Spam Score of 7??
-
Hi,
I recently took on a client for local SEO and i started improving his on page optimization etc and now I'm continuing with link building. It's hard since it's a boring industry (medical waste disposal), but I have gotten some links.
When I check up his link profile in OSE, it's still giving me a spam score of 7!!! and not showing the links I have acquired. I already removed the link it's showing up by contacting the website and it's not there anymore. The site is a very clean nice site, why am I getting such a high spam score?
Thanks for your help!
Rachel
-
Chris,
I really appreciate the time and effort you put into this thorough answer! Truly proud to be part of such a great community!
You said some really great points and put some of my worries to ease. I will continue link building and making a few corrections.
Thanks again for your helpful advice!
Rachel
-
Hi Rachel,
Not a problem, glad to hear you're on the right track! It's great to see the pages looking unique and much better for UX.
Looking at the elements flagged in your spam score breakdown, there are some relatively easy fixes in here still which may be contributing at least somewhat. To answer your question directly I would expect it will still be related to your link profile meaning less poor links and more quality ones will be the fix.
Don't forget that this score isn't a direct Google metric either. The entire Spam Score system is meant to be little more than a system of red flags for you to investigate - having a bad spam score isn't inherently a bad thing but it also shouldn't go ignored.
As for whether or not the Spam Score takes disavowed links into account, I can't find confirmation for this either way but I'd doubt it. This would require them having access to your Search Console to see the disavowed file.
Low MozTrust or MozRank Score / Large Site with Few Links These will obviously be resolved with ongoing link building but are likely the most significant factor in current score.
Small Proportion of Branded Links As you go about your link building, it tends to happen naturally but be sure to continue building links that use your brand name as the anchor.
Large Number of External Links You do have a fair volume of external links but they all appear to be legitimate so I'd ignore this one.
Low Number of Internal Links This one is quite valid. Beyond the nav I couldn't really see any internal linking practices going on. They shouldn't be promotional links within your blogs but just making sure that any piece of content that may be relevant to another page also includes a link. For example, if we mention Adwords on our SEO page, we'd include a link to our Adwords page for users who may want more information.
No Contact Info
May be caused by the fact that the phone number tends to show up with slightly unusual formatting in each instance; either:- 855.4.CYNTOX (429.6869)
- 855.429.6869
I'd be interested to see if changing this to just 855 429 6869 would clear that flag in the spam score. Applying schema markup here may also help.
External Links in Navigation This seems to be referring to the nav links to your login areas so it's another area I wouldn't really worry about. Changing this would frustrate users for the sake of satisfying an arbitrary checkpoint in this list which is exactly what we're not supposed to do with a tool like this!
On an interesting side note, ahrefs is still showing 42 obviously spammy referring domains. This won't change anything to do with your spam score since Moz isn't pulling Ahrefs metrics but it may not be great for your Google rankings if they're seeing the same links.
-
Hey Chris,
Thanks for steering me in the right direction way back in May! I was wondering what you'd suggest now... I improved the 50 pages with unique content and disavowed the links I couldn't remove, but I still have that horrible spam score :(.
Should I simply disregard it? Also, does OSE count the links that were disavowed?
Thank you,
Rachel
-
Hi Rachel, no problem at all, happy to help out!
We have a couple of clients in similar industries where it seems most of their successful competitors are using black hat tactics to get ahead and it seems to be working for them for now.
These clients are still too new to us to report anything valuable just yet - they're certainly moving ahead and I don't see an issue outranking their dodgy competitors, it's just frustrating that black hat SEO is typically much faster but their rankings could drop literally any day.
That aside, a disavow may help you somewhat but I always recommend spending the time removing as many as you can (without paying the removal fees that many will request!). Building new, high quality and relevant links will also help swing that ratio away from being almost exclusively spam. Everybody has at least some dodgy links to don't stress too much about getting it perfect, just improve the ratio.
It's great that you've got unique content coming and regional differences in law and restrictions is a great starting point for offering that unique value as well. Location pages like this are just fine, so long as they each serve a unique purpose. Just make sure the site structure and content caters to the user's intent, not just adding content to keyword-specific pages.
I would expect that removing as many of those bad links as you can, building quality new ones and improving the site's content will go a long way to lowering your spam score and more importantly, moving one step closer to driving qualified and converting traffic.
-
Hi Chris,
Thanks so much for putting in the time and effort to look into the website and answer my question.
This industry in general is full of spam and doorway pages (probably because of the hardship of getting quality links) but our competitors who have more links and spam are doing better than us and have a better spam score. Do you think if I disavow those links it will help?
You are very right about the pages that seem to be extraneous but I am actively curating content and they will be unique landing pages. Every state has its own laws and quirks in regards to medical waste and we will be focusing on that.
Do you think when I finish those task I will be able to rank better and have a lower spam rate?
Any other suggestions?
Thanks again!
-
Hi Rachel,
I've just spent a minute or two having a look over the site and link profile and there are quite few reasons why the spam score would be so high.
Looking at the link profile to start with, most of the links are made up of SEO directories and blog comment spam and this alone would be reason enough to consider the site spammy.
Looking at the onsite work, at first glance things don't seem too bad until I let Screaming Frog crawl it. There are some internal links pointing to 301s which isn't great efficiency for crawl budget but far more problematic is the ~50 pages that exist purely to chase a particular keyword. They don't offer any value to the user at all and are very direct in the keyword they target with only ~50 words of the same content on each with the location changed.
For example:
https://cyntox.com/oklahoma/
https://cyntox.com/north-dakota/
https://cyntox.com/ohio/Here are a couple of resources to better understand the Spam Score. Matt provided them in another thread and they proved very handy, just don't fall into the trap of only fixing elements that Moz looks at to lower the score; produce a stronger and more genuine website instead!
As is so often the case with Moz's spam score, if you want to lower the spam score you just need to lower the spam
I hope that helps!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Magento 1.9 SEO. I have product pages with identical On Page SEO score in the 90's. Some pull up Google page 1 some won't pull up at all. I am searching for the exact title on that page.
I have a website built on Magento 1.9. There are approximately 290,000 part numbers on the site. I am sampling Google SERP results. About 20% of the keywords show up on page 1 position 5 thru 10. 80% don't show up at all. When I do a MOZ page score I get high 80's to 90's. A page score of 89 on one part # may show up on page one, An identical page score on a different part # can't be found on Google. I am searching for the exact part # in the page title. Any thoughts on what may be going on? This seems to me like a Magento SEO issue.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | CTOPDS0 -
Can't support IE 7,8,9, 10\. Can we redirect them to another page that's optimized for those browsers so that we can have our site work on modern browers while still providing a destination of IE browsers?
Hi, Our site can't support IE 7,8,9, 10. Can we redirect them to another page that's optimized for those browsers so that we can have our site work on modern broswers while still providing a destination of IE browsers? Would their be an SEO penalty? Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | dspete0 -
Moz page optimization score issue, have a score of 95, but can get to 99 if I ad my keyword basically twice in the url.
Hello, I have a keyword for lack of providing too much info we will say my keyword is laptop-bags. Now we have a /laptop-bags/ page and inside that page **/laptop-bags/leather-shoulder/ ** We got a score of 95 for that page. Now I got a score of 99 when I changed it to **/laptop-bags/leather-shoulder-laptop-bags/ ** The way Bigcommerce handles is it will use the product category title in the url, page title and site links, to me it feels like it's spammy, as well as on my /laptop-bags/ page, I now have 18 keywords of " laptop bags " on that page when before it was 12, since I added laptop-bags to all 6 categories inside the laptop-bags page. How would you handle this, use the /keyword/ then /longtail-keyword/ in full or would using /laptop-bag/leather-shoulder/ still rank for leather shoulder laptop bags? I've asked this before and was told to use whatever sounded better to the user, but now moz is telling me different.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Deacyde0 -
How to do Spam Link Analysis before posting a link?
OSE provides Spam analysis for website link profile, Do Moz have a tool to check the link quality before placing a link? How to do Spam Link Analysis before posting a link?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | bondhoward1 -
Is there a tool to find out if a URL has been deemed "SPAM" by GOOGLE
I am currently doing a link audit on one of my sites and I am coming across some links that appear to be spam. Is there a tool that I can plug their URL into to see if they have been deemed spam by GOOGLE?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Mozd0 -
Spam Links? -115 Domains Sharing the Same IP Address, to Remove or Not Remove Links
Out of 250 domains that link to my site about 115 are from low quality directories that are published by the same company and hosted on the same ip address. Examples of these directories are: -www.keydirectory.net -www.linkwind.com -www.sitepassage.com -www.ubdaily.com -www.linkyard.org A recent site audit from a reputable SEO firm identified 125 toxic links. I assume these are those toxic links. They also identified about another 80 suspicious domains linking to my site. They audit concluded that my site is suffering a partial Penguin penalty due to low quality links. My question is whether it is safe to remove these 125 links from the low quality directories. I am concerned that removing this quantity of links all at once will cause a drop in ranking because the link profile will be thin with only about 125 domains remaining that point to the site. Granted those 125 domains should be of somewhat better quality. I am playing with fire by having these removed. I URGENTLY NEED ADVICE AS THE WEBMASTER HAS INITIATED STEPS TO REMOVE THE 125 LINKS. Thanks everyone!!! Alan
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Kingalan10 -
Complicated Question: Removing Spam Backlinks that were Not Requested
I'm new and seeking help with the following scenario: 1. Main site: is a domain.com established authority type site 2. Second site: is a domain.org (has robots.txt to no index) but someone obviously not site owner has done negative seo campaign against the .org domain and built spammy links to it. In fact, that's all that exist on this second domain because it is used for development purposes only right now.) No one would link to this one normally as it is just secondary domain used to protect trademark and for development use.) When searching for it by domain name it does not appear on first page for search results. Checking link profile the only links that show for domain.org are spam links. Have contacted site/s where spam links were placed (no answer) Main site domain.com and domain.org have same whois and hosted on the same server as they are owned by same company Main site domain.com still appears first for its name but has lost some rankings. I am working to fix some technical issues ie: duplicate urls with CMS etc, but would like to find out what to do about the domain.org content that clearly has had someone target it with spammy non requested backlinks.) domain.com has Google webmaster tools account, no messages about unnatural liking in those reports 1. I'm not sure I should add domain.org to GWT to see if there is an unnatural link penalty applied or if this would further connect the two domains through association. If I could get some feedback/suggestions on what my options are with regards to making sure that the domain.org domain has a clean profile that would be most appreciated. Also because site owner has would like to begin using domain.org in the future for some unique content, but as it stands right now cannot because domain has been targed by poor backlinks. Anyone else run into situation where the .org or .net versions were targeted by spammy backlinks even though the domains were not actively used? What's the safest way to proceed? a) Concerned about possible co-penalty between main site domain.com and domain.org b) how to remove problems issues with domain.org so that owner can use it in future. Many thanks for your thoughts and help with this one. I appreciate any help or feedback.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | web0230 -
Panda 3.7 recovery?
In June '12 we got a bunch of our keyword rankings wacked by Panda 3.7 and haven't recovered. This is really frustrating since we had been hit by the original Panda and spent months fixing our site so that we had recovered in December '11. I've read what I can find about this update to see if there is something specific about it that would have knocked us down again and can't find anything. Does anyone know of any specific issues that this update supposedly "fixed"?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | IanTheScot0