Google Webmaster Tools - Inappropriate Keywords
-
In December our website was the victim of a devastating pharma hack. Google Webmaster Tools never reported malware on our website, but our keywords within Webmaster Tools were all changed to keywords related to mens and ladies watches.
Our Google organic search rank and resulting traffic has been dramatically impacted.
Since realizing we were hacked, we rebuilt our website from the ground up with a clean and updated installation of Joomla CMS (from 1.5 to 2.5) and changed to a more secure server. As of December 21st, 2012, our website has been clean of the phama hack.
We wrote Google and told them what happened. They replied with a "no manual spam actions were found" message.
Unfortunately, Google Webmaster Tools still reflects all of the hacked keywords for mens and ladies watches.
We are watching our Google Webmaster Tools everyday waiting for Google to remove the hacked keywords. It's been a little over a month and still only about 5 of the first 100 keywords have anything to do with our website.
What do you recommend we do to expedite the removal of these inappropriate keywords in Google WMT?
-
Ok so first we need to determine if Google has re-indexed all the page on your site.
In WMT look for a "wrong" key phrase bringing impressions for your site.
The last column on that page will show your average position under that key phrase. We are looking for a "wrong" key phrase that has a really high position(first or second page hopefully). Really this is just to make it easier to find in the results.
Now that you've got a key phrase do a google search for that phrase and scour to see if your website is still showing in the results. Keep in mind the data in WMT is an average position, not an exact position. So I usually dig a souple of page down if I don't see it right away.
If you are in the results still, What is the Title and Description for your site showing?
If it still shows "Watches..." etc in the Title/description, chances are Google Hasn't re-indexed that particular page. Take that specific URL and do a fetch as Google through WMT. Once it has done the fetch you should be able to submit the URL for re-indexing.
It will probably take a day, but that URL should be fixed pretty quickly.
On Scope, yes I'm talking about limiting the dates. You should be able to do this in the upper right hand,. If you can't find it send me a private message and I can try to show you another way.
-
Paul,
Sorry to hear that you were also a victim of the pharma hack. Glad that things have cleared up for you. Any advice in your recovery with Google is appreciated.
I also appreciate your quick response. This hack has been so upsetting. We have been over a month in trying to figure this out and fix the issues that have come up and it still it seems it has been going at a snail's pace.
I just went into my WMT keywords and just for the keyword "watches" (and variants of it) we have 3,184,773 occurances.
I don't know what you mean by "limiting the scope of data" on WMT keywords. I don't see any date in the keyword area of WMT. How do we limit the scope of data?
When I look at the search query area almost 100% of those search terms are related to our website. So, that's excellent. It's just the keywords that are messed up and totally ridiculous!
We have resubmitted our website and I saw from our Googlebot fetch that all terms were out 12/24/12 and have been since then.
Thanks again, Paul.
-
Hey Angela,
A majority of the keywords in WMT are related to impressions. I would pick a few of the top improper key words and search them to see if your site is still showing up.
If yes: Is the Pharma hack title/description still showing up? You can try resubmitting your pages for indexing through webmaster tools individually. You could also resubmit your sitemap thru WMT if you have a whole lot of pages.
If No: Try limiting the scope of data you are looking at in WMT to when you know for sure that the issues were fixed. Beyond just the issues being fixed though you need to determine when Googlebot actually updated its records to reflect the removal of the pharma hack, so keep limiting the scope until you see all of the pharma hack key phrases go away.
I've been the victim of pharma hack before, and unfortunately it just takes a little time for everything to clear up. Hopefully the above suggestions are helpful.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Google rankings
I have encountered a serious problem with google rankings and the sequence of events goes like this for a high volume phrase. I make changes to the page which gets a score of 98 in Moz and equally good scores in other tools. I resubmit the page to Google for searching via crawl in google webmasters. After about 1/2 to 1 day, the page will be ranked between 30 and 50. Within another 1/2 to 1 day, the ranking goes completely away. This page has much higher scores than pages that are ranked. Other phrases continue to rank OK.
On-Page Optimization | | tiedyedshop0 -
Moz is advising that a page has too many of the same keywords.
But this sub-category page includes products that have the keyword in the product name. Should I be concerned?
On-Page Optimization | | Tacony_Corporation0 -
Strange ranking occurrences in Google (NL)
Mozzers, I got a question for all of you. Recently (about 3 months ago) I launched a renewed website for a costumer of mine. Since then rankings have been improving and some decreasing a little but overall it went quite allright. _Still, we now have some issues with some new pages and I really don't know what to do any more. _ The Case:
On-Page Optimization | | JarnoNijzing
For starters lets say the company sells vacuum cleaners. We now make pages for specific product ranges e.g. Miele Diamond vacuum cleaners which in turn tells something about this product range and has links to different pages of that series, for instance the Miele Black Diamond Silent Vacuum Cleaner. Why did we do this? We already ranked for specific product pages but also wanted to rank for more general terms and thus product ranges. What happened? We now rank perfectly well for the product pages itself but for some reason the Miele Diamond Vacuum Cleaners page doesn't rank at all or not as it should. Why is this strange? Because we applied the exact same tactic for some other product ranges on the same website and it worked like a charm (part of the reason why we started to do this for all product-ranges). I could really use some help here. If you want I can message you the pagelink in PM but I won't post it here for several reasons. The Vacuum Cleaners in this example or not the real products though but used as an exemplar. I really do hope to hear from you with some advice or request for more information. Regards
Jarno0 -
URL Keyword Variations?
I'm aware that keywords in the url aren't as effective as they used to be, but I'm still convinced that they do have a significant impact (based on results in one of the niches I'm in). My question is, will variations of keywords and "hidden" keywords have as much value as an exact keyword? For example, let's say that I'm trying to target the keyword "day." Will including variations like "daily" in the url work just as well? What about a brand name that includes the keyword hidden in its name, like "Dayest"? And, as a followup question, does including "stop" words have any effect? For example, if I'm trying to target the keyword "Day of the Month", would including "day" and "month" in the url be just as effective as including "day of the month"?
On-Page Optimization | | JABacchetta0 -
Schema.org and Google +
Now that google merged local into Google+, should we be changing the way we do the reviews on our sites to be out of 3? I had one out of 5 and it showed up in the SERPS, but since the change now nothing shows.
On-Page Optimization | | netviper0 -
Content Tabs and Keyword Stuffing
I am in the process of drawing up content templates to guide my company's marketing team in creating SEO optimized content as we move over our retail website to a new platform. On each product page, we will have multiple tabs that are crawl-able, each one containing different chunks of information on the products. Within each tab, I was thinking of breaking up the content and adding SEO value by using headers (h2 or h3) that have a keyword included. So, for example: "How The PRODUCT NAME Works" and "User Manuals for your PRODUCT NAME." Between the multiple tabs, in headers alone, the main keyword for the product (which will usually be the product name) will be on the page 7 times. Between this and the keywords that are part of the actual content (ex: product description), is this too many keyword instances? I know headers are often skimmed or skipped when used to simply break up the content, so I don't think they will impact user experience too much. However, I would love some feedback on if you agree with that and if you think I should cut down on the number of keywords or if I am headed in the right direction. Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | Marketing.SCG0 -
SEOMOZ tool - on page optmization question
Ok, I had the tool examine a page and while I got an A, it did say this..... Avoid Keyword Self-Cannibalization Easy fix <dl> <dt>Cannibalizing link</dt> <dd>"Kitchen Storage Racks", "Home Storage Racks", "Garage Storage Racks", "Wine Storage Racks", "Bicycle Storage Racks", and "wine storage racks"Explanation</dd> <dd>It's a best practice in SEO to target each keyword with a single page on your site (sometimes two if you've already achieved high rankings and are seeking a second, indented listing). To prevent engines from potentially seeing a signal that this page is not the intended ranking target and creating additional competition for your page, we suggest staying away from linking internally to another page with the target keyword(s) as the exact anchor text. Note that using modified versions is sometimes fine (for example, if this page targeted the word 'elephants', using 'baby elephants' in anchor text would be just fine).</dd> <dt>Recommendation</dt> <dd>Unless there is intent to rank multiple pages for the target keyword, it may be wise to modify the anchor text of this link so it is not an exact match.</dd> </dl> The keyword that was optimized was "storage racks". In the explanation it says that baby elephants is fine if elephants is your keyword so why isn't wine storage racks or kitchen storage racks ok what is the difference? why is mine cannibalizing but baby elephants is not? This may be very simplistic to you all but I'm learning as i go, thank you in advance
On-Page Optimization | | stacksofracks0 -
Keyword confusion
Thanks for taking the time to read through this. I'm currently optimizing a website and have a few structural questions: How should one view targeting keywords with respect to the home page of any given site? EG -> If the home page has the preferred keywords at the beginning of title and the page follows most if not all the recommendations from SEOMOZ tools, why are sub pages outranking my root domain for the set of keywords I'm after? When sub pages use my homepage keyword as the 2nd keyword in its respective title, does that give the overall homepage more power for the keyword it's after? EG. Homepage Title "ABC DEF - DEF ABC - XYZ | Company name I'm targeting "ABC DEF" for the home page Subpage title -> "DEF ABC - ABC DEF - XYZ | Company Name. The sub page keyword is "DEF ABC"
On-Page Optimization | | FPK0