Why google stubbornly keeps indexing my http urls instead of the https ones?
-
I moved everything to https in November, but there are plenty of pages which are still indexed by google as http instead of https, and I am wondering why.
Example: http://www.gomme-auto.it/pneumatici/barum correctly redirect permanently to https://www.gomme-auto.it/pneumatici/barum
Nevertheless if you search for pneumatici barum: https://www.google.it/search?q=pneumatici+barum&oq=pneumatici+barum
The third organic result listed is still http.
Since we moved to https google crawler visited that page tens of time, last one two days ago. But doesn't seems to care to update the protocol in google index.
Anyone knows why?
My concern is when I use API like semrush and ahrefs I have to do it twice to try both http and https, for a total of around 65k urls I waste a lot of my quota.
-
Thanks again Dirk! At the end I used xenu link sleuth and I am happy with the result.
-
Hi Massimiliano,
In Screaming Frog there is the option: Bulk Export > All inlinks -> this generates the full list of all your internal links with both source & destination. In Excel you just have to put a filter on the "Destination" column - to show only the url's starting with "http://" and you get all the info you need. This will probably not solve the issues with the images. For this the next solution below could be used.
The list can be quite long depending on the total number of url's on your site. An alternative would be to add a custom filter under 'Configuration>Custom' - only including url's that contain "http://www.gomme-auto.it" or "http://blog.gomme-auto.it" in the source, but in your case this wouldn't be very helpful as all the pages on your site contain this url in the javascript part. If you change the url's in the Javascript to https this could be used to find references to non https images.
If you want to do it manually, it's also an option - in the view 'internal' of the crawler you put "http://" in the search field - this shows you the list of all the http:// url's. You have to select the http url's one by one. For each of the url's you can select "Inlinks" at the bottom of the screen & then you see all the url's linking to the http version. This works for both the html & the images.
Hope this helps,
rgds
Dirk
-
Forgot to mention, yes I checked the scheme of the serp results for those pages, is not just google not displaying it, it really still have the http version indexed.
-
Hi DC,
in screaming frog I can see the old http links. Usually are manually inserted links and images in wordpress posts, I am more than eager to edit them, my problem is how to find all the pages containing them, in screaming frog I can see the links, but I don't see the referrer, in which page they are contained. Is there a way to see that in screaming frog, or in some other crawling software?
-
Hi,
First of all, are you sure that Google didn't take the migration into account?I just did a quick check on other https sites. Example: when I look for "Google Analytics" in Google - the first 3 results are all pointing to Google Analytics site, however only for the 3rd result the https is shown, even when all three are in https. So it's possible it is just a display issue rather than a real issue.
Second, I did a quick crawl of your site and I noticed that on some pages you still have links to the http version of your site (they are redirected but it's better to keep your internal links clean - without redirections).
When I checked one of these pages (https://www.gomme-auto.it/pneumatici/pneumatici-cinesi) I noticed that this page has some issues as it seems to load elements which are not in https - possible there are others as well.
example: /pneumatici/pneumatici-cinesi:1395 Mixed Content: The page at 'https://www.gomme-auto.it/pneumatici/pneumatici-cinesi' was loaded over HTTPS, but requested an insecure image 'http://www.gomme-auto.it/i/pneumatici-cinesi.jpg'. This content should also be served over HTTPS.
The page you mention as example: the http version still receives two internal links from https://www.gomme-auto.it/blog/pneumatici-barum-gli-economici-che-assicurano-ottime-prestazioni and https://www.gomme-auto.it/pneumatici/continental with anchor texts 'pneumatici Barmum' & 'Barum'
Guess google reasons, if the owner of the site is not updating his internal links, I'm not going to update my index
On all your pages there is a part of the source which contains calls to the http version - it's inside a script so not sure if it's really important, but you could try to change it to https as well
My advice would be to crawl your site with Screaming Frog, and check where links exist to http versions and update these links to https (or use relative links - which is adviced by Google (https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/6073543?hl=en see part 'common pitfalls')
rgds
Dirk
-
Mhhh, you are right theoretically could be the crawler budget. But if that is the case I should see that from the log, I should miss crawler visits on that page. Instead the crawler is happily visiting them.
By the way, how would you "force" the crawler to parse these pages?
I am going to check the sitemap now to remove that port number and try to split them. Thanks.
-
Darn it, you are right, we added a new site, not a change of address, sorry about that. Apparently my coffee is no longer effective!
-
As far as I know the change of address for http to https doesn't work, the protocol is not accepted when you do a change of address. And somewhere I read google itself saying when moving to https you should not do a change of address.
But they suggest to add a new site for the https version in GWT, which I did, and in fact the traffic slowly transitioned from the http site to the https site in GWT in the weeks following the move.
-
Are you sure? On https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/6033080?hl=en&ref_topic=6033084 it says: "No need to submit a change of address if you are only moving your site from HTTP to HTTPS."
I dont think you are given the option to select the same domain for change of address in GWT.
-
Looks like you are doing everything right (set up 301 redirects, updated all links on the site, updated canonical urls) - just need to force the crawlers to parse those pages more. perhaps crawler is hitting its budget before it gets to recrawl all of your new urls?
You should also update your sitemap as it contains a bunch of links that look like: https://www.gomme-auto.it:443/pneumatici/estivi/pirelli/cinturato-p1-verde/145/65/15/h/72
I recommend creating several sitemaps for different sections of the site and seeing how they are indexed via GWT.
-
Did you do a change of address in Google Webmaster Tools? Http and Https are considered different URLs, and you will have to do a change of address if you switched to a full https site.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Track PDF's in Google Analytics
Hi Mozzers, Is it possible to track PDF's via Google Analytics/Google tag manager? I'm not only looking for PDF downloads but for the actual activity when someone opens an interactive PDF document. So would it be possible to have onclick events on buttons in the PDF etc... Many thanks!
Reporting & Analytics | | WeAreDigital_BE
Sander0 -
Rel=Canonical vs. No Index
Ok, this is a long winded one. We're going to spell out what we've seen, then give a few questions to answer below, so please bear with us! We have websites with products listed on them and are looking for guidance on whether to use rel=canonical or some version of No Index for our filtered product listing pages. We work with a couple different website providers and have seen both strategies used. Right now, one of our web providers uses No Index, No Follow tags and Moz alerted us to the high frequency of these tags. We want to make sure our internal linking structure is sound and we are worried that blocking these filtered pages is keeping our product pages from being as relevant as they could be. We've seen recommendations to use No Index, Follow tags instead, but our other web provider uses a different method altogether. Another vendor uses a rel=canonical strategy which we've also seen when researching Nike and Amazon's sites. Because these are industry leading sites, we're wondering if we should get rid of the No Index tags completely and switch to the canonical strategy for our internal links. On that same provider's sites, we've found rel=canonical tags used after the first page of our product listings, and we've seen recommendations to use rel=prev and rel=next instead. With all that being said, we have three questions: 1)Which strategy (rel=canonical vs. No Index) do you recommend as being optimal for website crawlers and boosting our site relevance? 2)If we should be using some version of No Index, should we use Follow or No Follow? 2)Depending on the product, we have multiple pages of products for each category. Should we use rel=prev & rel=next instead of rel=canonical among the pages after page one? Thanks in advance!
Reporting & Analytics | | Leithmarketing0 -
Google Analytics Goal Tracking Not Working
I am trying to install goal tracking for a client to measure leads from SEO, and I'm running into problems with the Google Analytics goal tracking not working. The only thing that I can think of that is preventing goal tracking from working is that the URL confirming page request URI looks like "contact/#contact-form-4475" and perhaps the hashtag is causing problems. I wanted to ask the community if any of you have run into basic conversion tracking problems like this, where you need to track form fills on a website via a confirmation URL/destination URL goal, and what you did to solve it? I appreciate any input on how to get data on conversions either by fixing the goal in GA or using a different tracking tool. Thanks!
Reporting & Analytics | | williammarlow0 -
Google Analytics traffic hijacking?
Ran into something interesting a week ago - the same Google Analytics code was installed on two different sites by accident. The account was reporting traffic from both domains. Haven't found a definitive answer on how to stop this yet if it were to be used maliciously?
Reporting & Analytics | | khemistry0 -
Setting up Google Analytics for Subsites
I currently have one main .com site and am planning on launching geo-location subsites .co.uk, .com.au, .ru, etc... Traffic will flow between both sites and some of the content on the subsites will be duplicate and therefore include a canonical tag to the main site. I want to set up GA to capture who is going to the subsites and vice versa and correctly capture crossover traffic. Any advice on implementing advanced analytics directly (or links to sources that will direct me the right direction for this project)
Reporting & Analytics | | theLotter0 -
Results Google in different browsers
I have changed one of my company pages. Now I saw that the Google position is different using IE of Firefox. In IE we are at position 1, in Firefox we are at position 4. Does anybody know, why this is? And how I could change this for different browsers? At the end the results are from Google.
Reporting & Analytics | | vliegticketsnl0 -
Weird info from google analytics?
Hi Could anyone explain what these visits are in Google Analytics? Under traffic sources and organic I am seeing lots of entries with data like below. Any ideas what kind of traffic this is? Is it a bot and if so what is their purpose of it and is it recommended that you block it? Pages/Visit 1.00 Avg. Time on Site 00:00:00 % New Visits : 100% Bounce Rate: 100.00% Many Thanks
Reporting & Analytics | | ocelot0 -
List all URL's indexed by google
Hi all i need a list of all urls google has indexed from my site i want this in excel format or csv how do i go about getting this thanks in advance
Reporting & Analytics | | Will_Craig0