How come canonicalized pages are showing in the Duplicate Titles report?
-
I am currently removing all duplicate titles from my site via title tag changes, 301's, and in some instances, canonical tags.
I'm confused about why the Moz report spit out pages with duplicate titles that are canonicalized to other pages. Does Google actually consider these pages as having duplicate titles? Or is Roger Mozbot not intuitive enough to to disregard those pages?
-
Just jumping in here even though it's an old question.
The thing is, Moz is crawling the pages and showing duplicate titles, but if you have page B using rel=caonical pointing to page A, then Google will reference page A.
It's ok if page A and page B have the same title if using rel=canonical, because Google will follow that directive most of the time.
So if Moz is surfacing duplicate title tags but they are canonicalizing, it's safe to ignore Moz's flagged issue. Don't always take it at face value.
It would most likely be a waste of time to go change all the page titles for the duplicate pages if you're using rel=canonical.
-
Any time!
-
Got it! Thank you.
-
Pages canonicalized to the same page aren't duplicates, but their titles may still be. Canonicalization only affects the content of the page, not the title; the pages can still be resolved separately in the browser, so their titles may still be duplicates of one another.
If there are pages you don't want to surface in search results, you can noindex, follow those pages to prevent them showing up.
Sorry if my previous answer was a bit confusing! Hope this helps! If you've got more questions, feel free to write in to help@moz.com and we'll do what we can to sort things out for ya!
-
Thanks for your response. So you are saying that the pages that are canonicalized to the same page still are considered duplicates?
Let's say that Page A, Page B, and Page C all have the same title, with Page A being the canonical page. If Page B and Page C are both canonicalized to Page A, does that mean that Page B and C are considered to have duplicate titles while A is okay?
-
Hi there! Tawny from the Help Team here. Sergio's answer is helpful if you're dealing with duplicate content issues, and the links in that answer might help you figure out how to resolve those issues!
Pages are considered to have duplicate titles only if their titles are exact matches. There is no notion of overlapping or partial matches for this purpose. Like duplicate content, canonical versions should be considered, but not pages that refer to the canonical version. Furthermore, two pages with blank titles should not be considered duplicates of one another.
You can verify the page title by viewing the source code of the page itself. I hope this helps! Drop us a line at help@moz.com if you have any other questions or if there's anything that needs clarifying!
-
Hi,
I recently made the same question to moz support, here is my question and the reply:
QUESTION:
I am having a problem with a duplicated content error
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crawl Issues Report - Duplicate Page Content for Bajalibros Argentina (www.bajalibros.com/AR)
Generated at Wed Jul 27 15:22:27 +00:00 2016
URL
https://www.bajalibros.com/AR/Samanta-Schweblin-Autor-426833https://www.bajalibros.com/AR/Catherine-Clement-Autor-184525
THE REPLY
Hi there! I think this has to do with how our tools determine what is duplicate content. Our tool has a 90% tolerance for duplicate content, which means it will flag any content that has 90% of the same code between pages. This includes all the source code on the page and not just the viewable text, so often it's a matter of finding the best answer for the duplicate pages in question.
For instance, often with ecommerce sites, product pages will come up with duplicate content between two colors of the same item, and in that case it's good to use the canonical tag. If there are two versions of the site that exist - for instance, example.com/subfolder andwww.example.com/subfolder - you can put in 301 redirects to the correct page: https://moz.com/learn/seo/redirection. If it's just two pages on different subjects but thin content, filling out that content with an extra paragraph or two can help.
There are more in-depth explanations of common answers to duplicate content on this page, if you're curious!: https://moz.com/learn/seo/duplicate-content I hope this helps! Let me know if you have any other questions or if there's anything that needs clarifying!
Hope this applies to you too
Best
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Should you do on-page optimization for a page with rel=canonical tag?
If you ad a rel=canonical tag to a page, should you still optimize that page? I'm talking meta description, page title, etc.
On-Page Optimization | | marynau0 -
How to Handle duplicate pages/titles in Wordpress
The wordpress blog causes problems with page titles. If you go to the second page of blog posts it there's a different URL but with the same page title. for example: page 1: site/blog page 2: site/blog/page/2 Each page gets flagged for duplicate page titles. Thanks in advance for your thoughts,
On-Page Optimization | | heymarshall1 -
Long Meta Titles on Dynamic Pages
What to do with long meta titles on press release pages. Unlike other pages on the site, press release pages have no physical value and are dynamically created picking data from the database. Such pages i notice are automatically picking the URL/H1 as meta title and meta description. How to shorten such meta titles and descriptions? Do such errors (related to dynamically created pages) matter? Tanveer
On-Page Optimization | | Sequelmed0 -
"City page" links in footer of home page: Spammy?
Is listing a bunch of links to city pages in the footer of a home page considered "spammy" to Google? (ie- Chicago Alarms, Illinois Alarms, Naperville Alarms, etc.) What are the negative affects this might have on ranking, if any?
On-Page Optimization | | MChi0 -
Jquery in top of page vs text on bottom page
Is it the best way to use jquery sliders on the top of your page to still get all your text above the fold and score in search engines? for example: http://www.wolf-howl.com/wp-conte... is much better to score high ranks in search engines than http://www.wolf-howl.com/wp-conte... ?? Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | HMK-NL0 -
Source page leading to a 404 pages in reports
Hi everybody, I wonder how to find and quickly correct 404 errors in my crawl reports : SeoMoz says me "http://domain.com/this-page-is-dead" is 404, but I can't figure out a source page where a link to that url appears. I tried a google link:http://domain.com/this-page-is-dead request, with no more luck. I imagine the trick is trivial, but I need it 🙂 Moreover, why do not show a list of pages referring to this 404 page on reports ? Thanks, Loïc
On-Page Optimization | | mandinga0 -
Google SERPS showing wrong page.
I am new to SEO and trying to rank for keyword 'corporate entertainment' and my site is currently at 26. However google is showing the homepage http://www.musicliveuk.com in SERPS as opposed to my optomised page http://www.musicliveuk.com/home/corporate-entertainment. Any ideas why it is choosing so show the home page as the most relevant result?
On-Page Optimization | | SamCUK0 -
On Page Optimisation Reports
Firstly sorry if this has already been answered - I did look I promise.
On-Page Optimization | | Jock
Secondly sorry if the answer to this is blatently obvious! In the process of trying to optimise my landing pages, I am using On Page Optimisation reports. I have several (ok lots) with F grades which is not surprising as the landing page is not the landing page optimised for a certain keyword. If I change the landing page to the one that I have for a certain keyword then hey presto A or B grade (clever me)! Now here's the thing - presumably the landing page that is listed by default is the one that Google "sees" for a particular keyword. How do I change this if I can or do I have to be patient or am I just being plain daft?! Many thanks0