Why are my citations not showing up?
-
We're managing a website for a client and decided to use Yext to build citations. We've gone through and manually verified that they are live. Moz Local cannot find this website or the citations, nor could Ahrefs, or Majestic.
Google has indexed 154 pages of the website, Bing has indexed 10. This dealer has two websites (I know that's a faux pas, it's by client request), so that they can "test" our website before giving up their old one. They're tied to the same NAP, but have different web addresses. We got permission to claim the listings for the website we sent live and put them up about two months ago.
I can't figure out for the life of me why none of my tools will verify the existence of this website and the citations. I checked for a no index and no follow command in the HTML (which shouldn't be a problem because Google has indexed the site) and it was clean. The only thing I can think of is that the old site is getting credit for the citations even though we've listed a different website address. Can anyone verify this?
-
I have read a lot of the responses here. While some of it I agree with, I think we are overlooking some very basic ideas about search engines and what they do, how they work and how we get credit for backlinks that push up the domain authority of our websites.
So lets start at the beginning. It is a 'given in the SEO industry' that google citations (listings on multiple business listing sites) is important and that by signing up for YEXT we are attempting to solve a two-fold problem:
- We are synchronizing the NAP issue read more here ( name address phone number) for the purpose of resolving NAP consistency.
- we are having our sites listed on Showmelocal, Manta, Foursquare, Yelp etc in a synchronized format with a clickable link to our URL. ( domain of our business)
The second one, we immediately assume that by signing up for YEXT we will have our business domain listed there and google will give us credit for this backlink - WELL THIS WILL ONLY HAPPEN IF THAT PAGE THAT YOU ARE ON IS INDEXED BY GOOGLE. I.E. YOUR LISTING ON FOURSQUARE OR SHOWMELOCAL GETS INDEXED BY GOOGLE. AND THEN YOUR BUSINESS WEBSITE GETS INDEXED BY GOOGLE A FEW DAYS LATER -AND THEN GOOGLE GIVES YOUR CREDIT BECAUSE YOU HAVE A HIGH RANKING DOMAIN AUTHORITY DOFOLLOW BACKLINK POINTING TOWARDS YOUR BUSINESS URL.
This is not the case. Some people have mentioned on here that google sees these links. Google WILL NOT unless they get indexed. I agree with Chris Ashton that google does not see these links until a long time later - this is due to the amount of time it takes to index these sites and all these pages. Only when those pages with your business URL are indexed and your business site is indexed will you get credit.
If you find this explanation to be inaccurate then test it. You have to be testing it with a domain that you have signed up for YEXT and you cannot find its citation listings with its backlink when you perform an MOZ backlink search. Look at a business that is signed up for YEXT and not showing google citations when you use MOZ or other software. Perform a search in the same format as it is displayed on foursquare without the https: ....eg. enter the domainname.com just on its own into the google search bar....look through the pages ....if you cannot find it then the foursquare page is not indexed. Or search the name of the business with "foursquare" along side it in the google search bar....
eg: Bergman dentistry Queens foursquare ( a fictitious practice)
**if you dont see it in the SERPS pages -and it listed on foursquare- then its not indexed - **
hence you have confirmation.
** try with other citations sites... **
My solution - take the link to the profile page on foursquare or any other site - paste it multiple times into indexkings.com or pingfarm.com ( many advise against this but how else do you index someone else's site that you have no control over and you cannot login into search console) - also copy those multiple links and paste them into about 5-10 youtube video comment sections ( preferably your own) - when you tube indexes it it will crawl those links. then create a separate page on you site title links. paste the 100 or so google citation profile pages in here, now index the page manually using search console....when google crawls that page it will index those links.....
Failing this try to manually login into the profile pages - make some changes and update them - then do the method above.
comments are welcome, but the above has worked for me...
PH
PS - i made a correction as a I had previously mentioned YELP instead of YEXT. my mistake.
-
Note: This is Miriam replying, but I'm in Mozzer Alliance at the moment.
All feedback here is really good! Thanks, everyone, for contributing so generously.
Joricia, regarding Moz Local, I'm very curious that we are not finding anything for the business. Are you able to share the details? If not, it's totally okay, but I'd like to be able to re-produce the results you are seeing.
As others have mentioned, it is definitely not a good idea to have 2 websites featuring the same or similar NAP. This can cause untold issues, unfortunately
I'll look forward to your reply!
-
While I agree it may take longer to see some of the citations that are created with Yext, I don't think the duplicate information from Yext's data push is necessarily bad. It's not like you're duplicating an article - these are local citations which are treated a little differently. Yext is good because it helps create consistency in the local search ecosystem (which is a positive local ranking factor), but i don't think Google dings it for duplicate content. Businesses create hundreds of citations with the same information, yet rank very well. I see that as Google acknowledging the importance of some parts of the data, but ignoring or not positively counting others. Local citations are not "low quality" in the sense they'll help you in local search. Local directories (Yelp, Yellowpages, insiderpages, local newspaper business directories, etc) are valuable in their own way, but only if your intention is to improve local search presence.
To check if the citations are indexed do a site:{citationURL} search. If they're indexed, then Google has found them and is most likely counting them.
The two websites could be working against you, especially if they have similar information on them. Which website do you have tied to the GMB page? Is it the same as all the citations like you mentioned above?
-
Here's the problem. Moz, Majestic, and Ahrefs, all do not crawl nearly as deep as Google does. I promise you, Google sees these new citations, even though they don't register on your tools.
The citation created is a "low-quality" page, which is going to not only take longer for Ahrefs and even Google to find, but will also end up being far less impactful for positive search growth.
With Yext, you don't have the opportunity to create a unique/quality webpage... with Yext, you're essentially creating duplicate content, which we all know at this point Google does not appreciate.
Your citations are very likely already known to Google, even if you can't see them. If you search for the NAP in Google and don't see it, it's likely there is not enough unique content on the page and that there is not enough link-flow to the page.
Try running an experiment where you use Yext to create a Yahoo listing, then create your own Yahoo listing manually with a unique description, add all relevant categories and see which one ranks higher and faster.
-
Basically it's to do with the way the tools you're using gather this data.
The short answer here is that none of these tools can possibly give you real-time data - there will be a delay of anywhere from days to months depending on a number of factors so a fresh link built today may not show up in Moz (Open Site Explorer), Majestic, Ahrefs etc until some time early next year. It's a similar story if a new domain isn't showing up in the tool at all - if no backlinks have been "found" yet, it has no data to show you.
Since Google doesn't provide any of these tools with access to the citations they've "seen", each of them have their own way of collecting this data and trying to emulate what Google does as best they can.
What this means is that these tools have to recrawl a site before they can detect any new/lost backlinks and list them for you. This obviously takes time and a lot of resources given how many websites are live at any one moment so it will be done using some kind of algorithm and/or schedule.
Because each tool has their own way of doing this, you may even see one tool show you a fresh citation faster than others. Unfortunately this is the best indication we have of a backlink profile. Frustrating since we'd all love to report to our clients/managers exactly how a link building campaign is progressing in real-time but it just means that part of our job is understanding roughly how these tools work and communicating realistic expectations around them.
I hope that helps!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How does Google Local Insights report impressions for multiple mappack listings (same company) showing up for one query?
I had a client ask me a difficult question about impression reporting via Google Local Insights. Lets say a client is a popular ice cream chain and somebody does a local brand search for "San Francisco Exotic Tasty Ice" and three locations for the same company all show up in the Google Local Pack. Does each one of these locations receive their own impression via Google Local Insights? Or does Google just count this as one impression for one location altogether? Logically speaking I would think that each location would get its own impression in the insights report. However I'm wondering if there is anything to negate that. Any feedback is appreciated.
Local Listings | | RosemaryB0 -
Should citations include all your address? What is most important?
Hi I am looking to rank highly in local search for the city we are based in and I will be creating some citations so that we can rank for a city but have a problem. Our website lists us as being located in the Wirral which is a borough but Google + requires you to add a county for this line so could add either Merseyside or Cheshire. Should I leave this part of the citation out - i.e. Wirral or Merseyside. We are ranking well for the term Wirral and do not want to effect this. Could anyone advise me here so that we can start to rank better for the city Birkenhead? The Wirral is a peninsular as can be seen on Wilipedia - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metropolitan_Borough_of_Wirral
Local Listings | | SEM_at_Lees0 -
How Far is Too Far to Show Up in Local Results
Hi everyone, I have one client that is located about 45 minutes (25 miles) outside of a large city and I can't seem to help them rank within that large city. They're a relatively new business in the service industry (meaning they'll travel to an individual's residence) and in the surrounding cities closer to their physical location, they rank extremely well. In this large city, they have 3 keywords in the top 10, 2 snack pack rankings and then everything else is below 51! I have a feeling that distance depends on many things, but I am wondering if anyone has ever figured out how far away is **too far **to be considered local by Google. My feeling is that sure it would be nice to rank locally for this large city as it would open them up to a really large customer pool, but that maybe 45 minutes away is just not local (I know I personally don't consider that "local"). Again, I understand that ranking locally depends on a really wide range of factors, but I'm considering only distance in this question. Thanks so much!
Local Listings | | KaitlinNS0 -
Should I disavow local citation page links?
Hello Moz Community, I am worried about my link profile. I feel like there are so many low domain authority links coming from citation pages, or business listings. www.futuresolutionsmedia.com Would you recommend that I try to get rid of them, or just leave them be? Disavow them? MgircmN
Local Listings | | FutureSolutionsMedia0 -
Local Search and Schema.org - Do I need to tag up the "same as" Property to all my citations to help with local rankings?
Hi All, We have implemented Schema.og on our website and this also includes the local business schema for all of our branches.However I've read an article (see below ) which says we should also be doing "same as " property and linking this to ALL of our citations such as google plus page , yelp , bing places, city search etc etc as this will help with citations. I am wondering if anyone has done this ? - And if so , has this helped with local rankings etc - I don't really want to invest the extra costs to get this done if I can't find anywhere that says its made a difference - The article from whitespark - says - "when you create new citations for your business (or for your client’s), it’s a waiting game hoping that Google and the other search engines will find your new citations quickly and make the connection between those listings, the business, and the website. The “sameAs” property can help make that process much quicker _and _easier. Schema.org explains that the “sameAs” property is used along with the “URL of a reference Web page that unambiguously indicates the item's [or business’] identity.” By using the “sameAs” property in your NAP schema markup, you can tell search engines that the business you’ve marked up is the same one found at a certain citation URL Of course, Google+ isn’t the only important citation source. There’s also Bing Places, Facebook, Yelp, Citysearch and a few others. The nice thing about many schema.org properties is that you can use them multiple times in your markup." I am wondering what peoples thoughts were and whether they has implemented this and if so , did it help ? thanks Pete | [sameAs](http://schema.org/sameAs) | URL | URL of a reference Web page that unambiguously indicates the item's identity. E.g. the URL of the item's Wikipedia page, Freebase page, or official website. |
Local Listings | | PeteC121 -
Local SEO citations
Hello all 🙂 I've just started doing some local SEO citation stuff, using Whitespark. I'm wondering if it's a good idea to run different searches/listings for different keywords for the same business? For example, 'digital marketing manchester' and 'website design manchester' - or would you simply just do one keyphrase? All help appreciated!
Local Listings | | Seabrook
William0 -
Show Address or Not, this is the question
Our physical address is not manned because we primarily go to the customer site either electronically or in person. So technically, we are not supposed to check the box in Google+ " I also serve customers at my business address." Having the box unchecked hides the address on the Google+ page leaving just City and State. Now that we have submitted our location in Moz Local, we see this causes an inconsistent listing issue. The address shows in other listings but not in Google+. On one hand, we do not want people showing up to our location expecting to find us there when we are not. On the other hand, we want our listings to be consistent so that customers can see that we are local and can deliver our services in person when necessary. So what should we do about this? p8A6ZW5 ReWtbOa
Local Listings | | BoundlessData0 -
Local SEO: How many consistent citations needed to rank
Hello, Can you guys analyze this site and see how many (quality, consistent) citations they'll need to rank 1st (in local results) for the two following local terms: weight loss salt lake city hypnosis salt lake city website: The Brain Trainer LLC www.expandingpotentials.net Thank you
Local Listings | | BobGW0