Google SERP shows wrong (and inappropriate) thumbnail for Facebook videos?
-
Hello
I'm running into a strange issue with at least one of my client's video. The video is posted on Facebook. When searching for the video on Google, the SERP shows a completely wrong, and inappropriate, thumbnail image. (And in one case the preview video starts playing within Google SERP.) It also seems that Google is indexing various countries' facebook page for the same video separately (it-it.facebook.com, fr-fr.facebook.com, etc). Note that only the thumbnail and preview video within Google are wrong; if you click on the link, you see the correct video and page.
I hesitate to divulge the actual client video, but there are some reports on Google's search community about the same behavior:
- Here's one that stargs back in March: https://support.google.com/webmasters/thread/33760205?hl=en
- and a more recent one: https://support.google.com/websearch/thread/71452151?hl=en
It looks increasingly like a bug in some google algorithm, but nobody at google seems to acknowledge that. I've unpublished the original video from FB and submitted an 'outdated content' removal to Google, which is pending.
In the meantime, my questions for our group of experts here:
- Has anyone else experienced this and any other suggestionso n how to fix?
- If we assume that this is not a google bug: how could a malicious actor or black-hat SEO influence Google's algorithms to cause this?
Thanks,
mickey
-
Removing (unpublishing) content from facebook and using Gogole's removal tool works after a day or two. However, the issue returns when re-publishing and reintroduces the content .
This looks a lot like a bug in Google's algorithm. In one case, they publish the same thumbnail photo for two different videos (although the titles were related):
-
Thanks for responding, seoelevated. I'll add sepecific details on the videoObject schema further down.
I've had some success with removing these from Google SERP following these steps:
- Un-publish the page from FB (or from wherever else, presumably)
- Submit the URLs (copied from Google SERP) to Google's "remove out dated content"
- Google will complain that the page is still live, but click "Yes", it has indeed been updated or removed
- Select "the snippet and cache are outdated". (If you select " completely removed," the request will be Denied)
- Add some word from the google SERP snippet that would not appear on the updated page.
- repeat this process for all versions of this.
For step 6, I had submitted removal rquests for the same video on facebook.com, de-de.facebook.com, and zh-cn.facebook.com. I did not, however, submit it-it.facebok.com, and the wrong thumbnail still shows up on that page. (I just submitted that for removal as well.)
Next steps: I'll re-publish the facebook video pages and see what happens
Now, about schema: Yes I've checked the VideoObject schema. Here is an example with an unrelated video, one that also has an unrelated image but not an offensive one: https://www.facebook.com/CIPEDC/videos/10152675950170686/
When I look at the schema JSON on the page source I see a correct thumbnail: https://scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t15.5256-10/10963580_10152675951280686_1532157832_n.jpg?_nc_cat=103&_nc_sid=ed1892&_nc_ohc=3RP7d75npd4AX94ZsXC&_nc_ht=scontent-iad3-1.xx&oh=23f2c96e4bad740fcc2cbaf7f9b33bd0&oe=5F90B8FD :
_ "thumbnailUrl": "https://scontent-iad3-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t15.5256-10/10963580_10152675951280686_1532157832_n.jpg?_nc_cat=103&_nc_sid=ed1892&_nc_ohc=3RP7d75npd4AX94ZsXC&nc_ht=scontent-iad3-1.xx&oh=23f2c96e4bad740fcc2cbaf7f9b33bd0&oe=5F90B8FD",
This is an appropriate thumbnail for this video.
When I run the video URL through Google's Rich Results tester I get a different ThumbnailURL: https://lookaside.fbsbx.com/lookaside/crawler/media/?media_id=10152675950170686&get_thumbnail=1
This redirects to to the video page on Facebook--at least it does so on a browser and with curl:
< HTTP/2 302
< vary: Accept-Encoding
< pragma: no-cache
< location: https://www.facebook.com/CIPEDC/videos/10152675950170686/?is_lookaside=1It's possible that Facebook responds with a different URL or redirect based on user-agent, of course.
I also ran this through LinkedIn's post inspector. It picked up the same image as GOogle but can't render it:
https://www.linkedin.com/post-inspector/inspect/https:%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2FCIPEDC%2Fvideos%2F10152675950170686%2Fmickey
-
This is very interesting, and I see from the threads you linked that multiple businesses are having the same problem and the same difficulty navigating both the Google or Facebook support communities. Out of curiosity, are you able to inspect one of your Facebook pages whcih still has the video, and see if any schema for the type "VideoObject" is included in the page, and if so, paste the markup here (redacted as necessary)? I don't think I'll probably be able to help much on this, but perhaps something in the schema data might give some clues to the community here to work with.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Facebook News Feed - Proximity as a Factor?
I just got back from a conference in Florida and since being back am seeing many of those industry friends showing up in my Facebook feed with much more regularity than usual - is Facebook using proximity between devices in delivering who shows up in the news feed?
Social Media | | Leithmarketing0 -
Facebook 'SEO', Likes and Fans
I spent a bit of time this morning combing Google looking for some documentation on SEO for Facebook, specifically the value of 'likes', when liking one's status, how that effects the visibility of a given post and basically the criteria for creating whatever they deem a post to have gone 'viral'. I'm convinced there has to be some answers for my first two questions... ....somewhere. Likewise, I can appreciate if there's nothing available to answer my third question pertaining to 'viral criteria'. Nevertheless, if anyone has any resources/documentation that could provide me some insight into how FB interprets 'likes', how an increased number of 'likes' may lead to greater visibility and (more or less) the mechanics of how this interacts with the entire Facebook structure, I would greatly appreciate it. Thanks for reading, I look forward to the responses!
Social Media | | NiallSmith0 -
Facebook Page not in Search
My Facebook page does not show up within the first 50 results of a search for my brand. I have over 3,000 fans and am relatively active so it should be there. On the second page of SERPs for my brand there is a Facebook page of a spammy looking affiliate with 15 fans. On the third page my Facebook test page appears. Any ideas about what happened with my page? Is it possible Google penalized my Facebook page - and if so, how do I fix that? I checked the admin again and the page is open to the public and when I do a search for "brand facebook" it appears. Thanks for your help!
Social Media | | theLotter0 -
Facebook Account Architectures (Pages, Groups, etc)
I'm looking for help with how to setup/manage a community on Facebook. Here is the scenario: You have a bike store owner. Out of the store he also organizes different biking training groups, for people who want to be able to meet certain personal goals. These groups like to interact with the other members inside their groups, but not across groups. Does the following architecture make sense? The business would have 1 Company Page. Then for for various different training groups, the company admin would create Facebook 'Groups' which allow for interaction amongst members that way. Does that make sense? Or is there a smarter way to do this? It seems like this isn't very unified, because there could be a bunch of different groups. Is there a way to set this up inside the business' page itself? Any other thoughts?
Social Media | | brianspatterson0 -
Should the Google Plus button be sitewide?
Hi All, We are in the process of adding a Google Plus button to our site (to the header, sitewide) - at http://www.jewelleryoutlet.com.au/ My question is, should the button have behavioural characteristics that apply to the whole site, or only for that page that it is clicked on. Consider these scenarios: A customer clicks on the G+ button from the homepage - they then 'like' that page (our homepage, i.e. our site) A customer clicks on the G+ button from a category page - e.g. http://www.jewelleryoutlet.com.au/cheap-necklaces-s/1818.htm. Because the button is in the header and sitewide, should the customer be 'liking' http://www.jewelleryoutlet.com.au/ or http://www.jewelleryoutlet.com.au/cheap-necklaces-s/1818.htm? We are also adding a Google + button to the item template, e.g. on http://www.jewelleryoutlet.com.au/product-p/jn1003.htmsomewhere above the Add to Cart button. When they press the button in this instance, they are 'liking' only that page (which is how I would want the functionality to work). So my question is to do with point 2 above. Much like a Facebook 'like/fan count' type button that exists in the header of many sites, should the G+ button function the same way? E.g. if we have a count of 10 in the header on the homepage, then there is also a count of 10 sitewide? Or should this reset for every subsequent page that a customer lands on, and by pressing the G+ button on that page, they are 'liking' only that page. Which is better for SEO? Several different +1's to different pages (e.g. from the necklaces, bracelets and earrings category pages for a more natural structure) or several +1's all pointing to the homepage? Any help or suggestions regarding G+ button or the service in general would be much appreciated. Thanks
Social Media | | bradkrussell0 -
Google+ and Google Search Plus Your World. Are the results served actually the best results?
I recently started a discussion on Google+ and thought I would get some feedback from the SEO community. https://plus.google.com/106060287111641282262/posts/Hpak5R6uY47 This article suggests that Google Search Plus Your World does not improve search quality for users. When a search is performed, I can imagine that results would be skewed to Google+ content and +1s from people in your circles. Doesn't this mean that if you only follow not-so-influential people who share and +1 not so quality stuff that your new "world" results are just going to be low quality? Doesn't this mean that SEO and traditional linking methods are dying? This would mean that the bigger chains will have more advantage just like what happened after Panda. How does the small business compete with this? Any insight would be of super appreciation.
Social Media | | itrogers0 -
Facebook question
On the left side of our Facebook page, we constantly see a number like this - 5 talking about this ( just below the likes ). Please have a look at http://www.facebook.com/pages/UltraSEO/194716037239795 What does "5 talking about this" mean ?
Social Media | | seoug_20050 -
Experiment: Facebook Page vs Branded Domain
This is a followup to a Q&A posted by fideaux64 taking it from speculative to practical level. Question: Can a popular social profile page outrank an exact match branded domain. Domain: http://erasethethought.com/ Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Erase-The-Thought/111096868913182 Myspace: http://www.myspace.com/erase_the_thought Results: http://www.google.com.au/search?q=erase%20the%20thought This experiment is currently in progress. You're welcome to comment and participate. Note: Please do not link to the main domain - only Facebook or Myspace.
Social Media | | Dan-Petrovic1