Thanks for the fast response Alan. So should I not put rel=canonical tags on the page that refer to the http versions of the URL and just do the 301's and suck it up?
Posts made by JasonCooper
-
RE: What's the best way to deal with an entire existing site moving from http to https?posted in Technical SEO
-
What's the best way to deal with an entire existing site moving from http to https?posted in Technical SEO
I have a client that just switched their entire site from the standard unsecure (http) to secure (https) because of over-zealous compliance issues for protecting personal information in the health care realm.
They currently have the server setup to 302 redirect from the http version of a URL to the https version. My first inclination was to have them simply update that to a 301 and be done with it, but I'd prefer not to have to 301 every URL on the site.
I know that putting a rel="canonical" tag on every page that refers to the http version of the URL is a best practice (http://www.google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=139394), but should I leave the 302 redirects or update them to 301's. Something seems off to me about the search engines visiting an http page, getting 301 redirected to an https page and then being told by the canonical tag that it's actually the URL they were just 301 redirected from.