Micro sites?
-
Hi,
I have been speaking to seo firms regarding strategies and they mentioned setting up micro sites under domains that are relevant.
i.e setting up armanidoamin.co.uk and we use it as a blog type site to update all info, product reviews, news relating to armani.
Whats peoples thoughts on this? Does it work? Is it worth the effort?
Im not so sure but obviously looking for ideas.
Cheers
-
The reason why would be for multiple 1st page positions in the serps for the same keyword phrases. Most sites are not lucky enough to get rewarded with host crowding positions (your same domain ranking multiple times on the first page) but if you have microsites that you are able to get ranked now you have several first page positions.
If you are addressing different targets, this can be accomplished probably easier with your main, established already trusted site.
Google is addressing exact match domains as a ranking factor for exact reason. Microsites are spammy and grey hat and outside of Google's webmaster guidelines if addressing the same targets.
-
Absolutely. This gets you a thumbs up. If you are not connected to the main site, then you can take some risks and have some fun, and conduct SEO experiments without harming the enterprise site.
"But then you can indeed use some rather grey SEO tactics towards these buffer micro sites if you would want to... without being at risk of bringing the entire house down."
-
^ Good summary of this extensive discussion!
-
If it is purely from an SEO point of view then I think that I would avoid doing the micro sites, I think that you would get penalized from search engines.
I agree with Tom if you are putting all that work in that they are suggesting then why not just put that amount of work into your main website/blog/social media? That way you are unlikely to suffer any negative affects and will receive long term benefit in terms of content production, traffic and social media shares?
Hope that it all works out well for you.
Have a great weekend.
-
Actually if you are creating new domains it is going to take quite some efforts to boost the micro sites' PR in order for the backlinks to send you some juice... Efforts that can then better be directed at your main site.
Micro sites for backlinking purposes only make sense if they have theme, age and PR. Which means you will probably need to buy existing domains that are not being renewed before the actual deletion of the website... and that's a "game" in itself.
Micro sites aimed at your customer segments are another story obviously as described by Mike & Oliver.
-
I think the idea they suggested was for pure SEO. Branded URL, unique brand focused content. With links going to the website.
So someone searches for Armani J31 Jeans, they find our armanij31jeans.co.uk site, unique content, pictures, style advice all focused to that brand and style of product. We update it weekly with new pics, new stock, new content.
I see the idea but I sort of think, is it better to just focus on building links direct to the website, rather than having this network of sites all linking back to the main website?
-
We have used micro sites in the past for targetting 'niche' long tail keywords that would get lost within our main website. They have purely been from the point of view of benefiting the customer in helping them to find information that they need.
They tend to be for areas of our business and keywords that are on the fringes of our business.
We have found that by having a micro site it enables us to talk to our customers about these individul products directly to them rather than on a page that is within a website talking about a wide variety of products. (along the same lines as Mike explained in his example) We have two micro sites and one works really well for us the other doesn't. It is worth considering but like Tom says there are a number of warnings to take into consideration.
I think overall it depends why you are considering building the micro sites? If it is for the benefit of the consumer so that they can have clear and concise information that is relevant to them then it is worth doing with caution.
Hope that is of some help.
-
Interesting question!
I was recently also looking into this tactic, but as mentioned by Tom it takes quite some effort in order for these micro sites to be worth something SEO wise.
You would ideally need to get themed domains with age, PR and existing backlinks without paying over the odds. This in itself will take you some time to get it right. Then you need to change the Name servers, change Registrar. And you need hosting, preferably all over the place so it doesn't look like a network. After which you can start building the micro site, for which you need to create content... phew, hard work!
But then you can indeed use some rather grey SEO tactics towards these buffer micro sites if you would want to... without being at risk of bringing the entire house down.
Obviously Mike uses his micro sites differently and successfully, but from what I can tell reading your question the SEO firms you mention are probably going for the technique as described by Tom.
After evaluating this option I decided to rather try and come up with a Content idea closer to Public Relations than Page Rank...
-
Right on.
So here is an example for you. You sell designer men's apparel, but you also sell fishing and hunting apparel. Both apparel, but completely different types of audiences. You could have designerapparel.com (your main designer men's apparel site) and a microsite of outdoor.designerapparel.com. This subdomain microsite approach would carry some of your domain authority to the subdomain, all while providing a good experience for users, because the audiences and end product are so different, even though they are men's apparel.
Kind of a funky example, but I hope it illustrates how it can be used for men's apparel.
In your case, (although I don't know your business plan or customer segments, etc.) I would not worry about doing microsites.
Mike
-
We are a menswear retailer, so we sell shoes, tees, trainers, jeans, shirts etc.. from about 15-20 different brands.
now i wouldnt want 20 micros sites but would concentrate on say 4-5 top brands? all unique content, all with their own external domain name.
I am not a fan, it doesn't seem right but then again I am new to it.
last thing i want to do is risk it for nothing.
-
I agree. Thats what I thought when I was told.
I would rather have our retail site and build links direct to that from backlinking and our own blog, social etc..?
I thought the idea behind the micro sites was to take advantage of the brand being in the domain name and giving the micro site fresh content every few days dedicated to the brand in question (eg armani then another site would dedicate to Lyle & Scott). But it seems a lot of work when you can have 1 blog talking about all brands? But then you loose the url name, the brand keyword etc..?
-
It all depends whether it makes sense for your business.
For instance if you sell shoes, you would probably not benefit from having an Armani microsite and a Nike microsite UNLESS you want users to assume you ONLY sell Armani or ONLY sell Nike.
The company I work for uses microsites, because our main site is just too generic. We sell software and our software can be configured for any industry, but to say that can deter some people. So we have our main site (just examples here) software.com and microsites food.software.com, jewelry.software, animal.software.com - this approach works for us, because we have slightly different solutions for each of these industries and we do not want to look too generic or single people out if we listed these on our main site.
Some of it has to do with SEO, but really think about it from a marketing standpoint and how you want to market to your visitors. We want to market to visitors with a microsite saying, "We have awesome food software" instead of saying with our main site, "We can tailor your software for the food industry".
It has worked great for us having microsites. It is a little more work, because you need to manage multiple sites and have unique content across multiple sites, but we are seeing really good returns.
Hope this helps.
Mike
-
If not done correctly can take your main site down, so it can be done but they need to know what they are doing.
-
Not only can that easily look like a link network - which will get you penalised by all the search engines - but I don't see the point in doing such a thing.
Why would you not want to build authority directly to your website - post that sort of information and product reviews to your main domain. If the content is useful to people, they will link to it and perhaps share it on social networks.
That means all the "strength" from those shares and links will be going straight to your domain, not some sham micro-site.
The SEO companies you've spoken to are just promoting the idea of setting up a website to get some authority so it looks like you have an authority "link" to your site. Why you wouldn't want to build authority directly to your site to begin with is lost on me.
Unless they're talking about setting up a micro site with relevant content that they can spam the hell out of with some unsavoury tactics that you wouldn't "want to risk on your main site". So you're micro-site acts as a buffer in this sense.
Do you really want to rank in that way?
I'm much more interested in doing things in an open and tangible way. Produce the best content that you can and promote it as much as you can. Get legitimate authority straight to your site. That's not to say that marketing your content won't be easy - it can be a long and difficult process to get traction. But the rewards are infinitely better if you do.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
A single page from site not ranking
Hello, We have a new site launched in March, that is ranking well in search for all of the pages, except one and we don't know why. This page it is optimised exactly the same way like the others, but still doesn't rank in Google. We have verified robots.txt for noffollow, noindex tags, we have verified if it was penalized by Google, but still didn't find nothing. Initially we had another site and was on the topic of this page, but we have redirected it to the new one. In case this old site was anytime in the past penalized by Google, could it be possible that the new page be influenced by this? Also, we have another site that ranks on the first position, that targets the same keywords like the page that does not rank. It was the first site we launched, so it is pretty much old, but we do not have duplicate content on them. Maybe Google doesn't like the fact that both target the same keywords and chooses to display only the old site? Please help us if you have any ideas or have been through such thing. Thank you!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | daniela.pirlogea0 -
How much SEO damage would it do having a subdomain site rather directory site?
Hi all! With a coleague we were arguing about what is better: Having a subdomain or a directory.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Gaston Riera
Let me explain some more, this is about the cases: Having a multi-language site: Where en.domain.com or es.domain.com rather than domain.com/en/ or domain.com/es/ Having a Mobile and desktop version: m.domain.com or domain.com rather than domain.com/m or just domain.com. Having multiple location websites, you might figure. The dicussion started with me saying: Its better to have a directory site.
And my coleague said: Its better to have a subdomain site. Some of the reasons that he said is that big companies (such as wordpress) are doing that. And that's better for the business.
My reasons are fully based on this post from Rand Fishkin: Subdomains vs. Subfolders, Rel Canonical vs. 301, and How to Structure Links for SEO - Whiteboard Friday So, what does the community have to say about this?
Who should win this argue? GR.0 -
Redirecting old mobile site
Hi All, Trying to figure out the best option here. I have a website that used to utilize a separate mobile site (m.xyz.com) but now utilizes responsive design. What is the best way to deal with that old mobile site? De-index? 301 redirect back to the main site in the rare case someone finds the m. site somewhere? THanks! Ricky
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | RickyShockley0 -
Is the Tool Forcing Sites to Link Out?
Hi I have a tool that I wish to give to sites, it allows the user to get an accurate idea of their credit score with out giving away any personal data and with out having a credit search done on their file. Due to the way the tool works and to make the implementation on other peoples sites as simple as possible the tool remains hosted by me and a one line piece of Javascript code just needs to be added to the code of the site wishing to use the tool. This code includes a link to my site to call the information from my server to allow the tool to show and work on the other site. My questions are: Could this cause a problem with Google as far as their link quality goes? - Are we forcing people to give us a backlink to use the tool? (in the eyes of Google) or will Google not be able to read the Javascript / will ignore the link for SEO purposes? Should I make the link in the code Nofollow? If I should make the link a Nofollow any tips on how to make the most of the opportunity from a link building or SEO point of view? Thanks for your help
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | MotoringSEO0 -
Temporary Duplicate Sites - Do anything?
Hi Mozzers - We are about to move one of our sites to Joomla. This is one of our main sites and it receives about 40 million visits a month, so the dev team is a little concerned about how the new site will handle the load. Dev's solution, since we control about 2/3 of that traffic through our own internal email and cross promotions, is to launch the new site and not take down the old site. They would leave the old site on its current URL and make the new site something like new.sub.site.com. Traffic we control would continue to the old site, traffic that we detect as new would be re-directed to the new site. Over time (the think about 3-4 months) they would shift the traffic all to the new site, then eventually change the URL of the new site to be the URL of the old site and be done. So this seems to be at the outset a duplicate content (whole site) issue to start with. I think the best course of action is try to preserve all SEO value on the old URL since the new URL will eventually go away and become the old URL. I could consider on the new site no-crawl/no-index tags temporarily while both sites exist, but would that be risky since that site will eventually need to take those tags off and become the only site? Rel=canonical temporarily from the new site to the old site also seems like it might not be the best answer. Any thoughts?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Kenn_Gold0 -
Migrating a very large site
hello, we are thinking about changing imageworksstudio.com to imageworkscreative.com we have TONS of of pages and want to make sure that our Page Rank and Rankings are maintained. Are there any best practices or specific guides for redirecting for such a large site (which already has a bunch of redirects in place in the first place) Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | imageworks-2612900 -
Has my site been penalized?
Our site was listed on the first page for the phrase Active SEO on Google.co.uk. We suddenly find ourselves on page 4 overnight and we're not sure what's going on. We have not undertaken an Black hat techniques however the site is fairly new. Anyone have any ideas as to what is going on?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | MassivePrime0 -
Pages un-indexed in my site
My current website www.energyacuity.com has had most pages indexed for more than a year. However, I tried cache a few of the pages, and it looks the only one that is now indexed by Goggle is the homepage. Any thoughts on why this is happening?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | abernatj0