Welcome to the Q&A Forum

This is what we have done, as there are multiple languages and multiple countries.

We are going to use HREFLANG and Canonical, but doesn't this combination mean that titles and meta description from the canonical url is used on each of the duplicated regional sites?

I understand what both do, but thanks for the clarification.

I am wondering if when using the canonical to group same language micro-sites say English American and UK the heading elements are localised say:

English title / meta contains : "specialist organisation"

English American title  / meta contains: "specialty organization"

Would the cannonical source (the american version) be shown to a UK audience?

Just pondering is all, thanks again Istvan.

When optimising a regional same language micro site within a sub folder of a .com it dawned on me that our use of the hreflang and canonical meta elements will render individual elements such as H1 and title obsolete.

As a canonical tag takes the canonical source title and meta right?

It would still have value in optimising localised headings though?

Appreciate any thoughts, suggestions (o:

I seen a site linking internally using Caps from the home page to sub pages, the rest of the site links in lower-case. Are there any disadvantages in terms of link juice or duplication for doing this?

Example link from homepage: /blah/Doctors.aspx

Example link from other internal page: /blah/doctors.aspx

The site is on a Windows based server and not Linux.

Thanks in advance