Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Thanks Dave,

They aren't really complaining. It's more of the advice that's being offered to them by other parties. Other's are saying that I'm taking "power" away from the main site by using these smaller sites.

But...these smaller sites are pretty substantial in their own right. I believe that keeping them as microsites is the better way for local search.

Like Dave said, ANY info from anyone else is greatly appreciated.

Referring to the webinar on SEOMoz about Local Search that was presented by Nifty Marketing (http://www.seomoz.org/webinars/be-where-local-is-going). I have a question my client asked us regarding why we broke out their locations into microsites, and not just used subfolders. So here are the details:

• The client has one main website in real estate.
• They have 5 branches.
• Each branch covers about a 50 mile radius.
• Each branch also covers a specialized niche in their areas.
• When we created the main site we incorporated the full list of listings on the main site;
• We then created a microsite for each branch, who has a page of listings (same as the main site) but included the canonical link back to the main site.
• The reason we created a microsite for each branch is that the searches for each branch are very specific to their location and we felt that having only a subfolder would take away from the relevancy of the site and it's location.
• Now, the location sites rank on the first page for their very competitive, location based searches.
• The client, as we encourage, has had recommendations from others saying this is hurting them, not helping them.

My question is this... How can this hurt them when the microsites include a home page specific to the location, a contact page that is optimized with location specific information (maps, text, directions, NAP, call to action, etc.), a page listing area information about communities/events/etc., a page of the location's agents, and of course real estate listings (with canonical back to the main site)?

Am I misunderstanding? I understood that if the main site could support the separation of a section into a microsite, this would help local search. Local search is the bread and butter of this client's conversions.

AND if you tell me we should go back to having subfolders for each location, won't that seriously hurt our already excellent rankings? The client sees significant visitors from their placement of the location URLs.

THANKS!
Darlene

Good morning, I have a client who is a local realtor www.chantre.com and they have several locations in their region. We created individual sites for their locations that are linked from their main site (on the left bottom).

I need some advice and guidance...

• Are the location sites a good consideration as microsites?
• I know we should include the rel=canonical tag and are in the process of doing so, but any comments on this would be appreciated
• I know the answer to this one, but the client insists on continually asking about it...would it be better to have the location sites linked from the main site as subdomains?
• Any other suggestions to either prove or disprove our technique in breaking out the location sites, whether it's a good idea or if we are harming their SEO is appreciated

THANKS!
Darlene

News stories from the main site shown on other sites the company owns. It's a hospital website wanting to show their news on the individual doctor's websites.

Would you say that wrapping the text in the article tag would also help?

I have a large client with satellite sites. The large site produces many news articles and they want to put an RSS feed on the satellite sites that will display the articles from the large site.

My question is, will the rss feeds on the satellite sites be considered duplicate content?

If yes, do you have a suggestion to utilize the data from the large site without being penalized?

If no, do you have suggestions on what tags should be used on the satellite pages? EX: wrapped in

tags?

THANKS for the help.

Darlene