Fake Links indexing in google
-
Hello everyone,
I have an interesting situation occurring here, and hoping maybe someone here has seen something of this nature or be able to offer some sort of advice.
So, we recently installed a wordpress to a subdomain for our business and have been blogging through it. We added the google webmaster tools meta tag and I've noticed an increase in 404 links. I brought this up to or server admin, and he verified that there were a lot of ip's pinging our server looking for these links that don't exist. We've combed through our server files and nothing seems to be compromised. Today, we noticed that when you do site:ourdomain.com into google the subdomain with wordpress shows hundreds of these fake links, that when you visit them, return a 404 page.
Just curious if anyone has seen anything like this, what it may be, how we can stop it, could it negatively impact us in anyway? Should we even worry about it? Here's the link to the google results.
https://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Amshowells.com&oq=site%3A&aqs=chrome.0.69i59j69i57j69i58.1905j0j1&sourceid=chrome&es_sm=91&ie=UTF-8 (odd links show up on pages 2-3+)
-
Thank you everyone for your responses! The link you sent of the cached pages LynnP was also helpful. As soon as my co-worker who administers the server gets in I'm going to mention to him that we check the subfolders for anything fishy. I know for a fact he looked for subfolders that were suspicious but I'm not sure he may have thought to check the existing folders for sneaky things. Most passwords have been changed... but I will double check.
Again, thanks everyone for your help, very useful!
-
My 2 cents: This does look like a wp hack - been having a nightmare with a recent Pharma hack like JV mentions and honestly I still cannot figure out how exactly they got into the site but suspect through an outdated plugin.
A couple of things to keep in mind are to check your htaccess file for weird lines and have a look for non standard wp files in various folders (things like cache.php or ms-writer.php if I recall right). These files were not showing recent change dates however so it was not as simple as just ftping in and seeing which files had been recently changed (still no idea how they pulled that off). It can also be that all these pages are being spun out of a handful of php files (or the database!) so not 100% the case that you would actually see the subfolders (although in some cases you might). Also seen dev versions of wp on the same server that have not been kept so up to date be used to get into the main production version (pretty sure they were indexed through links sent via gmail emails, thanks google!).
You can check the google cache for any of these pages to see what they looked like and when they were last cached for example: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:Y0U-2Yyk3y4J:news.mshowells.com/CI/Ugg-Hazelwood-1437.shtml+
Most of them show late August cache dates so that should help narrow the timeframe. Interesting to note that all pages have a bunch of links at the bottom, some to your site some to other (probably infected) sites. All of the links are now 404s so maybe the hack got taken down by the originator (no idea why just a thought since its a bit odd that all of the links on the external sites also seem to be 404ing now). Needless to say, change all wpadmin, ftp etc passwords to be safe!
-
Hmm...never seen this exactly before - but a few years back we discovered for a client that their reality tv series show (Deadliest Catch) member site had been severely infected by Canadian Pharma phony sites....
Seems the hacker had 'broken' in via a MS update that was not done on their hosting platform site - and it took the tv company almost 4 months to disavow, rebuild and then index and begin to rank again as I remember....i.e. this was NOT a WP issue but a hosting server hack...
But with 20+ pages of Uggs and Nude Men rolling Christians (love that one, eh!) infections, you need to get that totally fixed asap so I'd start with querying the hosting vendor logs...
How comes to mind...if you can not determine where the hack came from - you could kill the subdomain after saving all your articles - recreate it say as "info.mshowells.com" or "advice.mshowells.com" or "counsel.mshowells.com" and reload in the same artices....have had to do that too for another client....
-
Yeah, only 2 of us, server admin guy. We're talking right now and the site is on a brand new VPS that has never been compromised, no strange folder structure, brand new install of Wordpress.. you can see lots of server errors in the error log on the server but the files NEVER existed, and neither of us removed the files. I, personally, do not even have access to the VPS. Only he does, and he is well aware what he's doing and most definitely would have noticed an odd set of folders and would have remembered deleting them. Almost as soon as we made the wordpress install live is when the 404 crawl errors showed up in google, and on the server. We both have seen many instances of wordpress sites being compromised and know what to look for and how to clean it up. This is why this is baffling. Because we're not exactly sure how or in what way they would benefit from this. My server admin thinks these hackers are somehow tricking google somehow... we just both have never seen this and not sure what to expect... very bizarre!
-
That's pretty strange. There isn't another web person there who might have cleaned things up without telling you? Or maybe your server company?
I don't see how these URLs could be indexed if they never existed, so at some point, someone created those pages and they were around long enough to get indexed. Are there any weird spikes in crawl rates or search queries since the launch of the subdomain?
I've seen this kind of hack before. The hacker just drops some folders full of HTML files into the roots. That's why all those links have a two characters sub directory. That was the folder the HTML files were in before someone likely just saw those folders in the root and deleted them. Maybe they didn't realize what they were doing and thought they were just doing the house cleaning?
Doing a "site:mshowells.com/ci/" or "site:mshowells.com/sp/" can show you what I'm talking about.
-
Well, the interesting thing is the links are only showing up on the subdomain news.mshowells.com - which has only existed on the server for maybe 2 - 3 months? Also, when we first noticed them, we checked the server and wordpress and there were no files and nothing was out of order or anything fishy. Everything was and is just fine. We haven't done any cleanup of any sort. And Wordpress & plugins have been kept up to date.
That's why it's weird because at no point were there hacked files or content or anything... so it's a little confusing...
-
Looks like a hack. A hacker somehow got in at some point, dropped a bunch of Ugg Boot affiliate marketing pages and left. Not sure why they are 404ing unless someone already discovered these when they happened and cleaned them up. That could've happened months and months ago.
The 404s shouldn't effect your SEO, but the hack has potential to if it hasn't been cleaned up properly. Do you see a spike in search queries if you look back over the last year or two? That may indicate when the hack occurred and was cleaned up. It's important to know how the hack was cleaned up, so you can ensure that the vulnerabilities have been resolved. If they haven't been, your site is still open to additional attacks, and spam like that can hurt your SEO.
For Wordpress, it's important to keep not only Wordpress itself up to date, but also your plugins (and only use well established plugins, and do a little research on them to make sure people aren't screaming about hacking issues). Hackers search for vulnerabilities in all sorts of places.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Pages not indexed
Hey everyone Despite doing the necessary checks, we have this problem that only a part of the sitemap is indexed.
Technical SEO | | conversal
We don't understand why this indexation doesn't want to take place. The major problem is that only a part of the sitemap is indexed. For a client we have several projects on the website with several subpages, but only a few of these subpages are indexed. Each project has 5 to 6 subpages. They all should be indexed. Project: https://www.brody.be/nl/nieuwbouwprojecten/nieuwbouw-eeklo/te-koop-eeklo/ Mainly subelements of the page are indexed: https://www.google.be/search?source=hp&ei=gZT1Wv2ANouX6ASC5K-4Bw&q=site%3Abrody.be%2Fnl%2Fnieuwbouwprojecten%2Fnieuwbouw-eeklo%2F&oq=site%3Abrody.be%2Fnl%2Fnieuwbouwprojecten%2Fnieuwbouw-eeklo%2F&gs_l=psy-ab.3...30.11088.0.11726.16.13.1.0.0.0.170.1112.8j3.11.0....0...1c.1.64.psy-ab..4.6.693.0..0j0i131k1.0.p6DjqM3iJY0 Do you have any idea what is going wrong here?
Thanks for your advice! Frederik
Digital marketeer at Conversal0 -
Google Indexed a version of my site w/ MX record subdomain
We're doing a site audit and found "internal" links to a page in search console that appear to be from a subdomain of our site based on our MX record. We use Google Mail internally. The links ultimately redirect to our correct preferred subdomain "www", but I am concerned as to why this is happening and if it can have any negative SEO implications. Example of one of the links: Links aspmx3.googlemail.com.sullivansolarpower.com/about/solar-power-blog/daniel-sullivan/renewable-energy-and-electric-cars-are-not-political-footballs I did a site operator search, site:aspmx3.googlemail.com.sullivansolarpower.com on google and it returns several results.
Technical SEO | | SS.Digital0 -
Do Sitespect links get indexed?
I put a link on one of my websites using sitespect because the next release is not for a few weeks. The reason for the link is to pass domain authority (SEO Juice) to the linked site. In my next release I will add the link in the actual code, but am hoping that from now till then google will crawl and index this link. So the question is, will google crawl and index links adding to webpages via sitespect? Here is the code: | * [http://www.](<a class=)yourdomain.com" class="" >YourDomain |
Technical SEO | | AlyssaN
| | | Link to Sitespect: http://www.sitespect.com/0 -
How to fix google index filled with redundant parameters
Hi All This follows on from a previous question (http://moz.com/community/q/how-to-fix-google-index-after-fixing-site-infected-with-malware) that on further investigation has become a much broader problem. I think this is an issue that may plague many sites following upgrades from CMS systems. First a little history. A new customer wanted to improve their site ranking and SEO. We discovered the site was running an old version of Joomla and had been hacked. URL's such as http://domain.com/index.php?vc=427&Buy_Pinnacle_Studio_14_Ultimate redirected users to other sites and the site was ranking for buy adobe or buy microsoft. There was no notification in webmaster tools that the site had been hacked. So an upgrade to a later version of Joomla was required and we implemented SEF URLs at the same time. This fixed the hacking problem, we now had SEF url's, fixed a lot of duplicate content and added new titles and descriptions. Problem is that after a couple of months things aren't really improving. The site is still ranking for adobe and microsoft and a lot of other rubbish and the urls like http://domain.com/index.php?vc=427&Buy_Pinnacle_Studio_14_Ultimate are still sending visitors but to the home page as are a lot of the old redundant urls with parameters in them. I think it is default behavior for a lot of CMS systems to ignore parameters it doesn't recognise so http://domain.com/index.php?vc=427&Buy_Pinnacle_Studio_14_Ultimate displays the home page and gives a 200 response code. My theory is that Google isn't removing these pages from the index because it's getting a 200 response code from old url's and possibly penalizing the site for duplicate content (which don't showing up in moz because there aren't any links on the site to these url's) The index in webmaster tools is showing over 1000 url's indexed when there are only around 300 actual url's. It also shows thousands of url's for each parameter type most of which aren't used. So my question is how to fix this, I don't think 404's or similar are the answer because there are so many and trying to find each combination of parameter would be impossible. Webmaster tools advises not to make changes to parameters but even so I don't think resetting or editing them individually is going to remove them and only change how google indexes them (if anyone knows different please let me know) Appreciate any assistance and also any comments or discussion on this matter. Regards, Ian
Technical SEO | | iragless0 -
"Links to your site" in google webmaster tools not showing any data
Hello All I have a very strange query regarding the "Links to your site" section in webmaster's account my account does not show the Link data after so many days (more then 30 days) of verification. Can you please help me out how can I get my data in the webmaster's account?
Technical SEO | | barnesdorf
Please note I have verified the account using Google Analytic verification process. (does this affect?) I have seen this issue in my two websites which I have verified by Google Analytics. Please help me out.0 -
Are my graphical top level nav button links read by google spider
I have a site hypeled.com - the top level nav buttons are images. I have checked in Fireworks (with style off) and Lynx how the site appears to the Google spider and the top level links are not visible in either representation. In the source code the links have alt tags - The buttons are CSS and are referenced like this: <a <span="">class</a><a <span="">="company" href="</a>/the-company/"> Does google read these links? Does google read the source code of the site and give the proper weight to the top level links? Thank you, Jonathon
Technical SEO | | jonniewap0 -
Affiliate links
Is there a best practice for linking out to affiliates URLs post panda? I know some believe it can be a factor.
Technical SEO | | PeterM220 -
Https indexed - though a no index no follow tag has been added
Hi, The https-pages of our booking section are being indexed by Google. We added But the pages are still being indexed. What can I do to exclude these URL's from the Google index? Thank you very much in advance! Kind regards, Dennis Overbeek ACSI Publishing | dennis@acsi.eu
Technical SEO | | SEO_ACSI0