Welcome to the Q&A Forum

I have done that for a blog with Dynamic content before. You could just add a block of text in the widget area titled "About Us".

Take the list of **blog networks **and disavow them. They are not replying because the owners don't give a ****

Nice way of sorting through blog networks is downloading the link data, check each homepage for external links, any with high outbound links on the homepage are more likely to be blog networks.

Basically, load the list of domains into scrapebox, use OBL checker plugin. Now you can see which ones have high OBL on homepage.

Actually if you feel some of the links you have created in the past could be problematic in the future and you know they are the type of links that have caused other sites a problem then I would remove them.

Penguin 2.1 has affected Businesses who have used bad link practices a long time ago. I would say it is better to be safe than sorry and fix it now before you do get hit. It would be harder getting out of an Algorithmic penalty.

That is my opinion anyway

Could be due to the fact your Anchor text "Web design" is dominating your link profile.

I would do something like

ACE Online - Top 100 Private Servers

Let your content target other keywords. Don't need to make an ugly title to target keywords.

SEO is defiantly not dead.

So can I

I just noticed this as an affect when trying to find content for my site. The site I was getting content for has amazing content already and is getting 8,000+ visits a month. But I had really good guest bloggers refusing to write on it because my PR was not updated even though my Domain Authority is pretty good.

This is why it came to me that either google needs to make an announcement of the removal or update it.

What are your thoughts of google not updating the PR toolbar?

So many people rely on it to evaluate websites. As time goes on with no update, good sites that could have good PR will be looked at as bad sites to link on or outreach to. With google continuing not to make an official announcement, people will continue to rely on this method of checking how much a website is worth to them.

Just to make this clear, I know a lot of people don't use PR to evaluate a site but I also know a lot of writers who don't follow SEO as much will use PR to check if your site is good or not. I just feel it would be nicer to have it officially announced that they are removing it or keeping it.

Also read here about it:

http://www.seroundtable.com/google-pagerank-no-update-17276.html

Apparently google had no comment at the moment.

Check the anchor texts first, PM me, I just dealt with some really bad negative SEO. I can help you  if you like.

Well, after countless hours of sorting through links and disavowing. My clients site is ranking number one again for a keyword that gets 500,000 exact searches a month.

I have impressed my self this month lol Thanks for all the replies. It was a very stressful time sorting through 500,000 links.

I would do something like

ACE Online - Top 100 Private Servers

Let your content target other keywords. Don't need to make an ugly title to target keywords.

Well, after countless hours of sorting through links and disavowing. My clients site is ranking number one again for a keyword that gets 500,000 exact searches a month.

I have impressed my self this month lol Thanks for all the replies. It was a very stressful time sorting through 500,000 links.

Actually if you feel some of the links you have created in the past could be problematic in the future and you know they are the type of links that have caused other sites a problem then I would remove them.

Penguin 2.1 has affected Businesses who have used bad link practices a long time ago. I would say it is better to be safe than sorry and fix it now before you do get hit. It would be harder getting out of an Algorithmic penalty.

That is my opinion anyway