Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
Single Site For Multiple Locations Or Multiple Sites?
-
Hi,
Sorry if this rambles on. There's a few details that kind of convolute this issue so I'll try and be as clear as possible.
The site in question has been online for roughly 5 years. It's established with many local citations, does well in local SERPs (working on organic results currently), and represents a business with 2 locations in the same county. The domain is structured as location1brandname.com.
The site was recently upgraded from a 6-10 page static HTML site with loads of duplicate content and poor structure to a nice, clean WordPress layout. Again, Google is cool with it, everything was 301'd properly, and our rankings haven't dropped (some have improved).
Here's the tricky part: To properly optimize this site for our second location, I am basically building a second website within the original, but customized for our second location. It will be location1brandname.com/secondcity and the menu will be unique to second-city service pages, unique NAP on footer, etc. I will then update our local citations with this new URL and hopefully we'll start appearing higher in local SERPs for the second-city keywords that our main URL isn't currently optimized for.
The issue I have is that our root domain has our first city location in the domain and that this might have some negative effect on ranking for the second URL. Conversely, starting on a brand new domain (secondcitybrandname.com) requires building an entire new site and being brand new.
My hunch is that we'll be fine making root.com/secondcity that locations homepage and starting a new domain, while cleaner and compeltely separate from our other location, is too much work for not enough benefit. It seems like if they're the same company/brand, they should be on the same sitee. and we can use the root juice to help.
Thoughts?
-
"My one suggestion is that you be sure that both cities' pages are accessible from the top level navigation. You mention building a second site within the site."
By second site within the site, I simply meant that once you're at the "home page" for the second location, virtually all of the menu links and content are unique to that location. For example, the root page links to Services > Service 1 which is optimized for Initial Location Services. On the Second Location home, they'd be unique URLs/Pages and would not show the initial locations NAP in the footer or anything.
"I'm not completely sure of what you are envisioning here, but did want to mention that I think it's important that the pages for both city a and city b are accessible from the main menu."
We will definitely have a link to our additional location in the main menu. The home page is a functional WordPress layout for the initial city (which is in the domain name), the menu/homepage will have a link to the additional city (which is the same layout as the main homepage, but with a unique menu and NAP). I definitely plan on having the homepage link to our second location so we can piggyback on the authority/juice of home page.
Wesley,
Thanks for the detailed and informative post. The only thing I'd like to point out is that I'm not referring to building out pages for service areas (although we will do that for a few of them), but an additional "home page" within the site for a city we actually have a location in.
So basically it's quite a bit different than building doorway pages when it's a legit "home page" for our actual location.
-
Hello,
You asked a very good question. I have run up across this too, many times before. I know that I am going to get blasted by some but I tend to take the opposite approach as Matt and Miriam these days (no offense to those two at all). Let me explain....
In the past, I would do exactly what you are thinking about. I would optimize one domain for the largest city the company was doing business in and create sub pages for the other smaller cities. With some good, non duplicated content, it would always work out well.
I did this so many times I cannot remember and it always produced great results. A website got traffic from all cities within one giant metro area.
That technique does not work out well for me any longer and I rarely use it. There are several reasons. Google has gotten better at recognizing which suburbs tend to go along with specific large cities. For instance, if you live in Portland, then Google will recognize that Beaverton, Hillsboro, Gresham and Tigard are all part of the same metropolitan area. I have noticed that they let the domain names with the highest trust and authority automatically rank for the smaller cities in the area.
At the very least, I have found that if the domain is strong enough, then all I have to do is mention those cities on the home page or some other strong page within the website and they will rank well for everything.
Currently, the results have been dismal for me when I have attempted to make a whole bunch of subpages,optimized for several cities.
In fact, I am going through this exact problem with two local clients. I think Google is trying to get rid of clutter. They are referred to by Google as doorway pages and Google is trying to get rid of them.
Now, according to them a page is only a doorway page IF it has "poor-quality content," but that is subjective. We all view our content as "high quality" but to Google those subpages does not give their users any value.
I am convinced that they frown on websites with several pages solely optimized to rank for all the smaller cities within a big metropolitan area. My suspicions were verified by Will Renolds in a Summit East 2013 video I just watched three days ago.
Some websites, who have a high enough pagerank and are "grandfathered in," can still get away with it. If you have been involved with SEO long enough you learn that just because another website is successful at doing something does not mean you will be as well. I would view myself as a gun slinger but lately I grown weary of playing the game of Russian Roulette with Google.
I have several websites that I firmly believe have lost rankings (they don't rank anymore for all the smaller cities and lost ranking for the bigger city) because of that. That might not have been the only reason but it appears that way to me. I am convinced that your overall relevance gets diluted when you do this.
Now, having said that, my official response depends on one thing: what is the main city you rank for now and what other city are you trying to rank for?
If the city is not that big, and your domain is strong, then I would just add the keyword of that city to the website you already have.
However, ff you are in a city like Dallas and you want to rank for Fort Worth, then I would start a whole new website for that city. Its a pain in the butt but I think that is the safe way to go.
These days I like optimizing a local client for just one major city. I do not like the idea of spreading a website too thin and end up, thereby making it seem less not entirely relevant for anything. The result is me accomplishing nothing, I just have a site that ranks on page 3 for everything.
If you start another website, you can give it a link from your established website to give it a boost. Just make sure it is not a sitewide link (ie. sidebar, footer or header).
Don't break what is working. You dodged a bullet with that duplicate content issue so be thankful you didn't drop like like an anvil being thrown from a 20+ story building. I would not try to test my luck by watering down your current website in an effort to rank for another city. The chances of it being a success are not as strong as they once were.
-
I would like to chime in here. It appears no one has mentioned links to domains. In my experience, multi-location efforts generally make for a bit of spam.
If I can't see the domains, I can't tell you it's an issue. Though it's generally better to make a page per location.
I would like to know more about the domains you own.
-
Hi Kirmeliux,
I agree with your approach of keeping this all on one domain, as opposed to building a second, separate site.
Will the fact that that your first city name is in the URL harm your ability to rank for the second city? This is a good question, but I have never seen a professional study done side by side of a non geo domain vs. a geo domain, in the scenario you're describing of then having to build a second geo term into the site. I'm sure this is a common issue with SABs. For example a plumber with the domain name thedallasplumber.com would then typically want to rank for Fort Worth and other geo terms, as well. I suspect that if this causes any hitch for Google, it would be slight and could be overcome by the authority the other city landing pages achieve.
My one suggestion is that you be sure that both cities' pages are accessible from the top level navigation. You mention building a second site within the site. I'm not completely sure of what you are envisioning here, but did want to mention that I think it's important that the pages for both city a and city b are accessible from the main menu.
-
I don't see why there would be an issue with 301 redirecting the second location domain and using it as a link on site, however I have actually not done it this when I have done this previously I have managed to gain links to domain.com/location2 and so on.
I also don't see your main logo linking back to the root even on the second city page as you are not going to be hiding the fact it is in a sub folder and not the main homepage/root. This was the case on the site I mentioned - navigation the same throughout the whole site.
-
Hi Matt,
Thanks for the response. I'm thinking keeping the second location on the main site is the answer, although having the initial city in the root URL is kind of skewing my thoughts a bit.
Any opinions on registering the secondcitybrand.com and 301'ing it to the root.com/secondcity URL? It'd look a little cleaner on citation sites and 301's retain the majority of the link juice. I also don't see our company receiving too many "natural" links without us controlling it, so I think we'd be fine on that end (and even so, 301's would be in place). This is probably such a small issue that it doesn't matter either way.
**Also, **The main logo on the WordPress will still link back to the root even on the secondcity sub location. This isn't too problematic is it?
-
Good question - I have experienced something similar and I would personally go with your second location in a sub-folder as you say you have already established this site and you will be able to benefit from the authority already gained. I would place relevant anchor text including the location possibly in the main homepage navigation pointing to this second location. When I worked on a similar site I had three locations from one site and I placed the relevant terms in the main navigation anchor text and obviously did the other basics such as keywords in URLs. Then I concentrated on building the authority of each locations homepage, including using competitions to get social interaction to each of these and building great local content that I then exposed to the relevant local audiences. Each one of the location pages then started to gain more natural links from local sources and I found they all ranked really well for their local terms.
Hope this helps..
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
SEO Best Practice for Managing a Businesses NAP with Multiple Addresses
I have a client with multiple business addresses - 3 across 3 states, from an SEO perspective what would be the best approach for displaying a NAP on the website? So far I've read that its best: to get 3 GMB account to point to 3 location pages & use a local phone number as opposed to a 1300 number. Display all 3 locations in the footer, run of site
Local Website Optimization | | jasongmcmahon1 -
Google for Jobs: how to deal with third-party sites that appear instead of your own?
We have shared our company's job postings on several third-party websites, including The Muse, as well as putting the job postings on our own website. Our site and The Muse have about the same schema markup except for these differences: The Muse...
Local Website Optimization | | Kevin_P
• Lists Experience Requirements
• Uses HTML in the description with tags and other markup (our website just has plain text)
• Has a Name in JobPosting
• URL is specific to the position (our website's URL just goes to the homepage)
• Has a logo URL for Organization When you type the exact job posting's title into Google, The Muse posting shows up in Google for Jobs--not our website's duplicate copy. The only way to see our website's job posting is to type in the exact job title plus "site:http://www.oursite.com". What is a good approach for getting our website's posting to be the priority in Google for Jobs? Do we need to remove postings from third-party sites? Structure them differently? Do organic factors affect which version of the job posting is shown, and if so, can I assume that our site will face challenges outranking a big third-party site?1 -
One locations page, or multiple pages?
Hi, I represent a franchisor who does all marketing- including local seo- for our franchisees. I've read a lot about local SEO and understand the basics, but have some remaining questions. 1- If our typical territories are quite large and encompass more than one major city, should we create multiple location pages for the same franchise owner? I believe the answer should be yes from an SEO stand point, but the problem is that most of our franchisees naturally just have one business address (their home). Since PO boxes and virtual offices aren't the way to go, what's the best course of action? And when I say major cities, I'm really talking about major cities (and not just small towns/boroughs). Can they just use a friend's/relative's address? 2- There's a lot of info out there about "locations pages," but it's not really clear whether or not you should really just have ONE page for each location, or several pages with different content? For instance, it looks like a lot of businesses are creating just one, "home-page" looking landing page for their individual locations, with everything from services to testimonials on just that one page. Is this preferred over creating several different local pages for that one location? The latter is what we currently do. From the user stand-point, it looks like each franchise location has it's own "mini website" on our main website. For instance, a landing page optimized for the local business name, a local services page, a project/photo gallery page, local review page, etc. It seems like a lot less work just building one landing page for each location, but is the payoff the same? I'm torn between the two strategies- is it really worth the extra work (in terms of traffic + local ranking) to build out the individual pages for the one location? Thanks Moz Community!
Local Website Optimization | | kimberleymeloserpa0 -
Site Not Rankings After a Few Months
I have a client site that I am beating my head against the wall for right now. Three months into a 100% white hat campaign, we can't get him ranking in the top 150. Here's the cliffsnotes: Built a new wordpress website All on page SEO has been done and score an A+ for his primary kws Robots.txt is setup correctly .htaccess is setup correctly new domain multiple 95 DA, 50 PA links from reputable, national sites. Yext Local listings SSL, CDN, Speed optimized Has 19 pages indexed by Google Posting one blog a week for him Granted his primary keyword is a hyper competitive kw, but still, I've been doing this for 8 years and never seen a guy be stuck on the 16th page for so long for the sort of links we are building him. I'm genuinely stumped here and could use some help.
Local Website Optimization | | BrianJGomez0 -
Location Pages and Duplicate Content and Doorway Pages, Oh My!
Google has this page on location pages. It's very useful but it doesn't say anything about handling the duplicate content a location page might have. Seeing as the loctions may have very similar services. Lets say they have example.com/location/boston, example.com/location/chicago, or maybe boston.example.com or chicago.example.com etc. They are landing pages for each location, housing that locations contact information as well as serving as a landing page for that location. Showing the same services/products as every other location. This information may also live on the main domains homepage or services page as well. My initial reaction agrees with this article: http://moz.com/blog/local-landing-pages-guide - but I'm really asking what does Google expect? Does this location pages guide from Google tell us we don't really have to make sure each of those location pages are unique? Sometimes creating "unique" location pages feels like you're creating **doorway pages - **"Multiple pages on your site with similar content designed to rank for specific queries like city or state names". In a nutshell, Google's Guidelines seem to have a conflict on this topic: Location Pages: "Have each location's or branch's information accessible on separate webpages"
Local Website Optimization | | eyeflow
Doorway Pages: "Multiple pages on your site with similar content designed to rank for specific queries like city or state names"
Duplicate Content: "If you have many pages that are similar, consider expanding each page or consolidating the pages into one." Now you could avoid making it a doorway page or a duplicate content page if you just put the location information on a page. Each page would then have a unique address, phone number, email, contact name, etc. But then the page would technically be in violation of this page: Thin Pages: "One of the most important steps in improving your site's ranking in Google search results is to ensure that it contains plenty of rich information that includes relevant keywords, used appropriately, that indicate the subject matter of your content." ...starting to feel like I'm in a Google Guidelines Paradox! Do you think this guide from Google means that duplicate content on these pages is acceptable as long as you use that markup? Or do you have another opinion?0 -
Duplicate content on a proxy site?
I have a local client with a 500 page site.
Local Website Optimization | | TFinder
They advertise online and use traditional media like direct mail.
A print media company, Valpak, has started a website
And wants the client to use their trackable phone number
And a proxy website. When I type the proxy domain in the browser
It appears to be client home page at this proxy URL. The vendor
Wishes to track activity on its site to prove their value or something
My question is: is their any "authority" risk to my clients website
By allowing this proxy site??0 -
Duplicate content question for multiple sites under one brand
I would like to get some opinions on the best way to handle duplicate / similar content that is on our company website and local facility level sites. Our company website is our flagship website that contains all of our service offerings, and we use this site to complete nationally for our SEO efforts. We then have around 100 localized facility level sites for the different locations we operate that we use to rank for local SEO. There is enough of a difference between these locations that it was decided (long ago before me) that there would be a separate website for each. There is however, much duplicate content across all these sites due to the service offerings being roughly the same. Every website has it's own unique domain name, but I believe they are all on the same C-block. I'm thinking of going with 1 of 2 options and wanted to get some opinions on which would be best. 1 - Keep the services content identical across the company website and all facility sites, and use the rel=canonical tag on all the facility sites to reference the company website. My only concern here is if this would drastically hurt local SEO for the facility sites. 2 - Create two unique sets of services content. Use one set on the company website. And use the second set on the facility sites, and either live with the duplicate content or try and sprinkle in enough local geographic content to create some differential between the facility sites. Or if there are other suggestions on a better way to handle this, I would love to hear any other thoughts as well. Thanks!
Local Website Optimization | | KHCreative0 -
How Best to do implement a Branch Locator for a Website with invididual location category pages
Hi All, We have an ecommerce Website with multiple locations for our stores and we currently display separate location specific pages for the different categories and sub categories. This has helped us previously to rank well for local search in each of the areas we have a store but over the last few months since humingbird, our local rankings on some things have dip a little . We want to implement a branch locator of some description to improve the user experience. From looking at other websites with branch locators, they tend to a separate button/page with which you can search for a branch etc. However, they don't have location specific pages. My query is should I do it so if a user comes in on a specific category location page and follows it through to product page , then to have a tab on the product page displaying the local branch from which he can come in. My thinking here is that , is that it would help confirm my local citations and help improve local rankings. Or Should the local branch be displayed on the local category pages instead or as well ?. If a user comes in from the homepage or not on a specific location page, then the branch locator will allow them to search for a specific branch. Should I also put in a branch locator as a separate page or can It be in more places. I don't want to damage anything which may have an effect on rankings due to citations and NAP on the location specific pages. Any advice or good examples to look at would be greatly appreciated thanks Sarah.
Local Website Optimization | | SarahCollins1