We don't get a ton from image search and the images themselves aren't worth finding.
The developers are coding like this for sitespeed reasons (I'd agree with it being "odd"). Thanks.
Posts made by JimLynch
-
RE: CSS background image links bad for seo?posted in Technical SEO
-
CSS background image links bad for seo?posted in Technical SEO
On one of the websites I manage SEO for, the developers are changing how our graphical links are coded. They're basically coding in such away where there is no anchor text and no alt tag, so for example:
So there's no anchor nor alt context for Google's crawler.
How badly will this affect SEO, or is it extremely minimal and I shouldn't worry about? Thanks in advance.
-
Ecommerce sites 30% drop in organic since the springposted in Algorithm Updates
I help manage SEO for a number of large retail websites and we've seen a significant drop in organic traffic (upwards of 30%) since around May 2015. It's likely we were hit my Google's Phantom Quality update, but I don't understand why it had such a big impact. Can anyone explain that Google update in more depth and advise on steps to take to recover from it? Thank you.
-
Application/x-msdownload in crawl report?posted in Technical SEO
In a crawl report for my company's site, the "content_type_header" column usually contains "text/html". But there are some random pages with "application/x-msdownload"... what does "application/x-msdownload" mean?
<colgroup><col width="121"></colgroup>
| |