Your Comments on my Website Please
-
Please post constructive comments about my website:
http://www.thewebhostinghero.com
Some of the stuff you may want to look at:
- Free tools: http://www.thewebhostinghero.com/free-tools
- Web host lookup: http://www.thewebhostinghero.com/who_is_hosting.php
- Articles, news, tutorials: http://www.thewebhostinghero.com/blog
- Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/WebHostingHero
I'm still weighting the option of building a new website and if I do, I want to make sure I won't do the same mistakes again.
Don't be scared to be brutal... but constructive.
Thank you
Stephane
-
What do you think about the new homepage layout?
I know I still have a lot of work to do, I'm still working on the About and Disclosure pages, the old ones are still there in the meantime.
-
Thank you Daniel for these great suggestions. I will get at it right away.
You see, I'm a programmer so this is the biggest part of my involvement in this site. I know very little about the other aspects and that's what I'm trying to improve.
-
I completely missed the "valuable content" including the tutorials the first time around. I spent 10 minutes on the site -- about 9 minutes and 45 seconds longer than most people will spend. Which highlights the problem. The good stuff is buried. The initial impression is of a very dubious site.
It is not at all clear what the purpose of the site is at first glance. So users are forced to try to find out who created it. But they will fail because the information is not there.
**Constructive Suggestion: **Include a Mission Statement near your logo. Something like: "Your independent expert guide to website hosting." (If that's what you're doing.)
**Constructive Suggestion: **Completely reorganize your navigation and UX. Eliminate extraneous material.
The most important page on any website of this kind is the about page. You don't have one. See this article on About Pages. (Note: by de-cloaking, I simply meant revealing who you are on page.)
Try looking at this website by my client Jon-Erik Kawamoto for an example of a good About page that establishes the site owner's credentials. The site also surfaces valuable content. It uses a blog format and the right hand column sorts content by category and also recent highlights.
The other part of the right hand column includes some affiliate marketing stuff.
Along the same lines, take a look at this site by my former client Jon Goodman. There is a wealth of free material, along with some premium products and affiliate promotions in the right hand column.
Constructive Suggestion: Try highlighting your best tools and content on the home page, perhaps in promtional boxes.
-
When I started this affiliate website about 5 years ago, I basically did the same thing that other affiliate sites did.
The reason why I posted this thread is that I'm aware of this and I want to take the website to another level. Eventually, I would like to get rid of the affiliate marketing business model and go toward selling advertisement instead. I'm not sure yet. But I can't do this all overnight. I need to get there gradually.
-
(By the way, sorry for my english, I speak french!)
Well I don't mind brutal comments but I also asked for constructive comments.
That said, I appreciate your honesty however it's easy to bash something without suggesting how to make it better.
1. "The fatal flaw is the anonymity. No sensible person would ever attach any importance to buying reccomendations that come out of nowhere from an anonymous nobody."
I do agree with you on that. Now how do I solve this? Should I include a byline with my picture in every post?
2. "Worse, this garbled, illogical and contradictory disclosure is deeply buried in a footer and confirms worst suspicions"
I admit I simply copied the disclosure policy sent to affiliates by some web hosting companies. Do you have any examples of what you consider to be a clear, concise disclosure?
3. "I'm not saying affiliate marketing is always and everywhere wrong. But first you have decloak [...]"
What do you mean by "decloak"? To me, "cloaking" is showing a different content to search engines than to visitors.
4. "[...] publish valuable content free [...]"
Did you look at the 220 tutorials I published? I put a ton of effort into them to make them as valuable as possible. Unlike many web hosting sites, I DO know my stuff, I've been a programmer, web developer and sysadmin for more than 18 years.
http://www.thewebhostinghero.com/category/tutorials
That said, there is some early content that makes me cringe a little when read them. I'm setting them to "noindex" and removing them gradually.
I also provide some free tools I've developed myself and I think this one is especially useful:
http://www.thewebhostinghero.com/speed/
If you think the content is not valuable enough, please explain a bit further.
As for the top 10 lists, they will soon be transformed into valuable buying guides instead of simple comparison grids.
5. "The basic pitch is that you would never jeopardize your reputation by recommending anyting other than valuable products you use yourself."
I do have accounts with most of the hosting companies advertised or listed in any top 10 lists (of course I get them for free most of the time). Obviously, I can't run 20 "real websites" just to use these services so what I did is I set up an identical blog on each of them and I perform benchmark test regularly.
Like I said, constructive comments are welcomed!
-
You asked for brutality, so here goes:
The site looks, feels and smells like a scam.
The fatal flaw is the anonymity. No sensible person would ever attach any importance to buying reccomendations that come out of nowhere from an anonymous nobody.
Worse, this garbled, illogical and contradictory disclosure is deeply buried in a footer and confirms worst suspicions:
"This blog is a personal blog written and edited by me. This blog accepts forms of cash advertising, sponsorship, paid insertions or other forms of compensation.
The compensation received may influence the advertising content, topics or posts made in this blog. That content, advertising space or post may not always be identified as paid or sponsored content.
The owner(s) of this blog is not compensated to provide opinion on products, services, websites and various other topics. The views and opinions expressed on this blog are purely the blog owners. If we claim or appear to be experts on a certain topic or product or service area, we will only endorse products or services that we believe, based on our expertise, are worthy of such endorsement. Any product claim, statistic, quote or other representation about a product or service should be verified with the manufacturer or provider."
I'm not saying affiliate marketing is always and everywhere wrong. But first you have decloak, publish valuable content free, and then be much more transparent in your disclosure. The basic pitch is that you would never jeopardize your reputation by recommending anyting other than valuable products you use yourself.
-
How would that make the website better?
I want to get comments on the content quality.
-
Actually Martin ,sorry, I misread your reply and should not be questioning your logic in this case
-
Header image is great but instead of header.png you could name it the-web-hosting-hero-header.png. The same for others pics
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
My website is not indexing the image.
Our website's images are not indexed. Will anyone help me? How will all images in my website be indexed? This is my website address: https://www.expertclipping.com/
On-Page Optimization | | jacky_risham0 -
Microsite and main website alternate in rankings
Hi all, I just noticed a potential issue with our websites. We have two ecommerce websites, one is a very large one selling all sorts of products, while the microsite focuses on a small segment of products. All products sold on the microsite are also sold on the main website. In the beginning of September, we upgraded the microsite to the same script that the main website uses to make it mobile friendly and update the design. They now look very similar. Before, both websites used to rank on page 1 for a specific keyword. I have noticed that since we upgraded the microsite, the two websites have been taking turns ranking for the keyword. For a few weeks the microsite ranks and the main website doesn't rank for the keyword. Then for a few weeks only the main website ranks and the microsite doesn't. I think the reason this is happening is that Google understands that the content is the same and the websites are both owned by the same company. Fair enough. I remember reading an article about this phenomenon before but can't remember where. Does anyone know which article I'm talking about (it would have been on an SEO blog/website, e.g. Moz, SEJ, SE Roundtable etc)? I'm not even sure what this phenomenon is called. If we can only have one of the pages rank, we would prefer it to be the microsite at all times. Would a canonical tag on the main website referring to the URL on the microsite fix this? I think at the moment the product descriptions are either very similar or identical. Would it help to make them more different to get both to rank again if that is what we wanted to do? In the end it is still the same product being sold by the same company - after Google has already sort of merged the two, would they "un-merge" them if the content was more different? Thanks in advance!
On-Page Optimization | | ViviCa10 -
How do i know about my website content quality is good or bad?
According to Google updates, content is the main part of the website ranking, so how do i know about my website content quality...if you have any type of tool for check website content quality please refer to me.
On-Page Optimization | | renukishor0 -
Social Media Profile and Website content dupe content issues ?
Is there a dupe content issue if your social media profiles and website have same content/copy ? For example if you have written great copy for your website home page then literally copy & paste that into your G+ co page introduction (since sums everything up perfectly and don't want to change it) would that have a negative effect or be perfectly ok ? cheers dan
On-Page Optimization | | Dan-Lawrence1 -
How does Google Detect which keywords my website should show up for in the SE?
When I checked my Google Webmaster Tools I found that my website is showing up for keywords that I didn't optimize for ... for example I optimize my website for "funny pictures with captions", and the website is showing up for "funny images with captions". I know that this is good, but the keyword is dancing all around, sometimes I search for "funny pictures with captions" and I show up in the 7th page, and some time I don't show up. and the same goes for the other keyword. of course I am optimizing for more than two keywords but the results is not consistent. my question is how does Google decide which keywords you website should show up for? Is it the on-page keywords?, or is it the off-page anchor text keywords? Thank you in advance ...
On-Page Optimization | | FarrisFahad
FarrisFahad0 -
Client has 2 websites... won't do away with old site.
Ok my situation is: We have built a new site for a client and they would like to keep both sites working. Should I just attempt to optimize both sites to rank well in their area? Or should I be suggesting a 301 redirect from the old domain to the new? Other options? Thanks in advance
On-Page Optimization | | IntermarkGroup0 -
Website posts
How many post a day should i post on my website to look natural ? first website is 1-2 years old second is 7 years old, i bought aged domain third is about 3 weeks old Thanks
On-Page Optimization | | xverticle0 -
Blog Comment IPs Seen By Google?
I have a page on a client's site for testimonials (a dental practice). The page is actually a post on a Wordpress install where customers can enter their testimonials as WP comments. In an effort to encourage more clients to give more testimonials I was considering setting up an iPad or other tablet at the receptionist's desk where patients would be able to enter their successes as comments on the page. If I made sure the patients all used unique names and emails in the Wordpress comments, would Google still see all the comments are from the same IP and view this as suspicious?
On-Page Optimization | | jargomang0