SIMPLE: NO
A permanent redirect (301) is a common and absolutely normal thing... I can`t see any negative effect in such a case
Welcome to the Q&A Forum
Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.
SIMPLE: NO
A permanent redirect (301) is a common and absolutely normal thing... I can`t see any negative effect in such a case
I see, well this is not very elegant so far and not really "perfect" regarding SEO aspects BUT all the things (advertisements that might generate a link to henry.com etc.) that my help building up DA, Pagerank, linkjuice etc. will be passed through to the other domain... you won`t loose anything of that by using a 301
this might not be the most perfect solution what your client prefers but it`s not uncommon
I would recommend you to work safe ... just changing one paragraph doesnt help to create you unique content. But this is what you should do... so better safe than sorry, use the canonical url... this is also not the best option but if you don
t have another one...
The chances that this might have a negative effect are not bad... dont use content (in the meaning of text in your case) twice... even not partially. It
s not that complicated to rewrite a text so that it`s not duplicate content. AVOID DC by all means!
You shouldn`t take those numbers too serious although they are not really wrong... just see this info as a recommendation. There is a unwritten rule which recommends that the keyword density should be between 2 and 4 percent but you should focus on writing a good text in general.
Of course you can keep in mind to use your keyword in a propriate way but what you do is: you write for humans not for machines...
Its undeniable that your text won
t rank for a keyword if you do not mention it (this might change in the future) but as I said: don`t focus too much on that.
Write a good text (everybody has a different opinion about the definition "good" by the way) and review it... think of using your keyword so that your text will still be a good one...