexts stuffed with keywords which doesn't look natural to me, and I assume google would not consider them natural either.
Your competitor pinkcherry doesn't look much better, but that should not give you much comfort. And btw they have much more linking root domains so they beat you anyhow.
It's the on page which is really an issue in my opinion. Just starting with following advices from MOZ page grader would help a lot.
Take this page http://www.cupidboutique.com/vibrators which I assume from your early comment you would like to see ranked better than your competitors for the keyword "vibrators", and look at the source code. Starting from the head there's a lot I don't like, if you want to rank for vibrators, trim the title, that megamenu is overkilling with external links, the keyword density is overwhelming, and 50 h2 tag are simply too much. And content is thin.
You should rethink it. If you look at hushcanada.com page source for their best ranking results for the keyword vibrators you will see it's much much much better.
Pinkcherry rules because of the links, hushcanada beat you because of their onpage.
-
Hi,
Yes I know pinkcherry.ca have some more number of backlinks than us, but not that much high as compare to our website. But hushcanada have very fewer number of backlinks, but if you see, their rankings are even better than pinkcherry and our website. For many keywords (such as sex toys, sex toys online, sex shop) they rank on first page.
Regarding backlinks anchor text, no website have anchor rich backlinks, most of anchor texts are irrelevant to keywords. I checked using Hrefs and Majestic SEO too.
As you said something wrong on my onpage, whats wrong are you saying about. I did not do any different things.
Thank you.
-
Hi Peter,
Thank you for your response. As per your questions, I am providing below some keyword ranking comparison for our website and pinkcherry:
sex toys: Pinkcherry.ca - 27, Cupidboutique.com - nowhere
adult toys - Pinkcherry.ca - 17, Cupidboutique.com - nowhere
adult sex toys - Pinkcherry.ca - 12, Cupidboutique.com - 60
Vibrators - Pinkcherry.ca - 12, Cupidboutique.com - Nowhere
These are some example only. There are too many keywords that they are rankings, but not we.
Now I am showing you their duplicate product URL pages:
http://www.pinkcherry.ca/5-function-p-e-prostate-massager-vibe-in-black
http://www.pinkcherry.com/5-function-p-e-prostate-massager-vibe-in-black
http://www.pinkcherry.ca/9-function-p-e-prostate-massager-vibe-in-black
http://www.pinkcherry.com/9-function-p-e-prostate-massager-vibe-in-black
http://www.pinkcherry.ca/anal-fantasy-beginner-s-fantasy-kit
http://www.pinkcherry.com/anal-fantasy-beginner-s-fantasy-kit
These are also just example, all of their products are duplicate each other.
Can you please analyze this and inform me what they are doing to achieve good ranking, which I am not doing.
Thank You.
<colgroup><col width="197"></colgroup>
| adult sex toys | -
I can see the total number of referring domains decreasing for cupidboutique.com while it's increasing for the two others. That's not good.
Usual metrics, like DA/Trust etc... are definitely better for pinkcherry who also has more backlinks, but cupidboutique values are supposely better than hushcanada.
But... The count of positions in SERP top 50 is surprisingly low for cupidboutique (209) when compared to pinkcherry (1.2k) and hushcanada (823), something is definitely wrong with your SEO on-page in my opinion; but it could also be your backlink profile, you should check anchor text diversity and backlink diversity.
-
Could you provide a sample of a couple of phrases where you're popping up below these competitors?
In the case of Pink Cherry, there are many ways to operate a .com and .ca site without it looking like duplicate content to Google. If the sites are properly targeted, and Google doesn't think they're trying to "double dip", so to speak (rank two identical sites in one country), they can operate two sites in English without any penalties. There are risks and trade-offs, but it can certainly be done successfully.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Claiming Google+ URLs?
I have several brands which I am managing G+ profile pages for. These range from established brands with large followings to just starting out. When I try to claim a custom URL for these on Google+, it says to add some extra characters after the brand names to make them unique. I can't find any example of established big brands who have G+ URLS like "+toyotausa24" "+tacobell3" or anything like that. This does not seem to be well documented anywhere. Can someone tell me what the deal is with this feature? Also what is the best practice for large brands when claiming this? +BrandName1?
Social Media | | IrvCo_Interactive2 -
Google+ Best Practice
I have a client company looking to make use of G+ The company has a high quality, decent traffic blog with articles written by 4 in-house team members. The company has a G+ company page and each of the 4 blog authors has their own G+ profile. None of the G+ authors have any interest in using their G+ profile for general social reasons - simply as a means for sharing content (and consuming content from others) within the scope of the business sector they are in. In order to take advantage of G+ authorship, we have now linked each user to their own G+ profile page (using Yoast WP plugin) and linked the website to the G+ company page. Rel=publisher also added for the company. In terms of best practice would you recommend sharing new blog posts to the individual's G+ profile page AND to the G+ company page or just do one or the other? As a final twist the company also has a G+ Local page which is primarily used for local search/map entry (the company is online but has a physical office address). Should articles also be posted to the G+ Local page?
Social Media | | bjalc20110 -
Google Pus Places, page and youtube issues. PLEASE HELP!!!
Ok I have a youtube channel, a page connected to that and I have a business listing but I cannot get all three to work together. Any ideas? https://plus.google.com/+CentralsaddleryCoUk is the page (I want to ad the location to this one) http://www.youtube.com/user/centralsaddleryvideo our youtube The two above seem to work fine but the local listing below will not connect to the page or youtube. https://plus.google.com/b/107598085314018001171/107598085314018001171/about?hl=en-GB This has been driving me nuts for ages.
Social Media | | mark_baird0 -
Facebook Like button and Google plus
I can't believe that I still did not figure out what would be the best way to have facebook like button and google plus on the home page. I have tried several options but I was always receiving errors in W3 validator. Can somebody help please? Thank you Iris
Social Media | | Rebeca10 -
Using youtube videos to rank for queries in the serps as well as youtube
I have some youtube videos of my business and some of them are ranking organically as well as for queries in youtube. Would it be wise to start naming more of my videos long tale key search phrases and uploading them to youtube to get them to rank organically and on youtube? what is the best way to optimize these videos? key phrases in the description as well as title of the video? How do i get them to rank on youtube as well as in the serps? just get lots of views or do links to my video help? Thanks mozzers! Ron
Social Media | | Ron100 -
Current and Potential Impact of Google+ on SERPs and ranking
After watching Rand & Dharmesh's The State of SEO and Internet Marketing in 2012 webinar, I've been trying to learn more about the (current and potential long-term) impact of Google+ on SERPS and ranking. How can one leverage Google+ to improve SEO? Would love to hear your thoughts. Thanks! Sherry
Social Media | | IMM0 -
Bringing a Google+ business page and a Google+ Local (Places) page together
We have a Google+ business page @ <cite>https://plus.google.com/105699067779457680386</cite> (therefore the managers of that page log in with their personal Google accounts to use Google+ as the business page). We had/have a Google Places listing tied to our company Google account, and that does show up in Google+ Local. I simply would like to marry the two so they can live together in perfect harmony. But that does not seem straightforward at all. If I'm logged in with our company Google account, I am asked to "join" Google+, but I don't want our company to be a "person" on Google Plus (just a Business Page). If I'm logged in with my personal Google account, and switch to using Google+ as our business page, and then click to claim/edit our Google+ Local listing, that doesn't work because I'm not logged in under our corporate Google account. It's an Internet mystery. Mozzers, assemble!
Social Media | | SamTurri0 -
Summarize your question.
Hey guys, I need some help with my company's website and integrating some of facebook's tools to my site. Basically what i need help with is creating a "like us" pop up option or a "share link" pop up option on my check out page. The process would be something like this....Once someone buys my product, the thank you page will appear, then a pop up will pop up and say something like " if you like us on facebook we will send you a free gift" so when they click on pop up, another facebook pop up will appear asking for permission to either like the page or share the link, then hopefully they share the link and the word is spread. Anyways, what are the basic steps that I need to get this done. anything to point me in the right direction would be very helpful, thanks! I got this idea from buying from a website recently, bonobos (great pants btw). I even took a screen shot of the 2 steps that happened to kinda model what I am looking for, for my website. the first image is what pops up on the thank you page itself, the next image shows what happens when you click the "share on facebook" button. I think dollar shave club does this too. xfpfo a9bWQ
Social Media | | david3050