Welcome to the Q&A Forum
Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.
Hello,
we have an argue internally regarding if we should keep the archive pages on a news site or not.
Pro
Con
archive pages receive from none to little traffic
archive pages are source of duplicate content, duplicate titles - which we can manage some how but does it worth?
What is your opinion on this topic, should we keep it or not?
thanks,
Irina
I've got a question regarding this. So normally Meta keywords it is not relevant and we shouldn't use them, however there are opinions that we can use them as these are signals for other Search Engines.
Meta news keywords - are ok to be used in the news sites.
what is your opinion on using both of them on a news site? Can this help, or harm?
thanks,
Irina
I agree with Alan, but I think to solve it for good, you need also to check what are the pages which refer to those and fix the links there, so it contain the correct link (with www or not).
Irina
Hi there,
I have the following situation with one of our job sites. We migrate the site to a new application, which is better from design point of view and also usability. For this we use a lot AJAX especially in searches. So every time a user is filtering down their search new results will be shown on the page, at the same url and with no page load.
But, having this implementation. affected Bounce rate - which increased from 38% to nearly 60%, PI/visits - which are now half, at 3 and also Avg Time on Site is half that is used to be coming to 2,5 min from nearly 6 min.
From Rand post, it is clearly that the content is very important in Google Panda, and all of these parameters we should consider, as it is telling the quality of the content.
So, my question will be, can this site be hit by Panda updates (maybe later on) because Bounce Rate, PI/Visits and Avg Time on site, decreased in such way?
At the moment we don't measure the Ajax impresion, but as I understood that we can do that though virtual pages in GA, does anyone of you have the experience how to handle this? Won't be this an artificial increase?
Thanks,
Irina
Thank you Ryan,
I checked nothing strange on that part, but I don't think this is the case, I suspect some technical issues, as the increase is only in visitors and visits, PI are decreasing, and bounce rate increase from 24% to 85%, time on site decrease from 5 min to 1 min.
So my guess that there is somewhere a code or something that is generating this kind of data. Any other ideas ?
Thank you,
Irina
For past 2 weeks, several of our sites have strange increase in direct traffic in Google Analytics. we also have another tracking code, and in this account we don't have any big changes, so this is very strange what is happening. We didn't changed any codes, and none of the changes were done to application.
Any ideas why this is happening?
Thank you Ryan,
Sites were launched 2 - 3 years ago, so not so new on the market :), we already connected them with our proprieties in other countries, and also for half an year doing some social marketing.
We tried to get some links by contacting other sites, but good valuable sites only agree to sell links :).
Hello, We are an international company, based mostly in Romania and Hungary, but we also launched some websites in Ukraine. The interesting thing in Ukraine that we are facing heavily, is how they are doing link building. Basically the only link building that they do is buying links through a platform: sape.ru (http://www.mainlinkads.com/ this is English version). Local SEO consultants also advice to buy links. It wasn't so much a problem, but when you have a good site with good content, but have competitors that are buying links and then overcome our good keyword positions, we started to questions whether to start buying links ourselves. What is your opinion on this? Is it possible that Google will penalize a big bunch of sites, now in sape.ru there are: 487 069 sites? Can we adopt the same strategy as our competitors as long as it is working? Thanks, Irina
