Hi Alex,

That is "exactly" what I did.

Structured data tool says it's valid while Search Console says it's an error :-/.

I should add the error search console gives is:  Either "offers", "review", or "aggregateRating" should be specified

Hi,

Trying to markup products for a site that does not show prices. Is there any way to markup a product price when the business model is:

1. customer calls or contacts shop.

2. shop gives a price quote based on level of detail and finish on the product

3. there is no base or top price.

Thanks in advance!

will do

Thanks for the quick response. I actually already disavowed the spammy image links 'just in case' haha.

The whole thing is weird, the spam links literally start at the exact same timeframe as FRED. However only people using our images on super spammy pages.

We have no ad heavy pages, no good links lost.

I'll keep updating this as time goes on.

Hi,

So starting about March 9 I started seeing huge losses in ranking for a client. These rankings continue to drop every week since and we changed nothing on the site.

At first I thought it must be the FRED update, so we have started rewriting and adding product descriptions to our pages (which is a good thing regardless). I also checked our backlink profile using OSE on MOZ and still saw the few linking root domains we had. Another Odd thing on this is that webmasters tools showed many more domains.

So today I bought a subscriptions to ahrefs and instantly saw that on the same timeline (starting March 1 2017) until now, we have literally doubled in inbound links from very spammy type sites. BUT the incoming links are not to content, people seem to be ripping off our images.

So my question is, do spammy inbound image links count against us the same as if someone linked actual written content or non image urls? Is FRED something I should still be looking into? Should i disavow a list of inbound image links?

Thanks in advance!