What affects the Google Merchant listing position under the Relevance Filter?
-
Hi,
I set-up a UK Google Merchant feed about 8months ago now which is automated for around 25K products. I am trying to work out why some other sites still rank better than mine in the Shopping listing under the default 'Relevancy' filter.
I have both a greater number and better reviews than the competitors and am showing a better price.
I wonder whether anyone has any information on whether the following factors affect the listing position under the 'Relevance' filter:
1 - Age of the listing or domain
2 - Historic 'Click-Rate' for domain in Shopping listing
2 - Overall quality of the data feed i.e. do errors or warnings for other products in the feed affect the positions of all items in the feed?
3 - Bounce rate or on-page time of clicks to target site
4 - Diversity of review sources
5 - Google Checkout reviews
6 - Company location in Google Local
For an ecommerce site this positioning can make a big-time difference to sales, so I'm hoping someone has run some tests on this they can share, and if not then why not?
Hoping someone can throw some light on this, as I can't find a great deal out there on this fundamental revenue stream for me.
Simon
-
After further investigation I think in my particular case the first company to add a specific EAN code for a product appears to gain the upper hand.
Some of the top ranking sites have no reviews and are not the best price by some degree. Since they also don't have Google Checkout and can't really have more fields entered for each product in their feeds, or be refreshing it more frequently, this would seem to be the likely answer.
-
1. I wouldn't remove the ones that have errors and warnings. I would fix them. Removing them isn't going to help your other products rank better. When I mentioned quality of your feed, I just meant don't have a product that is called Blue Mug and then the description says, "Blue Mug" Title would be Blue Mug, but then describe the mug fully. This blue mug is 4 inches tall by 2 inches wide and features an ergonomic handle. It's perfect for the chronic coffee drinker who is afraid of developing carpal tunnel..." Pretty awesome mug huh? More descriptive information that is accurate is what I mean by quality.
2. 250 reviews from the 3 different sources from what I can tell is better than all from the same. The reason I think this is because sometimes it's easy to manipulate one site, but to manipulate 3-4 is more difficult.
3. From what I've seen Checkout reviews are THE BEST reviews to have, so enabling Google Checkout is important. They are often times the hardest reviews to get, but the payoff is seen in product listings.
-
Hi Kadesmith,
Thanks very much for your input. So to clarify a few points.
1 - If I remove products from my feeds that have warnings or errors associated with them then my remaining listings will improve in Google Merchant Ranking in your opinion?
2 - If I had say 250 reviews from say 3 different review sources (say TrustPilot, Shopzilla and Pricegrabber) my rankings would likely be better than if I had the same 250 reviews from just 1 of these sources?
3 - How much of an influence does Google Checkout have on the rankings would you say? I did enable it in the past, but with a Magento site the complex shipping costs I use do not integrate with Google Checkout correctly and the access to necessary accounting information is frankly useless for UK purposes.
Thanks, Simon
-
From the testing I have done here are my findings specific to your questions:
1. Age - Not much of a factor. In fact, I have found that product listings seem to like fresh content.
2. Click Rate - Haven't seen much affect over the 3 sites I run.
3. Overall Quality - BINGO. The quality and quantity of data in your feed is the number 1 thing that I have found truly affects.
4. Bounce Rate - My bounce rate is pretty low when getting people from product feeds for all my sites, so I can't give feedback if a high bounce rate affects. I will say that product feed listings is one of the best sources of converting traffic for me though.
5. Diversity of review sources - This is probably the second biggest factor I have seen combined with #6 Google Checkout reviews. The more good reviews you have the better your product listings seem to do.
6. Company location in Google Local - Sorry can't give feedback here. Location doesn't matter in my niches.
Lastly, I just want to add that you want to make sure that you have data in every field possible. SKU and other product numbers are very big ones as they help you to rank with the big box boys on products that have several sellers. Provide something to your customers that they can't, and you'll find it helps a lot.
-
Just to add - I have as many possible fields (both required and optional) as anyone could reasonably have and probably a lot more than most.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Which domain will perform better on google.com? californiaweb.co OR webthreedesign.com ?
Which domain will perform better on google.com? californiaweb.co or webthreedesign.com ?
Branding | | Web3Marketing871 -
Google Books
Hi everyone, How does a retailer get listed as a reseller of books in Google SERPs? See this example for what I mean: http://imgur.com/IYAR43R Thanks in advanced! Paul
Branding | | kevinliao0 -
Anybody else seeing branded organic traffic decreasing and direct traffic increasing? Anything to do with Google auto-filling URLs?
If so, what could the reasons for this be? Maybe because of Google auto-filling URLs? Thanks for reading!
Branding | | DA20130 -
Loop-hole to Google's Penguin update? Anyone else have some input?
So I have this theory and I’m wondering if anyone else has some input. I believe I have found a loop-hole to Google’s Penguin update. Let me explain. I work for a pretty competitive party planning company. Our biggest competitor for search is also our bread and butter to our company, our consultants. In addition to outside competitors trying to manipulate business from those consultants. Anyways, one of my top priorities is to not only rank for multiple pages on our site, but to also have our social sites rank on the first two pages. Recently I have watched a spamming MLM YouTube video review of our company crawl up the YouTube charts and out rank us for our Company name in YouTube search. And now, this week, the video has crawled up to rank 3<sup>rd</sup> behind our main site and Wikipedia for our brand keyword! So how does a YouTube video that is simply a review out rank us for our company name in our social platforms? Mind you he is also outranking our core social sites of which we have thousands of comments and interactions on per day? Looking at all of the metrics of the video, according to how I believe ranking to work in Youtube, there is no way this guy should be ranking as high as he is. The video has a decent amount of copy, it has fewer than 10,000 views, 76 thumbs up, 5 thumbs down, fewer than 2,000 subscribers and his channel only has 12 videos. It wasn’t until I was looking at our search results in Seomoz that I realized what this guy was doing to move up so quickly in rankings. He has 1,671 linking root domains to his video. He has been building excessive links to this video on Youtube. Well, since Google isn’t going to penalize its own website, the old technique of excessively building links to one page… seems to be working. Has anyone else come across something like this? Where building excessive links to a video or other social platform substantially has increased rankings?
Branding | | ScentsySEO0 -
Can i link my rel=publisher to a number of relevant microsites ?
We have linked our Google plus company profile to our main website and setup a rel=publisher authorship which appears and works fine in the SERPS as we regularly create Google plus posts about our industry and products. We also gain some good traffic through some of our smaller product specific micro sites so i wanted to setup our publisher markup for these also as some of our posts are relevant to these products. I setup the rel=publisher on one of these , but the Google snippet testing tool says that the rel publisher is unverified. Is this Google's way of saying i cannot use the same Google plus company profile across multiple sites My question is: Does Google not allow you to display the same Google plus rel publisher profile for multiple websites ? or is the there a problem with how i am marking up my micro sites ? has anybody tried this ?
Branding | | Antony_Towle0 -
How To Rebrand A Company In The Eyes of Google?
Greetings, Nearly 6 years ago, our company switched its entire business model from providing customized vitamins to a women's health publisher that offers medical advice, news and health tips. We have actively developed a decent link profile for our new brand around women's health and specific health conditions. Nonetheless the old vitamin-related keyword profile is still very prevalent. We have many hundreds of links with old vitamin-related anchor text scattered across the web linking to our main site and to many vitamin mini-sites that we own. What is the best way to rebrand ourselves and basically eliminate this old link profile? My first thought is to immediately park / take down all our vitamin-related domains, and eventually these links will no longer carry any weight in the eyes of Google. The other strategy is to attempt to contact all the sites with the old anchor text and ask them to take the links down. This is not an exciting option to me as I know that this is tedious and a slow process with many dead-ends. Thanks in advance for any advice. Kind regards, Eric Darby
Branding | | Eric_Lifescript0 -
Google+ Vanity Urls: Brand vs Keyword
We have recently been assigned a Google+ vanity URL for our Google page. By default, Google has assigned to us our top performing non-branded keyword. (Probably roughly twice the highly targeted search volume of our brand) My question is: Should I go with my BRAND NAME as my Google+ vanity url, or should I go with my TOP KEYWORD as my Google+ vanity url?
Branding | | Czarto0 -
Google Places, Optimization when in the Suburb of a Metroplex?
A client's business just recently changed addresses. Even though they are physically less than a mile from the previous location, the city has changed. This has resulted in our Google Places results dissappearing (no surprise). What is the best practice for people searching for <product><metroplex-primary-city>to still get our Google Places result, even though we are technically in a suburb of this metroplex?</metroplex-primary-city></product> Already added the primary city name to the description. What else can I do?
Branding | | networkelites0