Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Hi Ramon,

Yup, that's correct on the setup - it's how we are thinking about it. Glad to hear you don't think we shold have duplication issues once we follow best practices.

Thanks for your help.

Hi Gaston,

Thanks!

My question was mainly due to the fact that all articles you and I have mentioned talk about using the same domain and internationalising that or buying a ccTLDs. My question is instead regarding adding a new domain gTLD to internationalise and whether if we do add a brand new domain (not subdomain), I need to do anything else apart from everything written on those articles.

Have a look at why I think .co is regarded as gTLD by Google: https://www.screencast.com/t/5YgjXIriy

Image from this article.

What I was pointing at on same article cited above is the following list of ccTLDs that Google treats as generic so as gTLDs and .co is one of them?

https://www.screencast.com/t/5YgjXIriy

Not sure what you mean by ".co is a ccTLD for Columbia" as Google treats it as generic according to this article? https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/62399?visit_id=1-636422994188525421-4135517685&rd=1

Hello,

Our business has been setup and has been targeting the uk. Therefore, we've always had a .co.uk domain. Now that we want to go international, we are looking into expanding in the U.S. and have bought a .co domain to do so.

My question is: would we get .co.uk penalised if some of the .co pages will have similar content to the .co.uk pages?

I know .co is a Generic Top Level Domain (gTLDs), but my understanding so far is that: as long as we set a country target & US language on the .co domain and follow basic cautionary steps and best practises from this article and others, we should be completely fine.

Is this also what you guys think?

Thanks in advance!

Hello everyone,

I was wondering if you could help me with understanding the following story:

A website has been moved from its HTTP version to a HTTPS version. The SEO manager has advised developers that they needed to do 301 redirects. However, in the end, 302 redirects have been put in place instead. Now, 301s should be put in place ASAP.

The million dollar question is: has the website lost all of its link juice already given the nature of the redirects? Also, does it depend on whether Google has indexed the new 302 pages or does it depend on something else?

Many thanks!

Thanks very much for your feedback! It helps a lot.

Thanks for that! It helps me understand what the risks may be in doing this now. Am I wrong in deducing you had a long-term positive gain overall?

Thanks!

Hiya,

I wondered if your site has recovered fully now and how long it took for it to do so?

Many thanks!