Again - thanks a lot. I totally agree. Next client meeting I'll stress that not only do Ifeel strongly about the subfolder issue, but the good people at SimplifySEO feel the same:) And they know their ish. Or something.
Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
Posts made by jamesm5i
-
RE: "Fourth-level" subdomains. Any negative impact compared with regular "third-level" subdomains?posted in Technical SEO
-
RE: "Fourth-level" subdomains. Any negative impact compared with regular "third-level" subdomains?posted in Technical SEO
Hey Rob,
Thanks a lot for this. This is great advice and really well-written. And you're preaching to the choir. I also prefer subfolders, but it's just not in the cards for this client for the time being. As it stands, we're stuck with subdomains.
Any other thoughts re: fourth-level vs. third-level domains, folks?
-
"Fourth-level" subdomains. Any negative impact compared with regular "third-level" subdomains?posted in Technical SEO
Hey moz
New client has a site that uses:
subdomains ("third-level" stuff like location.business.com) and;
"fourth-level" subdomains (location.parent.business.com)
Are these fourth-level addresses at risk of being treated differently than the other subdomains? Screaming Frog, for example, doesn't return these fourth-level addresses when doing a crawl for business.com except in the External tab. But maybe I'm just configuring the crawls incorrectly.
These addresses rank, but I'm worried that we're losing some link juice along the way. Any thoughts would be appreciated!