301 redirect subdirectory to new domain
-
I'm planning on using 301 redirects to spin out a subdirectory of my current website to be its own separate domain. For instance, I currently have a website www.website.com and my writers write tech news at www.website.com/news. Now I want to 301 redirect www.website.com/news to www.technews.com.
Will this have any negative impact on SEO? What are some steps that I can take to minimize these impacts?
-
Hi Guys,
I know this topic's a little old but my e-commerce website is basically at the verge of undergoing the same changes, and I've got a lot of ranking-based concerns here.
Our website ist called absinthes.com. It's available in 3 languages, so we created sub directories absinthes.com/de and absinthes.com/fr. The English version basically is always the default version when visiting absinthes.com.
For various reasons, our company decided to split absinthes.com into 3 separate shops: absinthes.com for English, absinthes.fr for French, and absinthes.de for German.
Now here's where I start getting worried: We're moving contents from a subdirectory (absinthes.com/de) via 301 page-by-page redirects to this new domain, absinthes.de. Am I supposed to let Google through Search Console know about this move, or will it think the entire site (absinthes.com, absinthes.com/fr) has then moved to absinthes.de?
Is it enough to put rel=canonical tags and 301 redirects in place to make sure we're not losing any of our rankings on both ends?
Would really appreciate your quick opinion on this, thanks so much!
-
Hi Chris,
Happy to be of help.
Thomas
-
Thanks for the thorough response Thomas!
-
Thank you Moosa,
I just took a look at where www.technews.com links to and that gave me the vastly more insight to what they are trying to accomplish and makes me believe that they will survive without the tech section
unfortunately, the non-www.version takes you to a dead page.
I would not worry too much about losing page rank based on the site it links to most likely being the new site you are speaking of I doubt this is a secret because you showed us the domain that points to it. of course I will not put that URL on here out of respect for you but I have placed the URL you mentioned above so people will know what you are referring to.
However, if you are going to go through with this I would place quality content on technews.com and take away the 301 redirect that points back to the main news site
I would then do something similar to what Moz did when they moved from SEOmoz.org to Moz.com they made http://moz.com/rand/ a live site that contained high-quality unique content in order to warm up the audience to the domain as well as Google
only if you are going to splice these things into two different sites would I go ahead and move your technology information over to technews.com domain and place all that content on it.
I would also want to inform your current readers of exactly what is going to occur.
In less you are going to really start going crazy on technology and have an entire business plan based around it which I am pretty sure you do if you are planning on doing this.
Then I would move forward with changing the tech section of your current site to become the beginning of technews.com ( I have made this a live link to where the www. version of it links so people can be of better help by under understanding the scale of this change.)
Unfortunately, any traffic, links, social media approvals, page rank and everything that is currently helping you rank with your news technology section will disappear. as soon as Google crawls the site and notices the 301 redirects.
Because you are not changing domains like when SEOmoz.org became Moz.com it is very unique that this type of thing occurs. Though I can understand now why you would want to do it.
I would recommend taking a tool like http://deepcrawl.co.uk/ and having it run a universal index on your current news site the reason I recommend Deep Crawl is I have used it with great success on extremely large sites over 1 million URI's it has the ability to scale Because it is not based on how much your local workstation or desktop has for RAM I believe it is hosted on AWS regardless because it is hosted it allows it to process the data on huge sites I usedit on the one Fortune 500 that I cannot name however it did a fantastic job.
if you read the information on this site you will see just how capable and indispensable tool like this is when making changes to a site a as large as your news site
http://deepcrawl.co.uk/features/advanced-processing
Another tool you should not be without my opinion is Screaming Frog SEO Spider though for the amount of pages that you will need to crawl you will need a workstation with a lot of RAM as it does many of the same things deep crawl does however requires you to install it on your local workstation or desktop it can be installed on Mac, PC and Linux though I have placed it on a Verizon Terremark server running Ubuntu with 24 gigs of RAM with a lot of success there are other things you will want it around for checking. I would purchase the Pro version Of
http://www.screamingfrog.co.uk/seo-spider/
I would then use a combination of Moz http://moz.com/researchtools/ose , https://ahrefs.com/ , http://www.majesticseo.com/ & Google Webmaster tools or www.google.com/webmasters/ to look at the back links pointing to technology.
http://moz.com/blog/achieving-an-seo-friendly-domain-migration-the-infographic
http://moz.com/blog/domain-migration-lessons
http://moz.com/blog/web-site-migration-guide-tips-for-seos
https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/83105?
http://moz.com/blog/achieving-an-seo-friendly-domain-migration-the-infographic
http://builtvisible.com/domain-migration/
http://builtvisible.com/surviving-seo-site-migration/
http://searchenginewatch.com/article/2067216/The-10-Step-Site-Migration-Process
http://googlewebmastercentral.blogspot.com/2008/04/best-practices-when-moving-your-site.html
a larger version of the photo below is right here
http://www.aleydasolis.com/images/seo-website-domain-migration.gif
I would follow the directions that are laid out in the URLs below because making a mistake when doing this will be costly to your new satellite business.
Hosting your new site on a server that you trust to have the capability to host it protect it is paramount to it surviving
Peek Hosting http://www.peakhosting.com/
Terremark http://www.terremark.com/
FireHost http://www.firehost.com/
To gain speed and reliability I would recommend not using the current DNS setup
ns-1027.awsdns-00.org
pdns6.ultradns.co.uksimply because AWS route 53 or ns-1027.awsdns-00.org depends on both DynECT Dyn.com & UltraDNS http://www.neustar.biz/services/dns-services is to keep itself alive and meaning if in the extremely unlikely instance of both of them going down you are out of luck.
However, your current setup depends on a secondary DNS that depends on your primary DNS being up I hope that makes sense.
I would simply do what many other companies that do not want down time and need very fast name servers do use DynECT along with UltraDNS or combine DynECT with EdgeCast Route DNS
Amazon.com is not backed up by AWS Route 53 as you can see below it is a combination of DynECT & UltraDNS two keep your site from having issues so it is not a good
use
ns1.p1.dynect.net & ns1.edgecastdns.net
or
ns1.p1.dynect.net & pdns1.ultradns.net
or just ns1.p1.dynect.net
UltraDNS had a bout of downtime less than a month ago on salesforce
Dyn has never been down ever look At the Way, Amazon configures their server DNS.
http://who.is/whois/amazon.com
Name Server: ns4.p31.dynect.net
Name Server: pdns6.ultradns.co.uk
Name Server: pdns1.ultradns.net
Name Server: ns3.p31.dynect.net
Name Server: ns2.p31.dynect.net
Name Server: ns1.p31.dynect.net
http://who.is/whois/technews.com
Name Server: pdns3.ultradns.org
Name Server: pdns1.ultradns.net
Name Server: pdns5.ultradns.info
Name Server: pdns2.ultradns.net
Name Server: pdns6.ultradns.co.uk
Name Server: pdns4.ultradns.org
Sincerely,
Thomas
PS large version of the photograph below his right here http://imgur.com/X3AiQNi.gif
-
Very Detailed answer y Thomas!!
If I have the similar kind of situation the first thing I would do is to audit the current website and will make sure the area that I am going to redirect have what kind of links and what impact they are producing to the website whole website.
If the section, I want to redirect have a major impact on rankings, now I have to make a decision. Can I afford a dip in ranking? And how users will react and respond to the new separate website.
I will recommend you to do your analysis and as there not much in your hand make sure what you want to achieve and what you can put at risk, make a back -up plan and start doing it.
Hope this helps!!
-
Some of the negative things that will happen to your current site include losing whatever page rank your current links that will be redirected contained.
When you 301 redirect a link to another site that is off of a subfolder it will impact your entire site's ability to rank if those 301s were helping you at all.
Are you going to continue to operate the first site as it was?
I would have to see the page rank of the site how many links you have that you are talking about redirecting and much more to actually tell you whether or not it is worth
harming their old site
it may not be worth it and it might be best to simply move the /news content and not redirect the pages themselves. To technews.com
There is not much that you can really do to in the impact of losing links of value to your current site except for build new exceptional content that gains the same quality and amount of links that you will be redirecting to the other site.
Also remember you will be losing any social media likes thumbs up's whatever when you 301 redirect.
I assume the first domain has nothing to do with tech news that is why you are splicing it off?
I would choose between creating a new site with the old site's content and of course deleting that content has to not have duplicate content because remember whichever domain has the highest page rank wins meaning your existing domain if it has a page rank will take away the technews.com site's ability to rank for that content. I would place information telling somebody that this page is now able to be found at technews.com/what-ever-the-pages
I hope you know not to just 301 redirect /news to the new domains homepage and think that will be the best way of doing things because it will not. Redirects are done page by page meaning if you had a news/opinions/ you could place it in technews.com/opinions/
That would more or less help the new site more than it would the old site.
If I could see the domain of the first site if you want to send it to me via private message I am more than happy to look at it that way if you are uncomfortable showing it in the form.
I hope this is of help,
Thomas
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Phasing in new website on www2 domain - 301 plan
Hi, I work for a large company and we're planning to phase in a new website. The idea is to develop key journeys on the new site and serve them on a www2 domain, removing them from the old website which is served on the www domain. The reason for this is because the old website is over 2,000 pages, and the management want to see new, improved journeys sooner rather than later. So, rather than launching all new pages and journeys at the same time, which will take a long time to design and develop, key journeys will move across to the new site / design sooner and made available to visitors. Whilst the overall journey might be a bit disjointed in parts (i.e. sending people from old to new site, and vice versa) I can't see a better way of doing it... Once all new content is complete, 301s will be implemented from old content on www. to new content www2. Once the phasing is complete, and all new content is in place on www2, 301s will be implemented to point everything back to www. Does anybody see any problems with this approach? Or any ideas on how to better handle this situation? Thanks Mozzers!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | RWesley0 -
301 Redirect from Authoritative but Loosely-Related Domain
We acquired a health-related blog about a year ago with good domain authority and a pretty strong link profile (TF ~40). We have been publishing good relevant content in it but it's not really paying dividends and we are considering doing a 301 to our money site, which is focused primarily on senior issues but has a lot of health-related content. The question is - with the two domains only being loosely related in subject matter, do we stand to harm our main site by redirecting from the other domain?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | sa_787040 -
Moving site to new domain without access to redirect from old to new. How can I do this with as little loss to SERP results as possible?
I've been hired to build a new site for a customer. They were duped by some shady characters at goglupe.com (If you can reach them, tell them they are rats--phone is disconnected, address is a comedy club on Mission in SF). Glupe owns the domain name and would not transfer or give FTP access prior to dropping off the face of the earth. The customer doesn't want to chase after them with lawyers, so we are moving on. New domain, new site with much of the same content as previous site. All that I have access to is the old wordpress site. I plan to build the new site, then remove all pages/posts from the old site. Is there anything I can do to salvage the current page 1 ranking? Obviously, the new domain will take some time to get back there. Just hoping to avoid any pitfalls or penalties if I can. If I had complete access, I would follow all the standard guidelines. But I don't. Any thoughts? Thanks! Chris
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | c_estep_tcbguy0 -
Can I undo a 301 redirect? Will it penalize my ranking?
I'm in charge of building a website for a company that made a mess. They own domain xxx.it (xxx is not the real domain, just a placeholder). Some years ago they 301 redirected xxx.it to xxx.com (they just changed TLDs). Last year they 301 redirected xxx.com to yyy.com (so, they actually changed domains). Now, after 13 months, the company failed and the new leadership wants me to undo everything and 301 redirect from yyy.com to xxx.it. So: 301 redirect is permanent. So, conceptually it's wrong to undo it. What happens if I undo it? Will my ranking be penalized, even if a significant amount of time has passed (13 months)? Will crawlers detect a loop (even if i remove any 301 redirect from xxx.it and theorically break the loop)? Here is the potential loop: xxx.it -> xxx.com -> yyy.com -> xxx.it -> etc... All of the articles I found on the web are quite old and not clear about this topic, that's why I'm asking this question.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | naska19900 -
Images Returning 404 Error Codes. 301 Redirects?
We're working with a site that has gone through a lot of changes over the years - ownership, complete site redesigns, different platforms, etc. - and we are finding that there are both a lot of pages and individual images that are returning 404 error codes in the Moz crawls. We're doing 301 redirects for the pages, but what would the best course of action be for the images? The images obviously don't exist on the site anymore and are therefore returning the 404 error codes. Should we do a 301 redirect to another similar image that is on the site now or redirect the images to an actual page? Or is there another solution that I'm not considering (besides doing nothing)? We'll go through the site to make sure that there aren't any pages within the site that are still linking to those images, which is probably where the 404 errors are coming from. Based on feedback below it sounds like once we do that, leaving them alone is a good option.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | garrettkite0 -
301 Redirect from unused domain
Hi All First question here so go easy.. I have a property site which is working well so far considering it;s early days, unfortunately some of my earlier efforts did not go so well and one in particular I pretty much destroyed in my attempts to improve the site SEO. Lucky enough my SEO skills have improved quite a bit lately, largely thanks to the great tools, tutorials and experts here at Moz 🙂 My question is whether I can use a 301 redirect to pass the domain authority and any link equity from an unused site to the one that ive done a better job on? it would seem a little sketchy to me and I would prefer not to get slapped and penalized "again" for doing something dodgy... Thanks everyone and thanks for all the help over the last 6 months or so.. Wes Dunn
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | wesdunn19771 -
301 of EDM domains
If I buy a keyword EDM domain and 301 redirect it to my site, will I rank better for that keyword?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | creaturmedia0 -
Subdomain v. subdirectory v. other domain for blogs
I have a good amount of content on our main domain ( http://m00.biz/w4Ljfr ) let's say for discussion it's doctors.com and as you can see, much of it is in subdirectories. Traditionally this was the approach. Now I have some other content on subdomains but it's primarily directories and databases. Now I see that Google is giving subdomains their own SER as if they are a separate site and competitors are locking in the top few results merely by having their content on subdomains. Now I have an opportunity of doing two things: 1. Current content: moving all the content of the past few years on their own subdomain (forum, blog), and I'll be moving forum software anyways. Not sure about our own guide, which has been up there for a while. 2. New content: putting up some new blogs/magazines such as "Doctor's Handbook." Let's say that is a common phrase. I can choose between the following: (a) www.doctors.com/handbook/ (b) handbook.doctors.com/ (c) www.doctorshandbook.com I've got a bit of a quandary here, not sure of the best course of action and am curious to hear from many of you who have handled situations like this before.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | attorney0