Temporary landing pages and SEO
-
Hi guys! I have a question that has been running through my mind for quite a while now.
On our company, we offer different products that we put on specific landing pages (one per product). This products are "live" on a 20 day period.
Right now, when the product expires, we put a label "This product expired" and return a 404.
Is this the right way to do it? Take into account that keeping the page "alive" is not an option. The options would be:
-
301 redirecting to another listing (should I worry about this implementation being wrong? Wouldn't Google find it suspicous that lots of pages redirect to the same listing?)
-
Return a 200 instead
Thanks for your time!
-
-
Agreed! Like with anything the answer is, "Well, it depends."
-
That is really good advice, i think the missing piece that we don't know in order to recommend the best approach is how much are these landing pages promoted on the web and are people linking to them. It all comes down to whether you are throwing away PR or not.
If a LP has good links pointing to it i would 301 it, if the LP has only a couple of links pointing to it, the slow 200 then 404 is a good approach.
"if a tree falls in the woods and no one is there does it make a sound?"
"if a page 404's and no one is linking to it, does it 404"
in other words, if there is no internal linking to the LP on your site and no one is linking to it and it is not in your sitemap xml files then you can simply remove the URL in WMT and Google will not report it as a 404.
-
I have to digress on 301s and then bring up soft 404s
You have to watch about sending too many 301s to a single page. Sometimes you have to do this, but I have also seen Google showing soft 404 errors when you have a bunch of many paged 301ing to a single page on sites we manage.
There is a subtle thing we have found on how Google thinks about 301s as it relates to 404s
http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2010/06/crawl-errors-now-reports-soft-404s.html
They state that to correct soft 404s one thing you should look at is 2.b "Should redirect to a more accurate URL"
Google prefers that a 301 is more of a one-to-one or several to one.
There was also a post in SEOmoz on this
http://www.seomoz.org/blog/301-redirect-or-relcanonical-which-one-should-you-use
If you send too many 301s to a single page - like the home page, this may look like you are trying to manipulate link juice.
I would be so bold as to say Google prefers a one to one relationship for 301s vs a many to one.
Options
- If you want to just get rid of pages already in the index
After 20 days, show a 200 on the page, update the message to say that this product is no longer available with a link to your search page but then add the noindex meta tag to that page. This will allow Google to spider, but remove the page from the index. You would also need to remove all links on your site to this page after 20 days as well.
Leave up the page for 6 months - 1 year and then setup a 404 as the page is dead and out of the Google index and the 20 day deal has been long gone.
This will get those pages out of the index, tell users where they need to go in case they land on the page and minimize any 404 or soft 404 errors in Google webmaster tools.
- Keep them out of the index to start with
I am assuming that since these pages are only up for 20 days, they do not have time to really gain any search traction to start with and so would not show up in the SERPs (or rank that high if they did).
If that is the case, why not put all these pages in a separate folder that you block with robots.txt and then no follow all links to them. Keep them out of the index to start with.
Sounds like you are optimizing a category type page above the product pages anyway and so you just focus on optimizing the category page vs the product pages themselves.
Beyond that, would need more specifics on the how and the why of what you are doing to try and figure out the if and the when of next steps
-
How about 301 redirecting to the main product listing with some sort of extra parameter on the URL (?productExpired, for example) that triggers a message like "The product you are looking for expired, check these"?
Of course, then I would add a canonical on the page with the ?productExpired.
Does this make sense?
-
I would 301 them to the homepage or if you have a main directory landing page that lists all of the offers. You don't want to 301 them to the closest landing page offer because that one too will have a limited life and you'll wind up daisy chaining redirects. Google has no problem with a site having a lot of 301's.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Is image SEO worth it for e-commerce?
I have been trying to find any case studies of people who have optimized images for SEO for their e-commerce website, but haven't been able to find any case study, indicating obtained results. I am wondering how much increase in Google Image search traffic others have been able to obtain when optimizing their e-commerce images for image SEO. I need this information to justify development resources needed for for example an image sitemap, changes to file names and alt texts, title tags and possibly EXIF data. File size is already ok. Hope someone has experience with this and can share some results. Also, would be great if Moz would do a Whiteboard Friday about this 🙂 (hint!).
Whiteboard Friday | | DocdataCommerce0 -
Long tail seo
Hi, I watched a video about long tail seo and it was mentioned there that finding keywords that have 0-10 search volume or no data at all may potentially have super high value for your specific business. Since opportunity score will tend to be high because there’s minimal searches or no data at all, the trick is to check the top 10 SERPs and if none of the 10 used your keyword then you may have found yourself a great long tail seo opportunity. Could anyone please clarify why that would be a great long tail seo opportunity? Thank you. -Michelle
Whiteboard Friday | | tanahoy0 -
Google AMP Cache - Does Google just crawl AMP pages and add them to their Google AMP Cache?
Is that all one needs to do to get AMP pages on Google's AMP Cache or is there more to it than that?
Whiteboard Friday | | Brian_Dowd0 -
Threatening SEO practice
Hi all, We have just taken on a site that has had SEO done for 3 years by a different company, but now that company is threatening the client to ruin their site with bad links, and get their site banned. I understand through Webmaster tools that you can monitor backlinks, and file a reconsideration request, but is there any other non-time consuming way of stopping this to start with? Hope someone can shine some light on the very unprofessional practice Thanks Neil
Whiteboard Friday | | londonesm0 -
Local SEO Citation Questions
I have checked out some great resources from Rand and others here on SEOMoz, as well as some other great articles written on YouMoz by you guys! I have two questions when it comes to citations for Local SEO though. I have heard that Google does not really take the address into consideration when indexing local citations. Instead it is a combination of the business name + phone number + area code. On one hand this makes a lot of sense as far as Google crunching all the information. You can achieve a fairly accurate citation with just those three things and still weed out a lot of the "brand mentions" as citations. However this conflicts with a lot of what I have been reading and watching as far as whiteboard Fridays and blogs here on SEOMoz. Can someone provide some insight or sources concerning this? Secondly, in case of SEO and Web Design companies, such as ourselves, who do not receive the "One Box" for Google localized search, do citations play any lesser role in ranking for localized seo keywords? I am not sure if there is a definitive answer to these questions or if they are open ended. Regardless any insight would be invaluable!
Whiteboard Friday | | KesilConsultingLLC0 -
Is there a better map buidling platform than Google Maps for SEO purposes?
I'm about to publish a blog post and white paper on the Sierra Wine Country (over 100 wineries in the mountains between Sacramento and Lake Tahoe) to my website http://thingsyoushoulddo.com. I'd like to provide an embeddable map. Last week in the whiteboard Friday, Rand talked about how a vimeo embed could link directly back to your website vs. a youtube embed that leads back to youtube. Is there anything similar in the map creation world?
Whiteboard Friday | | juliemarg0 -
Local SEO- Multiple businesses at one address
Rand was talking about the importance of address format being exactly the same across all citations in last week's WBF http://www.seomoz.org/blog/local-seo-checklist-for-new-sites-whiteboard-friday. But what about business name? I have two unrelated businesses at the same address and am in the process of updating/adding citations for each. Will duplicate citations (identical addy, different business name) harm my Places ranking? Any suggestions? David
Whiteboard Friday | | watkinsheating0 -
SEO MOZ Crawl Report Help
I recently bought a web page from a reputable Real Estate company (Real Estate Web Masters). They are known for their ability to write codes that index IDX feeds from MLS boards but they charge a huge rate compaired to other web devlopers in the Real Estate industry. After joining the SEO MOZ community and running a few SEO Bot Crawls I was scared when I reviewed the campaigns that I created. The report came back with Duplicate content on my blog and a bunch of on site errors and warnings. Below you will find a few quistions if you could help me with these answers I would appreciate it. 1. I have 28 URL's that show up on the error report that say they have duplicate content. Should I deleate all of these pages or erase all the content and try to make them more custom? I cant tell if this is a URL issue or a content issue. The bot reads the errors and sounds like it is trying to point out that there are more than one or two URL's on my page that point to the same blog post. If that is the problem then it is a programming issue. 2.Duplicate Page title= I have just created this blog so there are only about 30 submissions but almost every blog says it has a duplicate title? 3. Title element to long= how important is this to fix? I think this is also a programming issue becuase these title elements are created to show homes for sale within a certain price range say 200,000 to 300,000. There is a lot of desription within these tites on the homes that show up and there is a lot of homes for sale within that price range. So once again I think this would be a programming issue. I am trying to keep up with the Real Estate Web Masters on this subject but there SEO rates are $2500 a month and I am a start up company so I really need to learn how to do some of this on my own. Please advise! Relevant links My Web page Real Estate Web Masters The REW Forum I have asked for help from | I dont know if they will let you view this but I will update your response within that forum if that is ok with you.
Whiteboard Friday | | bwpatton0