Google Local Storefront or Google Service Area?
-
We have been seeing some strange things happen in Google local after the most recent update. We used to show up in the maps all the time and have made no major edits or changes to the profile.
Now when we search for our services, we show up high in the organic results, and not at all in maps (local listings). We have our profile setup as a service area since we do meet with people and provide services at their location, but also have checked the option that we also serve people at our address.
I am wondering if the recent update favors actual storefronts when people are searching for services. Any ideas? Technically all the actual work is provided at our location, and the service we provide at the service area locations is based upon consultations. If we switched it to an actual storefront listing could that possibly help? Our profile is fairly strong, and has reviews, long history of posts, etc.
What gives Google?
-
"We did this to let people know that we come out to their location, and also to try to expand our reach. For example, if you were searching for an SEO company in Chesterfield, that is an area that is about 30 mins from us. I'm not sure our local office listing would "carry" that far out, and thus the service area was created as a test."
Service area and service radius have absolutely no impact on ranking. It's been tested, proven. Typically you'll only rank in the city your are in. Unless competition is low and you are very strong, then sometimes you'll rank in other cities, but service area settings don't play a part.
"I'm not sure that the bot would take that long to recrawl the listing, and I would have thought that it would have happened by now if that was the case."
Sorry, not talking regular bots, like the ones that crawl sites. Maybe bot is the wrong word. But with Local listings you can have a violation for years without an issue. Then you make a minor edit and it seems to trigger a recheck of the listing to see if it stands up to current guidelines, then it gets wacked.
You had another question I got via email but it's not showing up here so copying:
"I had a question about this, as even though we had quite a few mentions of the city and service they were spread out throughout the description and not bulked together in the traditional definition of keyword-stuffing. If what you were saying about the description having no part to play is true, how would that have had an impact on the LBL drop?
Help me understand, my mind is a sponge right now ;)"
Description is not a RANKING factor. But the algo looks at it as a signal of spamminess. Spammers have lots of patterns that the algo can pick up on, this is one of them. So a non-spammy description can trip a filter if it follows the same pattern of overly repetitious keywords.
In that short description, count every single time any word is repeated more than once. I did a quick scan and counted 25.
Mike Blumenthal has also said mentioning city even twice in description can cause a 10 point ranking penalty. I have examples I could show at my forum, where the description was not spammy or KW stuffed, but the city and KWs were repeated multiple times. They clean up description per my recommendation and pop right back up.
But again all that was pre-pigeon. After, it seemed like lots of really spammy ones were getting away with it. So may no longer be an issue.
But like I said above, if it does not help and if customers will never see it and if it could maybe hurt AND if your ranking was suffering, why not clean it up? Nothing to lose.
-
Sorry David, I'm not seeing the description cleaned up at all. Is it cleaned up in dash but it's just not showing live yet?
-
I had a question about this, as even though we had quite a few mentions of the city and service they were spread out throughout the description and not bulked together in the traditional definition of keyword-stuffing. If what you were saying about the description having no part to play is true, how would that have had an impact on the LBL drop?
Help me understand, my mind is a sponge right now
-
Linda,
Thank you for your insights into this issue. We have cleaned up the description, and now it appears to rank again. This is simply maddening lol, especially when you see all the keyword driven URL's and old-SEO-world tactics that still work in our area. I can't imagine what it's like trying to rank in a larger area such as Chicago or NYC, although I'd enjoy that battle to the top.
We try to practice white-hat to the core, and it is very frustrating when we see other companies submitting to link farms, using stuffed content and other methods and still ranking well. Doing it the right way is definitely more time consuming, but I feel it is the best for a sustainable result.
I'm not sure what caused the drop. We were showing up for over a year in the number one position, and I don't have to explain what that can do for validation to potential clients when you have the number one LBL and organic.
Now that it is working, I wonder if we should still make the change to deleting the service area and sticking with the local address. Linda, your thoughts? As I'm sure you are aware, sometimes when you shake up things in Google it can have the adverse reaction you were expecting.
"I looked at your images and you have a big VERY nice professional agency office. So I don't understand why you set up a service area. Again SABs don't rank lower per se BUT miscategorizing your business could cause a problem. You don't do the work onsite like a plumber and do have a commercial office, so don't think you should have service area at all. There is no reason to. No way it would help and could in fact hurt."
**We did this to let people know that we come out to their location, and also to try to expand our reach. For example, if you were searching for an SEO company in Chesterfield, that is an area that is about 30 mins from us. I'm not sure our local office listing would "carry" that far out, and thus the service area was created as a test. A test that for a long time was working well. I'm not sure that the bot would take that long to recrawl the listing, and I would have thought that it would have happened by now if that was the case. All speculation of course, but it is an interesting point to consider. Thank you for your kind words about the office, as I have personally spent many hours trying to get it "just right". **
Miriam and Linda, thank you for all your help and insight regarding this issue. It has been truly helpful and educating. When I first had this question there was no doubt in my mind of where to ask. Literally said to myself "Just put a question up on MOZ, they will know" lol.
*sorry for so many edits. The text editor is not playing nice tonight
-
Thanks Miriam,
No I have not seen a ranking penalty like that for not hiding address.
And you bring up good points about the history of SEOs and Google Miriam and this is an industry that's under higher scrutiny.
I was coming to stick my neck way out and suggest something I've never suspected before. But lo and behold I double checked your ranking for "St Louis SEO company" and you are #1 again.
So all that aside. I looked at your images and you have a big VERY nice professional agency office. So I don't understand why you set up a service area. Again SABs don't rank lower per se BUT miscategorizing your business could cause a problem. You don't do the work onsite like a plumber and do have a commercial office, so don't think you should have service area at all. There is no reason to. No way it would help and could in fact hurt.
So even though you are ranking again right now, I would still clean up that description to be on the safe side and remove the service area settings and see if that helps your ranking become more stable.
-
Linda - thank you for catching my mistake! I should have typed 'was' not 'is' in speaking about Google's behavior with hidden addresses from a historical standpoint. My error! I've corrected it.
-
Hi David!
Great tip from Linda regarding the description. She has documented this previously and knows her stuff Thank you for letting us know which business this was for, as well.
Okay, so ... clearly, you have a staffed, physical office and, ideally, should be able to mark your business as also serving customers at your location. The only thing that could possibly go wrong with this is if Google does not believe that your industry should have addresses displayed. Google has behaved somewhat uniquely over the years in regards to SEO/web design firms. For a long time, the only way to get these to display in packs was to add an 'in' to your query ... like 'SEO company in Denver'. Finally, a year or two ago, they changed their policy on this and started showing normal local results for this industry.
What we can surmise from this is that Google has been especially sensitive regarding spamming in this industry and, possibly, that they view most SEO/design firms as virtual rather than brick-and-mortar. So, you can mark your business as serving customers at the location, but ultimately, it will be up to Google to decide whether they want to display your address or not.
And that brings me to a question I'd like to ask Linda, based on her experience with her forum: Linda have you ever seen a case in which Google went beyond simply hiding the address for a business that legitimately deserved to have it displayed (like David's company) and simultaneously punished the business, rankings wise? I've not seen this - but I thought I'd ask if you had. Love having you pop by!
-
Hi David, didn't know if it was for you or a client and the 1st post didn't show your company name, so thanks for clarifying.
FYI a listing can be fine for a long time, and then a bot does a recheck and finds a problem that had been there for a long time. So you don't necessarily need to change something for rankings to go south - just so you know for future reference with clients.
OK now others may disagree but I've done consulting for numerous companies where this was a problem and correcting it caused the listing to pop right up.
Look at your description on your G+ L page and how much KW repetition there is. City repeated 3 or 4 times. Main keywords including the KWs in your name repeated several times.
Now have to say that may not be it, because KW repetition like that USED to cause a ranking penalty, but after Pigeon hit it did not seem to any more.
But cleaning it up won't hurt because: 1) Description is not a local ranking factor at all, so keyword stuffing won't help. 2) Google has removed all links to G+ L pages so customers will likely never even see that description either.
So I would totally strip out all keywords especially city and business name. Just do a short benign paragraph with benefits etc. not mentioning all the services.
Try that and see if it helps.
-
Linda,
Thank you for your reply and in trying to help. Let me give some details:
We offer SEO and optimization services in the St Louis area. Currently, our listing is set to be a service area, but we also include the checkbox that we serve people at our location. We have an office building that is fully staffed for people to visit and discuss their business goals in detail. The office is where the majority of our work is performed, but we also offer consultations and meetings at the client's location (hence the service area we are willing to drive to). The service area includes other areas around St Louis up to a 30-mile radius.
We made no listing changes and very few site changes that would have dropped us from showing in the maps (LBL) area. We still show up there, but you actually have to open the maps view and scroll down the list using the more information or more businesses link that Google provides. The site changes that were made were primarily visual, and the site load speed etc remain the same.
If you do a search for "St Louis SEO company" we used to show up as the number one listing, and also as the number one organic. The organic has stayed the same. The LBL has more depth than that of our competition and includes longer descriptions, more links to associated profiles, and images. This is why I am wondering what happened? Why did it move to a lower position when it was static and remained there for months on end?
This is why I am wondering if we should revise the listing to say that we only service people at our office, and if that will influence the LBL display. From our research, it didn't matter where you were typing it from, and it always showed up in the top three. Even if you searched from a further location from our office.
-
Hi Miriam, thought I'd pop in on this one, hope you don't mind. Thanks for linking to my forum thread about duplicates.
Hi David,
It's actually no longer true that hiding your address and using a service area hurts your rankings over brick and mortar. But Miriam is right, it used to be true a couple years ago.
For one example Google: plumber san marcos ca. All 3 that rank on top have address hidden. The ones that rank lower have address showing.
"but also have checked the option that we also serve people at our address." That will show address which could be a violation depending on the situation.
What industry and what service? And what type of location do you have? Is it your home? Is it an office with a sign for your company? Is it an office that's staffed full-time to receive walk- in traffic?
If you answer those I can advise further. But bottom line, if you need to hide your address on your listing, you really need to comply. It's a major violation if you don't.
But I agree with Miriam too, there could be something else that caused the ranking drop, because the service area setting would not be the problem.
-
Hey David,
Could you specify which recent update you mean? It might help the community pinpoint this better. Here's what I can tell you:
-
Google was actually typically believed to favor physical addresses over SABs. This has been the feeling, historically, so if you do serve people at your address, definitely specify this.
-
Your explanation of no longer appearing in the local packs is raising some flags, for sure. Are you not able to find your listing anywhere in the local finder view? Not sure what this is, please see: https://moz.com/blog/where-did-google-local-go-the-google-places-api-change-made-simple.
Things to investigate would be duplicates (http://www.localsearchforum.com/google-duplicates-merges/38281-critical-google-local-dupe-research-tips-new-tool-new-trick.html), guideline violations (https://support.google.com/business/answer/3038177?hl=en) and active competitors who have simply surpassed you.
In your shoes, I would absolutely be doing a full audit (https://moz.com/blog/ultimate-local-seo-audit). Disappearing from the local results entirely is almost a sure sign of a serious problem. I hate to give bad news like that, but fortunately, you've noticed something isn't right and can start investigating ASAP. Wishing you good luck on this!
-
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google+ Brand Account Separate from Google My Business
Hi everyone, I tried to create a Google+ account from a client's Google My Business, but found that 'Enable Google+' is no longer available on the sidebar of the GMB dashboard. I used this tutorial to do that before - http://onlineownership.com/create-google-page-connected-google-business-page/ An update on that article: Update: 31st October 2017
Local Listings | | nhhernandez
Google My Business has confirmed that enabling a G+ business page will no longer be available. Users will need to now create a G+ Brand page for their business on G+. My question is: If we create a separate G+ Brand page, are we still able to tie it up with GMB or are they going to be completely different platforms? On the dashboard for our older clients we have a list that goes like: Your Business is Live on Google View on Search View on Maps View on Google+ In light of this new change. Do we still really have to bother creating G+ brand pages? It seems like the newly launched Google Posts is more user-friendly and easier to update. The posts could be created on GMB and it's going to appear on searches within the local knowledge graph. Thoughts?1 -
Google Knowledge Graph Carousel
Hi - I am trying to get on the Google Knowledge Graph Carousel. I've set up G+, YouTube, Consistent NAP, local business schema, etc. but still have not been featured. Can you please help me figure out why I cannot get a carousel feature. Please help me determine what I am missing.
Local Listings | | mmmeans0 -
Local Search and Schema.org - Do I need to tag up the "same as" Property to all my citations to help with local rankings?
Hi All, We have implemented Schema.og on our website and this also includes the local business schema for all of our branches.However I've read an article (see below ) which says we should also be doing "same as " property and linking this to ALL of our citations such as google plus page , yelp , bing places, city search etc etc as this will help with citations. I am wondering if anyone has done this ? - And if so , has this helped with local rankings etc - I don't really want to invest the extra costs to get this done if I can't find anywhere that says its made a difference - The article from whitespark - says - "when you create new citations for your business (or for your client’s), it’s a waiting game hoping that Google and the other search engines will find your new citations quickly and make the connection between those listings, the business, and the website. The “sameAs” property can help make that process much quicker _and _easier. Schema.org explains that the “sameAs” property is used along with the “URL of a reference Web page that unambiguously indicates the item's [or business’] identity.” By using the “sameAs” property in your NAP schema markup, you can tell search engines that the business you’ve marked up is the same one found at a certain citation URL Of course, Google+ isn’t the only important citation source. There’s also Bing Places, Facebook, Yelp, Citysearch and a few others. The nice thing about many schema.org properties is that you can use them multiple times in your markup." I am wondering what peoples thoughts were and whether they has implemented this and if so , did it help ? thanks Pete | [sameAs](http://schema.org/sameAs) | URL | URL of a reference Web page that unambiguously indicates the item's identity. E.g. the URL of the item's Wikipedia page, Freebase page, or official website. |
Local Listings | | PeteC121 -
Not showing in local for primary keyword
I have a client in the junk removal business and I can't get him to show in local for junk removal +city. Junk removal is not a Google Plus category so we have to choose Garbage Collection Service, which everyone else does as well. I've optimized the site and the local listing pretty well, much better than the competitors, but we're still not showing. It's not that we're asking to rank better, we're just trying to get on the list for the one term that makes all the difference in this business. I feel like there's a junk removal party going on and we're not invited. I've thought about a possible over-optimization penalty, but there's no G warning or message and we use fewer keywords than our competitors and have no spammy links as some of the competition does. Some companies that are no longer in business are visible. I just can't figure out what we might be doing wrong. Any ideas or suggestions I might have missed?
Local Listings | | Dino640 -
Google + / Local for Business. How to SEO ?... Done the basic but no real change.
Hi All, We have set up all of our Google local for business pages which are verified and these link to the relevant branch pages on our website. The branch pages also link back to the relevant google local page. We only appear for one category on the google local pages and we have also done a large number of citations (NAP) across all locations and the text used in each of the google pages is keyword rich and we mention the city in there as well to localise it. We have a few google + likes and we have used hootsuite to publish the same content across some of the google local pages which links back to our website blog , we are not appearing in local search whereas our competitors seem to be appear for all their branches. Is there any fundamental tips or things we need to do to def. get up on the rankings.. Or any good articles worth reading ?.. I've had a look but can't seem to see anything relating a google local business bible.. thanks Pete
Local Listings | | PeteC121 -
Local Citations
So we are working on our citations. Now the issue is (not really an issue, but it is definitely very annoying) is that we have multiple locations. I get that you need to then have multiple listings. Where I get baffled is that I have read that you will then need to have more than 1 google + account for the different addresses. That seems like a lot of work to keep two google + accounts updated. Is this a must for SEO purposes?
Local Listings | | blackrino0 -
Local Optimisation without Local Pages?
What is the best and latest technique to optimise a website target lots of multiple local areas - I have a site where we want to target 10-15 local areas - at the moment the content mentions the local areas but not all of them as I felt it was going to turn into a list or keyword stuffing.I still see sites creating individual pages for each local area and including the areas in the url - the client wants to try and resist this as they do not want a lot of "bullsh*t" pages - (there exact words). What are the latest techniques or options? What have people tried and been successful with or equally failed with?
Local Listings | | JohnW-UK0 -
How do URL's influence Google Rankings?
Hi There, I have a new client who wishes to rank in Google UK for 'Antique Fireplaces London'. Currently they rank 49th. They do not know their logins for Google Local (where they have 40+ positive reviews). And have very mess social activity (which i am trying to sort out). The domain is around 8 years old - website has just been redone (drupal) where a lot of the former SEO errors were corrected) but they seem to be outranked by much newer websites that have much lower domain authority and less inbound links. My client also has much more recognition in online trade magazines and newspapers than most of their competitors. Would buying some additional domains with the keywords they wish to rank for help? Or will this look dodgy to google? Any other quick tips to give them a boost?
Local Listings | | skehoe0